Jump to content

The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

In fairness, one of my old man's high school buddies worked his whole career at Tinker.  We would periodically visit them at their home in Moore.

I enjoyed those visits very, very much, because dad's buddy had a daughter a year older than me who was a ridiculously attractive brunette with very large attention-getting.....things that got Brisket's attention.  Brisket had it bad for her, for many years.

Brisket has since learned that yes, she is an okie through and through, she is a single mom, lives on gov't assistance, and moved back in with her folks.  And, per my dad based on his last visit there, she looked like hell.  50 okie years is like 90 regular years, I think.

She sounds Oklahoma As Fuck.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

Lotta F-150 Raptors about to be hitting the used lots.

I’m shorting truck nut futures like you wouldn’t believe!!!!!!!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
41 minutes ago, LCHorn said:

I’m not a real big fan of “negging” on principle.  I think it’s useful for crowdsourcing but otherwise it’s kind bullying.  

Some people need to be bullied. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Haha 4
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, safe sex said:

See my post above, Bozo. It is willful at this point.

Not only is it willful, but they know deep down that so much of what they voted for is indefensible.  You know it, I know it, they know it.  But they're damn sure never going to admit that.

They are not serious people.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

I don't really consider it bullying, it's just internet points.  Still, I don't do it very often because I feel it's rage and anger getting the better of me.  I'm strivin, lawd.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

She sounds Oklahoma As Fuck.

Yeah...and as a pathetic, fawning adolescent, I couldn't even clear what I presume were her very low standards.

Lord did she have a body.

Way to rub it in.

  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, Brisketexan said:

Yeah...and as a pathetic, fawning adolescent, I couldn't even clear what I presume were her very low standards.

Lord did she have a body.

Way to rub it in.

Only answer is just rub one out.

  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

I’m not sure what this says about me, but I don’t think I’ve ever actually negged anybody except for the cycle. 

I negged you for no reason just now.

 

I blame it on me being Gen X.  Sorry man.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
1 hour ago, safe sex said:

It's so telling every "conservative" refuses to even try defending this shit, because the acting of actually putting those thoughts in writing necessitates that you examine them. And they're not in the habit of examining their thoughts. Sometimes doing that makes you change your mind.

"I'm not really into politics"

I'm  sure plenty of Germsns said the same thing in the early 40s.

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
3 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

Consider Sara a prospective future member of this thread:

 

 

 

My wife is on a Lake Travis Moms group. I have no idea why except for the drip of idiocy dopamine hits, like sick fucks that frequent Tex Ags here. Anyway, lots of posts looking for Anti Vax pediatricians- apparently and the ground zero for patriot DRs is Marble Falls.  Least suprising news ever. At least DKR passed peacefully before the freaks killed him vía a previously cured disease.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
34 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

Consider Sara a prospective future member of this thread:

 

 

 

And hope you will find a doctor who might straighten your stupid ass out.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 hours ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

I think there is a method to the madness: All these laid off federal employees can take the places of all the deported farm workers, roofers, and yard guys. 

well-so-im-done.gif.20a5b9cb93420c39c81cc81fd0b2f03a.gif

  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

I’m not sure what this says about me, but I don’t think I’ve ever actually negged anybody except for the cycle. 

Temu coupons, rep cycle, and unblurred images of a naked Trump. Things which should be negged.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
On 2/23/2025 at 5:24 PM, Gatorubet said:

No offense Ag, but I have never heard your defense of why gerrymandering districts so that politicians can absolutely and in total safety ignore any good ideas of the other side - and also be safe to refuse to seek  bipartisan compromise (to avoid being primaried by MAGA or a pissed off Trump) is  a good thing.

That sounds to me as valid as building our next generation battlefield tank out of grass.  I mean, I’ve never been in the military, and I’m not an engineer, but there is also a basic common sense/human experience thing that whispers in my ear - even on subjects of which I am not well-versed.

If you don’t wanna give it a go in public feel free to private message me. I promise not to share our discussion and to engage in a polite and respectful way.   But I admit to not being able to conjure one good thing that would come of that system of fully gerrymandered districts - at least not without seeing your input.

The offer is genuine.

Nm.   I should’ve read to the bottom of the thread again.  I thank you for saying that you like that idea, but you failed to say how it avoids the problems I specifically mentioned.    

It’s kind of like me asking why you think all muscle cars should have four-cylinder engines, and you reply more cars should be cheaper and painted red.   Well, those two things are absolutely legitimate standalone propositions, they don’t address the obvious problem with putting a four-cylinder engine in a muscle car.

I've never said the bolded.

But, since you talk about gerrymandering...

New York voted 56%-44% for Trump.  They gerrymandered their congressional districts to 73%-27% Democrats...

