Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, NashLonghorn said:

 Vandy is coming to Austin and I live in Nashville. I’m fucking concerned about this game.  Look at last year in Nashville, with a better Texas team.  

lsu is a better team than this texas team, and vandy throttled them today. you’re right to be fucking concerned dude.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Goredho said:

Dude, Arch and the OL were neck and neck in a homeless vagrant dick sucking contest tonight but the OL managed to get a couple more money shots to their faces to pull out the victory.

#winning

You have a way with words. Hopefully the board will see the next generation of sports board chat.

So if the game tonight was Surly pron, the goal line stand would be the grand facial. The holding penalty would be discovering the condom had a big hole in it, and the winning FG would be your date's pimp arriving to take her away so you could get back to more Surly pursuits - i.e., solving the lack of talent in ranks of 300 lb blockers and 100 lb . hookers.

Posted (edited)

I was hoping that Kentucky would go for the touchdown on forth down instead of taking the 3 points, it gave us a chance, he should have known by that point there was no way for us to move the ball, they likely would have won if they just took it to another OT, the look on Stoops face after they got stuffed was great, he knew he blew it

Edited by Farmer Vincent
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Irish Wrist Watch said:

You have a way with words. Hopefully the board will see the next generation of sports board chat.

So if the game tonight was Surly pron, the goal line stand would be the grand facial. The holding penalty would be discovering the condom had a big hole in it, and the winning FG would be your date's pimp arriving to take her away so you could get back to more Surly pursuits - i.e., solving the lack of talent in ranks of 300 lb blockers and 100 lb . hookers.

In this case 300 lb hookers

Posted
7 hours ago, Drew said:

You clearly didnt watch the game. So sit this one out. 

Bub, arch was running for his life just about every time he got the ball. I think it's be jittery and rushing my mechanics/throws too if I was getting absolutely pummeled every time I had the ball for more than .05 seconds. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Did sark have a fuckin brain aneurism this offseason? We rarely scheme anything open, we rarely work any kind of quick passing game, Tre Wisner is somehow our best weapon, and we can’t pass protect long enough to take a deep shot which is the one thing we were all banking on this year. Sark looks like a defeated man on the sideline. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

The frustrating thing is the compounding effect from missing easy dink and dunk throws. 

1 incomplete isnt just a loss of down and small chunk of yard, its a loss of half the playbook, its ratchets up difficulty of moving the chain, loses momentum, time of possession, wear on opposing defense, everything. 

if we completed just half of the 3 yard misses, the complexion of the game would be totally different. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said:

Did sark have a fuckin brain aneurism this offseason? We rarely scheme anything open, we rarely work any kind of quick passing game, Tre Wisner is somehow our best weapon, and we can’t pass protect long enough to take a deep shot which is the one thing we were all banking on this year. Sark looks like a defeated man on the sideline. 

I seriously don't know if some of y'all need bigger TVs or your eyes checked or just don't know anything about football. Receivers were open all day. 

I believe the offensive struggles are 100% on the OL and QB. Those 6 players have been barely passable and that's why this team has 2 losses. We saw a major regression from last week on the OL front and I think that had a pretty big impact on Arch, but I don't think there's a ton of QBs in the country that would have done much better against unblocked defenders and a constantly imploding pocket and the need to run around like crazy instead of going through any kind of reads in the pocket. 

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
1 minute ago, immamac said:

I seriously don't know if some of y'all need bigger TVs or your eyes checked or just don't know anything about football. Receivers were open all day. 

I believe the offensive struggles are 100% on the OL and QB. Those 6 players have been barely passable and that's why this team has 2 losses. We saw a major regression from last week on the OL front and I think that had a pretty big impact on Arch, but I don't think there's a ton of QBs in the country that would have done much better against unblocked defenders and a constantly imploding pocket and the need to run around like crazy instead of going through any kind of reads in the pocket. 

