Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

I'm honestly shocked they haven’t been leaked, but the thing is, the people who could leak know the power in having them, and hanging them over the heads of people they want things

Maybe that explains Mitch.   That bastard had his turtle freak on - which explains the no witnesses and no evidence allowed in the impeachment hearings.

Those turtle freak memories probably come flooding back to transfix him at the most inopportune times.

 IMG_4927.gif.281aadace7c75f4b16149d0fcf66bd31.gif

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Steel Shank said:

I'm getting lost here. Correct me where I need it:

  • Epstein is discovered to be a pervert while Obama in office
  • There is rumored to be a client list
  • Republicans/Trump/Maga demand release of list
  • List not released, Epstein dies in prison
  • Trump is now president, and his girl Bondi says "I got the list!"
  • List not released, Dems and/or others want it released
  • Trump and staff now say "There is no list"

 

Is that it?

Obama and Hillary created the list that doesn't actually exist. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Bobby_Batronic said:

Meh, the Dems had the chance to release this information quite recently and declined. Either tons of pols, celebs and other powerbrokers came to party at his island and only Epstein diddled the minors, or they’re all involved and no one wants to open Pandora’s box. Probably the latter which is why it’s unlikely we’ll never know what happened. 

This is exactly what someone who diddled kids at Epstein island would say.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

The most fascinating thing to me about these past few days is that if they wanted this story to go away, he and Bondi decided to do the exact opposite, and we re seeing both the “Streisand Effect” and a the perfect example of “gaslighting” happening at the exact same moment.

I also like that he lumped Hunter Biden’s laptop in with the hoaxes.

These are literally things that more than a few MAGA or MAGA-adjacent types really give a shit about for some reason, and that helped drive a major conspiracy movement (Q/Qanons) and he’s telling them to forget about it, that it’s nothing, and if they believe it, they are a part of the leftist conspiracy against him.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
48 minutes ago, Bobby_Batronic said:

Epstein killed himself in 2019. By your “norms” standard the only person involved was dead for 4 years when the current administration took over. Thats if we believe that there was a secret party island for the elites covered in cameras where minors were being sex trafficked for just Epstein himself.  
 

That seems unlikely to me, but I don’t think we’ll ever know  

 

They're not my norms.  https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-27000-principles-federal-prosecution#9-27.760

Generally, you don't disclose factual material underlying investigations and prosecutions until constitutional requirements mandate disclosure to the defendant.

For uncharged parties, you don't disclose material that might incriminate them because they have no forum in which to defend themselves.

 

'there is ordinarily “no legitimate governmental interest served” by the government’s public allegation of wrongdoing by an uncharged party, and this is true “[r]egardless of what criminal charges may . . . b[e] contemplated by the Assistant United States Attorney against the [third party] for the future.”"

  • Hook 'Em 9
Posted
2 hours ago, Steel Shank said:

I'm getting lost here. Correct me where I need it:

  • Epstein is discovered to be a pervert while Obama in office
  • There is rumored to be a client list
  • Republicans/Trump/Maga demand release of list
  • List not released, Epstein dies in prison
  • Trump is now president, and his girl Bondi says "I got the list!"
  • List not released, Dems and/or others want it released
  • Trump and staff now say "There is no list"

 

Is that it?

YARN | You just made the list buddy. | Stripes (1981) | Video gifs by  quotes | c0404165 | 紗

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

How long before Ghislaine Maxwell will "commit suicide?"

Marvel Studios Smile GIF by Disney+

Well, Maga or not, the broader conspiracy theory presence is very real and generates a shit ton of traffic/feed/attention. (Sadly) 

There is NOTHING to compel any conspiracy theory rumors better than the death of a very high profile person. Right now, team Maga has the cover of Epstein's "suicide" occurring under Biden. That cover goes away real fast if she dies. Frankly, while I will never pull for someone, anyone, to be silenced, it if should occur, I certainly won't shed tears. However, it will stir a hornets nest in that particular "community" and I don't think that bodes well for anyone "involved".

Just throwing that poop on the wall but.. I think it really is a factor.