California voted 59%-38% for Trump.  They gerrymandered their congressional districts to 82%-17% Democrats.

Do you think that any Republican good ideas are being looked at there?  Do you think they're seeking any bipartisan compromise there?

 

I think the state legislative representation should be close to how the state normally votes state-wise.

And if an area in Austin is mostly Democrats, they should have Dems representing them.  And if they're mostly Republicans (haha in Austin), they should have mostly Reps representing them.

Bozo keeps going to the "communities of interest"...

But, politics is one of those interests.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

I completely agree. I just haven’t personally used it very much or if at all, I tend to like this stuff that is good and kind of ignore the rest. And I go out of my way to make fun of the dumb stuff. 
That’s another reason why we should be civil to the decent Republicans, so dumb ones will come in here and we can make fun of them.

You know, Paul was being sarcastic when he said to suffer fools gladly

Edited by Sawbonz
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
On 2/23/2025 at 5:31 PM, CTC2 said:

Well, that’s not the current reality. 

In Texas, people voted for Trump 56%-43%.

The legislature is 59% Republican and 41% Democrat.

 

Contrast to CA:

Trump 59-38, Legisture 82-17...

 

One is actually close like I think it should be.  The other isn't.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Ag with kids said:

I've never said the bolded.

But, since you talk about gerrymandering...

New York voted 56%-44% for Trump.  They gerrymandered their congressional districts to 73%-27% Democrats...

California voted 59%-38% for Trump.  They gerrymandered their congressional districts to 82%-17% Democrats.

Do you think that any Republican good ideas are being looked at there?  Do you think they're seeking any bipartisan compromise there?

I never said you said that, I said you never addressed how to solve that problem.  You seem to ignore the fact that democracy cannot exist as effective  governance without good faith compromise.  Having everyone safely ensconced in deep red and deep blue districts effectively removes any hope of compromise.

That is the concept I addressed, one which you still refuse to address (albeit it I did a poor job at describing that so you know what I was addressing)

But I thank you for your response because you’ve just demonstrated that you have no earthly idea what ‘gerrymandered’ means.  Lots of people voting blue in blue states is not gerrymandering. Lots of people in red states voting red is not gerrymandering.   People voting for the president has nothing to do with gerrymandering.  As the presidential vote is statewide, it only affects the electoral college.    

So perhaps your ideas might be better received if they were bolstered by some basic civics class knowledge. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Ag with kids said:

I've never said the bolded.

But, since you talk about gerrymandering...

New York voted 56%-44% for Trump.  They gerrymandered their congressional districts to 73%-27% Democrats...

California voted 59%-38% for Trump.  They gerrymandered their congressional districts to 82%-17% Democrats.

Do you think that any Republican good ideas are being looked at there?  Do you think they're seeking any bipartisan compromise there?

 

I think the state legislative representation should be close to how the state normally votes state-wise.

And if an area in Austin is mostly Democrats, they should have Dems representing them.  And if they're mostly Republicans (haha in Austin), they should have mostly Reps representing them.

Bozo keeps going to the "communities of interest"...

But, politics is one of those interests.

Everything this guy just said is bullshit:

1) if you curate the components of the district to produce a preordained partisan outcome you are denying the salience of all other interests 

2) local issues do not break on national party lines, because if your hypothesis was correct, the partisan alignment of the delegation wouldn’t need to be engineered in advance. 

AND

3) So you are supportive of NY and California’s partisan gerrymander? I think partisan gerrymandering is evil and subverts democracy. Do you support it or not?

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
Posted
On 2/23/2025 at 7:13 PM, TwiceHorn said:

Well, the only way we have of determining that is Presidential elections, which may or may not be representative of a population's more "daily" voting.

In 2024, Texas went  about 56-42 Trump, so R.

Yet, the Congressional delegation is 65-35 R.

Is that close?  Or is that fucky?

I think that shouldn't be the case in TX.

I also think it shouldn't be the case in NY, CA, and IL.  Hell, CA voted 38% for Trump...and has 17% GOP representation...

 

But, if TX plays nice, then the GOP gets fucked.  Since the Dems aren't going to play nice in those states.

I don't like it.  I think it's wrong.

 

But, I also think the GOP allowing themselves to be fucked is wrong.

3 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Everything this guy just said is bullshit:

1) if you curate the components of the district to produce a preordained partisan outcome you are denying the salience of all other interests 

2) local issues do not break on national party lines, because if your hypothesis was correct, the partisan alignment of the delegation wouldn’t need to be engineered in advance. 

AND

3) So you are supportive of NY and California’s partisan gerrymander? I think partisan gerrymandering is evil and subverts democracy. Do you support it or not?

No.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Ghost of NMAS said:

If the GOP is claiming that Trump won California and New York then this election really was stolen

I don't think that is what Ag is saying, but it certainly wouldn't be anywhere near one of their bigger lies.

