Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We stop importing and those dollars stop boomeranging back to buy stock and treasuries.  Cool cool.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

So we are just going to decrease the volume of trade to the point net $ of exported goods = net $ of imported goods. Brilliant 

You didn't know that was how it was supposed to work? -MAGA

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Sawbonz said:

So we are just going to decrease the volume of trade to the point net $ of exported goods = net $ of imported goods. Brilliant 

No imports at all!  NIAA!

Fuck your coffee, your Scotch and Irish whiskey, your krautwagens and British loudspeakers.

  • Rage+1 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Pancho said:

The “art” of “the” deal

 

“Up to Scott B”

It’s not like he’s the President who solely drove this abuse of a loophole on “national security” to levy the biggest US backed trade war in a century, and then threw a tantrum when China punched back. Now it’s all “up to Scott B”. That’ll do it. I’m sure that will absolve him of the consequences 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

So we are just going to decrease the volume of trade to the point net $ of exported goods = net $ of imported goods. Brilliant 

We're going back to the barter system.  I'll trade you this cigar for that roll of toilet paper.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

“Up to Scott B”

It’s not like he’s the President who solely drove this abuse of a loophole on “national security” to levy the biggest US backed trade war in a century, and then threw a tantrum when China punched back. Now it’s all “up to Scott B”. That’ll do it. I’m sure that will absolve him of the consequences 

Who gets axed first? Bessent or Navarro? 

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
Posted
36 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

“Up to Scott B”

It’s not like he’s the President who solely drove this abuse of a loophole on “national security” to levy the biggest US backed trade war in a century, and then threw a tantrum when China punched back. Now it’s all “up to Scott B”. That’ll do it. I’m sure that will absolve him of the consequences 

Hey, Scotty B., how you feelin' about joining this shit patrol now?

Probably not Scotty B. now:

no-regrets-no-ragrets.gif

Posted
“Up to Scott B”
It’s not like he’s the President who solely drove this abuse of a loophole on “national security” to levy the biggest US backed trade war in a century, and then threw a tantrum when China punched back. Now it’s all “up to Scott B”. That’ll do it. I’m sure that will absolve him of the consequences 

So about 6 months from now when the tariffs have been nothing but a failure, he will be able to attack Bessent for being a FOOL, similar to Powell. Textbook Trump.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Derka said:

 

lol at the title there. I think that there's a lot of flat out stupidity and second and third order effects that are just lost on the idiocy of the tariffs, but this isn't actually presented in a cohesive plain way, he goes too far into the trap of complexity which is part of wanting to be correct. 

Mental Models & Product #5: Second-Order Thinking | by Isabel ...



×
×
  • Create New...