Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, Captainant said:

And a significant component of that dogmatic support for Israel is the belief that it checks one of the key boxes for Christ to return and usher in the end of days. Fundagelicals have been buckwild over that for decades

Rex never heard of that so it’s not really a thing.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 6
Posted
2 hours ago, Fastbreak said:

Everything that the dear leader doesn’t like is fake news. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

f20f2cc0ca070cd330bc5e573cdb3230.jpg

 

25 minutes ago, speed817 said:

🤣🤣🤣

 

 

 

2 hours ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

Maybe he's using the alternate definition of "completely" that he uses when he claims he completed the border border wall. 

In his defense, I’m pretty sure the pentagon just played the last scene of TopGun Maverick in the situation room while the adults all huddled in another room dealing with the actual mission.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
18 minutes ago, linux said:

If they knew then Israel knew since they were a leaking bucket.

Mossad is very good at what they do,  but I don’t think that’s true. “They” may have been a leaking bucket but the operational security between Hamas and Iran is probably very tight, for them anyway.

Furthermore we can only guess what Mossad knew. And it’s possible to know things without knowing what they mean. Our own experience leading up to 9/11 is a good example of not putting pieces together and acting on information. 
 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Dnaguy said:

 

 

In his defense, I’m pretty sure the pentagon just played the last scene of TopGun Maverick in the situation room while the adults all huddled in another room dealing with the actual mission.

Well he did say there was a female pilot and what do you know TG2 did have a female pilot!

Posted
1 minute ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Mossad is very good at what they do,  but I don’t think that’s true. “They” may have been a leaking bucket but the operational security between Hamas and Iran is probably very tight, for them anyway.

Furthermore we can only guess what Mossad knew. And it’s possible to know things without knowing what they mean. Our own experience leading up to 9/11 is a good example of not putting pieces together and acting on information. 
 

The United States did not build a drone manufacturing base in the middle of the the cave next to UBL lived, the level of intelligence access Israel had in Tehran up until last week went beyond anything ever seen, when they appointed the head of counter intelligence he was a Mossad asset, who then appointed other assets.

Honestly SAM coverage can be repeatedly beaten with US based satellite intelligence, but Iran could very well cut off that intelligence spigot if they are paranoid enough. That was the real clownshow that they started an unwinnable war and burned probably all their assets in the process.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Mossad is very good at what they do,  but I don’t think that’s true. “They” may have been a leaking bucket but the operational security between Hamas and Iran is probably very tight, for them anyway.

Furthermore we can only guess what Mossad knew. And it’s possible to know things without knowing what they mean. Our own experience leading up to 9/11 is a good example of not putting pieces together and acting on information. 
 

You have no idea what you are talking about. Firstly, this would not have been under Mossad's purview. Second, there are heaps of evidence that Netanyahu's government was aware of Hamas' plans and did nothing, you can probably guess why. There have been dozens of articles written about this subject just by Israeli journalists alone.

How can you possibly have your head stuck this far in the sand?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

Second, there are heaps of evidence that Netanyahu's government was aware of Hamas' plans and did nothing, you can probably guess why.

If they did, that’s truly abhorrent. That said, most of what I’ve seen along those lines is evidence of the “911 was an inside job” variety. 

 

13 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

How can you possibly have your head stuck this far in the sand?

So let me get this straight- you’re affronted that I call Hamas a terrorist organization and an Iranian proxy, but at the same time you’re of the opinion that the Netanyahu regime was aware of a coming terrorist attack by Hamas via their intel on Iran.  Therefore, I have my head in the sand. 
 

Vine Ok GIF

Posted
5 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

If they did, that’s truly abhorrent. That said, most of what I’ve seen along those lines is evidence of the “911 was an inside job” variety. 

 

So let me get this straight- you’re affronted that I call Hamas a terrorist organization and an Iranian proxy, but at the same time you’re of the opinion that the Netanyahu regime was aware of a coming terrorist attack by Hamas via their intel on Iran.  Therefore, I have my head in the sand. 
 

