Jump to content

Aggy doesn't lie, cheat, or steal


Beau Vine

Recommended Posts

Except when they do...

Quote

An already unusual fall semester was wrapping up when Texas A&M University officials sent out an email in early December to the hundreds of students in an online finance class that set off a panic.

Faculty reported concerns of cheating “on a very large scale” to the Aggie Honor System Office, after they noticed some students in the class answered online test questions too quickly. Later, faculty discovered entire exams posted on a “homework help” website that has become synonymous with cheating.

University officials told guilty students to self-report by 5 p.m. on Dec. 8. If they didn’t come forward but were found in violation of the academic honor code, they could face suspension or expulsion.

“If you engaged in this behavior, I would like to encourage you in the strongest way to reclaim your personal integrity,” said Timothy Powers, director of the Aggie Honor System Office, in the email to students.

University officials at Texas A&M and experts elsewhere said academic misconduct cases have increased during the pandemic as remote courses and online assignments create more opportunities for students to push the limits.

At Texas A&M, academic dishonesty reports have increased by as much as 20% from last fall, Powers said. The University of North Texas saw a 20% increase, and Texas State University saw reports of cheating increase by one-third over the previous fall. The University of Houston saw reports more than double from last fall to 456 cases as of Dec. 14.

“Instead of taking an assessment in class where the teacher is watching you, you are at your computer not being watched,” said Rachel Davenport, a lecturer at Texas State and vice chair of the Honor Code Council, which reviews academic misconduct cases. “The opportunity has just increased dramatically to use online sources.”

Need to keep tabs on the latest coronavirus news in Texas? Our evening roundup has you covered.
Coronavirus in Texas newsletter
Need to keep tabs on the latest coronavirus news in Texas? Our evening roundup has you covered.

Your email address

I agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.
Browse all newsletters at texastribune.org/subscribe.

In the case at Texas A&M, students interviewed by The Texas Tribune said they used a website called Chegg to access answers on assignments. The website started years ago for textbook rentals and has since expanded to include online tutoring. For a monthly fee, students can submit questions that someone around the world will answer within a few hours. While critics said the site can be helpful for students seeking tutoring, they argue many students are misusing it to pass off another person’s work as their own.

According to Powers’ email, Texas A&M’s online learning platform, Canvas, tracks how long test questions are displayed on a student’s screen. He said there are “hundreds of examples” where students answered a question faster than it would take to read it.

Powers said in the email ”many, many” students in the finance class had already admitted to either posting questions online so someone else could answer them or searching for already answered questions to complete assignments and tests.

Complaints about the tutoring website from university administrators are widespread. This spring, Georgia Tech University took action against students in a physics class suspected of using Chegg to cheat. Boston University also investigated students in some science classes for inappropriately using Chegg.

In a statement, a Chegg spokesperson said they support academic integrity.

“At Chegg, we believe that expertise and experience is important to actually retain knowledge and apply it in whatever field students seek upon graduation, so we ask students to stick to our Honor Code,” said spokesperson Devonya Batiste.

According to its honor code, Chegg prohibits cheating and will share user information and activity with universities if they suspect foul play.

Batiste would not say whether Texas A&M requested student activity regarding the finance class. Texas A&M would not discuss details of the investigation, including how many students self-reported the cheating. Neither of the two doctorate students who taught the class responded to a request for comment.

Earlier this fall, the International Center for Academic Integrity, an organization that provides resources and trainings to combat cheating in higher education, released a statement condemning the use of third parties to complete assignments, known as contract cheating, which they said appears to be growing during the pandemic.

“Far from being a benign problem, contract cheating has implications for credibility of academic degrees, institutional accreditation and for society as a whole, as the students who engage in contract cheating graduate, enter the workforce, and move into leadership positions,” the statement said.

‘I should’ve canceled my account’
Texas A&M’s honor code reads: “An Aggie does not lie, cheat or steal or tolerate those who do.” The refrain is ingrained in students starting at freshman orientation.

Some students who self-reported cheating to the university said the stress of the ongoing pandemic and the shift to more virtual classes made it more difficult to find study partners or connect with professors in person for help. Those factors contributed to their decision to create an account on Chegg.

