Jump to content

Elon Musk: Officially a fraud and piece of shit. Official or unofficial war criminal?


MaybeACoordinator

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, totallynotabuttpirate said:

I'm a big boy now, no one is going to tell me what to do!

You're just not a big enough boy to actually do the right thing which is not support an apartheid racist cunt by justifying marginal gains.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Captain Ron said:

That report is pretty damning. They might cite "production issues" but when you deliver significantly less vehicles than you make, that's not a production problem, but a demand problem.

 

Selling cars is hard.

 

https://wapo.st/49k56Oc

 

Quote

“This will be not be a moment of celebration for the bulls and instead be a rip-the-Band-Aid quarter for Tesla investors,” Ives said. “For Musk, this is a fork-in-the-road time to get Tesla through this turbulent period, otherwise darker days could be ahead.”

oh, i'm sure that he will turn his focus to TSLA and away from tweeting at all hours and "building" (well reducing) what Twitter is for sure now...right?! RIGHT?!

from comments elsewhere

Quote

In Q1 2024 Tesla produced 751 more cars DAILY than they sold.

this is a very good question btw

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NoName said:

oh, i'm sure that he will turn his focus to TSLA and away from tweeting at all hours and "building" (well reducing) what Twitter is for sure now...right?! RIGHT?!

from comments elsewhere

this is a very good question btw

 

At the bottom of Town Lake

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Da Fino said:

Never realized they have those funny shaped steering wheels. Is that how they are selling all of their cars now?

Good friend of mine in LA owned two Teslas, the sedan and the crossover thingy. The crossover has that stupid wheel. They sold the sedan due to Elon's shittiness but have kept the crossover for the time being. They'll be getting rid of it soon.

 

12 hours ago, totallynotabuttpirate said:

So I spent over an hour with a Mach-E GT Performance today and it's a really solid car. Handling is bit better than the MY, but you lose the ground clearance and it still drives like an SUV/Crossover. After $10k of discounts, OTD price was $70K. So ~$17K more than an M3 LR with the $2K performance update (which beats the Mach-E 0-60 time). And the M3 has 70-80 miles more range. 

In summary, fuck no, I'm not spending $17K more for less performance and (mostly) less features. 

Unlike some of you neckbeard fucks, I'm out in the streets actually looking for a car that meets my needs, that's all that matters to me. It's really easy to spend someone else's money, so you can eat all the dicks in the world and I'll buy the car that I want. 

1cfd2edf-dfb3-4599-af82-4dd383d35a8e_tex

 

3 minutes ago, texasdago said:

At the bottom of Town Lake

The pond at Angela Chao's ranch? (Too soon?)

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, totallynotabuttpirate said:

So I spent over an hour with a Mach-E GT Performance today and it's a really solid car. Handling is bit better than the MY, but you lose the ground clearance and it still drives like an SUV/Crossover. After $10k of discounts, OTD price was $70K. So ~$17K more than an M3 LR with the $2K performance update (which beats the Mach-E 0-60 time). And the M3 has 70-80 miles more range. 

In summary, fuck no, I'm not spending $17K more for less performance and (mostly) less features. 

Unlike some of you neckbeard fucks, I'm out in the streets actually looking for a car that meets my needs, that's all that matters to me. It's really easy to spend someone else's money, so you can eat all the dicks in the world and I'll buy the car that I want. 

And I ain't even got a garage you can call home and ask my wife

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

He’s going to have to move the operation to Mexico, isn’t he?

 

13 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

It's much less woke there due to the cartels

Maybe he could send Kpax to negotiate on his behalf as a show of goodwill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mdmost said:

Elon needs to mute that End Wokeness one since it seems to be the primary source of where he gets his misinformation. So of course he won't do that. 

Unfortunately this line of thinking gives Elon the benefit of the doubt that he is seeking the "truth". He is not. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hank Kingsley said:

Unfortunately this line of thinking gives Elon the benefit of the doubt that he is seeking the "truth". He is not. 

 

Yep.

The only two options here are that Elmo is dumber than a bag of hammers, or openly opposes the Republic.  Or both.  It's probably both.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Unfortunately this line of thinking gives Elon the benefit of the doubt that he is seeking the "truth". He is not. 

7 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Yep.

The only two options here are that Elmo is dumber than a bag of hammers, or openly opposes the Republic.  Or both.  It's probably both.

Elmo is dumb enough to absolutely believe he is seeking the truth - witness the Qanon idiots who believed they were doing their own research (reading stupid shit online).  

Edit and everything needs to be framed in the mindset of somebody who grew up in 1980s South Africa.

Edited by atomheartbevo
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MrBig said:

I bet Elmo loved The Phantom Menace and thought Jar-Jar was a phenomenal link between human and alien life forms. 

we are less than a month away from Elon posting about how Jar Jar was a Sith collaborator and trained force user

https://old.reddit.com/r/StarWars/comments/3qvj6w/theory_jar_jar_binks_was_a_trained_force_user/

Spoiler

1200px-Star_Wars_Day_May_The_Fourth.svg.

 

Edited by NoName
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Sure thing, buddy.

 

keeps moving the goal post since they are losing users at a higher % rate than myspace did - now it's all about traffic - not mDAU!

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NoName said:

keeps moving the goal post since they are losing users at a higher % rate than myspace did - now it's all about traffic - not mDAU!

