Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, troph said:

how can anyone think this is how this shit should go, for reals. debate the decision, okay. debate the efficacy of the mission, ok. did it work or not? that's just facts. no we can't have normal discourse, we have a fucking lunch room food fight.  can we has real intel people talking at podiums who are just telling the shit that went down and what's next or not next or what can or can't be talked about please. pretty please, with whipped cream on top?  for the love of christ, moses and muhammad, this nana nana boo boo shit is fucking dumb. 

 

Could not agree more.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hate said:

Could not agree more.

to be clear I wasn't talking about this message board, I was talking about our elected and appointed officials.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
9 minutes ago, Bateshorn said:

I know we are talking tactical campaigns... but since being a pedantic asshole is a birthright here, I'd argue this little campaign in the spring of 1863 is kinda the gold standard for operational planning and execution:

Vicksburg-Campaign-March-31-to-July-4-1863-%28November-2020%29.jpg.webp?itok=FB5gcIdw

The "Gibraltar" of the South was about as decisive as it goes in terms of Confederate losses.  Grant running his gunboats at night, up against the Confederate shoreline, was a stroke of genius - especially in light that they were unable to depress their guns low enough to engage them. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, troph said:

to be clear I wasn't talking about this message board, I was talking about our elected and appointed officials.

image.jpeg.d7194d58c2955c3b75d2728c6808c8aa.jpeg

  • Like 4
Posted
19 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Yet again, either your reading comprehension fails you or your abhorrence of reading anything more than two sentences has.

 

069b7d66-7023-4db7-acf4-e31ef58ebf5a_tex

Posted
16 minutes ago, troph said:

to be clear I wasn't talking about this message board, I was talking about our elected and appointed officials.

To be clear, I agree with your point. I’m not sure why that was in question.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
I know we are talking tactical campaigns... but since being a pedantic asshole is a birthright here, I'd argue this little campaign in the spring of 1863 is kinda the gold standard for operational planning and execution:
Vicksburg-Campaign-March-31-to-July-4-1863-%28November-2020%29.jpg.webp?itok=FB5gcIdw

You think that’s more impressive than sending invisible bombers over a country with severely degraded air defenses?
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 5
Posted

After a modicum of thought, I’m leaning towards the opinion that if we really did obliterate the site, even if the uranium wasn’t there and there are sites elsewhere ready to be spun up, shouldn’t we release our evidence and brag on our capability?  
 

Is there a downside?  Images of the site, whatever we have that everyone knows we have. 
 

the b2 is a known entity, the only thing that would change is the weight capacity floor goes up. Ok. The range is still unknown without the refueling details. The ordinance is known but untested in real world situations. If it worked, let’s advertise that fact. 
 

If we can really prove what he is claiming, shouldn’t we?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

After a modicum of thought, I’m leaning towards the opinion that if we really did obliterate the site, even if the uranium wasn’t there and there are sites elsewhere ready to be spun up, shouldn’t we release our evidence and brag on our capability?  
 

Is there a downside?  Images of the site, whatever we have that everyone knows we have. 
 

the b2 is a known entity, the only thing that would change is the weight capacity floor goes up. Ok. The range is still unknown without the refueling details. The ordinance is known but untested in real world situations. If it worked, let’s advertise that fact. 
 

If we can really prove what he is claiming, shouldn’t we?

that's what some prior admins would have done. maybe not all.

Posted
47 minutes ago, bolverk said:

 

Yet again, either your reading comprehension fails you or your abhorrence of reading anything more than two sentences has.

From the linked article, which I'll again link here:

The scheme delivers on the commitment in the Programme for Government to progress legislation prohibiting import of goods from the settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory following the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) of July 19, 2024.

Ireland's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade says that the main purpose of the Bill is to prohibit the importation of goods into the State from Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem. Any such importation will thereby become an offence under the Customs Act 2015, and the prohibition created by the Bill will also then engage the customs powers under that Act, including those relating to search, seizure, and forfeiture.

The scheme proposes to use the Israeli settlement postal code system currently employed by the EU in differentiating Israeli goods from settlement goods in order to identify goods of settlement origin for the purposes of the new Bill.

The General Scheme - which can be read online here - will now be referred to the Oireachtas Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade for Pre-Legislative Scrutiny.

