Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted

Surly legal cartel will be here soon enough to set your ass straight.  This is how the system is intended to work, it's just unfortunate that the only time in history it has functioned this way is when it's in favor of Orange Turd Fucker.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I'll beat this dead horse again as ConLaw was one of the few good grades I got in law school.  There's being originalist and then there's this insanity.  The guardrails were not written regarding Presidential behavior for the very fucking simple reason they just didn't bother to lay out every scenario for abuse of power.  "Well the framers never mentioned a President making a phone call to digitally scan electronic voting machines of Black voters in the late 1700's.  Therefore as an originalist, we cannot possibly allow this case to move forward to Georgia."

Oh, they didn't have telephones, electronic ballots, or black voters in Georgia back then?  Fucking shocked.  Did we have assault rifles, airplanes, or a nuclear arsenal?  Why are they regulated?  

Posted
29 minutes ago, Js1 said:

So apparently all laws must say they include President Donald Trump or they don’t apply to him?

There is a notion lurking somewhere in the law that certain criminal offenses may not apply to POTUS or other federal officials unless Congress makes that clear.  The better view is that Congress knows how to exclude persons from the reach of criminal statutes, and unless it does so explicitly, did not so exclude.

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
22 hours ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

Stormy Daniels is talking about going to the bathroom in Trump’s hotel suite and seeing a “leather-looking” toiletry bag on the counter. She says she saw Old Spice 

 

 

He wears shitty cologne just like us!

 

  • Haha 4
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

There is a notion lurking somewhere in the law that certain criminal offenses may not apply to POTUS or other federal officials unless Congress makes that clear.  The better view is that Congress knows how to exclude persons from the reach of criminal statutes, and unless it does so explicitly, did not so exclude.

You're making a good argument that Congress isn't actually a well functioning part of the government, and maybe our system isn't exactly the best. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

Four years just wasn't enough time to prosecute him for trying to steal the last election, I guess. Probably shouldn't have sat on their hands for two years. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Four years just wasn't enough time to prosecute him for trying to steal the last election, I guess. Probably shouldn't have sat on their hands for two years. 

this is where i lay the blame.  even congress was able to jump on the ball and have an impeachment trial in a matter of weeks.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

Surly legal cartel will be here soon enough to set your ass straight.  This is how the system is intended to work, it's just unfortunate that the only time in history it has functioned this way is when it's in favor of Orange Turd Fucker.

I’ve been here saying the law is fake for years.

Posted
9 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

I had a 1973 Type LT.  Fire engine red.  No spoiler.

Also, are you people (YOU PEOPLE) getting Kraco car stereos and Cragar wheels mixed up?

No, Kraco got their start by making "snap on" whitewall attachments, to change your ordinary black tires into whitewalls.

Posted
4 minutes ago, BehoId, The Underminer! said:

this is where i lay the blame.  even congress was able to jump on the ball and have an impeachment trial in a matter of weeks.

Nothing really happened until after the 1/6 committee was finished. By that point it had been almost two years. Thanks Merrick. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Satchel said:

Why is nobody talking about the biggest bullet Stormy dodged? She was almost an aggy.


her time at the gold club in Baton Rouge matches up to me probably seeing her there 

#csb

Posted

"It's a special blend cologne I developed myself, Carla.  Mixture of Hai Karate, Old Spice, and something that takes spots our." (Babe Kit) 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
18 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

Would I proudly drive that sonofabitch today?

You bet your fucking ass I would.

With the windows down, cranking some Jethro Tull.  Maybe some Thin Lizzy.

Gramama's Deuce and a Quarter was my devil's chariot when I was unleashed on the female citizenry of Selma Alabama.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, GenXer said:

Resisting urge to deep fake this one

do-it-ben-stiller.gif

2 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

"It's a special blend cologne I developed myself, Carla.  Mixture of Hai Karate, Old Spice, and something that takes spots our." (Babe Kit) 

60% of the time it works every time.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

I'm not gonna lie to you, Donald.  That doesn't make any sense.  

It is Sex Predator, not Sex Panther.  And that is a scientific fact.  I don't know why we're yelling!  

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

He wears shitty cologne just like us!

 

Speak for yourself.  My Acqua di Gio makes me smell so sexy that I have to defile myself at least once a day.

Posted
3 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

 

and your Johnson's Baby Powder?

 

 

Please...what are you a poor?  It's Shower to Shower all the way.

image.png.096e944156d358fc90ba6319ee086537.png

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Man, imagine future people learning about all of this. "Wait so he tried to steal the 2020 election. Everyone watched it happen in real time. Like, he tried so many different ways to steal an election he lost." 

"Yes."

"..... including phone calls that were taped, in which he instructed states to alter their vote count so he would win?"

"Yes."

".... including organizing a mob and sending them to the Capitol."

"Yes."

".... and four years later, he was the nominee again? Why was he not in jail?"

"Reasons." 

People+Figurines+&+Sculptures.jpg

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Justice is blind.  Which means it’s slow and clumsy, like all blind things. 

stealing this

Posted
39 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Man, imagine future people learning about all of this. "Wait so he tried to steal the 2020 election. Everyone watched it happen in real time. Like, he tried so many different ways to steal an election he lost." 

"Yes."

"..... including phone calls that were taped, in which he instructed states to alter their vote count so he would win?"

"Yes."

".... including organizing a mob and sending them to the Capitol."

"Yes."

".... and four years later, he was the nominee again? Why was he not in jail?"

"Reasons." 