“The culmination of the pandemic and its effect on learning, the assignments being open-note and the ease of access to Chegg made the decision to use outside help a lot easier for most students,” a junior in the class told the Tribune via email. The student self-reported and asked not to be named because of fear of hurting his future job prospects.

The junior said he started using Chegg to help him with homework because he was struggling with the course material and the online format. Then, he saw exact questions from Chegg appear on a quiz.

“The moment I realized actual exam questions were on Chegg, I should've canceled my account,” he said.

While students were allowed to use their notes and textbook during quizzes and tests throughout the semester, it’s against policy to access and review test questions before an assessment.

In a letter submitted to the university as part of its investigation, a different unnamed student said professors should have provided more explicit communication about what is acceptable given that many of them were taking a variety of online, hybrid and in-person courses.

REFERENCE
 A student letter in response to the Texas A&M cheating allegations.
(105.8 KB) DOWNLOAD
“Using the internet in an attempt to help a student figure out how to solve certain problems, not specifically to give them the answer, was a gray area throughout the course,” the student wrote. “When the professor did not ever talk about this gray area and did not monitor the suspicious activity from the beginning, this shaped the general understanding that students held as the course progressed.”

Academic integrity experts said providing proactive reminders about what is acceptable helps deter students from cheating. But, they said, common sense should dictate to students when their behavior is considered cheating.

“There’s a difference between students using online tools to prepare themselves and learn about things,” Powers said. “It’s completely different for a student to walk into an exam and have seen the identical questions with the identical multiple choice answers before. That should be different and... they should realize this is inappropriate.”

Group messaging
Even before the pandemic, online resources such as GroupMe, a group messaging app, were creating more opportunities for students to cheat. Last year, 70 students at the University of Texas at Austin were disciplined because students shared information about an upcoming test after the professor had prohibited the use of the messaging app.

This fall, some professors at Texas Tech University in Lubbock also saw evidence of cheating through GroupMe, according to emails obtained by the Tribune. In November, the provost’s office recommended making final exams available 24 hours before they were due. But this past weekend, multiple professors shared with administrators that they disagreed with that recommendation, arguing it allows students to collaborate or use online help.

“Newsflash: Students ignore the ‘Strive for Honor” sermon,’” wrote journalism professor Lyombe Eko in an email to administrators and faculty, referring to Tech’s honor code.

Eko said he saw instances of cheating in his Media Law class. At least 25 students answered a question with an obscure incorrect answer not included in his lecture or the textbook.

“Minutes after a test or exam begins, some students post it and discuss it with their peers on GroupMe,” Eko wrote. “Some students wait for the answers there before they start to take the exam.”

Eko said a student alerted him of the GroupMe account. In the spring, he plans to explicitly tell students that sharing information on GroupMe counts as academic dishonesty.

Texas Tech administrators also suggested that faculty use an online proctoring tool called Proctorio, which prompts students to turn on their microphone and camera so professors can monitor them during an exam. But multiple professors said they felt Proctorio was an invasion of privacy. Students across the country have voiced similar concerns.

Davenport said there are other ways professors can mitigate cheating. She advises professors to search for their questions online to see if they’ve been posted, to create a large bank of questions so students aren’t all taking identical tests and to provide flexibility with deadlines so students don’t feel pressured to cheat.

She said many students are more digitally savvy than their professors, especially those who never taught an online course before the pandemic. When courses shifted online rapidly in the spring, preventing cheating wasn’t a top priority.

“Many of them are learning, ‘what even is Chegg?’” she said. “They’re trying to catch up with so many other things that that kind of took a back seat.”

Chegg isn’t the only problem site out there. As soon as some professors get a handle on one website, a similar one pops up. Davenport said there’s even websites where students can pay someone to take their entire online class for them.

Two Aggie students who spoke to the Tribune and self-reported their misconduct received failing grades for the class and have been placed on academic probation until they complete an academic integrity program. They are also barred from graduating with honors.

Texas A&M administrators said that as of Dec. 14, no students had been suspended or expelled, but it could take as long as a month to navigate that process, not including winter break. Students can also appeal if they believe the punishment was too harsh.

One Aggie senior who said he self-reported and received an F in the class said he’s relieved he wasn’t expelled. He also asked not to be named for fear of repercussions for speaking out against the university. He thinks the university should reflect on the way the course is offered for future semesters.