Alright tough guy, I’m not going to read an article with a goofy headline like that. Have fun being pissed off. 

  • Fuck You 5
Posted
4 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

Alright tough guy, I’m not going to read an article with a goofy headline like that. Have fun being pissed off. 

But you’ll pop off with half-cocked commentary based on what you think the article says solely from the headline? It’s okay not to read the article, but it’s dumb as fuck to provide commentary without reading it. But then again, it’s you so we know what to expect.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Fuck You 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

Alright tough guy, I’m not going to read an article with a goofy headline like that. Have fun being pissed off. 

image.thumb.png.dc5e903974f8ae7105c1142c32e5ebf4.png
image.png.97dfa3959f2700451328f309f5c37b41.png

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, MagicSoccerSpray said:

 

So we slash our govt spending… to give $30bn to Iran? Or is that $30bn just frozen assets being released?

Posted
2 minutes ago, bluto said:

Or is that $30bn just frozen assets being released?

By the law of Republican bullshittery, we have to say it's giving Iran $30bn.  No nuance

Donald J. Trump wants to give Iran $30 billion

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, Covri said:

Rex when he enters a thread

 

  Hide contents

image.gif.07f504d4f758aabfb3a053f18d2661f4.gif

 

That and a little bit of Nathan repeatedly get fucked by the shark.

IMG_2436.gif.d58892951fc8c47fb26fbc65a8cccda0.gif

  • Haha 5
Posted
4 minutes ago, Js1 said:

By the law of Republican bullshittery, we have to say it's giving Iran $30bn.  No nuance

Donald J. Trump wants to give Iran $30 billion

All because Netanyahu nearly lost power over a no-confidence vote and had to distract the Israeli public.

3 minutes ago, MagicSoccerSpray said:

 

So will they be signing an Iran-Israeli peace agreement as well?  Or are we just lumping Iran in with the Arabs?

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Js1 said:

By the law of Republican bullshittery, we have to say it's giving Iran $30bn.  No nuance

Donald J. Trump wants to give Iran $30 billion

MAGA will love this.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/30/2024 at 12:58 AM, Rex Kramer said:

Please, more of your narrative. Euro Jews are too Jew-y to ever be really from the Middle East. That about cover it?

 

On 5/30/2024 at 4:24 PM, Rex Kramer said:

Easily riled vagine. 

I suspect not (though there was no slur at all) - not when you and your band of gypsies are so antisemitic in tone. 

I really miss the times in this thread that Rex was just posting antisemitic slurs while quoting and repping PRONG HORN instead of pretending he's interested in having a discussion about the topic at hand but refusing to look at and data.

  • Fuck You 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

 

I really miss the times in this thread that Rex was just posting antisemitic slurs while quoting and repping PRONG HORN instead of pretending he's interested in having a discussion about the topic at hand but refusing to look at and data.

Correctly assuming your anti-Jewish sentiment was being anti-Semitic?  That’s rich. 

You’re visibily angry about the attack on Iran. I’d care enough to explore it, but I already know the reason. 

  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

Correctly assuming your anti-Jewish sentiment was being anti-Semitic?  That’s rich. 

You’re visibily angry about the attack on Iran. I’d care enough to explore it, but I already know the reason. 

I wasn't even involved in the conversation, dummy, you need to stop drinking. Just because you incessantly mention me and @ me doesn't mean you are arguing with me.

You don't know shit. You won't explore a thing because you're a goddamn pussy. 

snoop dogg girl bye GIF by VH1

Posted
5 hours ago, bolverk said:

 

Fuck off with that bullshit. Multiple articles have already been linked here stating that the site suffered severe damage. I know that I've posted at least a couple that have said the same thing. Not a single soul has denied or disputed that. There have been in-depth discussions, specifically speculating whether the delicate centrifuges could have survived the blast, depending on how they were stored and packed, or if they were just left in place or moved off-site.

Do not confuse mocking premature celebrations of total OBLITERATION by the rah-rah-rah clownshitshow brigade with being happy that Iran might still retain the capacity to make a bomb. No one here wants that.

image.gif.b11d4b0bd281102d52013857dd6d6720.gif

Posted
2 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

I wasn't even involved in the conversation, dummy, you need to stop drinking. Just because you incessantly mention me and @ me doesn't mean you are arguing with me.

