Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

lol how some of you bootlickers try to spin that should be interesting 

they'll be here once the talking points come out

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
11 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

lol how some of you bootlickers try to spin that should be interesting 

Dear Leader's own words. Plain English. No ambiguity. Zero confusion.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
39 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

The disinformation was life-threatening, in most cases, not some statement of controversial opinion.  And it was done in the public interest, not to salve the ego of the fuckstick president.

And, oooh, the administration expressed frustration.

Did they have the FCC chairman threatening to revoke their license?

Image

  • Fuck You 10
Posted
2 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Image

What about what Kimmel said was false information? What about it would cause substantial public harm or has caused substantial public harm?

Do you see how your argument doesn't hold any water?

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Dear Leader's own words. Plain English. No ambiguity. Zero confusion.

It's like you haven't just spent the last week seeing them spin Charlie Kirk's own words.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Damn.

 

Christian author Frank Turek, who was with Charlie Kirk when he was assassinated, shared a heartbreaking testimony of what happened in those final moments:

"Now, here's what Erika wants me to relate on Sunday. This is going to be the hard part, but maybe also the comforting part. Charlie Kirk was literally like a son to me. I have three sons. He was like my fourth son. My three sons are a little bit older than Charlie; he was like my fourth son. So when he was hit… if your son got hit, what would you do? What would you do? I got in the car… because if there was any way I could save him, I had to do something. I couldn’t just… “Okay, just take him, you guys got it.”

So, they got him into the side of the car. It was an SUV. It was an SUV we took over, and I’m on one side—and there’s actually video of this, somebody was taking video of this—I’m on one side of the car, the right side, and they’re getting Charlie in. So, I run over to the other side, but the guy who was dragging him in is now blocking that entrance. So at that point, I run around to the back. I pop the top—the back gate open—and I jump in the back. The car lurches forward. Apparently, somebody jumped in the car, so the car lurches forward. So I almost fall out of the car or the SUV. Then I grab the thing and close it. And there’s five of us in the car now. Justin is driving, Dan is up front with the GPS, Rick has got him… Rick is on my left and Brian is there, and I’m coming over the back seat. And Charlie’s laid out in front… just right in front of me. And Charlie is so tall we can’t… we can’t close the door.

We drove four miles… I don’t know, four-something miles… all the way to the hospital with the door open. To this day, I don’t know how Brian stayed in the car. Because we’re just… “Go, go, go, go, go!” We’re… you know, we’re trying to stop the bleeding. You saw it. And I’m yelling, “Come on, Charlie, come on, come on!” Meanwhile, my phone is still on. My son and daughter-in-law are hearing this whole thing. And his security team, again: Justin, Dan, Brian, and Rick. They loved Charlie. But they were much cooler than I— I mean, they’re just carrying out—they’re calmly, but they’re swiftly doing exactly what they were trained to do. Rick starts praying out loud. I’m praying out loud. We’re yelling, “Come on! Let’s go, let’s go, let’s go!” My son’s hearing all this. And we’re doing the best we can to navigate traffic. This is not a highway—we’re on surface streets.

And suddenly, there’s an ambulance coming toward us. And there was a conversation in the car—should we stop? We’re like, “No, no, just keep going, just keep going.” The doctor later said that was the right thing to do. Ambulance goes by us. We’re still heading to the hospital, trying to get there. At one point, somebody says, “Let’s get there in one piece!” because we’re just—we’re cutting through intersections, you know, we’re just beeping the horn. This is not an emergency vehicle. There’s no… there’s no lights, there’s none of this. And I go, “We’ve got to start CPR.” So I try and start that.

Now… Charlie wasn’t there. His eyes were fixed. He wasn’t looking at me. He was looking past me, right into eternity. He was with Jesus already. He was killed instantly and felt absolutely no pain—that’s what I was told later. But of course, we had to try. And by the way, there was just nothing… nothing any of us could do about it. We were giving him CPR, but nothing was happening. It wasn’t like if we had better first aid or we had better medical facilities or we were faster to the hospital, we could have saved him. We couldn’t. So if that’s any comfort at all, Charlie didn’t suffer. He was gone. He was with Jesus. “Absent from the body, present with the Lord.” That’s where he was.

Now it is true, when we got to the hospital, and they started working on him right away, they did get a pulse back. And so, Rick and I were just—everyone’s praying—we’re just praying for a miracle. We had a small sliver of hope. And the doctor later said that we got a pulse because Charlie was a very healthy man. But the shot was catastrophic. So 20 or 30 minutes later, the surgeon came out and said he was dead."

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

delete / an hour late

1 hour ago, Chad Fuck said:

Will someone rid me of this meddlesome priest?

Beat me to it. 

Edited by Vegas64
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Image

You are the dumbest motherfucker on this board.   You should go to Texags, where you'll be above average.

Edited by Beau Vine
  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Rip76 said:

And by the way, there was just nothing… nothing any of us could do about it. We were giving him CPR, but nothing was happening.

Did they even try thoughts and prayers?

