Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, LTtxfan said:

If we don't win SEC, hopefully still a home game in the cfp playoffs... 🤘

 

What was Golden asking him?  The tweet says "was" Quinn Ewers' final game at Texas.  Is he talking about the Arkansas game, and implicitly asking if Arch is our starting QB for the rest of the season?  Or is he asking if this Saturday, our last home game of the regular season, will be Quinn's last game at DKR because he will be going pro or will transfer?  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Replies 26.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
14 minutes ago, Zeus said:

 

Just because a line got written into a movie doesn't make it clever.

Again, I'd lose it. Even if I was Billy Bob Thornton. It only sounds clever if you turn your brain completely off.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, markstanco said:

Correct. I only had to watch the first 1:33 to find one.



 

By far the best deep balls I saw were at 6:03 (best of the bunch), 6:31 and 10:40.

Know it's highlights, but QE showed good pocket presence on more plays here than I recall seeing throughout this season.

No surprise, but seemed like teams bit on (respected) the play action more than now.

 

Posted

IF he comes back. I’m assuming sark opens competition up. No assurances that qe is starter and he’ll transfer out. If he annoints qe as starter and arch leaves……oh boy fuck that noise 

Posted
1 minute ago, Scuba Saba said:

For heaven's sake. QE is considering the possibility of returning to UT in 2025. Sark needs to have a come to Jesus talk with both QE and Arch. 

I think one of two things will happen:  (1) Sark has a meeting with both of them and tells them that there is open competition for the QB position in spring ball; or (2) Sark tells Quinn bluntly that the QB job next season is Arch's and that if Quinn wants to stay in college for his final year of eligibility he should transfer.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

  Michael Irvin used to say that Aikman's passes kind of hung in the air for you to grab. Quinn throws a similar ball, easy for the RBs to catch. When Troy would throw deep he leaned back like an archer shooting an arrow, no change in his throwing motion at all, just changed the trajectory. Niether of them had great deep balls but I think QE will also find a way to work with it, he does get in streaks where he hits the deep routes.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, Scuba Saba said:

For heaven's sake. QE is considering the possibility of returning to UT in 2025. 

I mean, that quote doesn’t suggest that at all. We don’t know if this is Ewers last home game because he could play there again this season, the rest is just Golden stirring shit up.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, markstanco said:

Correct. I only had to watch the first 1:33 to find one.

 

Thanks for posting video...

damn Sark needs to have Ewers watch his good throws/plays from the past over and over and over again.

Then hopefully...

Screenshot_2024-11-18-15-22-32_kindlephoto-3524248.png.844001d7aecb68fca8d4fd77c0c36386.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Codaxx said:

The offense would likely be different. Sark has talked about how Tau and Mac Jones had different offenses. Tau was predominantly RPO and Mac was predominantly play action. I do agree Arch is not as good on the short timing routes as Quinn. Quinn is typically elite in that area. Quinn struggles when teams take away the flats from him. The issue for Quinn is the consistency. This was the year we all assumed Quinn would play at a consistent level. Michigan sucked us in. He is still the same the QB. He struggles with deep balls, he is slow through his progressions, poor footwork, and bad pocket feel. I fell in love with the promise of Quinn's talent, but now the tape is starting to win me over. This just seems to be who Quinn is. Arch may be similar. We do not know for sure how he would progress in a game or over the several games. I would assume he improves. Texas fans are always hard on QBs. Freshmen Colt and Vince got a lot of heat from fans. I remember defending freshman Sam and Quinn. All of them improved, but only Quinn has needed to be defended as a 3rd year starter. 

Tua is actually the elite play action passer and Mac was the RPO assassin under Sark. 
 

Quinn was supposed to be elite at the RPOs, but he’s mostly just very good at them. When those are taken away from him, his effectiveness isn’t nearly as high. 
 

I believe Arch will be good at both, but he’ll likely be an elite play action guy. 

Posted
1 hour ago, derpyhorndog said:

By far the best deep balls I saw were at 6:03 (best of the bunch), 6:31 and 10:40.

Know it's highlights, but QE showed good pocket presence on more plays here than I recall seeing throughout this season.

No surprise, but seemed like teams bit on (respected) the play action more than now.

