Jump to content

Charlie Kirk assassinated at an event in Utah (by a 22 YO groyper)


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

you can watch the video of his throat opening up. Its obvious.

Why are yall watching that? I didn't even wanna see it once but accidentally stumbled on it. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, coachherman'sgrill said:

Oh, and there’s this. The grift must continue but I’m happy when I see people wear this stuff. I know who to avoid. 

https://saintcharliekirk.com/

I don't mean to be nitpicky or anything, but it wasn't arrows in the chest.  

Also, call the modeling agency and tell them we need an annoying white boy to wear a t-shirt for us.

unisex-classic-tee-black-front-68c3501d6a0eb.thumb.webp.b24725b5459b1ef17044957b66eda17d.webp
 

  • Haha 1
Posted

You shouldn't. If you have ever blood trailed an animal, you know that the exit wound produces all of the blood and the entrance in most cases produces none. It's not rocket science. I see your posts in "shit Ive cooked lately" and think you're an artist. However, you know shit here. If you have only rifle hunted than shut the fuck up.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

You shouldn't. If you have ever blood trailed an animal, you know that the exit wound produces all of the blood and the entrance in most cases produces none. It's not rocket science. I see your posts in "shit Ive cooked lately" and think you're an artist. However, you know shit here. If you have only rifle hunted than shut the fuck up.

You are cracking dude. CK didn't take a bow shot. He took a high powered rifle shot to the fn jugular. The shot was pushed and off target. He was not wearing armor. I am not sure what you are doing here nor why you are doing it. 

Posted (edited)

 But I do appreciate the acknowledgement of the game food prons thread. We can come together on those types of things. 

Edited by Anastasis
Posted
10 minutes ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

You shouldn't. If you have ever blood trailed an animal, you know that the exit wound produces all of the blood and the entrance in most cases produces none. It's not rocket science. I see your posts in "shit Ive cooked lately" and think you're an artist. However, you know shit here. If you have only rifle hunted than shut the fuck up.

who cares how the bullet killed him when nobody disputes it killed him jfc

Posted

Where did this "Charlie was wearing body armor and the bullet ricocheted up into his neck" theory come from, and ultimately why would it matter?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted
34 minutes ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

watch this video. Start at 7 minutes.  You poor people are so susceptible to bullshit. He clearly is shot in the throat. 

 

 

It's just completely fucked that all these people refer to "certain entities" and it's always "they" wanted him dead. Like we don't live in a country where some asshole fires a gun into a crowd every day for no reason at all.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

Okay so after reviewing the text messages vs the discord messages, it's pretty clear to me that the conversation between roommate and shooter were written by someone else. Look at the sentence structure, wording, and punctuation differences. In the FBI obtained messages everything is punctuated and properly capitalized for the most part. Also, there are tons of phrases that young people just do not use. Then you get the discord stuff and it's normal 22 yr old everything. Hardly ever capitalizing at the beginning of sentences unless the phone forces it and no periods. Thats how kids text. All of us that have them know this. That was not written by a kid. 

Yeah, ChatGPT would have done a better job fabricating those texts than whichever boomer Fed Trump flunky did.

These people are in their 20s and obsessed with memes, so much so that the shooter leaves meme messages on the bullet casings.  Yet, in the texts, neither the shooter or his roomie even abbreviate anything, much less talk in online speak.  

Plus, the texts are what the smart detectives in the movies would call an orgy of evidence.  First Robinson admits to committing the shooting.  Strike one.  Then he admits to leaving the gun in the woods.  Strike two.  Then his roomie asks him why.  They literally ask him for his motive.  Seems like you'd already know the opinion of the guy fucking you and living with you on an issue such as this, but c'est la vie I suppose.  He admits to not liking Kirk and Kirk being a hate spewing POS.  Strike three.  Then his roomie, for some fucking reason, asks him how long he's been planning the shooting!  It's like this roommate is a fucking police interrogator!  He admits to planning it for about a week.  Premeditation.  Strike four.

