Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 minutes ago, hornian said:

I kind of expect this from the older generation. But Gen Z? Being so butt hurt that someone expressed a differnt worldview that they film it and post it online and actively try to get other professor fired? That was surprising to me.  Very Karen-esque energy. 

Hate is passed down from generation to generation with great pride. "Heritage, not hate" is usually how you can ID that type of chud. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, 956 Worldwide said:

It’s not particularly new for college students to believe that they have a right to silence speech they believe conflicts with their moral values, and it’s not particularly confined to the left or right. You can’t even begin to count the number of guest lectures that have been pulled down on college campuses over the last 15 years or so after undergrad groups threw fits over the content. 
 

It is fairly new for the chief executive of the country to indulge their tantrums. 

True. 
 

Although I’m dating myself, I was in undergrad during the Bush II years and I remember a lot of neocons speaking on campus to some fanfare/protests, but no one was trying to get anyone fired for allowing it. Stufents shouting down Ann Coulter comes to mind.  Protests about the content of the speaker’s ideals? Sure. Trying to fire the college dean for allowing the speaker? Not so much. 

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Posted

Kids/young adults these days have been raised on phones/internet where instant satisfaction is easily found. Combine that with hands off/poor parenting and you develop an intrinsic deep rooted thought that they're always right. They have no sense of the bigger picture, they have no reading of social cues anymore, it's basically a look at me world and they're there to film it for "likes" which sadly is mostly what they care about now. I know that was a bit broader than what you asked, but the intolerance starts at the root. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

For many people dissent and opposing views are their Satan.  It is not allowed and it must be avoided at all costs.

This is nothing new.  I agree that it is fucked up and should be different, but whatcha gonna do?

see-birdbox.gif

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, hornian said:

I read this article on the Texas Tribune about an A&MDean getting fired for not forcing a professor to toe the line and teach that LGBT people exist. 

https://www.texastribune.org/2025/09/08/texas-am-video-professor-student-gender-identity-content/

Putting aside the politics of it, my main take away is that this is because some 18-22 year old undergrad got his or her or their (see what I did there?) feels hurt.
 

I kind of expect this from the older generation. But Gen Z? Being so butt hurt that someone expressed a differnt worldview that they film it and post it online and actively try to get other professor fired? That was surprising to me.  Very Karen-esque energy. 

This person was thoroughly indoctrinated by their parents and probably their peers at some "Christian" private school.

She was probably also a political plant like the daughter of that embarrassing UT grad twat that did a similar thing a couple of years ago.  Only at that time, the administration wasnt what it is now.

It's denunciation, like something out of a Soviet or French Revolution novel.

Texas, fuck Texas, all hail our fucked up state.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
Just now, TwiceHorn said:

This person was thoroughly indoctrinated by their parents and probably their peers at some "Christian" private school.

She was probably also a political plant like the daughter of that embarrassing UT grad twat that did a similar thing a couple of years ago.

This type of thing is on both sides of the political spectrum.

Posted
1 hour ago, hornian said:

I read this article on the Texas Tribune about an A&MDean getting fired for not forcing a professor to toe the line and teach that LGBT people exist. 
 

You don’t want to make it political but you write crap like this. You seem to be part of the problem.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 12
Posted
Just now, Texas Fight said:

You don’t want to make it political but you write crap like this. You seem to be part of the problem.

We should cancel him

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Texas Fight said:

You don’t want to make it political but you write crap like this. You seem to be part of the problem.

Yes, If you just thought like you were told there wouldn’t be any problem.

’You are free to be a drunkard, an idler, a coward, a backbiter, a fornicator; but you are not free to think for yourself.’

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

The university administrators bit is just blatantly untrue. It’s been a problem for years.  Universities have set pretty ugly precedent on this front. FIRE is a great group that takes an extremely principled stance on this. 

https://www.thefire.org/news/report-scholars-punished-their-speech-skyrocketed-over-last-three-years
 

 

Ok then.  I can clearly recall student protests from the left on various things that never amounted to anything, as well as the ones where student groups sponsoring controversial speakers canceled events.  I didn't recall any adverse administration action or certainly the federal government getting involved.

But I am old.  Shanty out front should have told you.

Nonetheless, that report indicates that external pressure from the right recently has accelerated, rather exponentially.

Sanctions attempts from 2000 to present

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Ghost of NMAS said:

Yes, If you just thought like you were told there wouldn’t be any problem.

’You are free to be a drunkard, an idler, a coward, a backbiter, a fornicator; but you are not free to think for yourself.’