Edited by BurntEyes
Posted
5 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

Well, Maga or not, the broader conspiracy theory presence is very real and generates a shit ton of traffic/feed/attention. (Sadly) 

There is NOTHING to compel any conspiracy theory rumors better than the death of a very high profile person. Right now, team Maga has the cover of Epstein's "suicide" occurring under Biden. That cover goes away real fast if she dies. Frankly, while I will never pull for someone, anyone, to be silenced, it if should occur, I certainly won't shed tears. However, it will stir a hornets nest in that particular "community" and I don't think that bodes well for anyone "involved".

Just throwing that poop on the wall but.. I think it really is a factor.

Epstein's death occured in 2019.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

There is NOTHING to compel any conspiracy theory rumors better than the death of a very high profile person. Right now, team Maga has the cover of Epstein's "suicide" occurring under Biden.

Biden was President in 2019?


Figure It Out What GIF by CBC
 

edit:
 

@bolverk

fist shake GIF

Edited by atomheartbevo
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 6
Posted
52 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

They're not my norms.  https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-27000-principles-federal-prosecution#9-27.760

Generally, you don't disclose factual material underlying investigations and prosecutions until constitutional requirements mandate disclosure to the defendant.

For uncharged parties, you don't disclose material that might incriminate them because they have no forum in which to defend themselves.

 

'there is ordinarily “no legitimate governmental interest served” by the government’s public allegation of wrongdoing by an uncharged party, and this is true “[r]egardless of what criminal charges may . . . b[e] contemplated by the Assistant United States Attorney against the [third party] for the future.”"

Which brings us right back to the supposition that Epstein was the only person abusing underage girls at his party place. I don’t think that’s likely. 
 

I mentioned there being no reason to withhold information unless there’s an ongoing investigation, and find is hard to believe that they’re still looking into it. And I agree that you don’t name names unless they’re being charged. I just don’t think that it’s anywhere near as clean as Epstein acting alone. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

'there is ordinarily “no legitimate governmental interest served” by the government’s public allegation of wrongdoing by an uncharged party, and this is true “[r]egardless of what criminal charges may . . . b[e] contemplated by the Assistant United States Attorney against the [third party] for the future.”"

While all dead-on true, this does not address the reasons why nobody was charged.   The Biden people were naive enough not to charge Trump for political optics of the new president charging the former president.  Wankers.  Or the Clinton thing made it a non-starter.   But even that is not a reason to NOT charge anybody else involved not named Trump or Clinton - if you can destroy all but certain evidence against certain people that is.*

Nobody is going to come clean, as the “but….I had sex with fewer minor girls than those other guys did” defense won’t likely be a successful one.
 

(* And I’m sure the US never had any back channel communication with Great Britain where the UK government told us it did not really wanna see a Royal Prince involved in a pedophile scandal for the good of the nation, thank you very much, old chap.  Wink, wink, nudge, nudge - say no more.)

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

 

One administration literally campaigned on exposing the Epstein scandal and promised answers to their base, and now they are doing everything in their power to make it go away. 

Don’t really care who ran on what. I don’t need someone to politic for exposing child predators to want child predators exposed. 

Posted
2 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:


 

I'm honestly shocked they haven’t been leaked, but the thing is, the people who could leak know the power in having them, and hanging them over the heads of people they want things from.

I am honestly shocked Maxwell hasn’t committed “suicide” yet or died from “natural causes”.

But evidently she has a hidden time bomb as insurance.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
57 minutes ago, MrBig said:

She’s a pretty decent speaker. I saw her on a Ted Talk the other day. These fuckers have their claws in pretty much everything. 

She was the mouth piece organizer for both big time political and wealth while at the same time recruiting youth and beauty. Obviously, I applaud hating her for her motives,  but there is no doubt she's got some impressive speaking/influence skills. 

It would be very bad for bad guys with something to hide have her speak.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chopper said:

The leading magats can't even remember basic facts.

 

Dumb old fuck doesn't know what arrested or indicted means, anyway.

Worth pointing out that he was initially arrested, federally deferred, and convicted in Florida between 2005-2008, during the Shrub administration.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
On 1/3/2024 at 11:47 AM, Incredulity said:

what a joke.

There are some serious efforts to obfuscate this thing going on.

Nothing To See Here GIF by Giphy QA

I agree with this comment from the second page of this thread, so why are you silent now?

For the life of me, I can't understand why--after so much caterwauling for so long--they don't want it released now.