 

His timing and anticipation was so much better in those clips than since coming back from his injury. We're also really missing those quick strikes to the middle of the field right now. Everything is just a beat slow and off kilter. Finally, his legs have disappeared as a factor. He seems stuck in mud compared to last year, not entirely sure why. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
1 hour ago, markstanco said:

Correct. I only had to watch the first 1:33 to find one.



 

I've not seen Quinn play that confident and loose since that game. He came in smiling and had a completely different attitude like he absolutely knew he was going to win that game. He was animated before game, during the game... just seemed like a different person and his playing showed. I'd love to see that Quinn again in these upcoming games.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, Atticus said:

Tua is actually the elite play action passer and Mac was the RPO assassin under Sark. 
 

Quinn was supposed to be elite at the RPOs, but he’s mostly just very good at them. When those are taken away from him, his effectiveness isn’t nearly as high. 
 

I believe Arch will be good at both, but he’ll likely be an elite play action guy. 

not sure it really matters, but Surly going Surly. 

 

Jones threw a higher percentage of passes in games viewed past the 10-yard mark than Tagovailoa with 85 attempts to Tua’s 78. This is most likely due to the higher volume of RPO’s with Tagovailoa taking snaps. Surprisingly, it was passing between the hashes that bothered Mac Jones.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/tua-tagovailoa-mac-jones-better-alabama-qb-prospect/

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2021/12/1/22811214/tua-tagovailoa-rpo-offense-miami-dolphins

 

the point was Sark will adapt is offense to the strengths of his QBs. Given Arch's obvious deep ball ability, he is more suited to play-action shots than Ewers. That is not to say that Arch will not be great at RPOs. You could see the difference in the way Sark called games with Arch vs Ewers. Sark admitted he called too many deep shots in Arch's first start. He was probably giddy with the idea of having the deep ball back in his playbook. 

Edited by Codaxx
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Derka said:

what kind of college football championship team thinks or plays this way? none.  absolutely nobody is out here trying to be the trent dilfer ravens. nobody thinks that you can win a national title while hiding your quarterback.

again, when arch comes in/starts the game we’re bombing the ball down the field and calling a totally different game than when QE is in. its two totally different offenses. it’s beyond clear by now that our offensive game planning and play calling have been centered around quinn’s shortcomings. been that way for more than a year. 

You should text Sark, because you've clearly cracked the code.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
14 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

not sure it really matters, but Surly going Surly. 

 

Jones threw a higher percentage of passes in games viewed past the 10-yard mark than Tagovailoa with 85 attempts to Tua’s 78. This is most likely due to the higher volume of RPO’s with Tagovailoa taking snaps. Surprisingly, it was passing between the hashes that bothered Mac Jones.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/tua-tagovailoa-mac-jones-better-alabama-qb-prospect/

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2021/12/1/22811214/tua-tagovailoa-rpo-offense-miami-dolphins

 

the point was Sark will adapt is offense to the strengths of his QBs. Given Arch's obvious deep ball ability, he is more suited to play-action shots than Ewers. That is not to say that Arch will not be great at RPOs. You could see the difference in the way Sark called games with Arch vs Ewers. Sark admitted he called too many deep shots in Arch's first start. He was probably giddy with the idea of having the deep ball back in his playbook. 

Not gonna derail the thread, but Sark actually said exactly what I did at one point when comparing Tua and Mac.  
 

Quinn doesn’t seem to have the same level of mastery in this offense as those guys though

Posted
1 hour ago, South Austin said:

I think one of two things will happen:  (1) Sark has a meeting with both of them and tells them that there is open competition for the QB position in spring ball; or (2) Sark tells Quinn bluntly that the QB job next season is Arch's and that if Quinn wants to stay in college for his final year of eligibility he should transfer.

I think those are the two most likely scenarios.  No way Sark promises the job to Quinn, with the possible exception of a national title this year (and in my opinion not even then.)

Posted
41 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

Did someone ask if Quinn was going to walk out for senior day or was it just Golden's bullshit question about last game?