He doesn’t have to think like me.

I’m just asking him to accurately write what happened in the class and not instigate in the opening post while he pokes fingers in the chest of anyone who tries to make this thread political.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck You 6
Posted
28 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Students taking umbrage at what a professor teaches, yes.

University administrators and, especially, government officials taking action on it, not so much.

 

Who wants to tell him 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Texas Fight said:

You don’t want to make it political but you write crap like this. You seem to be part of the problem.

How is that post political? 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I will say this, too.  When I wrote above, evidently incorrectly, about university administrators not taking official adverse action based on student protest or denunciation, I was basing it on my own observation of mostly "local" meaning in-state events.

In keeping with what Texas used to be, I'm thinking the administrations were pretty live-and-let-live about this sort of thing, borne out by what Welsh did even at the highly conservative lapdog eaTme.  Whereas it seems the historical sanctions came from more east coast type places (Central Florida, wth?).

The futility of student protests and denunciations at local unis was one of the hallmarks of them.  Again, see shanty.

So much for that.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted

Where is the evidence that this generation is more intolerant compared to prior generations? When I was in high school, if you came out as gay, you were ostracized. We’ve come a long, long way since then.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
1 minute ago, bschoolprof said:

Where is the evidence that this generation is more intolerant compared to prior generations? When I was in high school, if you came out as gay, you were ostracized. We’ve come a long, long way since then.

We had come a long way since then.

536746e089fb7fb18db97935564f3851.gif&f=1

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, bschoolprof said:

Where is the evidence that this generation is more intolerant compared to prior generations? When I was in high school, if you came out as gay, you were ostracized. We’ve come a long, long way since then.

Curious how those norms shift again in the next decade if conservatives have their way. 
 

Also yay? So a gay youth is less ostracized but can literally see their right especially in this state actively work to demonize them and try to strip away their rights. 

Edited by YChang
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Goredho said:

It’s part of the cultural zeitgeist at this point to be an abject asshole challenging societal norms.

Being a cruel dick has incredible social and political value nowadays.  In fact, it appears to be the ONLY ethos of any social or political value in 2025.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, hornian said:

True. 
 

Although I’m dating myself, I was in undergrad during the Bush II years and I remember a lot of neocons speaking on campus to some fanfare/protests, but no one was trying to get anyone fired for allowing it. Stufents shouting down Ann Coulter comes to mind.  Protests about the content of the speaker’s ideals? Sure. Trying to fire the college dean for allowing the speaker? Not so much. 

Shit. DT board. Can we move this to CR to have a more honest conversation?

Edited by BrickHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
Just now, BrickHorn said:

This. It’s idiotic to both sides this issue. One side are fascists spreading hateful propaganda and the other side are, at their very worst, well-intentioned moon bats expressing tolerance for harmless shit the other side has decided to hate. To put this in more concrete terms: leftists protest rightwing personalities  because they openly advocate for harming people; this rightwing student got a professor fired for arguing against a purported scientific justification for discriminating against and oppressing human beings with atypical gender identities. In both cases, the right wing side is pushing to harm a group of people and the left wing side is acting to protect them. 

The two sides are not at all equivalent and it’s at best lazy bullshit to imply otherwise. 

I don't think they are equivalent in general, but I don't discount the danger of tankie leftist silencing of dissent.  Seriously, see the reference to "denunciations" in the Soviet system.  It's a dangerous approach, if left to its own devices so it can reach its natural end.

Yes, the resistance from the "left" today in response to hard-right government-backed attacks is mostly about standing up for the weak against attacks meant to harm them.  But historical hard-left "denunciations" and where they tried to go here (and successfully did in many other countries) is dangerous.

Here's a hint: authoritarian crushing of any dissenting ideas is almost always a bad thing.  IDGAF if you are a left authoritarian or a right authoritarian.  Shitting on academic freedom and liberty, and inevitably personal freedom and liberty, is bad.  

Except we live in a moment where it is now government policy, and is cheered as good.  In fact, it is cheered as the only good thing out there.  The only good thing happening in society right now is....owning and silencing and punishing the opposition.  That's pretty fucky, and really bad for us.

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted (edited)

I have 2 siblings, early Millennials, who work in education.  One in HS ed and one in college.  They both say the youngs' dumbassery bottomed out 5-8 years ago.  Plenty of kids today have their acts together, example being college graduation.  Many of them take college classes in HS and put themselves on track to graduate college in less than 4 years.  Big contrast with the 90's gen that was on the 5 year plan.

