Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

This might be a problem ?

 

It's sloppy, for sure, but not a big problem.

In fact, they already solved it by some jackleg named Dean John Sauer of the "James Otis Law Group" of Chesterfield, MO entering an appearance. He seems to be admitted to practice before the DC Circuit.

And, although it seems to be a no-name law firm in BFE, he is the former SG of Missouri under Mincing Josh Hawley.  So, that doesn't necessarily mean he's any good, but it does mean that he's a member of the Party in good standing.  Seig Heil.

Posted (edited)

I'm picturing Eric Trump after like 3 hours of trying to use a Rand-McNally printed road atlas finally screaming, "Hey Dad!  I found Chesterfield, Missouri!  It's right by a place called, uh...Ferguson.  Wonder what happened there?  Anyway turns out your new attorneys for DC Circuit lease a building in the Saint Louis area from the McCloskeys.  I wonder who they are?"  Simulation...

Edited by YGIFS
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, The Dog said:

Did she flip?

 

SHE DID

 

I would love to her testify in detail about some of the famous Oval Office meetings. The best part is that there were non-lawyers in the room, so there is ZERO client-attorney privilege that can be asserted.

I assume that if she met or spoke with Trump alone, even her plea deal can remove Trump's right to attorney-client privilege if he can successfully argue that she was his attorney. It's his right, not hers.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

I would love to her testify in detail about some of the famous Oval Office meetings. The best part is that there were non-lawyers in the room, so there is ZERO client-attorney privilege that can be asserted.

I assume that if she met or spoke with Trump alone, even her plea deal can remove Trump's right to attorney-client privilege if he can successfully argue that she was his attorney. It's his right, not hers.

Attorney client privilege can get super complicated. Not an expert on this BUT - There’s the issue of who is the client in terms of whether or not others present are client representatives allowing privilege to extend. Add executive privilege vs outside the scope of the office of the president I would think. Add did the client waive privilege by running his mouth (breaching confidentiality himself). And add privilege busting conversations like commission of a crime and your left with a briefing and significant delays and hearings on the matter.

I would expect her plea is going to blow a hole on privilege arguments but again not an expert and I would fully expect the prosecution has addressed all of these issues satisfactorily from their view point.

But basically nothing legal is easy otherwise we wouldn’t get PAID. 

Edited by troph
Posted
10 minutes ago, Post Oak said:

What kind of sentence was she looking at and what do you think the plea is for?

 

Quote

Ms. Powell, who appeared in a downtown Atlanta courtroom, was sentenced to six years of probation for the charges, a significantly less-severe outcome than she would have faced if found guilty of the charges for which she was originally indicted, which included a violation of the state racketeering law.

She was also fined $6,000 and agreed to pay $2,700 restitution to the State of Georgia, as well as write an apology letter “to the citizens of the state of Georgia.”

 

Posted
1 minute ago, troph said:

Attorney client privilege can get super complicated. Not an expert on this BUT - There’s the issue of who is the client in terms of whether or not others present are client representatives allowing privilege to extend. Add executive privilege vs outside the scope of the office of the president I would think. And add privilege busting conversations like commission of a crime and your left with a briefing and significant delays and hearings on the matter.

basically nothing legal is easy otherwise we wouldn’t get PAID. 

I'm specifically thinking of the meeting that included Powell, Trump, Guiliani and the Overstock.com CEO, who is not an attorney nor a govt employee. I would think that bringing in a random dude into a meeting with the President has to remove all semblance of privilege. 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, SilasCoade said:

If he starts talking about the fringe on the flags in the courtroom, admiralty, and maritime law then we'll know it's going well.

In my worthless paragraph, the disclaimer says that I am a sovereign citizen!

Posted
20 minutes ago, The Dog said:

 

While I can't stand her face, I wish the courtroom video had been zoomed in on Powell when she was agreeing that the facts proved she broke the law and she accepted it.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

While I can't stand her face, I wish the courtroom video had been zoomed in on Powell when she was agreeing that the facts proved she broke the law and she accepted it.

 

Still, hearing her say it was pretty pretty good.

Can't unfuck everything she's fucked up, but still.  Better than a kick in the dick.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
 
Elite. Strike. Force. Team.  
Jenna and Rudy’s lawyers have to be re-thinking things.   Like, “why didn’t we plead before she did?”
I doubt they are dishing out any more 6 year probations now they have her  testimony.  
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Gatorubet said:

Elite. Strike. Force. Team.  

Jenna and Rudy’s lawyers have to be re-thinking things.   Like, “why didn’t we plead before she did?”

I doubt they are dishing out any more 6 month probations now they have her  testimony.  

She was one of the ringleaders and was in the room for all of the conversations. This is a MASSIVE flip. 

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:
Think Chesebro is getting nervous?  His trial is about to start.

Just read that his lawyers started a Give Send Go campaign on his behalf because, apparently, he's broke.

 

Gotta love (actually not) how Trump is using this case to earn millions and he doesn't share a dime with any of them.

Outside of a few people who remain useful to Trump, he leaves carnage in his close sphere. So many arrests, lawyer fees and ultimately convictions. I assume bankruptcy or diminished financial prospects are there as well.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Especially fucked are Scott Hall, Misty, Hampton and Kathleen Latham.

They share the same RICO count charges 32-37.      But just because she wasn’t charged in other counts does not mean she doesn’t have evidence that can prove those other counts. It just means they did not have enough on her at the time to charge her. Her depth and breadth of knowledge about all things overturning the election will provide a bunch of evidence in other counts.

Posted
1 minute ago, Gatorubet said:

Especially fucked are Scott Hall, Misty, Hampton and Kathleen Latham.

They share the same RICO count charges 32-37.      But just because she wasn’t charged in other counts does not mean she doesn’t have evidence that can prove those other counts. It just means they did not have enough on her at the time to charge her. Her depth and breadth of knowledge about all things overturning the election will provide a bunch of evidence in other counts.

Didn't Hall already plead out?

  • Hook 'Em 2


×
×
  • Create New...