Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

why isn't ut making a move like this ? they have the money

 

 

Banks is widely regarded as one of, if not the best special teams coach in college football. And we pay him a lot for it. While their were some key fuck ups this year, in general special teams have been good under Banks. Changing a rainmaking position to an NFL guy that knows shit about college recruiting would be fucking stupid. 

Edited by Dahobbs
  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted

Look we went about 10 years without ever catching a punt and just letting the ball roll another 10-20 yards downfield.

At least this year we caught punts. I can live with that progress.

I mean the coach can’t kick for Bert. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, tbone_ said:

Look we went about 10 years without ever catching a punt and just letting the ball roll another 10-20 yards downfield.

At least this year we caught punts. I can live with that progress.

I mean the coach can’t kick for Bert. 

Can the stripper? Or the monkey?

  • Haha 1
Posted
Banks is widely regarded as one of, if not the best special teams coach in college football. And we pay him a lot for it. While their were some key fuck ups this year, in general special teams have been good under Banks. Changing a rainmaking position to an NFL guy that knows shit about college recruiting would be fucking stupid. 

Coaching special teams is like on the water boy. Just run some laps with farmer Fran.
Posted
13 hours ago, Jkwellborn said:


Coaching special teams is like on the water boy. Just run some laps with farmer Fran.

It's insane to me that this sport has an aspect of the game kicking/punting evolve so that insanely specialized players are the only ones capable.  Special teams coaches are responsible for coaching the other 10 players on the field, but just cross their fingers with the most important.  They should have just phased kicking out of the game 30+ years ago.

Posted

A good buddy of mine from HS was the deep snapper at A&M for 4 years. He said he, P, and K all would dip Copenhagen and fart around most of the time at practice. And they were all good at their positions. Maybe things have changed in last 30 years, but seemed to be pretty low stress. 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

A good buddy of mine from HS was the deep snapper at A&M for 4 years. He said he, P, and K all would dip Copenhagen and fart around most of the time at practice. And they were all good at their positions. Maybe things have changed in last 30 years, but seemed to be pretty low stress. 

 

 

I'm sure it's changed, but probably just someone that tries to get them to focus on keeping things consistent for the most part.  I doubt many special teams coaches are actually giving useful instructions on kicking mechanics.

Posted

Jim Rome was interviewing someone from NFL Network today and Rome says something to the effect that the name he keeps hearing coming up for the Cowboys job is "Sark, Sark, Sark."

NFL Network guy said he thought Texas job a better job than the Cowboys job.  I was a little surprised they spent a couple minutes discussing pros and cons for Sark taking that job.

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
4 hours ago, 7KHorn said:

Jim Rome was interviewing someone from NFL Network today and Rome says something to the effect that the name he keeps hearing coming up for the Cowboys job is "Sark, Sark, Sark."

NFL Network guy said he thought Texas job a better job than the Cowboys job.  I was a little surprised they spent a couple minutes discussing pros and cons for Sark taking that job.

To me the NFL is a much better gig at this point but I suppose that's personal preference.

I actually don't think Sark would be a particularly good NFL HC. Much of his success here has simply been an effect of the roster he's built; which of course he gets a ton of credit for as a college coach, but it would not work like that in the NFL. His track record in games where the other side has something approaching a similar talent level isn't great and he was a mediocre NFL OC.

I'm not real worried about him leaving because he seems like a pretty self aware guy and probably knows that. And he's put so much into Texas and is now so close, with Arch fucking Manning about to take the keys, I have a hard time seeing him walk away from that.

Especially to work for NFL aggy lol.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Nobody gives a shit, but after some time for thought, here is where I am at with the past season.

Our OL was pretty good, but struggled against elite defensive lines.  Our QB was pretty good, but was never very mobile, had to play hurt much of the time and became very jittery in the pocket as the year went on.  Quinn being the statue he is was a less than ideal QB for our line given their limitations, and our line was less than ideal for Quinn given his limitations.  A mobile QB would have had a better chance of success behind that line.  This really only mattered when we played our two toughest opponents -- Georgia and Ohio State -- though it did help make some other wins unnecessarily close.