Edited by Parliament
  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
1 hour ago, UTPhil2006 said:

Kids/young adults these days have been raised on phones/internet where instant satisfaction is easily found. Combine that with hands off/poor parenting and you develop an intrinsic deep rooted thought that they're always right. They have no sense of the bigger picture, they have no reading of social cues anymore, it's basically a look at me world and they're there to film it for "likes" which sadly is mostly what they care about now. I know that was a bit broader than what you asked, but the intolerance starts at the root. 

1 hour ago, kibbles said:

because many people of our generation(I am 50) raised their kids in a bubble with no actual skills besides asking mommy and daddy what to do.

1 hour ago, safe sex said:

Both sides, guys, both sides! 

We can blame our parents, but I can point to the fact that the fringe political movements in America (on both sides) over the last 50 years have always drawn heavily from the college crowd.  Because they don’t know any better, and they read a little Ayn Rand or whoever, and whatever is read on the left, and think that they are enlightened and that is their world view.

But there are also sheltered people (probably some overlap and college freaks them out) who maintain dumb beliefs that were passed down to them.  I’ve had somebody I went to high school with claims there were no gay or lesbian students when we were there.  Me pointing out several people in the LBGTQ crowd in our class, and that I went to two same-sex marriages of classmates of ours doesn’t change their thinking - because “they weren’t gay back then”.

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted

Answering the broader question, the young are always/usually/often idealistic to the point of being ideologues, with the attendant intolerance of the status quo or other notions.

Historically, that's taken the form of utopian and other pretty impractical notions that are identified with progressives or liberals.

So, it's a bit startling to see these retrograde ideologues cropping up.  So it seems that it may be six of one, half a dozen of the other.  However, I think the liberal idealism is a more natural result of new autonomy and exposure to new ideas.  That is, the reason that higher education is progressive by its very nature, as opposed to the result of some sort of political influence or indoctrination.

This retrograde idealism is definitely a product of indoctrination.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

That is, the reason that higher education is progressive by its very nature, as opposed to the result of some sort of political influence or indoctrination.

This retrograde idealism is definitely a product of indoctrination.

Yes....but...I think that USED to be true.

Sponge-brained youth would show up at university, get exposed to utopian (fantastical, unrealistic) ideas which are often raised by voices/authors on the left, and buy into them hardcore because they have little wisdom, experience, or discernment.  Frankly, it's a natural part of the intellectual growth curve; many people go through an "ignorant, naive idealist" phase.  

Such "ignorant, naive idealist" tendencies generally didn't lend themselves to hardcore retrograde/"conservative" thinking; that mostly came from upbringing.  BUT....in recent years, with social media, algorithms, and an explosion of often purposefully divisive right-wing online content being streamed 24/7 into those same impressionable sponge brains, young intolerant ideologues of the right-wing persuasion have blossomed.  Will they grow out of that phase?  It remains to be seen, we're still pretty early in this game.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, bschoolprof said:

Where is the evidence that this generation is more intolerant compared to prior generations? When I was in high school, if you came out as gay, you were ostracized. We’ve come a long, long way since then.

Sure. But the same folks behind this incident are also actively working to get cases in front of SCOTUS to overturn Obergfell. 

Also, go read the dissent in Lawrence v Texas and try to argue that that's not the current majority opinion of the court should a case be brought.

It's going backwards.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)

I don't know if they're any more or less intolerant than previous generations.

I do believe that they're more emboldened to attempt to take aggressive stances, which has been encouraged by cancel culture and has been allowed to proliferate through weak or poor or even aggressively malignant leadership.

Honestly when I see how open and welcoming my kids are to people who are different than them, how they really don't see race or color or gender or sexual orientation as being identifiers of differences, how they view all of those as either irrelevant or fluid, I'm very proud of them.  That is very different from my teenage/high school experience in the 80s.  So in that sense they are far more open and tolerant than my generation was.  I realize they're not the sole cohort for judgment and they have peers that don't view things in the same way, but those groups seem to be fewer and further between, than when I was a kid.

5 minutes ago, Foosters said:

Sure. But the same folks behind this incident are also actively working to get cases in front of SCOTUS to overturn Obergfell. 

Also, go read the dissent in Lawrence v Texas and try to argue that that's not the current majority opinion of the court should a case be brought.

It's going backwards.

 

That might be true, but it doesn't really address the topic of this thread, about the younger generation.  I don't believe it's the younger generation that's putting court cases in front of SCOTUS and other circuits.

 

 

Edited by utee94
  • Hook 'Em 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...