“I'm not going to agree with what we did, but at the same time the way they handled it wasn’t entirely fair,” he said, arguing the professors should have caught this earlier if it was such a widespread issue. “I think they should really question the professors because of the fact that so many people did this in such a large class. There’s something questionable there.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

create new questions for every test

teaching high school math a decade ago, my mom had to have multiple forms per class because the cheating was that rampant.  if a test was given in 1st period the answers were up on a board by 2nd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Any college kid knows that these websites can get you through school. Schools need to either up their game by forcing professors to create new questions for every test, or utilize more online proctor services. Both are not fool proof but it raises the difficulty level of cheating.

Truth.  McGraw-Hill rolled out an online proctoring service this fall that I think worked pretty well.  Last summer, before they had it, I had a girl who had made C's on the first two tests make a 94 on a much harder test and she completed it in something like 24 minutes when 2 hours was allocated and I had other students complaining about not having enough time.  I made them take the final on Zoom.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Used Chegg in grad school a bit, but I would say 90% of the time it was worthless. The material and classes are too focused/refined and you'd spend more time cutting through all the noise and junk/wrong answers on Chegg than if you'd just open the book and learn the material except for the most basic and general of topics. Which leads me to my next point:

I can see how undergrad it would be valuable; lots of "general" material and standardized ways of disseminating it to large groups of people mean that they probably don't have the time or energy to change tests so much and that the same generic questions for ECON301 at UT show up every semester.

And I know we are making fun of Aggy here because of their code and this article, but we are naive to believe this isn't also happening at UT at the same scale.

Edited by DonkeyCigars
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was in UT engineering school back in the day, all of the frat boys had files of all previous tests for all of the classes. However the UT engineering professors would not only change up the questions, they would ask questions that could only be answered if you truly had read and understood the material.

I used to chuckle watching people try to game the system and go down in flames, eventually transferring out within a year or two. The real story here is lazy professors.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's rampant and the technology seems to stay one step ahead of the school's/professor's ability (or desire) to stop it.

I was at lunch with a client who took a call from his kid who was driving to visit a buddy in Austin and was going to take an online exam for the buddy in exchange for a free weekend of food and booze.  

On the flip side, I heard that some of the new proctoring software may have technology built in to monitor eye / facial movement  and send alerts to the professor if it appears the test taker is "looking away" too much - indicating that they had cheating resources at hand.

Wandering eyes in class, Cliffs Notes, papers for BJ's, Chegg or whatever its called......the road goes on forever and the party never ends.

Every school, every generation.......

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, South Austin said:

They didn’t cheat. They just ran out of integrity.

I don't know how to do memes, but could it be "inteGRITTY" ? And then have the Flyers mascot who Aggies hate because he beat Trump and he's almost kinda Burnt Orange?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Reagan1k said:

It's rampant and the technology seems to stay one step ahead of the school's/professor's ability (or desire) to stop it.

I was at lunch with a client who took a call from his kid who was driving to visit a buddy in Austin and was going to take an online exam for the buddy in exchange for a free weekend of food and booze.  

On the flip side, I heard that some of the new proctoring software may have technology built in to monitor eye / facial movement  and send alerts to the professor if it appears the test taker is "looking away" too much - indicating that they had cheating resources at hand.

Wandering eyes in class, Cliffs Notes, papers for BJ's, Chegg or whatever its called......the road goes on forever and the party never ends.

Every school, every generation.......

 

For my recent grad program, we frequently had live proctors in India watching you during the test over your laptop webcam. And they wanted to see your test taking room prior to starting. If you looked around too much, they told you to stop it. I could envision a few ways to trick them but it wouldn't necessarily be easy.  For other tests, you were just recorded.  And with all of these tests, your laptop is locked down from opening up other programs. 

However, I'm sure there is a battle between proctor software and anti-proctor software.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dad taught at a junior college back in the 80s.  He had five versions of every test for every class.  A couple of my friends who had classes with him were very unhappy with that.  And the fact that I couldn't give them any or all of the versions.  My dad generated them the day of the test.  Computers were new, but he sure knew how to use them.

Edited by Scheiss Meister
Fat fingers for phone.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Scheiss Meister said:

My dad taught at a junior college back in the 80s.  He had five versions of every test for every class.  A couple of my friends who had classes with him were very unhappy with that.  And the fact that I couldn't give them any or all of the versions.  My dad generated them the day of the test.  Computers were new, but he sure knew how to use them.