Well we played those two opponents three times and lost all three, two of those losses costing us championships.  In all 3 of those losses, an ineffectual offense was the primary factor.  The damming thing about that to me, and its all on Sark, is that we had a mobile QB on the sideline that we could have meaningfully tried at any point during those 3 losses to see if their mobility made the difference.  We never meaningfully tried.  I say meaningfully because a couple series in the first half in the first GA game is not a meaningful attempt to see if an Arch offense could be more successful.

I love Sark.  He's our guy for the foreseeable future (if he wants to be) and rightfully so.  But he needs to fucking reflect on that.

Edited by Goredho
  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted (edited)

It seems some on here are banking on Arch running around and saving us like Klubnik or Leavitt and I think they are in store for disappointment. Wasn’t the thought during his recruitment that they ruled out places like Clemson and Ole Miss because they didn’t want Arch to be a battering ram or hero ball QB?

The Manning’s didn’t send him here to be Sam Ehlinger and I was honestly pretty surprised we used him in the role we did this year but that probably speaks volumes to the short yardage/redzone issues and it was such a specialty role. Some of the stuff he did against Georgia the first time was him just being a young QB facing Georgia running around like a chicken with his head cut off.

Now that he is the full time guy it is going to be hammered in his head to avoid big hits and scramble to throw. His mobility will be nice and likely open up the playbook a little bit more and I’m sure we will mix in some QB run more often than we ever did with Ewers, but those expecting him to regularly register 10 carries a game are probably going to be screaming after games about why we “didn’t run Arch more??”

Edited by Hookem2147
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
12 hours ago, 7KHorn said:

Jim Rome was interviewing someone from NFL Network today and Rome says something to the effect that the name he keeps hearing coming up for the Cowboys job is "Sark, Sark, Sark."

NFL Network guy said he thought Texas job a better job than the Cowboys job.  I was a little surprised they spent a couple minutes discussing pros and cons for Sark taking that job.

Jim Rome is still around? The surprise of the year.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

It seems some on here are banking on Arch running around and saving us like Klubnik or Leavitt and I think they are in store for disappointment. Wasn’t the thought during his recruitment that they ruled out places like Clemson and Ole Miss because they didn’t want Arch to be a battering ram or hero ball QB?

The Manning’s didn’t send him here to be Sam Ehlinger and I was honestly pretty surprised we used him in the role we did this year but that probably speaks volumes to the short yardage/redzone issues and it was such a specialty role. Some of the stuff he did against Georgia the first time was him just being a young QB facing Georgia running around like a chicken with his head cut off.

Now that he is the full time guy it is going to be hammered in his head to avoid big hits and scramble to throw. His mobility will be nice and likely open up the playbook a little bit more and I’m sure we will mix in some QB run more often than we ever did with Ewers, but those expecting him to regularly register 10 carries a game are probably going to be screaming after games about why we “didn’t run Arch more??”

I expect QBs to make plays with their feet in modern football. I do not expect tons of designed runs or QB power from our QBs. I expect Arch to be a better playmaker and extender of drives with feet and moving around the pocket. 

Edited by AlrightAlrightAlright
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, AlrightAlrightAlright said:

I expect QBs to make plays with their feet in modern football. I do not expect tons of designed runs or QB power from our QBs. I expect Arch to be a better playmaker and extender of drives with feet and moving around the pocket. 

I think the main thing I expect from our offense with Arch at the helm is to have that QB sneak (ten-wedge, anyone?) on tap, a better deep ball, running plays where the QB actually has to be accounted for by at least one of the defenders, and a few, or even several, fewer plays where the QB doesn't seem resigned to being sacked. 

Oh, and Arch or no Arch, let's not lose any games because we don't have a red zone ability. 

