Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

Also of note, there's going to be a lot of really pissed off victims who are going to be doing a lot more interviews, not to mention more documents and emails coming out.  The Trump administration does not understand the Barbara Streisand effect.

Poor Venezuela, we hardly knew ya.

Ok that last line made me chuckle. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Vintner said:

Ok that last line made me chuckle. 

I wish I was being funny, but the House committee said they are going to continue looking into the Epstein stuff, so there's going to have to be some distractions.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Hank Kingsley said:

I'd appreciate any commentary from conservatives regarding these "answers" and  behavior from Kash Patel. 

Is this acceptable? Are you ok with this from the FBI Director? 

 

I mean, of course its acceptable. They are already willing to ignore Trump's proclivity for having sex with minors, so why would the Director of the FBI covering for him matter?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
On 9/10/2025 at 8:24 PM, Gil Bang said:

GF is from Miami, and we often visit her sister in Coral Gables.  They sell it down there, and she's always got a case in the garage fridge for me when we visit. 

It ain't the same as it is in the Dominican Republic. Was the first beer I ever had. love it. 

And nah, it ain't just cuz it is hot in the DR. It is a damn good beer. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, wild_turkey said:

What is the point of the House hearing with Patel? Just more political theater? Congress isn’t going to do shit, just like they aren’t going to do shit to RFK Jr.

If anything, it plants reminder seeds into some of the MAGAs still focused on Epstein after Charlie Kirk.  And apparently a lot of those MAGAs are turning on Patel.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, wild_turkey said:

What is the point of the House hearing with Patel? Just more political theater? Congress isn’t going to do shit, just like they aren’t going to do shit to RFK Jr.

Public oversight. It’s one of Congress’s jobs they haven’t willfully given up.  You may be dismissive but there is value in having the director of the FBI answer questions under oath and on tv

Posted
11 minutes ago, South Austin said:

If anything, it plants reminder seeds into some of the MAGAs still focused on Epstein after Charlie Kirk.  And apparently a lot of those MAGAs are turning on Patel.  

Yep, he spent years helping to wind these people up, and they get excited that he’s given the FBI, only to have him tell them that there’s nothing there.  It’s not going over very well.  They wanted Hollywood elites nailed to the wall.

3 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

Public oversight. It’s one of Congress’s jobs they haven’t willfully given up.  You may be dismissive but there is value in having the director of the FBI answer questions under oath and on tv

And there are probably some who, if/when shit hits the fan, want to be able to say that they were asking questions and that they weren’t part of the cover-up.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...