Jump to content

September 1st: Texans, Fire Up Your VPNs, or Present Your Government-Issued ID to View Porn Online


atomheartbevo

Recommended Posts

On 7/6/2023 at 6:42 PM, Macklemore said:

With the legislation Congress passed that led to the shut down of Backpage and craiglist ads, and no more Houston Press hard copy ads, finding a whore has become a mess with scammers far exceeding legitimate providers. It’s no longer an enjoyable hobby as it once was. I predict the quality of porn to suffer if PornHub blocking access to entire states becomes the norm.

Confused Chris Christie GIF

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NeverMarryAStripper said:

I'm sure a few months after it goes into effect, there will be a hack that releases a complete list of every Texan that presented their ID to view porn.  I bet every state politician will be on the list.

And a good 5-10% of them will have accessed gay porn. I’m sure of that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/5/2023 at 4:22 PM, sidis said:

i think all these stepsons, stepmoms, stepsisters, stepdaughters, stepdaughter's friends shoudl all have to show id to prove they are step-related.

that has been the most fucking bizarre development in the world of porn over the last ten years that i will never understand.

It's gross and I don't get it, but I'm more disturbed that any girl over 20 is now labelled a "MILF." Like that term has no meaning anymore, they just slap it on whenever they like, as long as the girl is over 20 I guess. And yes, I know these girls can and often do have kids well before 20, but my point stands, as traditionally understood, a Milf should be at least over 40.

Edited by 'stache
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, South Austin said:

Seems low.

 

2 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

I'd like to bet the over, please.

Depends. Maybe 5-10% might access gay porn but I’d bet the over on how many are going to be accessing men with trans women porn. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Goredho said:

So how does this work for search engines?  You can still go to google, search for ass, go the images or videos results and see some shit to fap with.  Does Google have to start policing that?

Majority of their content is not porn, so it’s not an issue.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

Majority of their content is not porn, so it’s not an issue.

But in terms of protecting children from accessing pr0n, they a search and click away?  I guess if they can enforce the block of content from the site that does have a majority pr0n content on the click through.

14 year old me would have been intrepid enough to fap to thumbnail gifs.

Edited by Goredho
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Here's the rub: the people who passed this bill don't give a single fuck about protecting children. They just needed a pretense to pass legislation to let them turn the state against websites they don't like and snoop into their users personal information. Same deal for the similarly positioned social media law that was also passed

Yeah, I get that.  I should have put protecting children from accessing pr0n in quotes.

air-quotes.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Goredho said:

But in terms of protecting children from accessing pr0n, they a search and click away?  I guess if they can enforce the block of content from the site that does have a majority pr0n content on the click through.

14 year old me would have been intrepid enough to fap to thumbnail gifs.

Google blurs the thumbnails in the search results now. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Goredho said:

So how does this work for search engines?  You can still go to google, search for ass, go the images or videos results and see some shit to fap with.  Does Google have to start policing that?

Amateur. Professional perverts know to use Yandex for NSFW, torrent, and other shit that Google is forced to filter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, crash_davis said:

Idiot motherfuckers of a certain political spectrum were revolting daily when they had to wear masks during the peak of Covid. Gubment is restricting mah civil liberties!

I am seeing that they are equally pissed about this government action. 

giphy.gif

Yeah, government acting as a man in the middle gateway between you and information seems like a milestone towards a dystopian future.  I realize they’ve probably been snooping all along, but restricting access seems brand new?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Goredho said:

Yeah, government acting as a man in the middle gateway between you and information seems like a milestone towards a dystopian future.  I realize they’ve probably been snooping all along, but restricting access seems brand new?

it's all for the kids. We can restrict access to porn to save them (and kittens) but we can't restrict access to guns to save them from being slaughtered in schools.

Please vote for me!

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Goredho said:

Yeah, government acting as a man in the middle gateway between you and information seems like a milestone towards a dystopian future.  I realize they’ve probably been snooping all along, but restricting access seems brand new?

It's not restricting access - it's requiring personal identification and being stored in a database. You know, that thing the gun nuts always complain about being an infringement of their 2A rights? So weird that porn is so dangerous you need to be on a registry if you're looking at it, but guns are hunky dory

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Captainant said:

It's not restricting access - it's requiring personal identification and being stored in a database. You know, that thing the gun nuts always complain about being an infringement of their 2A rights? So weird that porn is so dangerous you need to be on a registry if you're looking at it, but guns are hunky dory

Is the database maintained by the state/government or the business purveying porn?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Goredho said:

Is the database maintained by the state/government or the business purveying porn?

“Hand over your identifying data and information about your fetishes to this private business that doesn’t want it but has to collect it because otherwise we shut them down.” 

Edited by 956 Worldwide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

“Hand over your identifying data and information about your fetishes to this private business that doesn’t want it but has to collect it because otherwise we shut them down.” 

 

And prove compliance by handing the information over to the government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Goredho said:

Yeah, government acting as a man in the middle gateway between you and information seems like a milestone towards a dystopian future.  I realize they’ve probably been snooping all along, but restricting access seems brand new?

The feds are another story, but the state (of Texas) hasn't been snooping, at least not like this.  This is completely new territory, both creating the means to try and see who is accessing porn sites, and trying to block it if you refuse to identify yourself.

3 hours ago, Goredho said:

Is the database maintained by the state/government or the business purveying porn?

Well, you see this goes into effect on September 1st, so Texas still has almost 60 days to figure it out.   

Texas does have a digital identification process called Texas by Texas (TxT), so I'm guessing they are busy putting together the infrastructure/APIs/whatever for porn sites to access it.

In Louisiana, there's a couple of ways, but one of them is that the state setup a "digital wallet" (which I guess mirrors our Texas by Texas thing) and so when you go to a porn site, it asks for information, and you put the information in, and it hits up the state's "digital wallet" to see if you are old enough to access the porn site. 

There are some commercial third-party verification databases if you don't want the state knowing, and you present/verify your ID with them, but then who are they selling their data to?  The state?  Is the state going to leave that information alone?  

Edited by atomheartbevo
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, crash_davis said:

it's all for the kids. We can restrict access to porn to save them (and kittens) but we can't restrict access to guns to save them from being slaughtered in schools.

Please vote for me!

I’d like them to show me the porn  video that killed 60 people in less than an hour

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, South Austin said:

spacer.png

You jest, but if they aren't actively seeking out such porn sites that aren't doing verification, or if they are verifying porns sites that are reported by people, then it's a toothless law.

The State of Texas is going to pay somebody to look at porn.

And I'm sure there will be plenty of citizens doing their own research to report porn websites to the State of Texas.  I know one or two that I could picture doing that, and I'm going to mention to them that every time they report such a site, they themselves will probably end up in a database for visiting said site.

Edited by atomheartbevo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...