Maaan this thread Saturday if Quinn doesn’t walk out with the seniors on senior day would break surly. I almost hope it happens 

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, perfectchaos007 said:

Maaan this thread Saturday if Quinn doesn’t walk out with the seniors on senior day would break surly. I almost hope it happens 

I'm kinda with you on that.  I think it's a character flaw.  Sue me.

Posted
55 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Zero chance Quinn plays at Texas next year. Stop. 

It's simple math, right? You want two years out of Arch, and if his upside is as high as it looks, he'll definitely be gone after his RS Jr year.

I actually like Quinn, but one way or another, this is his last year at Texas. 

Posted
1 hour ago, MotownHorn said:

He could go to Duke and see if he can beat out Maalik again

“I made it to the College Football Playoff last year without any backup.” The Maalik disrespect on that one really grinds my gears.
IMG_9197.webp.aea23ea9cbb342cea7c0803876548cad.webp

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

Here is the issue regarding Quinn and Arch - 

At this point in the season we can't just put Arch in and say go get em. He's had hardly any real live game experience outside of 2 games earlier in the season. Sark and Quinn aren't putting away teams enough to give Arch any quality snaps. We have to roll with Quinn no matter what or we're fucked and we aren't doing shit in the playoffs. 

I would absolutely love to see what Arch could do, but realistically he probably doesn't do much. It's maddening watching Quinn play, but you have to go with experience and this defense to keep us in the NC hunt. I really think next season Arch will dominate, but we aren't gonna see that against Kentucky or aggy. It sucks going in circles with Quinn, but he at least finds ways to move the ball in some miraculous ways. 

It won't be Quinn who wins us a NC (assuming we make it there), it will be this defense. They're literally the only thing keeping this team at 9-1, and shutting down Georgia for the most part. It's too late in the season for us to plug in Arch. This was the same shit Mack would do. He wouldn't put teams away so we could get our heir any game time experience. Quinn is who he is. He isn't changing, and he isn't going to be lighting teams up aside from maybe 1 or 2 games. 

We'll see who he really can be in the playoffs. Sark still has him on training wheels, which is why we aren't seeing different routes. We're also down to two small RB's that Sark can't understand they aren't big enough to run through tackles. I don't know what the deal is with not playing Gibson more, but something has to give. We're 10 games into the season, he just had a 100 yard game, and then he disappears against Arky. I don't know what the fuck is going on in Sark's head, but he needs to pull it out of his ass and get more players involved. We're literally hanging on to and hoping Bond, Golden, or Moore to get us TD's. Same with Blue and Wisner. It's like Sark didn't learn from the Georgia game that both Blue and Wisner can be shut down easily. Also Quinn throwing to the flat that either hits the ground, Blue drops it, or Blue catches it and get tackled and loses yards. 

So basically, we have to hope new shit comes to light in the next 2 games and Quinn either goes ape shit for 5 TD's like against UF, or out defense gods ape shit like they did against Arky. There seems to be no middle ground other than self-sacking or dump offs. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
QE, with sark as his third year coach, and surrounded by the best pass catchers in america, is no.25 nationally in QB RTG, and no.68 nationally in yards gained oer pass.
Arch Manning is no.2 nationally in both categories. 
weird how they have the exact same coach and surrounding cast, and yet both the eyeball test and the stats show that sark runs totally different offenses for each qb, with the arch manning offense being much more dynamic and explosive. hmm…i wonder what conclusions we can draw from that.

The sun was in Quinn’s eyes
Posted
For heaven's sake. QE is considering the possibility of returning to UT in 2025. Sark needs to have a come to Jesus talk with both QE and Arch. 

Where are you hearing that? I hope it’s not the tweet a few posts up. If so, read it again and oh attention to where the quotation marks are. JFC.
  • Haha 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, WinningIsHard said:

Troy Aikman didn’t throw a great deep ball. Holy shit this thread is full of so much stupid it’s almost unbelievable. I’d say next we need somebody to claim Montana was panicky in the pocket like Quinn. 
season 3 wtf GIF by Black Sails

This

There may be more stupid in this thread than all of the other stupid threads in Surly history.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, BlackCat said:

At this point I’m just telling myself that Sark built this team with Ewers as the center point and leader, and the team is riding or dying with that formula. It seems clear to me that culturally, Sark finally has the team he wants, and he isn’t gonna mess with all of that as long as we are winning. By most accounts I’ve seen or heard, Quinn is a good dude and well liked by his teammates. If the team feels invested in his success, then that would explain Sark sticking with him despite having dicks for feet and abysmal pocket presence. 