He knows the bots are cooking these numbers, that's why he's done absolutely zero to curb the issue. 

It's funny looking at this tweet now. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/03/tesla-bear-says-elon-musks-ev-maker-will-go-bust-stock-worth-14.html

Noted Tesla bear says Musk’s EV maker could ‘go bust’ and stock is worth $14

Quote

Lekander has taken his bearish Tesla call further, suggesting the stock could fall to $14 per share. He said his call is based on an estimate that the company’s full-year earnings per share this year would be $1.40. Lekander contends that Tesla is a “no growth” stock and should be valued on 10 times forward earnings, versus around 58 times forward earnings currently. Forward earnings are an important metric used by traders to gauge the value of a stock.

+
 

Quote

Lekander gave a number of reasons for his negative outlook. He said Tesla’s business model has been based on strong revenue growth, vertical integration and direct-to-consumer sales. Vertical integration broadly refers to when one company internally handles many parts of a process from the manufacturing of the car to the software. This model is “brilliant” when a company grows, but goes in “reverse” when sales fall, Lekander said.

The hedge fund boss said Tesla’s first-quarter problems were not to do with some of the reasons the company cited such as supply chain disruption. Instead, it is a “demand problem,” according to Lekander, who said two cars — the Model 3 and Model Y — make up the bulk of the U.S. automaker’s sales. And the company does not see another new vehicle being released until 2025.

“I don’t see any reason whatsoever to see any recovery over the next two years given that these models are stale and given the economy is not rocketing,” Lekander said.

 

 

Edited by NoName
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

 

Austin — There have been recent and inaccurate reports about the voter registration process and ID requirements in Texas. Please see the statement from Secretary of State Jane Nelson below.

"It is totally inaccurate that 1.2 million voters have registered to vote in Texas without a photo ID this year. The truth is our voter rolls have increased by 57,711 voters since the beginning of 2024. This is less than the number of people registered in the same timeframe in 2022 (about 65,000) and in 2020 (about 104,000).

When Texans register to vote, they must provide a driver license number or a Social Security number. When an individual registers to vote with just a SSN, the state verifies that the SSN is authentic.

While federal law allows individuals to register to vote without a photo ID, Texans must actually show proof of ID to vote. The 1.2 million figure comes from the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) website, which is supposed to report the number of times states have asked to verify an individual’s social security number. The SSA number is clearly incorrect, and we are working now to determine why there is such a large discrepancy."

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

While federal law allows individuals to register to vote without a photo ID, Texans must actually show proof of ID to vote.

This is what Elmo is too fucking dumb to understand.

Because he is dumb.  Not smart.  Dumb.  A fucking idiot.  An absolute fucking spoon.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Austin — There have been recent and inaccurate reports about the voter registration process and ID requirements in Texas. Please see the statement from Secretary of State Jane Nelson below.

"It is totally inaccurate that 1.2 million voters have registered to vote in Texas without a photo ID this year. The truth is our voter rolls have increased by 57,711 voters since the beginning of 2024. This is less than the number of people registered in the same timeframe in 2022 (about 65,000) and in 2020 (about 104,000).

When Texans register to vote, they must provide a driver license number or a Social Security number. When an individual registers to vote with just a SSN, the state verifies that the SSN is authentic.

While federal law allows individuals to register to vote without a photo ID, Texans must actually show proof of ID to vote. The 1.2 million figure comes from the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) website, which is supposed to report the number of times states have asked to verify an individual’s social security number. The SSA number is clearly incorrect, and we are working now to determine why there is such a large discrepancy."

 

 

 Noted left wing operative Jane Nelson is clearly lying

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/1/2024 at 9:41 PM, totallynotabuttpirate said:

So I spent over an hour with a Mach-E GT Performance today and it's a really solid car. Handling is bit better than the MY, but you lose the ground clearance and it still drives like an SUV/Crossover. After $10k of discounts, OTD price was $70K. So ~$17K more than an M3 LR with the $2K performance update (which beats the Mach-E 0-60 time). And the M3 has 70-80 miles more range. 

In summary, fuck no, I'm not spending $17K more for less performance and (mostly) less features. 

Unlike some of you neckbeard fucks, I'm out in the streets actually looking for a car that meets my needs, that's all that matters to me. It's really easy to spend someone else's money, so you can eat all the dicks in the world and I'll buy the car that I want. 

ride randy marsh GIF by South Park

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this wouldn't be allowed anywhere else.

i'm sure it will be fine, it isn't like the computer vision for FSD is super important - it's only one of the many different sensors out there to help a Tesla actually drive itself.

wait, what's that? they only use cameras?

Awkward Uh Oh GIF by It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia

how can a guy with a fiduciary responsibility to TSLA, as their CEO, hire extremely important talent from the public company he owns to the private startup he also owns and is the CEO of?

Quote

As Elon Musk builds his xAI artificial intelligence startup, he's having to compete with big tech giants and a slew of other startups for talent. One place he's managed to snare several promising engineers from, though, is close to home - Tesla.

Last month, Tesla machine-learning scientist Ethan Knight became the fourth Tesla engineer to leave the car company for xAI, the startup's website shows. At Tesla, Knight had overseen the team working on computer vision for Tesla's self-driving technology, according to a former employee. His departure follows those engineers who worked at Tesla on supercomputing, Autopilot and artificial intelligence infrastructure and have joined xAI in the past 12 months.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...