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, ultimaton said:

Did they even try thoughts and prayers?

They did.  It’s in the article.

4 minutes ago, Foosters said:

YOU'RE FIRED

Or shot in the throat.

Posted
Just now, Rip76 said:

Maybe I quoted the wrong thing?

One gets fired for saying what they feel and one got shot for it.

I don't understand the point you're trying to make.

Is it that because he was shot in the neck, any punishment short of that is fair game for those who criticize him?

We can't criticize the gov't punishing speech because he was shot in the neck?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

image.png.e1059e9a5b76bef26271fecfe69d2777.png

 

Yes, Kimmel is a part of this story, because of the government steamrolling any criticism of how it responded to his death. This comparison is valid because of two homeless encampments being strafed with gunfire in Minneapolis, after Kilmeade’s comments. It is a comment on news, people, and the double standard our government is observing, as well as the consequences,

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
4 hours ago, ChickenSandwich said:

Image

Hoax does not have the meaning that Trump ascribes to it.

And substantial public harm doesn't mean hurt feelers on the part of a bunch of snowflake MAGAts.  It's defined right there, and Kimmel didn't do it.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

Aaaand here goes the state sanctioned demonization of trans people

 

[Quoted from reporting]

The Trump administration is preparing to designate transgender people as “violent extremists” in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s murder, two national security officials tell me.

“We're looking at the entire spider web for any of these attacks,” FBI director Kash Patel told the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, when asked about shootings by trans individuals.

“They,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said after the Kirk murder, are “putting this crazy ideology in our schools,” echoing the growing view of many in Trump’s inner circle that a “cult of gender ideology” is behind an explosion of violence by some as yet unidentified “radical left.”

Two days before Kirk was killed, Donald Trump condemned “transgender insanity.” Then in an interview about the shooting, he blamed “the radicals on the left,” saying: “they want transgender for everyone.”

“They are cynically targeting trans people because the shooter’s lover was trans,” one senior intelligence official tells me. “The administration has convinced itself that the Charlie Kirk murder exposes some dark conspiracy.”

The senior official explains that there is no process per se for dealing with trans people as a “threat group,” but feels that trans individuals will be increasingly targeted under the banner of “violent extremism.”

[End quoted block]

 

Damn those TRN head stamps, spreading their radical pronouns! It's wild how the Administration is just moving ahead with their script even if the facts don't line up 

  • Rage+1 5
Posted
Just now, Chrispyed said:

Why the fuck are they focusing on that stupid shit. Goddamnit 

They're literally just following through on Project 2025. The FCC chair is even shitposting about it. Demonizing and persecuting trans people has been a tentpole of the Administration for a long while.

 

When a fascist tells you what they plan to do if they get power, BELIEVE THEM

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Aaaand here goes the state sanctioned demonization of trans people

 

[Quoted from reporting]

The Trump administration is preparing to designate transgender people as “violent extremists” in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s murder, two national security officials tell me.

“We're looking at the entire spider web for any of these attacks,” FBI director Kash Patel told the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, when asked about shootings by trans individuals.

“They,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said after the Kirk murder, are “putting this crazy ideology in our schools,” echoing the growing view of many in Trump’s inner circle that a “cult of gender ideology” is behind an explosion of violence by some as yet unidentified “radical left.”

Two days before Kirk was killed, Donald Trump condemned “transgender insanity.” Then in an interview about the shooting, he blamed “the radicals on the left,” saying: “they want transgender for everyone.”

“They are cynically targeting trans people because the shooter’s lover was trans,” one senior intelligence official tells me. “The administration has convinced itself that the Charlie Kirk murder exposes some dark conspiracy.”

The senior official explains that there is no process per se for dealing with trans people as a “threat group,” but feels that trans individuals will be increasingly targeted under the banner of “violent extremism.”

[End quoted block]

 

Damn those TRN head stamps, spreading their radical pronouns! It's wild how the Administration is just moving ahead with their script even if the facts don't line up 

What the fuck! Obsequious, butt spreading maggat felchers eating shit, laughing at their own abasement.

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Longhornstampede said:

Ha! Seems like Kimmel was vocalizing all the mental gymnastics being practiced by every single poster on this thread. He took the bullet for all of y'all.

Are you happy that the government is publicly threatening broadcasters with their licenses for things like this?

Is that your America?

Is declaring a tiny minority of the US population to be a terrorist organization subject to investigation and persecution something you endorse?  Because the paramour of the shooter apparently was trans?

Is this your America?

  • Like 2
Posted
34 minutes ago, Longhornstampede said:

Ha! Seems like Kimmel was vocalizing all the mental gymnastics being practiced by every single poster on this thread. He took the bullet for all of y'all.

No that was Charlie 

  • Haha 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Are you happy that the government is publicly threatening broadcasters with their licenses for things like this?

Is that your America?

Is declaring a tiny minority of the US population to be a terrorist organization subject to investigation and persecution something you endorse?  Because the paramour of the shooter apparently was trans?

Is this your America?

Yes, they are happy with this. Why is this even a question?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...