Does none of that sound suspicious to anyone else?  He's talking with his trans lover and this person is just essentially reading off of a "How to Get People to Confess to Everything" manual.  He also specifically refers to his trans roomie as "my love."  First, that's just a weird as fuck Victorian era way of speaking that 22 year old Gen Z fuckheads wouldn't talk like.  Secondly, it specifically paints the roomie as his trans lover which was the angle the Republicans were pushing from the jump.  On top of all that, Robinson goes out of his way to explain the bullet casings, even saying "remember how I was engraving bullets?"  Why would he bring this part up?  Especially if the roommate already knows he had been fucking around with the bullets.  It is terribly convenient for the Republican prosecutors though who now can tie the messages up as shitposting by a leftist who wanted to get a rise out of conservatives.  

Even if you don't think the messages are just out and out fabrications, it's clear they're not ALL of the messages that were sent.  There are no time stamps and the ellipses indicate that they're skipping some of the texts.  So in the best case scenario, they've given us a curated set of texts designed to maximally push their narrative.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 3
Posted
10 minutes ago, SpiralOut said:

Yeah, ChatGPT would have done a better job fabricating those texts than whichever boomer Fed Trump flunky did.

These people are in their 20s and obsessed with memes, so much so that the shooter leaves meme messages on the bullet casings.  Yet, in the texts, neither the shooter or his roomie even abbreviate anything, much less talk in online speak.  

Plus, the texts are what the smart detectives in the movies would call an orgy of evidence.  First Robinson admits to committing the shooting.  Strike one.  Then he admits to leaving the gun in the woods.  Strike two.  Then his roomie asks him why.  They literally ask him for his motive.  Seems like you'd already know the opinion of the guy fucking you and living with you on an issue such as this, but c'est la vie I suppose.  He admits to not liking Kirk and Kirk being a hate spewing POS.  Strike three.  Then his roomie, for some fucking reason, asks him how long he's been planning the shooting!  It's like this roommate is a fucking police interrogator!  He admits to planning it for about a week.  Premeditation.  Strike four.

Does none of that sound suspicious to anyone else?  He's talking with his trans lover and this person is just essentially reading off of a "How to Get People to Confess to Everything" manual.  He also specifically refers to his trans roomie as "my love."  First, that's just a weird as fuck Victorian era way of speaking that 22 year old Gen Z fuckheads wouldn't talk like.  Secondly, it specifically paints the roomie as his trans lover which was the angle the Republicans were pushing from the jump.  On top of all that, Robinson goes out of his way to explain the bullet casings, even saying "remember how I was engraving bullets?"  Why would he bring this part up?  Especially if the roommate already knows he had been fucking around with the bullets.  It is terribly convenient for the Republican prosecutors though who now can tie the messages up as shitposting by a leftist who wanted to get a rise out of conservatives.  

Even if you don't think the messages are just out and out fabrications, it's clear they're not ALL of the messages that were sent.  There are no time stamps and the ellipses indicate that they're skipping some of the texts.  So in the best case scenario, they've given us a curated set of texts designed to maximally push their narrative.

This actually is a pretty damn good argument. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

If it weren’t so sincere and sinister of a motive to hate on LGBTQ folks, I’d crack up at their pearl clutching…guess all that gay, lesbian, ‘trap’ or trans or whatever that seems to be about 1/3rd of every porn site is only viewed by dirty liberals huh?

image.jpeg.8ea764769e5fc689fdf4f131c1a61edc.jpeg

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Homercles said:

If it weren’t so sincere and sinister of a motive to hate on LGBTQ folks, I’d crack up at their pearl clutching…guess all that gay, lesbian, ‘trap’ or trans or whatever that seems to be about 1/3rd of every porn site is only viewed by dirty liberals huh?

image.jpeg.8ea764769e5fc689fdf4f131c1a61edc.jpeg

Fuck yeah Rhode Island

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Homercles said:

If it weren’t so sincere and sinister of a motive to hate on LGBTQ folks, I’d crack up at their pearl clutching…guess all that gay, lesbian, ‘trap’ or trans or whatever that seems to be about 1/3rd of every porn site is only viewed by dirty liberals huh?

image.jpeg.8ea764769e5fc689fdf4f131c1a61edc.jpeg

unimpressed michael keaton GIF

 

Not buying that for a second, no way that Texas isn't "big naturals" and don't ask me why I know that. 

