Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

And she's on the stand.  Let the good times roll.

Can't wait for the "They're attacking his poor child to get at him" line in the lunchtime press conference.

Edited by TexasHooch
Posted
32 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

 

 

 

For those that don't want to go to the twitters:

Quote

BREAKING: Donald Trump’s daughter Ivanka Trump throws her husband Jared Kushner under the bus while testifying under oath at the Trump Organization’s $250 fraud trial in New York.

While being questioned by prosecutors from Attorney General Letitia James’ office, Ivanka Trump threw Kushner to the wolves, admitting under oath that it was Kushner himself who introduced her to the Deutsche Bank banker who helped Donald Trump and the Trump Organization commit financial fraud by inflating Trump’s assets in order to secure fraudulent loans for its Miami Doral gold course, the Old Post Office in D.C., as well as a large property in Chicago.

This is devastating news not only for the Trump Organization, but for her own husband Jared Kushner, which she just exposed to criminal liability for helping Trump and the Trump family business commit rampant fraud with her devastating testimony. Tick-tock, Jared Kushner…

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

 

 

 

given that this was posted before she even took the stand, I have doubts about the veracity of the sources...

Edited by Rimbo
Posted
8 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

given that this was posted before she even took the stand, I have doubts about the veracity of the sources...

Occupy Democrats is a complete click-bait account.  

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, gernblansten said:

spacer.png

 

"This thing is bigger than my dad. This is big bank business, not a real estate issue. Look at him. Kareem Akbar. He's the head of the Trump Organization. That's right. The educated brother from the bank. He's the real head of the Trump Organization." 

It's bigger than your mushroom dad??

Well-Yea.gif

Posted

Is that vapid cunt putting her top-dollar milk wagons on display today, or nah? I need to know how attuned to the proceedings I should be. 

Posted
Occupy Democrats is a complete click-bait account.  

It’s the left side version of “watch Ben Shapiro destroy this lib WITH FACTS AND LOGIC!” - overstated hyperbolic bullshit that is never what actually happened.
  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted

Well that's what happens when you don't blow the I.T. guy, you dumb cunt.  For being the smart one, Ivanka really going about this the wrong way...

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Ok, something just occurred to me here.

As far as I can tell, all of the loans in question here closed long prior to limitations, like 2010, 2011, 2012.  They objected to her testifying to any of that.

But where that may be important is that, yes there was a species of fraud occurring every time Trump submitted a bs SFC according to loan covenants.  So that sustains the summary judgment.  And those events all occurred within limitations.

But the fraud that set the loan terms occurred outside the statute of limitations.  So, I am not sure Engoron is really going to be able to look at the loan terms to decide a disgorgement number.  There may be some way around this.

But prepare your anus.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
10 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Ok, something just occurred to me here.

As far as I can tell, all of the loans in question here closed long prior to limitations, like 2010, 2011, 2012.  They objected to her testifying to any of that.

But where that may be important is that, yes there was a species of fraud occurring every time Trump submitted a bs SFC according to loan covenants.  So that sustains the summary judgment.  And those events all occurred within limitations.

But the fraud that set the loan terms occurred outside the statute of limitations.  So, I am not sure Engoron is really going to be able to look at the loan terms to decide a disgorgement number.  There may be some way around this.

But prepare your anus.

I don’t speak lawyer but this is what I got 

 

IMG_2296.gif.047b41303aa15ea8576ec5b6378453b1.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Ok, something just occurred to me here.

As far as I can tell, all of the loans in question here closed long prior to limitations, like 2010, 2011, 2012.  They objected to her testifying to any of that.

But where that may be important is that, yes there was a species of fraud occurring every time Trump submitted a bs SFC according to loan covenants.  So that sustains the summary judgment.  And those events all occurred within limitations.

But the fraud that set the loan terms occurred outside the statute of limitations.  So, I am not sure Engoron is really going to be able to look at the loan terms to decide a disgorgement number.  There may be some way around this.

But prepare your anus.

They've frequently brought up that the terms of the agreement required DJT to maintain a certain net worth.  Presumably if he had to attest to "still" being above the number (or perhaps failing to report that he had fallen under it) at any date inside the limitations, the savings he subsequently experienced on interest rates due to that fraud would be subject to disgorgement.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Please tell me somebody has worked up a meme of the two astronauts with Eric looking out into the distance, asking "Hey Dad, Revocable Trusts mean you trust me forever right?"  And Donald holding the pistol to his head, "Sure son, that's what it means..." 

Posted
7 hours ago, BearSchlong said:

My ex-wife was always whining about how she should have married her childhood friend Clark Hunt instead of me.

50/50 chance
- she was once in the same room with him
(probably at Kanakuk or Neiman Marcus)
- she blew him at church camp

My wife once dated the son of a former regent at Texas Tech. The dude is a billionaire. He's good friends with my ex-in laws, who sent him my way when he was having trouble insuring his $12M secondary residence in Montecito. I was showing my wife the pictures when we were working on it and told her, "See, you could've had this!"

And we laughed and laughed and laughed.