UT Physics and Chemistry lower-division classes were notorious for having test databases that generated a different test for nearly every student.  Printed on greenbar paper and answered on a scantron.  Your question 3 was completely different from the people sitting next to you.

And those multiple choice questions were fiendishly difficult with almost right answers.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

UT Physics and Chemistry lower-division classes were notorious for having test databases that generated a different test for nearly every student.  Printed on greenbar paper and answered on a scantron.  Your question 3 was completely different from the people sitting next to you.

And those multiple choice questions were fiendishly difficult with almost right answers.

 

The almost right answers I figured out eventually.  Everything had like six decimal places.

a) 5.323049

b) 5.284034

c) 5.230849

d) 5.824390

e) 5.283904

It became apparent to me that the wrong answers were all randomly generated numbers.  Because they were random, there was zero chance you would actually get that answer using the numbers from the problem.  So if I didn't know how to do the question, I'd just sit there and bang away.  Multiply by this, square that, cosine these two, divide by pi.  Every now and again one of those numbers would pop up on my calculator. 

 

Maybe two or three every test I was able to just brute force that way.

  • Hook 'Em 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BehoId, The Underminer! said:

 

The almost right answers I figured out eventually.  Everything had like six decimal places.

a) 5.323049

b) 5.284034

c) 5.230849

d) 5.824390

e) 5.283904

It became apparent to me that the wrong answers were all randomly generated numbers.  Because they were random, there was zero chance you would actually get that answer using the numbers from the problem.  So if I didn't know how to do the question, I'd just sit there and bang away.  Multiply by this, square that, cosine these two, divide by pi.  Every now and again one of those numbers would pop up on my calculator. 

 

Maybe two or three every test I was able to just brute force that way.

And you're exactly the guy I would want to hire.  I'm less concerned if you know the answer as I am if you can figure out the answer.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

UT Physics and Chemistry lower-division classes were notorious for having test databases that generated a different test for nearly every student.  Printed on greenbar paper and answered on a scantron.  Your question 3 was completely different from the people sitting next to you.

And those multiple choice questions were fiendishly difficult with almost right answers.

AKA, the engineering "weed out" classes(along with Calc)...

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

UT Physics and Chemistry lower-division classes were notorious for having test databases that generated a different test for nearly every student.  Printed on greenbar paper and answered on a scantron.  Your question 3 was completely different from the people sitting next to you.

And those multiple choice questions were fiendishly difficult with almost right answers.

 

48 minutes ago, BehoId, The Underminer! said:

 

The almost right answers I figured out eventually.  Everything had like six decimal places.

a) 5.323049

b) 5.284034

c) 5.230849

d) 5.824390

e) 5.283904

It became apparent to me that the wrong answers were all randomly generated numbers.  Because they were random, there was zero chance you would actually get that answer using the numbers from the problem.  So if I didn't know how to do the question, I'd just sit there and bang away.  Multiply by this, square that, cosine these two, divide by pi.  Every now and again one of those numbers would pop up on my calculator. 

 

Maybe two or three every test I was able to just brute force that way.

 

I remember for at least some classes, you had to enter your numerical answer, in scientific notation, into the scantron. No guessing or brute forcing, or eliminating obviously wrong answers and guessing from of the remainder.

 

everybody in the same section would have the same test, but other sections would have questions scrambled and given quantities changed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Reagan1k said:

And you're exactly the guy I would want to hire.  I'm less concerned if you know the answer as I am if you can figure out the answer.

 

 

life isn't a multiple choice question. I don't know what your field is, but I'm guessing the answers in your field aren't multiple choice either.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

 

life isn't a multiple choice question. I don't know what your field is, but I'm guessing the answers in your field aren't multiple choice either.

 

No - and I said that a little tongue in cheek, but the reality is that ingenuity and problem solving ability is vital.  Some of the smartest people I have ever met became dumber than a box of rocks if faced with a challenge for which they didn't have an immediate answer.

I'd rather have a team member who can find solutions even if in a round about method than one who is "smart" but paralyzed by adversity or anything outside of their comfort zone.