  • Haha 5
Posted
4 minutes ago, Homercles said:

If it weren’t so sincere and sinister of a motive to hate on LGBTQ folks, I’d crack up at their pearl clutching…guess all that gay, lesbian, ‘trap’ or trans or whatever that seems to be about 1/3rd of every porn site is only viewed by dirty liberals huh?

image.jpeg.8ea764769e5fc689fdf4f131c1a61edc.jpeg

Can we annex all the cartoons weirdo states?

Posted
5 hours ago, babysdaddy said:

Don't think so.  Pretty clear, by his own text, he is not further to the right of CK.  

So you're saying that hate is a feature of the right. Glad we agree.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Yeah, ChatGPT would have done a better job fabricating those texts than whichever boomer Fed Trump flunky did.
These people are in their 20s and obsessed with memes, so much so that the shooter leaves meme messages on the bullet casings.  Yet, in the texts, neither the shooter or his roomie even abbreviate anything, much less talk in online speak.  
Plus, the texts are what the smart detectives in the movies would call an orgy of evidence.  First Robinson admits to committing the shooting.  Strike one.  Then he admits to leaving the gun in the woods.  Strike two.  Then his roomie asks him why.  They literally ask him for his motive.  Seems like you'd already know the opinion of the guy fucking you and living with you on an issue such as this, but c'est la vie I suppose.  He admits to not liking Kirk and Kirk being a hate spewing POS.  Strike three.  Then his roomie, for some fucking reason, asks him how long he's been planning the shooting!  It's like this roommate is a fucking police interrogator!  He admits to planning it for about a week.  Premeditation.  Strike four.
Does none of that sound suspicious to anyone else?  He's talking with his trans lover and this person is just essentially reading off of a "How to Get People to Confess to Everything" manual.  He also specifically refers to his trans roomie as "my love."  First, that's just a weird as fuck Victorian era way of speaking that 22 year old Gen Z fuckheads wouldn't talk like.  Secondly, it specifically paints the roomie as his trans lover which was the angle the Republicans were pushing from the jump.  On top of all that, Robinson goes out of his way to explain the bullet casings, even saying "remember how I was engraving bullets?"  Why would he bring this part up?  Especially if the roommate already knows he had been fucking around with the bullets.  It is terribly convenient for the Republican prosecutors though who now can tie the messages up as shitposting by a leftist who wanted to get a rise out of conservatives.  
Even if you don't think the messages are just out and out fabrications, it's clear they're not ALL of the messages that were sent.  There are no time stamps and the ellipses indicate that they're skipping some of the texts.  So in the best case scenario, they've given us a curated set of texts designed to maximally push their narrative.

giphy.gif
  • Like 1
Posted
Have they found the bullet that killed Charlie yet? How do they know it’s the right weapon if there is not even a matching bullet yet?

One thing my wife mentioned a few days ago is how fucking fast everything went. Was there a real autopsy? Did they go in and find the bullet that killed him to match it to the weapon he supposedly used? It takes a couple days normally to prepare a body but wasn’t Kirk’s body in AF2 the day after, maybe two days after.

I didn’t believe the text exchange. It was too perfect. The law dogs have commented that the death penalty really doesn’t apply here — maybe they know that and are putting it out there to get the kid to get scared, crack and really confess not over a dubious text exchange.
Posted
2 hours ago, Thatguy said:

Why are yall watching that? I didn't even wanna see it once but accidentally stumbled on it. 

I saw it once. It was more than I needed to see it. Reveling in violence as a society just begets more of it. We passed that point a good while back though.

Posted
9 minutes ago, C-Man said:


One thing my wife mentioned a few days ago is how fucking fast everything went. Was there a real autopsy? Did they go in and find the bullet that killed him to match it to the weapon he supposedly used? It takes a couple days normally to prepare a body but wasn’t Kirk’s body in AF2 the day after, maybe two days after.

