Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Beau Vine said:

So Maxwell told Blanche that she'd produce a list without Trump's name on it and refuse to testify to Congress if she gets a pardon.

Do I have that correct?  A convicted child sex trafficker has the President of the United States held over a barrel?

Ghislaine to Trump

IMG_7991.gif.df722b0e491f987f41044fb866d3d405.gif

  • Haha 3
  • Drool 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Gatorubet said:

Does she have an employer I can refer this to?

I'm sure somewhere in her social media bio she will note the University for which she works. Her sociological history work is top notch and I'm sure she's well published too. I'm quite curious about her work justifying NAMBLA against Greek Society's normative behavior. We all know, if it happened in the past, norms at the current time were different and made the behavior completely acceptable even in modern normative morals. I don't recall anyone taking issue with pedophilia in the 1990s. Right? 

Edited by BurntEyes
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, BurntEyes said:

I'm sure somewhere in her social media bio she will note the University in which they work. Her sociological history work is top notch and I'm sure she's well published too. I'm quiet curious about her work justifying NAMBLA and Greek Society's normative behavior. We all know, if it happened in the past, norms at the current time were different and made the behavior completely acceptable even in modern normative morals. I don't recall anyone taking issue with pedophilia in the 1990s. Right? 

Who among us haven’t sacrificed a fellow citizen to ensure a good harvest, right?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Drool 1
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

 

20250727_101533.jpg

 

She's an extremely vocal and yet very confused person (arrogant ignorance, if you will), one of those kinds of people who you shouldn't take seriously but sort of have to because their financial success and social capital depend on destructive trolling.

Quote

Political views
Banks is known for publicly speaking out on African-American civil rights issues, with a commentator at Splice Today describing her as having "that hot New York temper where she will pop off if you cross her the wrong way".[99][130] In December 2014, she called for over $100 trillion to be paid to African Americans as financial reparations for the enslavement of their ancestors, citing U.S. reparations to Native American communities and German reparations to Jewish survivors of the Holocaust as precedents.[130][131] On Twitter, she urged young African Americans to take an interest in such issues, adding, "We are the children of the people who perished in the name of modern capitalism and we deserve a piece of that fucking pie".[130][131] She added that reparations could be used to improve educational prospects for black Americans.[130]

In 2016, Banks took to Twitter to express her endorsement of Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, clarifying that "I have no hope for America ... I think Donald Trump is evil like America is evil and in order for America to keep up with itself it needs him ... politicians are inherently evil, I trust the one who is most transparent."[132] She retracted her endorsement of Trump in October 2016, posting on Facebook: "I made a major mistake endorsing toupey-toupee. Women's rights are important and we must protect them."[133][134] Nonetheless, after Trump won the presidency, she posted, "He is my fucking hero right now. I am elated."[135]

In April 2022, Banks posted an Instagram story repeatedly chastising Ukraine in the 2022 Russian invasion of the country. She claimed, without evidence, that Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy prevented African exchange students from leaving the country, in reference to Ukrainians authorities who barred Black immigrants from fleeing at the onset of the war.[136][137] She also claimed without evidence that Ukraine was using its embassies in African countries to recruit mercenaries to fight in Ukraine. Banks said that Zelenskyy was trying to provoke a global nuclear war and urged Ukraine to surrender.[136] In a previous Instagram story from April 1, she had praised Russia's president Vladimir Putin, saying that she "really fucking love" him and calling him her "favorite super villain ever".[138]

Banks moved from Los Angeles to Miami in 2021.[139] In January 2023, she said that she did so because she had become disillusioned with the politics of Los Angeles and that she felt "way safer" in Florida.[140] She also praised Florida's governor Ron DeSantis, whom she called "focused on the basic shit" and "practical about a lot of things".[128][140]

In July 2024, Banks attended a rally in support of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign in Florida.[141] On November 4, the day before the election, she posted on X (formerly Twitter) that she would be voting for Kamala Harris due to concerns over Elon Musk's involvement with Trump; she wrote that Musk "belongs nowhere near American politics".[142][143] On November 6, she posted an image on X, purportedly of her ballot with Donald Trump selected, captioned, "I lied, I voted for Trump yesterday."[144] In April 2025, she expressed regret for voting for Trump, writing: "Ok I think it's time everyone who voted for Trump admit that we made a fucking mess. Like this is an absolute disaster. He's so petty and vindictive rn. Tbh, rightfully so, but not when the wellbeing and livelihood of billions of people – damn near the entire world lay in your hands."[145][146]