 

Edited by The Original Greaser Bob
Posted
25 minutes ago, Ag with kids said:

I think that shouldn't be the case in TX.

I also think it shouldn't be the case in NY, CA, and IL.  Hell, CA voted 38% for Trump...and has 17% GOP representation...

 

But, if TX plays nice, then the GOP gets fucked.  Since the Dems aren't going to play nice in those states.

I don't like it.  I think it's wrong.

 

But, I also think the GOP allowing themselves to be fucked is wrong.

No.

I think we can effectively ignore this guy.  He is team GOP.  Democrats won’t “play nice.” Whatever the fuck that means.    

and he seems not to understand that every congressional district is different with the different issues and different politicians running for office. So if you get a dip, shit, I am not a witch senatorial candidate, she might lose Biggly.     But that will have nothing to do with the merits of the presidential vote, and absolutely nothing to do with the merits of a congressional election on a different part of the state between different politicians.

I think he wants to have representatives appointed to Congress based upon how the state voted in a presidential election.  But it is impossible to know what he wants because it is fair to say he has no idea what he wants, what he means, or how to tie the free floating noodles in his brain into one cohesive theory.

So once again, we have a conservative visitor who mouths incomprehensible word salad - and then blames liberal Cabal for not embracing his thought nuggets.  Bill Buckley is so very very dead.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted

I hate speaking for Ag with Kids but generally speaking most people view the effectiveness of a gerrymander as the delta between who wins House elections as compared to how a state votes on a statewide basis. That’s why he is pointing to the discrepancy between statewide totals and representation in the house.

Clearly individual candidates matter as well.

Interestingly, I learned tonight that California has a somewhat independent commission drawing house districts. New York has something similar.

The comparison to Texas is poor because the Texas Rs have effectively reached the limits of their ability to further gerrymander house seats. After the 2020 census, they had to give numerous safe seats to the Democratic Party to keep the majority of R incumbents safe.

Both California and New York have several competitive seats.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, Ghost of NMAS said:

If the GOP is claiming that Trump won California and New York then this election really was stolen

*stollen

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Posted
No.

There is only one party that has ever seriously championed nonpartisan redistricting policies. Welcome to the Democratic party. Glad to have you aboard.
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Ag with kids said:

In Texas, people voted for Trump 56%-43%.

The legislature is 59% Republican and 41% Democrat.

 

Contrast to CA:

Trump 59-38, Legisture 82-17...

 

One is actually close like I think it should be.  The other isn't.

Actually look at the districts and how they are drawn. Look at voter trends by zip. It’s way more complicated than your simple math. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, hookemATL said:

He votes Republican because he loves the idea of hurting marginalized people, just like every other nazi sympathizing piece of shit that votes for the GOP.
 

THESE ARE NOT SERIOUS OR DECENT HUMANS. THEY LACK EMPATHY ON A PERSONAL AND GLOBAL LEVEL, AND DO NOT BELIEVE ANYONE OTHER THAN THEMSELVES (OR PEOPLE WITH THAT FOLLOW THEIR GOD OR LOOK LIKE THEM) DESERVES HAPPINESS AND FREEDOM. 

He doesn’t provide cogent or thoughtful defenses because there is no defending the vile shit they do top to bottom.  The Republican Party is a blight, and he is just another locust in the swarm  

plus he’s a fucking aggy, which should be the biggest red flag of all. 

i voted republican because kamala hadn't really convinced me.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
8 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

️Massive Oklahoma job loss as 600 federal employees at Tinker Air Force Base will be fired tomorrow
️ Tinker is the largest single site employer in Oklahoma

image.png.f0c2b805cae3eeffc69efb7b070ac91e.png

Approaching Animal Kingdom GIF by Marcel Katz / The Art Plug

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

In fairness, one of my old man's high school buddies worked his whole career at Tinker.  We would periodically visit them at their home in Moore.

I enjoyed those visits very, very much, because dad's buddy had a daughter a year older than me who was a ridiculously attractive brunette with very large attention-getting.....things that got Brisket's attention.  Brisket had it bad for her, for many years.

Brisket has since learned that yes, she is an okie through and through, she is a single mom, lives on gov't assistance, and moved back in with her folks.  And, per my dad based on his last visit there, she looked like hell.  50 okie years is like 90 regular years, I think.

pics from when she was hot?

  • Haha 1
Posted
I hate this because the Leopard ate a kids ears. I need it to eat the mom and dad’s face. 

On the bright side, there’s a good chance that kid is going to grow up to HATE her shitty parents, will cut them out of her life, and will cause them immense sadness and pain, because of what those assholes put her through for no reason.
So, smile!
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1


×
×
  • Create New...