The time for a change has come and gone, IMO. Sark could have easily trotted Arch out there to start the second half against Georgia and seen where it took us while using the injury excuse for Ewers to shield him a bit. With two regular-season games left and a CFP berth literally at our fingertips, it just isn't worth it to potentially blow this whole thing up, especially with the media shitstorm that would come with Manning taking over unless there is injury or Ewers really just has a total collapse where he hands the ball to the other team 3 times in a half or something along those lines.

I will give Sark a little credit for learning from 2022 and not just continuing to have Ewers bang his head against the wall. He has adjusted the offense to a version that I'm sure isn't what him and the staff envisioned, but we can still get where we want to go when at our best. 

It's still hard for me to comprehend how bad Ewers' feel in the pocket has gotten. He was never elite, but it damn sure never looked this bad at the end of last year or the beginning of this year. 

Edited by Hookem2147
  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted

Quinn might be the most unique QB in college football history. I'm trying to think of someone who has had success like he has, while not being a threat to run, struggling with basic shit in the pocket, and being almost incapable of completing a ball thrown deep. 

This was intended to be a compliment. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
6 hours ago, Derka said:

what kind of college football championship team thinks or plays this way? none.  absolutely nobody is out here trying to be the trent dilfer ravens. nobody thinks that you can win a national title while hiding your quarterback.

again, when arch comes in/starts the game we’re bombing the ball down the field and calling a totally different game than when QE is in. its two totally different offenses. it’s beyond clear by now that our offensive game planning and play calling have been centered around quinn’s shortcomings. been that way for more than a year. 

While I don’t disagree with some of your statements here, I’ll just ask you this: do you think it is also possible that we run different offenses with Arch and Quinn because we have a damn good HFC and OC who plays into his QB’s strengths? 

If I’m not fanboying over Arch, which is really easy to do with what we’ve seen this year in his limited action, I’m seeing him as someone who isn’t as accurate as Quinn in the short and intermediate game and doesn’t throw as good of a ball for YAC as Quinn. Arch has better mobility/pocket presence, better arm strength and more accurate on the deep ball. And Arch is a vocal fiery leader.

I think we can all agree that Arch has a higher ceiling and is probably closer to what Sark desires as his signal caller in his ideal offense. That said, it’s pretty much a guarantee based on QE being the guy that Sark feels more confident in his Quinn version of the offense with Quinn as a 3rd year starter running it over his Arch version of the offense with Arch the RS FR running it.

Posted
14 hours ago, Derka said:

and who exactly has quinn played? he was terrible against the one team we played with a pulse, and his best win is against 5-3 vanderbilt where we scored zero TDs and six total points in the second half. show me all of the skins that QE has on his wall from this season?

beyond that, just look at the tape. arch’s tape dominates quinn’s tape despite arch playing way fewer snaps. QE has had 3-4x as many opportunities as Arch has had to put together a solid film reel, and yet its arch who we see making his reads and hitting his progressions, its arch who we see making plays with his legs, its arch who we see keeping his eyes downfield while moving up in the pocket, and its arch who we see making play after play downfield. what does quinn’s highlight reel look like, besides self sacks, sideways throws, and “jackpot!” level deep balls that land 15 yards beyond receiver? 

The two worst teams we played were the two teams that Arch started against. Full stop. Nothing else needs to be said.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
28 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Quinn might be the most unique QB in college football history. I'm trying to think of someone who has had success like he has, while not being a threat to run, struggling with basic shit in the pocket, and being almost incapable of completing a ball thrown deep. 

This was intended to be a compliment. 

He does some elite, unstoppable shit. He just doesn’t do it consistently enough. Maybe 20-30% of the time? But that’s enough to win a lot of games with our other talent against bad teams. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Tired Horn said:

It's simple math, right? You want two years out of Arch, and if his upside is as high as it looks, he'll definitely be gone after his RS Jr year.  I actually like Quinn, but one way or another, this is his last year at Texas. 