In June 2025, Banks stated that she was a Zionist and supported Israel, writing "Fuck Palestine" on X. She wrote, "No Black Person Should Support Palestine", citing anti-black racism in the Arab world. She asserted that Israel should only give Afro-Palestinians asylum, claiming, without proof, that the other Palestinians had carried out a genocide against them.[147] She criticized the two-state solution, stating, "No. [Mandatory Palestine] should all be Israel. Palestine cannot support itself without help from other countries, so the people should just leave or become naturalized Israelis."[148] At the end of June, she was named as one of "12 people who made the world freer this year" at the 2025 Sinai Awards organized by the magazine Tablet.[149] She had previously denounced "racists" in Israel and stated she would never return to the country in May 2018.[150]

Disputes and controversies
See also: Social media use by Azealia Banks
Banks has developed a reputation for disputes with several public figures on social media,[151] particularly Twitter, with Complex noting that "she gets more attention for her public feuds than she does for her music".[152][153]

Banks has been involved in altercations with crew and passengers aboard commercial flights, resulting in her being removed from airliners, and she has accused some foreign airlines of racism against her.[154][155] She also denounced "racists" in Israel and Australia and said she would never return to either country.[150][156]

In May 2016, Banks posted what several media outlets described as a racist and homophobic rant[157][158] against Zayn Malik on Twitter, later targeting young actress Skai Jackson.[158][159][160] As a result, Banks was dropped by her UK booking agency and a then-upcoming hip-hop festival, and her Twitter account was suspended.[161][162][163]

In October 2016, Banks filed a police report against actor Russell Crowe, claiming that he choked and spat at her before proceeding to call her the n word during a party in his hotel suite. However, the Los Angeles District Attorney's office dropped the case in December. RZA supported Banks' claims the following year during an interview with The Breakfast Club, but also condemned her alleged "obnoxious and erratic" behavior.[164][165] Crowe in turn claimed that he removed Banks from the premises because she threatened to physically assault other attendees.[166]

In December 2016, Banks posted a series of videos on Instagram detailing her cleanup of a closet in her apartment where she claimed to have been practicing witchcraft. She admitted to practicing "three years worth of brujeria". The video appeared to show dried blood, feathers, and the carrion of dead chickens.[167] In January 2021, she received criticism after posting a video on Instagram of her exhuming the remains of her dead pet cat, Lucifer, and collected some of his bones. She later said in an interview that she did not eat the cat and exhumed it for taxidermizing purposes.[168][169][170]

In January 2019, Banks posted xenophobic remarks about Irish people, in which she used ethnic slurs and mocked the Great Famine, after performing in Ireland.[171][172][173] That August, she posted xenophobic remarks about Swedish people after performing in Sweden, adding that she "would really love to see someone bomb the shit out of this place".[174][175]

In July 2025, controversy arose when Banks posted screenshots of nude photos sent to her by Conor McGregor on X.[176][177]

 

Oh, lookie here. The magazine, Tablet, that @Bevo tried to pass off a year or so ago as a credible and unbiased source, which published that easily debunked and laughably bad statistical "analysis," downplaying the deaths of Palestinian civilians, rewarded her online trolling with a fucking prize this past June.

Edited by bolverk
Posted (edited)
On 7/26/2025 at 11:29 AM, Beau Vine said:

 

Missed this informative and in depth perspective. However, its clear he hasn't consulted with the space lizards and as such, he's missing a huge part of the picture. This is really just all a smoke screen to keep we informed from focusing on exposing the flat earth reality. 

Did you know that Bigfoot is real, but not what people think. They actually serve as the Men In Black in remote locations where seeing the flat reality of earth is far more likely. They disappear people who find the ice walls. 

Edited by BurntEyes
  • Haha 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, Captainant said:

 

 

 

 

The president is all up in the epstein list

Zero chance that Trump got mad at Epstein for hiring a waitress or hostess away from MarALago. There were reports of a break between them for fighting over a parcel of land. That is a more credible story but to my knowledge Trump hasn't acknowledged it. Others said it.

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Zero chance that Trump got mad at Epstein for hiring a waitress or hostess away from MarALago. There were reports of a break between them for fighting over a parcel of land. That is a more credible story but to my knowledge Trump hasn't acknowledged it. Others said it.

I'm not about to defend Trump or his story as being true. 

However, in a hypothetical you have 2 absolute ego maniacs that that, I think most would agree, view women as property. 

