Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, RDCanecutter said:

I am not a lawyer, but I played one in a student film at UT.

No, wait... that was an alcoholic.

21 minutes ago, speed817 said:

I'm worse....I'm an engineer....

Edited by Bullneck
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

That would be awesome.  

Flynn will get his along with Stone and Bannon in Willard Hotel command center stuff that will be indicted soon.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BamaATL said:

Ginni Thomas is my bet for Co-Conspirator 6, which brings a fun wrinkle to all this if true.  Maddow almost said it and hesitated because there is no confirmation and won't be for a while.  

This would be FUCKING AMAZING!

Posted

Y'all do realize that the unindicted co-conspirators, are, in fact, as yet unindicted?  Charges may come, they may not, but they're facing no consequences from this indictment.

Posted
1 hour ago, Chewbacca said:

Fuck that, we should encourage him to flee to Russia.  Convict him in absentia and he'll never come back and it's kinda hard to run a campaign from Moscow.

He won't leave unless he's forced. He'd have zero power in Russia, and he thrives on power. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

Ginni Thomas is my bet for Co-Conspirator 6, which brings a fun wrinkle to all this if true.  Maddow almost said it and hesitated because there is no confirmation and won't be for a while.  

Did she do anything more than text conspiracy theories to Mark Meadows?

Posted
1 minute ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Did she do anything more than text conspiracy theories to Mark Meadows?

I remember reading that she was involved in the Michigan fake electors, whether or not that is substantiated legally I do not know.  I do know she fits the description of a political operative and that she is not a lawyer.  Now a lot of people in the orbit fit that description, but she has always jumped out to me as being neck deep in all this.  That having been said, I have nothing in so far as proof to that.  It is for now, idle speculation of my own.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, BamaATL said:

I remember reading that she was involved in the Michigan fake electors, whether or not that is substantiated legally I do not know.  I do know she fits the description of a political operative and that she is not a lawyer.  Now a lot of people in the orbit fit that description, but she has always jumped out to me as being neck deep in all this.  That having been said, I have nothing in so far as proof to that.  It is for now, idle speculation of my own.  

Wasn’t she involved in Arizona too?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Js1 said:

Wasn’t she involved in Arizona too?

I may well have Arizona and Michigan confused in this, or it could be both.  What I do recall is that she is certainly involved in at least some aspects of the fake electors. 

Posted
1 hour ago, tx ind said:

dotard attorney on CNN right now is such a choad.  Kaitlin Collins is a babe.

Infuriating and we are going to see this going forward.  It's wild to see the people who are still hanging on to defend him.

Posted
56 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

Ginni Thomas is my bet for Co-Conspirator 6, which brings a fun wrinkle to all this if true.  Maddow almost said it and hesitated because there is no confirmation and won't be for a while.  

 

As much as I'd love it to be Thomas, it most certainly has to be Bannon.

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted

 

The Georgia DA could cut and paste about 15 pages of that, add Senator Lady Bugs as a co-conspirator (and maybe two or three more specific predicate act crime allegations) and she could file tomorrow. 

Actually, given the strength of the J6 indictment, I’d like her to add as many codefendants as possible so they can suck millions of dollars of GOP fundraising into criminal defense fees instead of GQP campaign ads

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

 

 

“No. it was like when his son was being born, and he was chasing a porn star around a hotel room to have sex. He had no idea that was wrong.”

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted

You know, I think I'd be ok with this sort of justice system if whenever someone was dead to rights on something, they at least got a broadside on the jaw from a waffle iron.  Like, immediately.  Oh, you were caught on camera?  WANG!  

Ok, now go get your trial.  

Posted
 
 

I love Watters question of “how are you gonna prove he knew there was no election fraud?” What. A fucking. Choad. The fucking indictment (and that’s just the indictment, there’s a lot more than that) is page after page of EVIDENCE that Trump 1) knew exactly that, and was told over and over and over again, and 2) he never had any contrary FACTS (that is, facts that actually supported fraud).
Trump had person after person telling him “sir, the moon is not made of cheese. It isn’t. We’ve had astronauts go there, they verify that it’s not made of cheese. There is zero evidence that it is made of cheese.” And Watters is asking “oh yeah, we’ll how can you prove that Trump knew the moon isn’t made of cheese?!?!” I mean, maybe their defense is “everyone knows he’s such a complete fucking moron that he wouldn’t believe water is wet even as he’s drowning in it.” Ok. Cool. Hook ‘em.
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Posted
43 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Basically, this is their defense

america-south-park.gif

We all know that what they say among themselves, what they say to the public, and what they say to the courts are 3 independent lines of thought. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

This one, unlike the Mar A Lago case, is going to have some "presidential" shit in it.  Immunity, etc.  But, I don't see a First Amendment defense working at all.  If it was just the 1/6 speech, that might be a different story, but it's not.

Nor will an advice of counsel defense work, because he picked and chose his counsel and ignored the ones that told him what he didn't want to hear.  And, she's not going to let them re-litigate election fraud, unless they come up with something from prior to January 6 that's credible and was known to Trump at the time, which aint happening.

I don't expect Chutkan to tolerate much foolishness here.  This won't be burdened by CIPA and classified information.  It will be interesting to see when she sets a trial date, etc. and compare it to Cannon, but I think the two cases are pretty apples and oranges.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Pato del Muerto said:

We all know that what they say among themselves, what they say to the public, and what they say to the courts are 3 independent lines of thought. 

In all reality, their argument is: well, it may be illegal, but it SHOULDN'T BE so therefore, it's ok for them and their god.  That's it.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

everyone knows he’s such a complete fucking moron that he wouldn’t believe water is wet even as he’s drowning in it.”

Why theorize this when we can have a practical lab and be certain?

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
  • Drool 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

I just want to say how fucking INSANE it is that we have to sit here and watch people try to justify any of this.

If I were a person on camera on any rational news network, I would not be able to not bury my head in my hands and just scream out, "WHAT THE FUCK ARE WE TALKING ABOUT!?!?!"

The Republican argument is fully irrational, disingenuous, and insane.  The media needs to (and I've been saying this since 2016) call people LIARS and FRAUDS.  We cannot continue down this path of "huh, well, maybe..."  NO!  This is fucking nuts.  Fuck these people.

 

giphy (1) (3).gif

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Gatorubet said:

Weismann on MSNBC with the money observation: Trump has now been indicted for criminal conduct he did prior to being elected, his criminal conduct while he was President, and his criminal conduct after he left office.  

The hitherto unknown POTUS criminal Hat Trick. 

spacer.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1


×
×
  • Create New...