Point well taken.  As an engineering applicant in the OP's example, I would want the basic knowledge. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly what a bunch of dumbasses! I remember one time as a Freshmen a buddy of mine in a Frat and I went to some party where we ran into  a fellow who had the same professor up in Georgetown, for Economics.  Long story short is my frat friend followed up and sure enough the prior tests matched up and they were going to take their test a few days before ours.  I honestly didn't need the test as I would have had to screw up pretty bad to blow my A.  But I thought WTF, and memorized the answers I didn't know.  My frat friend just fucking remembers 1A, 2c, etc.

It was cool that the test matched up, and sure enough that dumb ass was the first guy down the aisle to hand in his paper.  I sat there and took my time, even answering a couple questions incorrectly.  Answering super fast KNOWING there is certainly some data gathering to proctor the at home tests is so fucking dumb they deserve to get caught.  That being said, right now I would assume most everyone is cheating to some degree, as people tend to take the easy path.  It will catch up to them next year when they have to try to learn at a higher level the shit they should have learned in this class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got pretty good at the tests that were the same questions, and in the same order, but in a different pattern. Not sure if I explained that well, but for example:

Test 1: Regular Test, Question 1 = Question 1, Question 2 = Question 2

Test 2: The alternate test for your neighbor, Question 1 = Test 1's Question 13, Question 2 = Test 1's Question 14, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Any college kid knows that these websites can get you through school. Schools need to either up their game by forcing professors to create new questions for every test, or utilize more online proctor services. Both are not fool proof but it raises the difficulty level of cheating.

My dad was a college prof.  In the early 1980's, his university experience a massive influx of students from <country name redacted>.  Let's just say that these students abided by a different, more lenient honor code.

He retaliated by not only developing new tests every semester, but by developing a pair of tests for each class.  He forced all students to sit in a grid during the exam, where everyone left/right/front/back had the other test, so cheating was virtually impossible.  Of course, this had nothing to do with the internet, but it just shows what level of effort profs need to go to in order to combat the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, some amount of gaming the system should be expected as part of your education. Learning how to do things smarter instead of harder is an essential skill in life. But there is a big difference between getting ahold of a few past tests and actually using them to study and memorizing the answers (1a, 2c...etc) or just copying off of another student.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NotActuallyALonghorn said:

Honestly, some amount of gaming the system should be expected as part of your education. Learning how to do things smarter instead of harder is an essential skill in life. But there is a big difference between getting ahold of a few past tests and actually using them to study and memorizing the answers (1a, 2c...etc) or just copying off of another student.

It was pretty common to be able to look at prior year's exams in law school.  It gave you a "flavor" for things but was no help when the rubber hit the road.  Some engineering profs made earlier tests available too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Beau Vine said:

According to Powers’ email, Texas A&M’s online learning platform, Canvas, tracks how long test questions are displayed on a student’s screen. He said there are “hundreds of examples” where students answered a question faster than it would take to read it.

I'm having a hard time reconciling this, having seen Canvas in action with my kids here in AISD, and it was slow as shit.  

I just finished some classes at ACC, and we used Blackboard (different LMS), and the quizzes/tests were timed.  One prof had a pretty short amount of time to take quizzes/tests - his attitude was "if you don't know the material, you won't have time to look it up online" - basically spend a few minutes looking up one answer, and you'll run out of time and miss 2-3 other answers.

Of course, another prof had some really long tests that took up well over an hour of the allotted two-hour window, but she used questions we had seen on the quizzes, and if you had saved copies and had them handy/memorized, you were golden.

Blackboard tracked time on questions, and our time online overall, and our online textbook/reading and certain projects were done through Cengage.com or whatever, and that also tracked your time.  If you fucked around and skipped through stuff, the profs would know it, since the time wouldn't be reflected in Cengage.

12 hours ago, Beau Vine said:

Complaints about the tutoring website from university administrators are widespread. This spring, Georgia Tech University took action against students in a physics class suspected of using Chegg to cheat. Boston University also investigated students in some science classes for inappropriately using Chegg.

Yeah, there's also "quizlets" or whatever, and a few others.  Somebody in one of my classes mentioned those to a few of us, and was bitching that some answers were wrong or something.  Maybe it's because I'm older, but it's like "read the fucking chapter, the answers are all there."  Those kids probably skated through with those sites, but this will catch up with them at some point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Any college kid knows that these websites can get you through school. Schools need to either up their game by forcing professors to create new questions for every test, or utilize more online proctor services. Both are not fool proof but it raises the difficulty level of cheating.