 

6 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

In addition to the three families, there's a lot of other weird shit in their story, some of which I didn't know. That D magazine article above is pretty fascinating. 

And the current, ongoing AG Hill III stuff is pretty bizarre and fascinating. 

It's interesting that they try and legislate morality to everybody else when that family tree is crazy fucked up.

 

5 hours ago, TexasHooch said:

And she's on the stand.  Let the good times roll.

Can't wait for the "They're attacking his poor child to get at him" line in the lunchtime press conference.

Seth Meyers made that joke Monday night about bearded Eric and Junior -- the mean ol' prosecution was going after Trump's wittle "kids"

Posted
19 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Ok, something just occurred to me here.

As far as I can tell, all of the loans in question here closed long prior to limitations, like 2010, 2011, 2012.  They objected to her testifying to any of that.

But where that may be important is that, yes there was a species of fraud occurring every time Trump submitted a bs SFC according to loan covenants.  So that sustains the summary judgment.  And those events all occurred within limitations.

But the fraud that set the loan terms occurred outside the statute of limitations.  So, I am not sure Engoron is really going to be able to look at the loan terms to decide a disgorgement number.  There may be some way around this.

But prepare your anus.

Are you saying Ivanka should prepare her anus? Engoron should prepare his anus? or I should prepare my anus?  Exactly whose anus is in jeopardy?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, safe sex said:

Goddammit, Mallrats is not a good movie, but it's got some of K. Smith's best set-up/response jokes 

I can't decide if Smith or M. Night Shyamawhatever had more of a straight shot down into irrelevance.  It's nuanced.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I can't decide if Smith or M. Night Shyamawhatever had more of a straight shot down into irrelevance.  It's nuanced.

Teen me is very disappointed in Smith completely giving up on developing as an artist just because Jersey Girl (better than reviews would suggest) and Cop Out bombed. Pussy. 

Chasing Amy hasn't aged well, and it was probably never as good as I thought it was, but it was an important piece of queer representation (through the eyes of a cis straight man lmao) to teenage me.

Edited by safe sex
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, safe sex said:

Chasing Amy hasn't aged well, 

That's an understatement.  I watched it a couple of years ago, expecting the same rush I got when it came out because of the super smart dialog, etc.

Yeah, it wasn't super smart at all.  It was painful.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

That's an understatement.  I watched it a couple of years ago, expecting the same rush I got when it came out because of the super smart dialog, etc.

Yeah, it wasn't super smart at all.  It was painful.

Same experience. I hadn't seen it since probably 2000, and had been a big fan. Yeaaahhhh.... not great. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

That's an understatement.  I watched it a couple of years ago, expecting the same rush I got when it came out because of the super smart dialog, etc.

Yeah, it wasn't super smart at all.  It was painful.

Yeah it's tough to get through now. Hooper X still slaps tho. 

image.png.ac59bc02fcc9d52f21ee77ecee74204a.png

Edited by safe sex
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Same experience. I hadn't seen it since probably 2000, and had been a big fan. Yeaaahhhh.... not great. 

Man....but peak Joey Lauren Adams may have been the most enchantingly cute gal in existence.

And, I've long known a flight attendant who is a dead-ringer for her.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Drool 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Lurch said:

They've frequently brought up that the terms of the agreement required DJT to maintain a certain net worth.  Presumably if he had to attest to "still" being above the number (or perhaps failing to report that he had fallen under it) at any date inside the limitations, the savings he subsequently experienced on interest rates due to that fraud would be subject to disgorgement.

Yeah, assuming the remedies for the lender were a rise in rates, that could be possible.  I had kind of assumed, without having seen the testimony, that the disgorgement figure was based on the loan amount at X% when it would have been Y% if the facts were known.  But what you said is a definite possibilty.

Posted

csb alert/ I think I told this lame-ass story on LFZ about 20 years ago.  I'm home alone for Christmas working and sending some gifts to my family in Chicago from some UPS/Fedex shop on South Lamar.  My cheap ass flip phone is outta batteries and I don't know the zip code to where my sisters just moved.  So guy behind counter gives me the old-school zip code book by suburbs for every town in America.  I'm flipping through and staring in frustration.  I look up just a tad and packing up a box is this neon purple thong almost all the way up outta the jeans of the owner.  She's as frustrated as me.  She stands up, straightens her jeans, and turns and does this cute hair tuck thing behind the ear.  Sure enough, it was Joey Lauren Adams.  I guess she was living in Austin at the time.  I'll never forget that ass shot and she made my lonely holiday season a little brighter.  It was a quainter town back then...

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Drool 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Goredho said:

Are you saying Ivanka should prepare her anus? Engoron should prepare his anus? or I should prepare my anus?  Exactly whose anus is in jeopardy?

Well I am trying to find weaknesses in James case. For example, reasons the business death penalty or huge disgorgement numbers bandied about won't hold up. 

I don't think any appeal will absolve him by any stretch, but the major penalties may not. Any current celebration may premature. So it's the collective anus that may be in jeopardy. 

The surly cloaca if you will. 

 

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1


×
×
  • Create New...