@statsman, as the thread's OP, it's kind of odd you haven't posted on the topic lately. Did you lose interest in the case?

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Drool 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, bolverk said:

I agree with this comment from the second page of this thread, so why are you silent now?

I haven't posted in the CR for about a month.  I really don't care enough about the leftists crying performance art to participate.

 

RE this topic:  Obviously there are some seriously powerful people who seriously do not want "the list" published, as I previously stated.  I'll leave the rest to y'all

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Incredulity said:

Obviously there are some seriously powerful people who seriously do not want "the list" published, as I previously stated.  I'll leave the rest to y'all

But aren't you upset that those people are being protected? Don't you care about powerful pedophiles getting away with it?

You seemed so passionate about this topic before.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
  • Drool 1
Posted
Just now, bolverk said:

But aren't you upset that those people are being protected? Don't you care about powerful pedophiles getting away with it?

You seemed so passionate about this topic before.

oh-that-was-different-injured.gif

  • Like 1
  • Haha 7
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, bolverk said:

But aren't you upset that those people are being protected? Don't you care about powerful pedophiles getting away with it?

You seemed so passionate about this topic before.

Well, most of my posts in this thread were about Kimmel and Rodgers slap fight so I am not exactly sure what the fuck you are babbling about.   Unsurprisingly,  you don't either.

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, bolverk said:

 

@statsman, as the thread's OP, it's kind of odd you haven't posted on the topic lately. Did you lose interest in the case?

No, I try not to post in DT. Besides the ad hominem and appeals to authority, there are (as you well know) plenty of posters that try to win arguments by crying to mods about “shit posting” when they don’t like what someone is saying. On another thread, I got a one week ban for linking a WSJ op-ed (Immamac said it was “shit posting”; I guess I should have waited a couple of days for the news story). I don’t feel like responding in kind, so I find DT interesting to read, but not good for engaging. 

Edited by statsman
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, statsman said:

there are (as you well know) plenty of posters that try to win arguments by crying to mods about “shit posting” when they don’t like what someone is saying. On another thread, I got a one week ban for linking a WSJ op-ed (Immamac said it was “shit posting”;

Same.

 

Also, just realized this is DT.... great news/non-political thread is great.

Posted

“Boo hoo - my hypocrisy and political shit fit was thrown in my face (gasp) in DT! How dare you bring politics into a news story where countless administration officials and the attorney general claimed for months that THIS was the biggest scandal in government only to turn tail and hide bc the President changed his mind”

Yeah, I hear you. Surely there’s a non-political way to discuss such news. Also, who even cares anymore? Amirite 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Drool 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, statsman said:

No, I try not to post in DT. Besides the ad hominem and appeals to authority, there are (as you well know) plenty of posters that try to win arguments by crying to mods about “shit posting” when they don’t like what someone is saying. On another thread, I got a one week ban for linking a WSJ op-ed (Immamac said it was “shit posting”; I guess I should have waited a couple of days for the news story). I don’t feel like responding in kind, so I find DT interesting to read, but not good for engaging. 

 

8 minutes ago, Incredulity said:

Same.

 

Also, just realized this is DT.... great news/non-political thread is great.

It is absolutely news that the House Rules Committee voted against releasing the files. There's no opinion or editorializing in my post. I'm just puzzled why you guys lost interest.

I'm sorry that this news is so upsetting.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

Yeah, I hear you. Surely there’s a non-political way to discuss such news. Also, who even cares anymore? Amirite 

Trump and his AG publicly ordered it covered up and for his followers to stop talking about it, and Republican-led House Rules Committee in Congress voted against releasing the files.  Those are facts and news.

Honestly, we should be talking about his followers that are freaking out over it.  They are entertaining as hell as they are being gaslighted by the man himself, while at the same time their identity was wrapped up in exposing Epstein's client lists, etc.

Edited by atomheartbevo
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Assuming the files are criminal in nature, ie evidence seized using search warrants, pursuant to grand jury subpoena and other criminal processes, they would be in the sole control of the DOJ.

HoR ain't got nothin to do with it unless they somehow obtained copies, which a norm-following DOJ would resist for the same reason it doesn't make such files publicly available.

So, unnecessary grandstanding by House Rules Committee.

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...