  • Like 3
Posted
11 minutes ago, Tex Long said:

I think the main thing I expect from our offense with Arch at the helm is to have that QB sneak (ten-wedge, anyone?) on tap, a better deep ball, running plays where the QB actually has to be accounted for by at least one of the defenders, and a few, or even several, fewer plays where the QB doesn't seem resigned to being sacked. 

Oh, and Arch or no Arch, let's not lose any games because we don't have a red zone ability. 

The QB sneak is definitely in the playbook with him. Ran (or tried to run it) it 4 or 5 times this year with him under center (CSU, Miss State a couple of times, Clemson).

Ewers sucked at it (the few times we tried it last year) and was so fragile this year that they didn't trust him to take hits.

It should also probably be noted that you need a good center when executing a QB sneak. Majors was only in there for a few of the attempts, so it's tough to know if he was good at it or not, but we need to hope his replacement is. 

  • Like 1
Posted

No doubt QB sneak is back on the table. As mentioned, we ran it with ease for Arch vs. Colorado St, but had some issues with it later on. Sark was chewing Arch out when it took multiple attempts vs. Miss St. 

Feel pretty comfortable we will get that sorted out this offseason. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

The easiest way to get yards, especially in the red zone, is a straight line up the middle.  The easiest way to blow up plays is once again a straight line up the middle.  We can talk about Quinn, Arch, blah blah blah whatever but this Oline has to be better straight up the middle than they have been.  1.  It enables the running scheme Sark really wants to use and 2.  Well that's just football.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted
I expect QBs to make plays with their feet in modern football. I do not expect tons of designed runs or QB power from our QBs. I expect Arch to be a better playmaker and extender of drives with feet and moving around the pocket. 

Yeah, I don’t expect him to be ran like Sam. But doing what Colt did by keeping defenses honest or scrambling for available yards as opposed to being sacked or throwing it away is definitely what needs to happen.
  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, gmr548 said:

To me the NFL is a much better gig at this point but I suppose that's personal preference.

I actually don't think Sark would be a particularly good NFL HC. Much of his success here has simply been an effect of the roster he's built; which of course he gets a ton of credit for as a college coach, but it would not work like that in the NFL. His track record in games where the other side has something approaching a similar talent level isn't great and he was a mediocre NFL OC.

I'm not real worried about him leaving because he seems like a pretty self aware guy and probably knows that. And he's put so much into Texas and is now so close, with Arch fucking Manning about to take the keys, I have a hard time seeing him walk away from that.

Especially to work for NFL aggy lol.

Sark: Jerry, Stephen, we need a QB badly and I'd like us to to take Arch Manning with our 1st round pick.

Skeletor: We'll take it under advisement.

Announcer: With the 1st pick in the 2026 NFL draft, the Dallas Cowboys select.... Conner Weigman from the University of Houston.

Sark

Bryan Cranston GIFs | Tenor

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Redneck Mutha said:

Sark: Jerry, Stephen, we need a QB badly and I'd like us to to take Arch Manning with our 1st round pick.

Skeletor: We'll take it under advisement.

Announcer: With the 1st pick in the 2026 NFL draft, the Dallas Cowboys select.... Conner Weigman from the University of Houston.

Sark

Bryan Cranston GIFs | Tenor

He’ll draft whoever the Arkansas qb is

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
On 1/15/2025 at 2:40 PM, Scuba Saba said:

Carpe diem. My concern is over not seizing the opportunity. You may bet that you have a plan that will provide more but that is not guaranteed. An opportunity missed will not reoccur. A secondary concern is the appearance to recruits. Time will tell.  

Using ChatGPT to write fortune cookie inserts should be illegal…

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 5
Posted
18 hours ago, gmr548 said:

To me the NFL is a much better gig at this point but I suppose that's personal preference.

I actually don't think Sark would be a particularly good NFL HC. Much of his success here has simply been an effect of the roster he's built; which of course he gets a ton of credit for as a college coach, but it would not work like that in the NFL. His track record in games where the other side has something approaching a similar talent level isn't great and he was a mediocre NFL OC.