Running open but Manning is sick of getting his ass rocked every fucking time. I can understand being strong in the pocket but sometimes we have to be able to dial something up and get it out quick. 
it’s all kinds of discombobulation on that side of the ball. If we have to go and score 20 next week against Miss st I doubt we can do it. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Texasborn91 said:

Running open but Manning is sick of getting his ass rocked every fucking time. I can understand being strong in the pocket but sometimes we have to be able to dial something up and get it out quick. 
it’s all kinds of discombobulation on that side of the ball. If we have to go and score 20 next week against Miss st I doubt we can do it. 

I don't think Arch is capable of routinely getting it out quick.  

So it's a real toxic mix.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

After watching the game  and others multiple times:

Arch is a terrible miss on QB. Almost 3 years here and this is what we have? Yes, start anyone else. Put Arch at RB.

OL too many projects after the first Sark year. Knowing this why didn't we portal a few? We did it for IDL.

RB - Wisner is great but is an outside scatback. Hoping Cooper can legit run up the middle and stay healthy. 

WR - a$m got two very talented fast WR's. We got injured Mosley. Hard to say is it Arch or them? They can't separate so that's on them some. When they do Arch sits on the ball and gets sacked.

Milwee - no clue what he does. We need a real OC or Sark is fired soon.  

 

Posted
9 hours ago, JBJ said:

This.
image.png.a23d909821396d15a8e60ac9a1e7b315.png

 

Niblett and Boumeister are the MVPs.

Stoops is an absolute moron. They completely dominated us in every aspect of the game, are at home, and he doesn’t kick the FG in OT

Posted
1 minute ago, Sawbonz said:

Stoops is an absolute moron. They completely dominated us in every aspect of the game, are at home, and he doesn’t kick the FG in OT

The announcers did a fine job of rationalizing that, but it was stupid.  Yes, a TD in OT practically guaranteed a win for UK, but they should have held out for a higher percentage play in a subsequent OT.

Posted
8 hours ago, Sgt Hulk said:

Jfc we just struggled to score 16 points against fucking Kentucky of all teams and we got people saying we will score more on fucking Georgia. This board is fucked dumber than sark 

You have nearly 25k posts and you just now figured that out?

Posted
9 hours ago, A-Tex Devil said:

I said it upthread but Sark is scheming open receivers like every other good OC.  Guys are open.  Arch doesn’t see them then has no time to move to the next read.  But he shouldn’t have to.  Receivers are open over and over in immediate windows Arch keeps missing it.  

Sark didn’t just now forget how to call offense.  He could be doing better and doesn’t get a pass. But this is too fast for Arch.  

Sark should ask the head coach to bench arch and see if one of the backups can execute the plays he calls 

  • Haha 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Farmer Vincent said:

I was hoping that Kentucky would go for the touchdown on forth down instead of taking the 3 points, it gave us a chance, he should have known by that point there was no way for us to move the ball, they likely would have won if they just took it to another OT, the look on Stoops face after they got stuffed was great, he knew he blew it

Shall we review the fourth down decisions of Coach Stoops and their impact on the game?

First possession, didn't kick field goal. May have provided victory margin.

OT, didn't kick field goal even though his defense was killing us. Allows shitty Texas offense to win game even though they lost yards in their possession. 

You never know how valuable a point or three will be later in the game.

Also, I don't blame this would-be loss on Arch.

Posted
39 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

The announcers did a fine job of rationalizing that, but it was stupid.  Yes, a TD in OT practically guaranteed a win for UK, but they should have held out for a higher percentage play in a subsequent OT.

This isn’t a random 4th down from your own 40, where going for it is like counting cards at the blackjack table. You have one shot here. You’re playing a top 5 run defense that just stoned you they play before and an inept offense who hasn’t done anything vs your defense all night. 2nd or 3rd OT maybe do that. On the road probably. Not there

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
8 hours ago, NashLonghorn said:

I sat on the 40 yard line about 20 rows up in the Cotton Bowl to see that debacle. It still haunts me to this day.  I believe Miami set a record for penalties if I’m not mistaken.

