Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Derka said:

nobody, and i mean nobody, is a bigger snowflake than a magat. watching them suddenly give so many shits about the super bowl halftime show, something they’ve never watched or cared about before, is as pathetic as it is funny. what’s next, the miss america pageant? love island? the royal wedding? what’s the next event that’s never mattered before that’s suddenly going to trigger the fuck out of the fragile ass snowflakes who worship donald trump?

 

Women's boxing.  Oh shit, never mind.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, softlynow said:

Stop it, get help. A member of the other team concedes a point? Great! Use that concession against them. Don't muddy the water. Don't help the fascists. You need to fight the urge for precision, because that urge aids and abets the liars and grifters.

Concedes a point?  

I think we're all better off knowing what these assholes are lying about, when they're actually lying.

Posted

That’s right. The White House is calling judges who tell them the illegal shit they’re doing is illegal… they’re calling those judges “insurrectionists”. Thats where we are now.

We’re probably about six months away from them saying they’re going after all the insurrectionists who voted for Harris in 2024.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Red Five said:

That’s right. The White House is calling judges who tell them the illegal shit they’re doing is illegal… they’re calling those judges “insurrectionists”. Thats where we are now.

We’re probably about six months away from them saying they’re going after all the insurrectionists who voted for Harris in 2024.

Yep. There and here:

Quote

We have an Insurrection Act for a reason," Trump said. "If people were being killed and courts were holding us up, or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I'd do that."

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-threat-invoke-insurrection-act-escalates-showdown-with-democratic-cities-2025-10-07/

  • Rage+1 1
Posted

This Pam Bondi testimony is unreal. Here, allow me to give you a taste (paraphrased, slightly). Adam Schiff: "Pam Bondi, did Tom Homan take a $50k bribe?"

Bondi: "You're a sack of shit, Adam Schiff."

Schiff: "Let me try again. Did Tom Homan take a $50k bribe?"

Bondi: "I wish you had cancer."

Schiff: "Well, I guess you're not going to answer the question."

Bondi: "(clutching pearls) OMG stop with the personal attacks!!"

  • Haha 5
Posted

had some thoughts to get off my chest, so i just went off the dome and uploaded it to youtube. figured i’d share it here.

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

I’m beginning to think that some of my Christian brothers and sisters have lost the plot

 

I've visited Chicago many times. I don't seem to recall any rainforests or dense foliage that would necessitate the need for the head-to-toe cosplay camo these ICE guys are wearing.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

I’m beginning to think that some of my Christian brothers and sisters have lost the plot

 

He keeps using those words.  I do not think they mean what he thinks they mean.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

@Kyrie Eleison @Brisketexan @Anastasis I’m not as sharp about this stuff as you are. Would this be blasphemy or heresy?

I vote heresy, belief or practice contrary to religious teaching. Blasphemy is usually some form of verbal utterance 

I believe both fall into broader category of sacrilege 

 

 

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
1 hour ago, Red Five said:

This Pam Bondi testimony is unreal. Here, allow me to give you a taste (paraphrased, slightly). Adam Schiff: "Pam Bondi, did Tom Homan take a $50k bribe?"

Bondi: "You're a sack of shit, Adam Schiff."

Schiff: "Let me try again. Did Tom Homan take a $50k bribe?"

Bondi: "I wish you had cancer."

Schiff: "Well, I guess you're not going to answer the question."

Bondi: "(clutching pearls) OMG stop with the personal attacks!!"

Here's a clip of it:
 

 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Dutchrudder said:

Here's a clip of it:
 

 

What a C-U-N-T she is.

What do fires or protests (I refuse to call them riots) have to do with the Attorney General and the justice department.  Deflect, deflect, deflect, attack, attack, attack.

Posted

Trump is planning to force socialism in American farmers who voted for him:

https://farmpolicynews.illinois.edu/2025/10/farmer-aid-of-as-much-as-15-billion-expected-this-week/

The Trump administration is expected to announce a plan as soon as Tuesday (today) to bail out U.S. farmers stung by trade disputes and big harvests, with the initial outlay potentially totaling up to $15 billion, according to sources familiar with the matter.

  • Drool 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Satchel said:

Trump is planning to force socialism in American farmers who voted for him:

https://farmpolicynews.illinois.edu/2025/10/farmer-aid-of-as-much-as-15-billion-expected-this-week/

The Trump administration is expected to announce a plan as soon as Tuesday (today) to bail out U.S. farmers stung by trade disputes and big harvests, with the initial outlay potentially totaling up to $15 billion, according to sources familiar with the matter.

How does one deliver this aid when the government is shut down?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, David Dennison said:

She's had a bad day.

But it plays well with MAGA, so it doesn't matter.