I'm not real worried about him leaving because he seems like a pretty self aware guy and probably knows that. And he's put so much into Texas and is now so close, with Arch fucking Manning about to take the keys, I have a hard time seeing him walk away from that.

Especially to work for NFL aggy lol.

Yeah, the Mannings say hi.  

Posted
On 1/15/2025 at 2:40 PM, Scuba Saba said:

Carpe diem. My concern is over not seizing the opportunity. You may bet that you have a plan that will provide more but that is not guaranteed. An opportunity missed will not reoccur. A secondary concern is the appearance to recruits. Time will tell.  

Why would anyone go scuba diving in Saba?

Posted

Call it hindsight, I guess, but do you think different ideas were thrown around once our coaches realized we had a 3rd quarter problem? And we had plenty of great reps from Arch, in the games early in the season.  All we had to do was have Arch come out and run the first series of the 2nd half in two or three games in a row, it seems to me.  This was so much easier to handle than the stupid 2009 situation, I think, when Mack fucked up by refusing to let GG pass when he was allowed to go in and mop up.   Doesn't QE improve his focus, etc. when he sees Arch moving the ball in the 3rd quarter? Got to look at Saban.  Remember he sat whichever starting QB it was and went to the backup in the 3rd or 4th quarter?  Wasn't it the final game?  Unbelievable.  Is Saban the only coach with the balls to do that? 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, JGrayDBU said:

Call it hindsight, I guess, but do you think different ideas were thrown around once our coaches realized we had a 3rd quarter problem? And we had plenty of great reps from Arch, in the games early in the season.  All we had to do was have Arch come out and run the first series of the 2nd half in two or three games in a row, it seems to me.  This was so much easier to handle than the stupid 2009 situation, I think, when Mack fucked up by refusing to let GG pass when he was allowed to go in and mop up.   Doesn't QE improve his focus, etc. when he sees Arch moving the ball in the 3rd quarter? Got to look at Saban.  Remember he sat whichever starting QB it was and went to the backup in the 3rd or 4th quarter?  Wasn't it the final game?  Unbelievable.  Is Saban the only coach with the balls to do that? 

 

 

Have you watched us the last 3 years? The third quarter issue isn't new. And I doubt it is going away next year. 

Posted
1 hour ago, JGrayDBU said:

Call it hindsight, I guess, but do you think different ideas were thrown around once our coaches realized we had a 3rd quarter problem? And we had plenty of great reps from Arch, in the games early in the season.  All we had to do was have Arch come out and run the first series of the 2nd half in two or three games in a row, it seems to me.  This was so much easier to handle than the stupid 2009 situation, I think, when Mack fucked up by refusing to let GG pass when he was allowed to go in and mop up.   Doesn't QE improve his focus, etc. when he sees Arch moving the ball in the 3rd quarter? Got to look at Saban.  Remember he sat whichever starting QB it was and went to the backup in the 3rd or 4th quarter?  Wasn't it the final game?  Unbelievable.  Is Saban the only coach with the balls to do that? 

 

 

We have a third quarter with Arch against MSU where we fumbled on the first play we ran; Arch botching a 4th and short throw (to be fair I didn't love the play call, he was asked to make a very Ewers-esque throw in terms of touch and ball placement); MSU getting inside the Texas 40 down 14-6 before a penalty killed their drive; at least two OL procedural penalties; and Texas taking three plays to score on the worst defense they played all year from 1st and goal at the 1.

We also went long stretches without scoring on UTSA or ULM in the third quarter with Arch at QB. I'm not going to scrutinize those too much because they're scrimmages, but they're another data point that inserting Arch does not magically fix the third quarter.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
On 1/16/2025 at 8:54 AM, Gene Parmesan said:

It's insane to me that this sport has an aspect of the game kicking/punting evolve so that insanely specialized players are the only ones capable.  Special teams coaches are responsible for coaching the other 10 players on the field, but just cross their fingers with the most important.  They should have just phased kicking out of the game 30+ years ago.