I didn’t believe the text exchange. It was too perfect. The law dogs have commented that the death penalty really doesn’t apply here — maybe they know that and are putting it out there to get the kid to get scared, crack and really confess not over a dubious text exchange.

There's almost no physical evidence being presented in this case.  Just completely weird.  You'd think they'd get the bullet, do GSR on this kid's clothes, test the rifle to see if it had been fired, etc.  These are all standard gumshoe practices when investigating a shooting.  Not as important to the Trump run Feds as making sure everyone knows this kid is a trans loving leftist or whatever.  

Another weird thing to me is how limited the online evidence is against this guy.  So we've supposedly got these texts where he confesses to literally everything like the world's biggest idiot.  The other evidence was him being a gamer and using Discord and the messages they got off of that app.  Messages where absolutely nothing of note about Trump or Kirk or anything political is discussed whatsoever.  Just that this guy pretended not to be the shooter and then later confesses to his Discord pals that he offed Kirk, says he appreciates them, and then says goodbye.  Uh, what the fuck?  You don't have this guy's social media?  He never posted on Reddit even though one of his classmates specifically described him as a "Reddit kid?"  He doesn't have an Instagram, a Snapchat, a Twitter account, nothing?  Nothing about his Internet search history?  Did he wipe his computer before he went to shoot Kirk or something?  Or, is it that it would completely torpedo the narrative of this guy being a sweet, innocent MAGA child that got poisoned by the Left's evil rhetoric into becoming a trans loving killer if you showed what he'd actually been doing online?  I doubt ol' Patel and friends would want to tell all of us that his search history is full up of Nick Fuentes videos and that the most trafficked site he goes to is 4chan.  

Sorry, but this guy can't just be online to play Helldivers.  How in the world did he get radicalized to hate Kirk if he wasn't gorging himself on internet political content?  

 

Posted
34 minutes ago, SpiralOut said:

There's almost no physical evidence being presented in this case.  Just completely weird.  You'd think they'd get the bullet, do GSR on this kid's clothes, test the rifle to see if it had been fired, etc.  These are all standard gumshoe practices when investigating a shooting.  Not as important to the Trump run Feds as making sure everyone knows this kid is a trans loving leftist or whatever.  

Another weird thing to me is how limited the online evidence is against this guy.  So we've supposedly got these texts where he confesses to literally everything like the world's biggest idiot.  The other evidence was him being a gamer and using Discord and the messages they got off of that app.  Messages where absolutely nothing of note about Trump or Kirk or anything political is discussed whatsoever.  Just that this guy pretended not to be the shooter and then later confesses to his Discord pals that he offed Kirk, says he appreciates them, and then says goodbye.  Uh, what the fuck?  You don't have this guy's social media?  He never posted on Reddit even though one of his classmates specifically described him as a "Reddit kid?"  He doesn't have an Instagram, a Snapchat, a Twitter account, nothing?  Nothing about his Internet search history?  Did he wipe his computer before he went to shoot Kirk or something?  Or, is it that it would completely torpedo the narrative of this guy being a sweet, innocent MAGA child that got poisoned by the Left's evil rhetoric into becoming a trans loving killer if you showed what he'd actually been doing online?  I doubt ol' Patel and friends would want to tell all of us that his search history is full up of Nick Fuentes videos and that the most trafficked site he goes to is 4chan.  

Sorry, but this guy can't just be online to play Helldivers.  How in the world did he get radicalized to hate Kirk if he wasn't gorging himself on internet political content?  

 

The weirdest thing about all this is that evidence is being leaked to the public. Surely they have more than we are seeing.

Posted
9 hours ago, StassneyHorn said:

Say bombastic things to become troll

Seems like you should be past step one given how long you’ve been here 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Seems like you should be past step one given how long you’ve been here 

I'm in the "receive notifications from rat pack or retards with underwhelming responses/comebacks" step right now. You're in great company with the Biff Tannens, jimmyjazz and aggie08s of the world. Not yet in the CaptainAnt and Huckleberry stratosphere of confidently incorrect.



×
×
  • Create New...