I have a friend who took some university business classes online earlier this morning, and they were a step above aggy/community college/low-level classes.

They had software that had you do a visual scan of your environment with the camera, checked your computer/screenshotted your desktop constantly, it tracked your eyes - if you were looking away from the display, it'd bug you with a timer "You've looked away for X amount of minutes", and recorded everything, and the prof could come back and review it.  It would flag times when you were looking away, it would flag movement in the room (other people), etc.  It would also flag if you were typing/moving your hands doing something that didn't match with actual input (say you had a phone or mini iPad under your display or next to it or whatever.  It would apparently have you rescan your environment with the camera at random times and you only had X amount of seconds to respond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BehoId, The Underminer! said:

 

The almost right answers I figured out eventually.  Everything had like six decimal places.

a) 5.323049

b) 5.284034

c) 5.230849

d) 5.824390

e) 5.283904

It became apparent to me that the wrong answers were all randomly generated numbers.  Because they were random, there was zero chance you would actually get that answer using the numbers from the problem.  So if I didn't know how to do the question, I'd just sit there and bang away.  Multiply by this, square that, cosine these two, divide by pi.  Every now and again one of those numbers would pop up on my calculator. 

 

Maybe two or three every test I was able to just brute force that way.

And that's why you do e) None of these is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

I have a friend who took some university business classes online earlier this morning, and they were a step above aggy/community college/low-level classes.

They had software that had you do a visual scan of your environment with the camera, checked your computer/screenshotted your desktop constantly, it tracked your eyes - if you were looking away from the display, it'd bug you with a timer "You've looked away for X amount of minutes", and recorded everything, and the prof could come back and review it.  It would flag times when you were looking away, it would flag movement in the room (other people), etc.  It would also flag if you were typing/moving your hands doing something that didn't match with actual input (say you had a phone or mini iPad under your display or next to it or whatever.  It would apparently have you rescan your environment with the camera at random times and you only had X amount of seconds to respond.

That's what the McGraw Hill proctoring does -- I get a dashboard with a score for each student on basically "curious behavior."   If that score is low enough, I can go check the video from their webcam.  I regret to say that no one has flashed me her tits yet, though I'm not giving up hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

For my recent grad program, we frequently had live proctors in India watching you during the test over your laptop webcam. And they wanted to see your test taking room prior to starting. If you looked around too much, they told you to stop it. I could envision a few ways to trick them but it wouldn't necessarily be easy.  For other tests, you were just recorded.  And with all of these tests, your laptop is locked down from opening up other programs. 

However, I'm sure there is a battle between proctor software and anti-proctor software.

my niece took her finals for UNT from home here with some software like that - locked your device down, you had to have an operating webcam, if you left the view you had to explain why, you were instructed to not look around...the test window was like 12 hours so it either had some sort of facial tracking component or else they were just recording and would watch the tests later. 

she had to use my tablet for it and at one point, for her Spanish final, i had to use my phone to Google the keystrokes for accents on my device (she didn't think about that when she started). we just discussed it very clearly and then held my phone up to the camera so they could see what was on it.

it was kind of fascinating actually. she aced the test :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cheated some in high school.  Mostly blatantly lazy plagiarism on papers  This was waaaaay before the intertron..

Didn't cheat in college.  Didn't want to lose my money for the semester...back when a semester of school and books was about $1200 or less, but that was a lot of fucking work for me.  I felt it was too big of a risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Reagan1k said:

It's rampant and the technology seems to stay one step ahead of the school's/professor's ability (or desire) to stop it.

I was at lunch with a client who took a call from his kid who was driving to visit a buddy in Austin and was going to take an online exam for the buddy in exchange for a free weekend of food and booze.  

On the flip side, I heard that some of the new proctoring software may have technology built in to monitor eye / facial movement  and send alerts to the professor if it appears the test taker is "looking away" too much - indicating that they had cheating resources at hand.

Wandering eyes in class, Cliffs Notes, papers for BJ's, Chegg or whatever its called......the road goes on forever and the party never ends.

Every school, every generation.......

 

drunk animal house GIF by IFC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...