If Trump had a favorite "piece of property" at MarALago and an egomaniacal "competitor" "stole" that property, I can absolutely see it causing rift. Again, I'm not supporting the truth or accuracy of the story, but to say those two wouldn't fight over such a "possession" is to misunderstand their mindset.

Posted
1 minute ago, BurntEyes said:

I'm not about to defend Trump or his story as being true. 

However, in a hypothetical you have 2 absolute ego maniacs that that, I think most would agree, view women as property. 

If Trump had a favorite "piece of property" at MarALago and an egomaniacal "competitor" "stole" that property, I can absolutely see it causing rift. Again, I'm not supporting the truth or accuracy of the story, but to say those two wouldn't fight over such a "possession" is to misunderstand their mindset.

Saying that Epstein stole a person, when Epstein is not running a club, brings up more questions. Epstein stole a young, female hostess and that made Trump upset?

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Saying that Epstein stole a person, when Epstein is not running a club, brings up more questions. Epstein stole a young, female hostess and that made Trump upset?

Epstein employed "hosts" for his guests on his properties. Chefs, waiters, hostest, etc etc. were all legally employed by Epstein. At the surface it is 100% legal. Trump claimed in that video above:

"...he stole people that worked for me."

Implying that employees that worked for Trump were stolen by Epstein. He doesn't clarify who they were, I just used the young female as a hypothetical example to dispute your point that they wouldn't fight over an employee. They absolutely would. Of course Trump is not going to be specific about the employee(s).

Frankly, I don't believe a word of it anyways. He's generating a story to explain why they stopped talking. 

 

Edited by BurntEyes
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Meet with DOJ a few days ago. Today files an appeal to the SC on her conviction. HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM................................

 

https://www.axios.com/2025/07/28/ghislaine-maxwell-supreme-court-appeal-epstein-files

Ghislaine Maxwell pressed ahead with an appeal to the Supreme Court on Monday, seeking to overturn her conviction on the grounds that she was unlawfully prosecuted for sex trafficking minors with Jeffrey Epstein.

Maxwell's appeal revolves around a highly controversial 2007 plea agreement Epstein negotiated with the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida.

"The United States," the plea agreement stated, "agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to" four other suspects.

Maxwell was not listed as one of those suspects — but her lawyers argue she didn't need to be.

Between the lines: Maxwell's attorneys, the husband-wife team of Mona and David Oscar Markus contends that a plain reading of the deal protects unnamed co-conspirators as well, since it explicitly says it's "not limited to" those listed.

Markus also argues that language in the deal — promising immunity from "the United States" — means Maxwell couldn't be prosecuted for Epstein-related crimes anywhere in the country.

"The government's argument, across the board, is essentially an appeal to what it wishes the agreement had said, rather than what it actually says," Mona Markus wrote in the petition.

The other side: The Justice Department says former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, who negotiated the deal, didn't have authority to bind other federal districts — including the Southern District of New York, where Maxwell was ultimately tried and convicted.

The intrigue: Federal appeals courts have split over the key question of whether a plea deal struck by one U.S. Attorney's Office applies to the entire Justice Department.

The Justice Department acknowledged that divide in its own brief, but has urged the Supreme Court to reject Maxwell's appeal.

"The government was not even aware of [Maxwell's] role in Epstein's scheme at that time," DOJ argued, calling her "at most, an incidental third-party beneficiary of the agreement."

  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)

New shit has come to light!

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-jail-video-no-missing-minute-government-source-says/

The "missing minute" from the surveillance video at the Manhattan Metropolitan Correctional Center where Jeffrey Epstein died in 2019 may not be missing after all, CBS News has learned.

...

Attorney General Pam Bondi was questioned about the gap during a July 8 Cabinet meeting with President Trump. She said the missing minute was the result of a nightly reset of the video that caused the recording system to miss one recording minute every night, and attributed that information to the Bureau of Prisons.

"There was a minute that was off that counter and what we learned from [the] Bureau of Prisons was every year, every night, they redo that video," Bondi said. The equipment was old — "from like 1999, so every night is reset, so every night should have that same missing minute," she said.

Bondi said the department would share other video that showed the same thing happened every night when the video system reset. That video, however, has not yet been released. 

Experts in surveillance video, including video forensic professionals, told CBS News that a nightly reset would have been unusual and was not something they encountered in most video systems.

One thing that is clear, forensic experts say, is that the version of the recording released by the FBI was edited and not raw, as the government stated. Bondi, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino and others have said publicly that the video would be released unaltered. 