Vine Ok GIF

It is not "my opinion", though it's very cute that you're attempting to frame it that way to discredit the point. Also, no one is "affronted" that you call Hamas a terrorist organization, the point was that while you [correctly] call Hamas a terrorist organization, you handwave away terrorism committed by nation-state actors simply by the virtue of them being nation-states. Not to mention the fact that these same nation-states are the ones that get to define what is and what isn't terrorism. Convenient, isn't it?

Also, you both demonstrated a complete lack of knowledge of what Hezbollah is and why it exists, and completely ignored the point about the goings on in Lebanon entirely. Very nice.

All that coupled with your speculation about what Mossad knew about the attack when anyone with even basic knowledge of how Israel operates would know that intelligence gathering with regard to Gaza & the West Bank and any counter-terrorism operations fall under the purview of Shin Bet.

In other words, you're talking out of your ass and seemingly operating on nothing but vibes, stereotypes, and whatever you hear from Western media talking heads. It's annoying.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

you handwave away terrorism committed by nation-state actors simply by the virtue of them being nation-states.

No I don’t and didn’t. 
as for the rest … take a deep breath Brian. 

Posted
3 hours ago, VABuckeye said:

The most successful military strikes in history, my ass.

Let's look at what the B-17 did in WWII you fucking idiot.

The biggest turning point in WWII, certainly the war in the Pacific, was the Doolittle Raid. And that was a fleet of 16 B-25 Mitchell's.

Posted

Yeah, I thought about that one as well.  Obviously, Doolittle was the Pacific Theater with his raid.  Without the B-17 the European Theater becomes much bloodier.

Posted

Everything is the biggest and bestest with the idiot.  Don't waste your time trying to put things into actual perspective.  The conman knows no other way. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
21 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

I love how "woke" is now just a word that means "anything that doesn't support the Trump narrative."  The MAGA ability to just make up definitions for things that has no tie to reality: woke, DEI, CRT...it's impressive to watch.

The whole cult is nonce words.  And nonces.

Posted
1 hour ago, Hard Times said:

The biggest turning point in WWII, certainly the war in the Pacific, was the Doolittle Raid. And that was a fleet of 16 B-25 Mitchell's.

Come on man, even in just the Pacific it was clearly Midway.

Posted
5 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

If they did, that’s truly abhorrent. That said, most of what I’ve seen along those lines is evidence of the “911 was an inside job” variety. 

 

So let me get this straight- you’re affronted that I call Hamas a terrorist organization and an Iranian proxy, but at the same time you’re of the opinion that the Netanyahu regime was aware of a coming terrorist attack by Hamas via their intel on Iran.  Therefore, I have my head in the sand. 
 

Vine Ok GIF

There were plenty of credible analysts saying that Netanyahu was supporting Hamas as a boogey man to justify the shit Israel does. I believe that although I can't put my hands on the sources. I just recall them as credible. Bibi is a monster and he's fighting to stay out of prison. I'm persuaded that he did wish for an attack from Hamas to take the heat off of him and let him seize Gaza.

The Gaza campaign is that of a monster. That said, I would strongly doubt a story that Bibi knew how inhuman the Hamas attack would be. 

Anyways, that's how I remember it. 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Nivek said:

Everything is the biggest and bestest with the idiot.  Don't waste your time trying to put things into actual perspective.  The conman knows no other way. 

Yea, Trump exagerates like nobody has ever seen before.

Posted
3 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

There were plenty of credible analysts saying that Netanyahu was supporting Hamas as a boogey man to justify the shit Israel does. I believe that although I can't put my hands on the sources. I just recall them as credible. Bibi is a monster and he's fighting to stay out of prison. I'm persuaded that he did wish for an attack from Hamas to take the heat off of him and let him seize Gaza.

The Gaza campaign is that of a monster. That said, I would strongly doubt a story that Bibi knew how inhuman the Hamas attack would be. 

Anyways, that's how I remember it. 

https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/



×
×
  • Create New...