You don't know shit. You won't explore a thing because you're a goddamn pussy. 

snoop dogg girl bye GIF by VH1

I haven’t mentioned you in weeks and haven’t @ you ever, you self-aggrandizing contrarian. I was being sarcastic. I don’t care to know your rationales or motivations. I only will treat you fairly. I know enough about you to know I don’t want to know more. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Rex Kramer said:

I haven’t mentioned you in weeks and haven’t @ you ever, you self-aggrandizing contrarian. I was being sarcastic. I don’t care to know your rationales or motivations. I only will treat you fairly. I know enough about you to know I don’t want to know more. 

 

On 5/31/2024 at 11:28 AM, Rex Kramer said:

Do you hear that, @Brian Fantana?

Do you hear that, @bolverk?

@Brisketexan?  @F250?  @Hank_Hill?

Think Tim Robinson GIF by NETFLIX

Literally right after your antisemitic slurs, and quoting tweets PRONG HORN was posting as an attempted dunk lmao.

You are really bad at this, just stop. You lower the discourse of every conversation you barge into and you proudly don't know shit and refuse to learn shit. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

 

Think Tim Robinson GIF by NETFLIX

Literally right after your antisemitic slurs, and quoting tweets PRONG HORN was posting as an attempted dunk lmao.

You are really bad at this, just stop. You lower the discourse of every conversation you barge into and you proudly don't know shit and refuse to learn shit. 

 

5 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

 

Think Tim Robinson GIF by NETFLIX

Literally right after your antisemitic slurs, and quoting tweets PRONG HORN was posting as an attempted dunk lmao.

You are really bad at this, just stop. You lower the discourse of every conversation you barge into and you proudly don't know shit and refuse to learn shit. 

This’ll be my last post addressing you. I would appreciate if you did not post my words purposefully out of context to make it even appear I made any anti-Semitic remark when I clearly did not. Thank you. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Parliament said:

Oklahoma

Sigh.

[Brisket, shamefully recollecting his teenage crush on a certain curvy brunette daughter of a family friend who lived in Moore]

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

image.gif.b11d4b0bd281102d52013857dd6d6720.gif

Yes, I'm sure. If I'm wrong, I'll readily admit so.

Since you question those statements, your job is to find a single post from any poster on this site, who has expressed either opinion that 1) denies or disputes "severe damage" to the site, or 2) is happy that Iran might still retain the capacity to make a nuclear weapon. That's how this works. You cannot just say shit without proof.

I doubt you'll bother to even look, though. If you haven't provided evidence for your claim when I come back to this thread later this evening, I will immediately put you on ignore.

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Yes, I'm sure. If I'm wrong, I'll readily admit so.

Since you question those statements, your job is to find a single post from any poster on this site, who has expressed either opinion that 1) denies or disputes "severe damage" to the site, or 2) is happy that Iran might still retain the capacity to make a nuclear weapon. That's how this works. You cannot just say shit without proof.

I doubt you'll bother to even look, though. If you haven't provided evidence for your claim when I come back to this thread later this evening, I will immediately put you on ignore.

No damage was done and I'm super mad about the attack because I love the Ayatollah, he reminds me of my grandpa. Also, Iran can't get a nuke fast enough, if we're being honest here. If I could, I'd go over there and help them build it myself, but not before I join the Revolutionary Guard AND Hamas simultaneously so I can finally express my blind hatred for Israel properly.

Edited by Brian Fantana
sp
Posted
4 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

No damage was done and I'm super mad about the attack because I love the Ayatollah, he reminds me of my grandpa. Also, Iran can't get a nuke fast enough, if we're being honest here. If I could, I'd go over there and help them build it myself, but not before I join the Revolutionary Guard AND Hamas simultaneously so I can finally express my blind hatred for Israel properly.

Enjoy El Salvador!

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, bluto said:

So we slash our govt spending… to give $30bn to Iran? Or is that $30bn just frozen assets being released?

 

Just now, Js1 said:

By the law of Republican bullshittery, we have to say it's giving Iran $30bn.  No nuance

Donald J. Trump wants to give Iran $30 billion

 

 

Evidently the plan is for the Arabs to pay for it

Posted
1 minute ago, MagicSoccerSpray said:

 

 

 

Evidently the plan is for the Arabs to pay for it

So build a nuke and have the Arabs pay for it? Where have we heard that before?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...