Because they're more worried about what his incarceration would look like to the rest of the world and our paper-holders and allies, than what his re-election would look like internally.  He goes to jail or dies of anything but natural causes with full transparency and we descend into a pitfall that will make J6 look like a fraternity prank.  We lose reserve currency status, all our notes get called, our global equity positions are proper fucked, we have to retract hundreds of thousands of personnel, our trade agreements and diplomatic status get called to the mat, and our superpower status is lowered down a couple of notches.  

He will lose and will protest it, and with violence.  And we simply have to power through it.  Then he dies.  And we have to power through that backlash.  We have a decade-long battle ahead of us that will take the lives of thousands of Americans and soil the childhood of our daughters.  But it has to be done.  It was always going to result in something like this.  It was just our time.  Guys like you and me like this place and do our part to improve it, but me personally?  I couldn't have done what my grandfather did.  I couldn't have stormed Normandy or Okinawa to preserve our way of life.  But there's another wave coming and it's our time to hurt bad people.  I think I'm finally ready.  And the kicker is I think there's a way to have them take one another out.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Brisketexan said:


Yes. But she has a strong “no eating turd sandwiches” theology.

to be accurate, that is likely a Presbyterian committee ruling. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Red Five said:

Man, imagine future people learning about all of this. "Wait so he tried to steal the 2020 election. Everyone watched it happen in real time. Like, he tried so many different ways to steal an election he lost." 

"Yes."

"..... including phone calls that were taped, in which he instructed states to alter their vote count so he would win?"

"Yes."

".... including organizing a mob and sending them to the Capitol."

"Yes."

".... and four years later, he was the nominee again? Why was he not in jail?"

"Reasons." 

Narrator : He would soon discover that in the future, justice was not only blind, but had become rather retarded as well.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
2 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

I’ve been here saying the law is fake for years.

As have I.  Its core vulnerability is that it's just a fucking mutual agreement.  It's always been vulnerable to 1) abuse by the rich/privileged (ask a black dude from the past....entirety of US history....about that), and 2) a popular uprising against it.  That is, when enough people simply opt out of the mutual compact that is the Rule of Law, it's over.

"I have this piece of paper that says you have to do X."  In a Rule of Law society, people do what the piece of paper says.

In a Trumpian society, they say "fuck you" and go about doing whatever the fuck they want.  Which means that the only way you can require anyone else to do anything is with force/violence....which is exactly how the Trumpanzees want it to be.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

As have I.  Its core vulnerability is that it's just a fucking mutual agreement.  It's always been vulnerable to 1) abuse by the rich/privileged (ask a black dude from the past....entirety of US history....about that), and 2) a popular uprising against it.  That is, when enough people simply opt out of the mutual compact that is the Rule of Law, it's over.

"I have this piece of paper that says you have to do X."  In a Rule of Law society, people do what the piece of paper says.

In a Trumpian society, they say "fuck you" and go about doing whatever the fuck they want.  Which means that the only way you can require anyone else to do anything is with force/violence....which is exactly how the Trumpanzees want it to be.

Could be why rulers of other civilizations tended to cloak themselves in a divine right to rule, to hold back the masses. 
 

We tried to eschew that and for our troubles, the masses decided to cloak a monster with divine right to rule and press to install him on the throne. 

Edited by Pato del Muerto
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, locodos said:

Narrator : He would soon discover that in the future, justice was not only blind, but had become rather retarded as well.

Oh really? 

IMG_3024.jpeg

  • Haha 1
Posted

People involved in obstruction typically won't include the judiciary.  Yet here we sit.  We are going to have to win in November for any trial of consequence to even take place.  Ridiculous.  

The real problem to me isn't that lawyers are throwing everything they have at this (that after all is their job).  The problem is that judicial system is completely compromised by the politics of the day, rather than the heart of the matter.  I'm not sure how you solve that.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

People involved in obstruction typically won't include the judiciary.  Yet here we sit.  We are going to have to win in November for any trial of consequence to even take place.  Ridiculous.  

The real problem to me isn't that lawyers are throwing everything they have at this (that after all is their job).  The problem is that judicial system is completely compromised by the politics of the day, rather than the heart of the matter.  I'm not sure how you solve that.  

The Supreme Court is purposefully slow-walking something that should have been pushed to the front of the line pronto, a la Bush v Gore. And everyone (well, everyone paying attention, which is probably about 10% of society) is like "Yeah that sounds about right."

  • Rage+1 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Red Five said:

The Supreme Court is purposefully slow-walking something that should have been pushed to the front of the line pronto, a la Bush v Gore. And everyone (well, everyone paying attention, which is probably about 10% of society) is like "Yeah that sounds about right."

True, but I'm actually referring to how this has permeated well beneath the rungs of the Supreme Court.  To a degree, due to some judges being elected, this has always been the case, but I think in this era it's gotten far worse among appointed judges and the like.  Perhaps that's just my own frustration showing at the moment.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

People involved in obstruction typically won't include the judiciary.  Yet here we sit.  We are going to have to win in November for any trial of consequence to even take place.  Ridiculous.  

The real problem to me isn't that lawyers are throwing everything they have at this (that after all is their job).  The problem is that judicial system is completely compromised by the politics of the day, rather than the heart of the matter.  I'm not sure how you solve that.  

This is also true.  And, even if he is defeated in November, the narrative won't change much.  At that point, the prosecutions will be "THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION IS TRYING TO BURY ME TO COVER UP THE RIGGED AND STOLLEN ELECTION!  ALL THE EXPERTS SAY I WON BY A BIG AMOUNT!  ELECTION FRAUD!"  And his cult will buy it.  And people will die in the violence.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Could be why rulers of other civilizations tended to cloak themselves in a divine right to rule, to hold back the masses. 
 

We tried to eschew that and for our troubles, the masses decided to cloak a monster with divine right to rule and press to install him on the throne. 

Spot on



×
×
  • Create New...