When the DOJ and FBI shared the video with the public, they said in a news release that it was the "full raw" video, and that "anyone entering or attempting to enter the tier where Epstein's cell was located from the SHU common area would have been captured by this footage." 

Jim Stafford was one of several video forensic analysts who looked at the video for CBS News using specialized software to extract the underlying coding, known as metadata. He said the metadata showed that the file was first created on May 23 of this year and that it was likely a "screen capture, not an actual export" of the raw file. 

He also told CBS News the metadata showed that the video was in fact two separate videos stitched together. It was also slightly sped up, so the video covering 11 hours runs approximately 10 hours and 53 minutes in length. 

CBS asked the FBI and Justice Department for a response, but they declined to comment. The Bureau of Prisons said they "had no additional information to provide." 

Edited by Captainant
  • Rage+1 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Captainant said:

New shit has come to light!

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-jail-video-no-missing-minute-government-source-says/

The "missing minute" from the surveillance video at the Manhattan Metropolitan Correctional Center where Jeffrey Epstein died in 2019 may not be missing after all, CBS News has learned.

...

Attorney General Pam Bondi was questioned about the gap during a July 8 Cabinet meeting with President Trump. She said the missing minute was the result of a nightly reset of the video that caused the recording system to miss one recording minute every night, and attributed that information to the Bureau of Prisons.

"There was a minute that was off that counter and what we learned from [the] Bureau of Prisons was every year, every night, they redo that video," Bondi said. The equipment was old — "from like 1999, so every night is reset, so every night should have that same missing minute," she said.

Bondi said the department would share other video that showed the same thing happened every night when the video system reset. That video, however, has not yet been released. 

Experts in surveillance video, including video forensic professionals, told CBS News that a nightly reset would have been unusual and was not something they encountered in most video systems.

One thing that is clear, forensic experts say, is that the version of the recording released by the FBI was edited and not raw, as the government stated. Bondi, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino and others have said publicly that the video would be released unaltered. 

When the DOJ and FBI shared the video with the public, they said in a news release that it was the "full raw" video, and that "anyone entering or attempting to enter the tier where Epstein's cell was located from the SHU common area would have been captured by this footage." 

Jim Stafford was one of several video forensic analysts who looked at the video for CBS News using specialized software to extract the underlying coding, known as metadata. He said the metadata showed that the file was first created on May 23 of this year and that it was likely a "screen capture, not an actual export" of the raw file. 

He also told CBS News the metadata showed that the video was in fact two separate videos stitched together. It was also slightly sped up, so the video covering 11 hours runs approximately 10 hours and 53 minutes in length. 

CBS asked the FBI and Justice Department for a response, but they declined to comment. The Bureau of Prisons said they "had no additional information to provide." 

That sadly doesn't suprise me and in all that the video of Epstein's cell DOOR has not been provided. This was a common area. So not only what they provided almost certainly doctored, they aren't providing the most important video. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Brian Fantana said:

Lol why would you ever admit that

70+ years of empirical data that nothing you say has any real, negative consequences.

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
1 minute ago, kevwun said:

Now that we know it was a girl, I think we have to assume Epstein actually stole her.  As in kidnapped her.

Notably, Epstein was killed the day after the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ordered her civil suit unsealed. The facts in that civil case is what laid the groundwork for Maxwell's conviction in 2021. From Giuffre's wiki page:

In mid-2000,[27][28] Giuffre met Ghislaine Maxwell when working as a spa attendant at Donald Trump's private Mar-a-Lago club while reading a book about massage therapy.[21] Maxwell, a British socialite and daughter of the late media tycoon Robert Maxwell, approached Giuffre, noted the book that she was reading, inquired about her interest in massage, and offered her a potential job working for Epstein as a traveling masseuse with the assurance that no experience was necessary.[21] When Giuffre arrived at Epstein's Palm Beach home, she says he was naked lying down and Maxwell told her how to massage him. "They seemed like nice people so I trusted them, and I told them I'd had a really hard time in my life up until then—I'd been a runaway, I'd been sexually abused, physically abused. ... That was the worst thing I could have told them because now they knew how vulnerable I was", Giuffre stated.[22] Giuffre stated that after Maxwell introduced her to Jeffrey Epstein, the two quickly began grooming her to provide sexual services under the guise that she was to be trained as a professional massage therapist.[29]

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, miguelito said:

Do we need to start looking into this "spa" at Mar a Lago?

No, of course not, it's a boring topic that only losers would be interested in, why doesn't anyone talk about Obama's spa?  That's something you might be interested in looking into.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Drool 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...