No kicking in

 

 

football 

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, gmr548 said:

We have a third quarter with Arch against MSU where we fumbled on the first play we ran; Arch botching a 4th and short throw (to be fair I didn't love the play call, he was asked to make a very Ewers-esque throw in terms of touch and ball placement); MSU getting inside the Texas 40 down 14-6 before a penalty killed their drive; at least two OL procedural penalties; and Texas taking three plays to score on the worst defense they played all year from 1st and goal at the 1.

We also went long stretches without scoring on UTSA or ULM in the third quarter with Arch at QB. I'm not going to scrutinize those too much because they're scrimmages, but they're another data point that inserting Arch does not magically fix the third quarter.

Here is a guy who is paying attention. Plus rep!

Posted

Manning's TD pass right before half against MSU was one of the more impressive throws I've seen a Texas QB make in a long time. He got smoked and wasn't really able to fully step into it, but still put it on the money with a lot of zip.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
21 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

No doubt QB sneak is back on the table. As mentioned, we ran it with ease for Arch vs. Colorado St, but had some issues with it later on. Sark was chewing Arch out when it took multiple attempts vs. Miss St. 

Feel pretty comfortable we will get that sorted out this offseason. 

 

Sark is on record that he was chewing Arch out because he felt like he got in on the first two attempts but Arch got up too quickly before the ref could make it to the pile and see where he was, so no touchdown. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Dahobbs said:

Have you watched us the last 3 years? The third quarter issue isn't new. And I doubt it is going away next year. 

3rd quarter scoring average

2021- 8.9 points (15th)

2022- 7.6 points (27th)

2023- 7.1 points (39th)

2024- 5.8 points (65th)

  • Rage+1 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Hookem2147 said:

3rd quarter scoring average

2021- 8.9 points (15th)

2022- 7.6 points (27th)

2023- 7.1 points (39th)

2024- 5.8 points (65th)

He's been figured out

Posted
Sark is on record that he was chewing Arch out because he felt like he got in on the first two attempts but Arch got up too quickly before the ref could make it to the pile and see where he was, so no touchdown. 

I swear to this day that when Arch ran for that 1st down. TV was looking to review for a possible fumble and the whole time I was hollering at my TV that they should’ve been looking for Targeting! His hit was helmet to helmet behind the ear hole. When he stood up, his steps were staggered, so I knew he was concussed (potentially) at that time. Never saw the field again. Man could we’d have used him at 1st and Goal.

Hook’em!!!
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, westexhorn said:

He's been figured out

Interestingly, the 4th quarter scoring has followed a different trend 

2021- 5.8 (90th)

2022- 7.0 (62nd)

2023- 9.1 (15th)

2024- 6.7 (75th)

Edited by Hookem2147
Posted
12 hours ago, gmr548 said:

We have a third quarter with Arch against MSU where we fumbled on the first play we ran; Arch botching a 4th and short throw (to be fair I didn't love the play call, he was asked to make a very Ewers-esque throw in terms of touch and ball placement); MSU getting inside the Texas 40 down 14-6 before a penalty killed their drive; at least two OL procedural penalties; and Texas taking three plays to score on the worst defense they played all year from 1st and goal at the 1.

We also went long stretches without scoring on UTSA or ULM in the third quarter with Arch at QB. I'm not going to scrutinize those too much because they're scrimmages, but they're another data point that inserting Arch does not magically fix the third quarter.

I think the evidence is pretty damning that while Quinn’s physical capabilities might have been a part of it, and Arch might be able to offset those some with his skills etc that the real issues with our 3rd quarter isn't with the QB. Neither was Quinn the issue nor Arch the fix.

Sark's halftime adjustments, in short, are absolutely shit. It's getting worse not better. Doesn't matter the QB. 

This discussion doesn't really belong in the Arch thread, but I fear Arch might get some of the hate for a failure that absolutely rests on the shoulders of our HC. It's a problem and anyone that doesn't see it by this point.. fuck man, I dunno what to tell them that will.