I think the dotard has his cast of miscreants purposely step up and do some stupid shit on purpose to distract from the last stupid shit done by a cabinet member.  That way the public at large loses track of all the stupid shit.  Remember RFK Jr's testimony a few weeks ago?  Yeah, didn't think so.

Posted
Trump is planning to force socialism in American farmers who voted for him:
https://farmpolicynews.illinois.edu/2025/10/farmer-aid-of-as-much-as-15-billion-expected-this-week/
The Trump administration is expected to announce a plan as soon as Tuesday (today) to bail out U.S. farmers stung by trade disputes and big harvests, with the initial outlay potentially totaling up to $15 billion, according to sources familiar with the matter.

I know the constitution is a thing of the past, but doesn't Congress have to approve sometime that? Oh right, nevermind.
Posted
3 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Violence against clergy is sacrilege.

If you think I should stop slapping around my wife, just DM me. No need to call me out in front of everyone.

Posted
5 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:

Well pretty much violence is sacrilege, right? I mean, according to scripture not urban ii

You could tease that out based on St. Paul calling all bodies temples, I’m just laying out what canon law would describe violence against clergy.

Although the guy is just a Presbyterian so you can also call the photo “heresy.” 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, 956 Worldwide said:

You could tease that out based on St. Paul calling all bodies temples, I’m just laying out what canon law would describe violence against clergy.

Although the guy is just a Presbyterian so you can also call the photo “heresy.” 

ohhh he's protestant?! Then he's the heretic and deserves the violence!

Posted

"In United States constitutional law, plenary power is a power that has been granted to a body or person in absolute terms, with no review of or limitations upon the exercise of that power. The assignment of a plenary power to one body divests all other bodies from the right to exercise that power, where not otherwise entitled. Plenary powers are not subject to judicial review in a particular instance or in general. " --Wikipedia
 

 

 

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, MC Fresh Breath said:

"In United States constitutional law, plenary power is a power that has been granted to a body or person in absolute terms, with no review of or limitations upon the exercise of that power. The assignment of a plenary power to one body divests all other bodies from the right to exercise that power, where not otherwise entitled. Plenary powers are not subject to judicial review in a particular instance or in general. " --Wikipedia
 

 

 

Holy shit. That was fucking weird and he gave the game way. Too bad no one will care. 

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, MC Fresh Breath said:

"In United States constitutional law, plenary power is a power that has been granted to a body or person in absolute terms, with no review of or limitations upon the exercise of that power. The assignment of a plenary power to one body divests all other bodies from the right to exercise that power, where not otherwise entitled. Plenary powers are not subject to judicial review in a particular instance or in general. " --Wikipedia
 

 

 

takeaway one: old spray paint hair is flying awfully close to the sun.  he said next week's lines today oops oh fuck who cares

takeaway two: that cnn host is a bitch for letting him get away with that

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

I’m beginning to think that some of my Christian brothers and sisters have lost the plot

 

But enough about politics.  Do you all appreciate the damage done to our states’ economies by the wild pig populations?   This hurts everyone - homeowners, farmers, ranchers, endangered animal and plant populations threatened by wild pigs.

The elections will take care of themselves guys.    I am embracing my God-given right to enjoy purchasing my second amendment wild pig hunting semiautomatics.   because when the wild pigs come to destroy your prepper garden foods, your woke urban animal control officials won’t be there to help you. And your Nancy boy pepper spray won’t stop that lead boar from destroying every one of your vine-ripe beefsteak tomatoes. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, MC Fresh Breath said:

"In United States constitutional law, plenary power is a power that has been granted to a body or person in absolute terms, with no review of or limitations upon the exercise of that power. The assignment of a plenary power to one body divests all other bodies from the right to exercise that power, where not otherwise entitled. Plenary powers are not subject to judicial review in a particular instance or in general. " --Wikipedia
 

 

 

Dunno why that's any big deal, they've been pretending that Trump has plenary authority over all sorts of shit.

Technically, legally speaking, it is amusing to cite a section of US Code (a statute passed by Congress), when stating POTUS has plenary authority.  If Congress has to grant it, it's not plenary.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

I think the dotard has his cast of miscreants purposely step up and do some stupid shit on purpose to distract from the last stupid shit done by a cabinet member.  That way the public at large loses track of all the stupid shit.  Remember RFK Jr's testimony a few weeks ago?  Yeah, didn't think so.

All explained recently by.....Star Wars

Edited by Surly Bevo
Posted
1 minute ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

they likely didn't understand what he said

or they are paid to let it go. I'll let you decide for yourself why miller can go on cnn and make sweeping claims of power without any pushback.

Posted
5 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Dunno why that's any big deal, they've been pretending that Trump has plenary authority over all sorts of shit.

 

Sure, but saying it out loud on a national news station is a bit different don't you think?  



×
×
  • Create New...