Their team was loaded with talented players but so many thugs their program got completely out of control.  Same happened to Oklahoma and Baylor.

Posted

Any ideas on what happened to the running game this week? Wisner has his best game of the season and then we give him 14 total touches? Clark has 3 decent carries and then goes on a milk carton for the rest of the game.  If you have a good defense, a plus special teams unit, and a struggling QB, leaning on a running came is a viable plan (that worked very well the previous week) and yet it just got totally ignored all night. Was the defense just showing a heavy box every play that dictated the calls?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Duane Moore said:

Any ideas on what happened to the running game this week? Wisner has his best game of the season and then we give him 14 total touches? Clark has 3 decent carries and then goes on a milk carton for the rest of the game.  If you have a good defense, a plus special teams unit, and a struggling QB, leaning on a running came is a viable plan (that worked very well the previous week) and yet it just got totally ignored all night. Was the defense just showing a heavy box every play that dictated the calls?

We didn't even run outside zone, the thing that we demonstrated we could actually run last week.

Posted
Just now, Dahobbs said:

We didn't even run outside zone, the thing that we demonstrated we could actually run last week.

I think we finally dusted it off early in the 2nd half but the RBs only had 6 carries kn the 1st half. Really strange game plan 

Posted
59 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

The announcers did a fine job of rationalizing that, but it was stupid.  Yes, a TD in OT practically guaranteed a win for UK, but they should have held out for a higher percentage play in a subsequent OT.

 

Posted (edited)

It really seemed as if, after finding a formula for winning football last week (outside zone running, quick passes, moving the chains on long drives), Sark went right back to the “big game hunter” mentality of slow developing deep shots from the very first drive. 
 

Would really like to see the average distance to target stat for this week. 

Edited by Duane Moore
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Pancho unpinned this topic
Posted
9 hours ago, Murfdogg21 said:

No shit. On any given play, it seems 2-3 OL don’t block. We never blow people off the ball on run plays. Arch expects to get hit every time he drops back. 

This is what gets me, in the second half last week we were absolutely blowing OU off the LOS. We all figured getting Stroh out of the lineup had unlocked the o-line cheat code and we would be at least half ass average going forward.  What the fuck happened since then?

Posted
6 hours ago, mr. littlejeans said:

lsu is a better team than this texas team, and vandy throttled them today. you’re right to be fucking concerned dude.

You think LSU has a better defense?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Lou_Sassle said:

Bub, arch was running for his life just about every time he got the ball. I think it's be jittery and rushing my mechanics/throws too if I was getting absolutely pummeled every time I had the ball for more than .05 seconds. 

It wasn’t nearly as bad as you’re making it. The OL wasn’t good but it wasn’t as bad as Florida.  And he missed wide open guys when he had time and could set his feet. More than “2-3 times” as you claim. 
 

he wasn’t good. It’s okay to say. 

Edited by Drew
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

This is what gets me, in the second half last week we were absolutely blowing OU off the LOS. We all figured getting Stroh out of the lineup had unlocked the o-line cheat code and we would be at least half ass average going forward.  What the fuck happened since then?

No we weren't. Tre was doing a good job navigating outside zone against OU's slants. But he was having to dodge guys in the backfield to make it work. I worried that it wasn't repeatable. But we don't really know because we didn't even try running outside zone yesterday. 

1 minute ago, Drew said:

It wasn’t nearly as bad as you’re making it. The OL wasn’t good but it wasn’t as bad as Florida.  And he missed wide open guys when he had time and could set his feet. More than “2-3 times” wagon claim. 
 

he was fucking terrible. It’s okay to say. 

Fify. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Had no issues with Stoops gambling on 4th downs just question the play calls. His more erroneous and moronic calls was the FGA at the end of 1H, maybe try and get a closer shot for your kicker and on 3rd fucking down, too. Not sure there’s another FB program better at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory than UK. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...