Maybe Arch sticks around 3 more years to get more starts and experience???  

giphy.gif

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Hookem10 said:

IF he comes back. I’m assuming sark opens competition up. No assurances that qe is starter and he’ll transfer out. If he annoints qe as starter and arch leaves……oh boy fuck that noise 

I don’t even see this as a possible outcome. I think next year the Mannings and Arch are guaranteed QB1. I don’t see a world in which QE plays another season of CFB and plays for Texas. I could see him going to Michigan, Miami, Oregon, and a small handful of SEC schools if he gets around the intraconference transfer rules, than being back at Texas.

Posted
50 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Quinn might be the most unique QB in college football history. I'm trying to think of someone who has had success like he has, while not being a threat to run, struggling with basic shit in the pocket, and being almost incapable of completing a ball thrown deep. 

This was intended to be a compliment. 

He's also definitely the worst player to ever be featured on a video game cover and in a prominent national ad campaign in the same year.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

He does some elite, unstoppable shit. He just doesn’t do it consistently enough. Maybe 20-30% of the time? But that’s enough to win a lot of games with our other talent against bad teams. 

New thread title? “Quinn Ewers - 20 to 30% of the time he’s elite every time.”

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
14 hours ago, Hook1997 said:

That was a pretty bad comparison because using your way of thinking, we just played the worst pass defense in our “district”…..  

That's not how football works. Notice you said they have a bad pass defense. Why? Could it be that because they employ a 3-3-5 in the SEC they find themselves having to spin DBs down to deal with the running game leaving them vulnerable on the back end?

And if that were true wouldn't it mean that if they ever played a team that couldn't force them to spin down their DBs to help in the running game they would find themselves a little more capable on the back end? Quinn did not play well but we have struggled vs the 3-3-5 flyover since Sark has been here. The way Sark's route combos are matchup well with what the 3-3-5 does. The throw up the sideline to Golden that got broken up and the throw to Wingo are easily defended due to the 3 safeties on the field. In both those instances they rushed 3 qand dropped 8. Those same routes vs 2 safeties are catches.

Sometimes a team is finding running success but you decide it isn't hurting you bad enough to come out of your base shell. You would rather trade giving up rushing yards in order to prevent from giving your opponent easy passing yards. We do this all the time.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, I Plead Da Fif said:

 I could see him going to Michigan, Miami, Oregon, and a small handful of SEC schools if he gets around intraconference transfer rules, than being back at Texas.

Yeah, if a player goes in this 1st portal window, SEC now allows transfers to play immediately.  Grad transfers have immediate eligibility too...

Posted
9 minutes ago, CurlyDumps said:

He's also definitely the worst player to ever be featured on a video game cover and in a prominent national ad campaign in the same year.

Video game was not out but hold my beer.

Dr+Pepper+DJ+U.png?token=WlsnVwWnMHicPbK

  • Haha 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

That's not how football works. Notice you said they have a bad pass defense. Why? Could it be that because they employ a 3-3-5 in the SEC they find themselves having to spin DBs down to deal with the running game leaving them vulnerable on the back end?

And if that were true wouldn't it mean that if they ever played a team that couldn't force them to spin down their DBs to help in the running game they would find themselves a little more capable on the back end? Quinn did not play well but we have struggled vs the 3-3-5 flyover since Sark has been here. The way Sark's route combos are matchup well with what the 3-3-5 does. The throw up the sideline to Golden that got broken up and the throw to Wingo are easily defended due to the 3 safeties on the field. In both those instances they rushed 3 qand dropped 8. Those same routes vs 2 safeties are catches.

Sometimes a team is finding running success but you decide it isn't hurting you bad enough to come out of your base shell. You would rather trade giving up rushing yards in order to prevent from giving your opponent easy passing yards. We do this all the time.

There was an article out there that basically explained it saying Arkansas played 3 high and it absolutely takes the deep balls away. It’s also true Ewers doesn’t throw it as well as we’d like but in the end until Texas can reliably run the ball, teams are going to force Texas to run and short pass the way down the field.  Sark said as much and it’s why he said in the second half we had to be able to run the ball. Again, we have to start with a good running game for sark’s offense to be as deadly as we’ve known it to be.

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...