Posted

Sark clearly can make adjustments.  Klatt is talking about one such adjustment in the national champ game preview.  It's not like he is incapable of it, but, strangely, the 3Q was such a clusterfuck.  Is he better when he makes quick decisive adjustments (the one Klatt is talking about was clearly made in game during the 1H) and outhinks himself when he and the staff have 20 minutes?

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Surly Bevo said:

Sark clearly can make adjustments.  Klatt is talking about one such adjustment in the national champ game preview.  It's not like he is incapable of it, but, strangely, the 3Q was such a clusterfuck.  Is he better when he makes quick decisive adjustments (the one Klatt is talking about was clearly made in game during the 1H) and outhinks himself when he and the staff have 20 minutes?

I feel like people underrate the difficulty of being a full-time OC in game while also being head coach. As a standalone OC, you can spend every timeout and defensive possession reviewing clips, thinking about the next drive, talking to players, etc. As HC, you spend that time focused on the defense, special teams and time mgmt. You don't have "free time" to look at clips from previous drives or think about what the offense will do next. 

Point being - I'm pretty sure Sark can make adjustments as an OC, but does he have the time to figure out what those adjustments should be while also doing HC duties? Probably not. Maybe that's why a playcaller hasn't won a championship in so long..

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

It likely nothing more than semantics, but Sark isn't the OC.  Kyle Flood is, and AJ Milwee is co-OC.  I have no idea what input Flood/Milwee have during game prep, but it's pretty clear Sark is calling most of the plays.

Posted

I love Sark and what he’s done for the program. I really think it’s time for him to interpret the “game plan” to an officially named OC and let them run with it. Sark just needs to be a Sideline Coach and motivator, which he is already good at. That and the recruiting and public PR which he so excels at is at a premium and priceless.

Hook’em!!!

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, msucolt45 said:

I love Sark and what he’s done for the program. I really think it’s time for him to interpret the “game plan” to an officially named OC and let them run with it. Sark just needs to be a Sideline Coach and motivator, which he is already good at. That and the recruiting and public PR which he so excels at is at a premium and priceless.

Hook’em!!!

Time to bring this guy out of retirement.

image.thumb.png.db1b5c8b5639b55b4d73ac155e8ae231.png

Edited by Earl Haffler
  • Haha 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

It likely nothing more than semantics, but Sark isn't the OC.  Kyle Flood is, and AJ Milwee is co-OC.  I have no idea what input Flood/Milwee have during game prep, but it's pretty clear Sark is calling most of the plays.

Likely? It's nothing but.

"Co-" anything is theoretically justification for a higher salary. 

The actual OC is the one who decides whether to run or pass and which run or pass concept to use. The co-OCs are tasked with making the choice from their implementation. This is true regardless of whether we're talking practice or game.

In game, the OC is focused on how the game plan is working and what changes might be needed to fix a problem or take advantage of opportunities.

It just is not - or at least seems to be not - possible to oversee both the whole game as HC, and also the offense as OC. I lean toward "not possible". 

Almost possible, or we wouldn't be getting to the Final Four, despite our talent advantages. Not quite is nevertheless "not". 

Would it make your semantic problem better if we call the position HOC, for Head Offensive Coordinator?

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, TejasPedro said:

If Sark wins it all next year and he will never pay for another Drink in the ATX ever again!

Only next year? Tough crowd 

Posted
I feel like people underrate the difficulty of being a full-time OC in game while also being head coach. As a standalone OC, you can spend every timeout and defensive possession reviewing clips, thinking about the next drive, talking to players, etc. As HC, you spend that time focused on the defense, special teams and time mgmt. You don't have "free time" to look at clips from previous drives or think about what the offense will do next. 
Point being - I'm pretty sure Sark can make adjustments as an OC, but does he have the time to figure out what those adjustments should be while also doing HC duties? Probably not. Maybe that's why a playcaller hasn't won a championship in so long..

What exactly would an offensive minded HC like sark discuss with the defense? This is a serious question. I can think of a ton of shit to discuss with the shitty special teams coach.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...