Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The excuse of he was just joking with his friends can make sense. However, that excuse falls apart when when you look at the two Venmo transfers from Nov 20. One is just "sports gambling" and the second is "sports gambling (UCLA vs USC)." What joke makes sense that you need to specify a matchup in a transaction? Or is it most plausible that he is adding specificity to a transaction to make sure his buddy knows which transaction is for which bet?

Use Occam's Razor here, folks. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Danimal said:

The excuse of he was just joking with his friends can make sense. However, that excuse falls apart when when you look at the two Venmo transfers from Nov 20. One is just "sports gambling" and the second is "sports gambling (UCLA vs USC)." What joke makes sense that you need to specify a matchup in a transaction? Or is it most plausible that he is adding specificity to a transaction to make sure his buddy knows which transaction is for which bet?

Use Occam's Razor here, folks. 


It is obviously a lie but a lie he knows cannot be disproven. His 7 figure NIL deal depends on it so he is going to say whatever he needs to say. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Danimal said:

The excuse of he was just joking with his friends can make sense. However, that excuse falls apart when when you look at the two Venmo transfers from Nov 20. One is just "sports gambling" and the second is "sports gambling (UCLA vs USC)." What joke makes sense that you need to specify a matchup in a transaction? Or is it most plausible that he is adding specificity to a transaction to make sure his buddy knows which transaction is for which bet?

Use Occam's Razor here, folks. 

He also sent the same guy money for soccer gambling. All we have to do is determine who the recipient was. Too bad the NCAA doesn’t have subpoena power. (Do they?)

Posted
8 minutes ago, Newy25 said:


It is obviously a lie but a lie he knows cannot be disproven. His 7 figure NIL deal depends on it so he is going to say whatever he needs to say. 

If the recipient is a known bookie, he’s in deep shit. If not, you’d need the recipient’s bank and credit card records. Recipient was probably a buddy who was placing bets for him. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Chili dog said:

If the recipient is a known bookie, he’s in deep shit. If not, you’d need the recipient’s bank and credit card records. Recipient was probably a buddy who was placing bets for him. 

The Ohtani defense 

Posted

I am sure there are other people that paid this same guy for gambling who are lazy enough to have and keep those transactions as public. Hopefully the internet can find those.

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...