Jump to content

Charlie Kirk assassinated at an event in Utah [Crazy Person]


Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, troph said:

I’ll trade my thoughts and prayers for him and his family for legit gun regulation, even petition Congress 3x a year to put a statue somewhere in his honor if we can have sensible gun regulation. Isn’t political, we are the only developed nation where this shit happens. And the vast majority of people regardless of politics want it to stop. Make it happen and I’ll be the first person to turn in my high capacity clips or magazines or whatever the fuck they are called for my gloc. So let’s stop with the performative bullshit and do something about it.

I realize that there is still some shit to shake out, but he was likely shot with a hunting rifle. 

It was a political assassination. Your glock and the related magazines have nothing to do with that happened. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

So do I have this right? 

1. An old white man was immediately arrested after the shooting. He was let go after determining he wasn't the shooter. 

2. Utah police later arrested another man. The fucking FBI Director states that suspect has been caught. 

3. It was determined the second man was also not the shooter. The fucking FBI Director retracts and says shooter is still at large. 

4. Crickets since then??

 

How many fuckers were running around that area with long guns?

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Murfdogg21 said:

While I admit to not know everything he’s ever said publicly, the crap I get on social media feeds has been mostly him arguing on college campuses against DEI polices or the purposes of the 2nd amendment to protect citizens from a tyrannical government. Is that what people are calling hate speech and racist? 
 

And people are piling on with analogies to mass shootings and mocking his position on the second amendment. This event does not appear to be the same category as school and other mass shootings. The former is mentally ill, or incels, or religious influenced mentally ill, and/or (however you want to categorize it) trans people who are also unstable committing acts of mass murder on victims they don’t directly know. Today was an assassination of one known targeted individual purely on political grounds. 

It was a political assassination. The rest is hand waving. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck You 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

So do I have this right? 

1. An old white man was immediately arrested after the shooting. He was let go after determining he wasn't the shooter. 

2. Utah police later arrested another man. The fucking FBI Director states that suspect has been caught. 

3. It was determined the second man was also not the shooter. The fucking FBI Director retracts and says shooter is still at large. 

4. Crickets since then??

 

It's best to accept now that pretty much nothing that you hear in the next 48 hours is going to be accurate or true. From anyone.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:

So it's a free for all in here, huh?

There's not even a description of the shooter out there and the local cops and FBI have fumbled the ball on announcing the shooter has been caught. It's pretty wild that somebody in this day and age pulled this off in such a manner.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Murfdogg21 said:

While I admit to not know everything he’s ever said publicly, the crap I get on social media feeds has been mostly him arguing on college campuses against DEI polices or the purposes of the 2nd amendment to protect citizens from a tyrannical government. Is that what people are calling hate speech and racist? 
 

And people are piling on with analogies to mass shootings and mocking his position on the second amendment. This event does not appear to be the same category as school and other mass shootings. The former is mentally ill, or incels, or religious influenced mentally ill, and/or (however you want to categorize it) trans people who are also unstable committing acts of mass murder on victims they don’t directly know. Today was an assassination of one known targeted individual purely on political grounds. 

Mocking his position on the second amendment?  Spell out that please .  Otherwise you are full of shit.  And a negger.  I’ll report you, as a negger, to your local authorities.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

It's best to accept now that pretty much nothing that you hear in the next 48 hours is going to be accurate or true. From anyone.

Well, I've got a good source that said  "Charlie don't surf".

 

Take it for what it's worth.

Posted
40 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

They don't even know who killed him, much less the motive.

Never let facts get in the way of a good narrative. 

Posted
1 hour ago, John80 said:

someone that's going to kill another person isn't going to try and get a gun legally that can be traced to him and he will have no problem getting one illegally just like anyone can easily get any illegal drug. My attempt at sarcasm didn't go over well, If the US could do a reasonably good job at keeping guns away from criminals I would be fine with banning guns but our experience with drugs is criminals have no problem getting endless amounts of illegal drugs and it would be the same for guns.

HI JOHN!! MY NAME'S BULLNECK!!!

Posted
Just now, Judge Roybeanbag said:

Whatever it was he shot the fuck out of him. Was no ear grazing or Connolly dinking.  

Life is a matter of a half inch one way or the other for most of us.  

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Incredulity said:

Which include…..???

several different types including public shootings, bar/club incidents, family annihilations, drive-by, workplace and those which defy description but with the established foundation definition being that they have a minimum of four victims shot, either injured or killed, not including any shooter who may also have been killed or injured in the incident. 

 

Why are GVA Mass Shooting numbers higher than some other sources?

GVA uses a purely statistical threshold to define mass shooting based ONLY on the numeric value of 4 or more shot or killed, not including the shooter. GVA does not parse the definition to remove any subcategory of shooting. To that end we don’t exclude, set apart, caveat, or differentiate victims based upon the circumstances in which they were shot.
GVA believes that equal importance is given to the counting of those injured as well as killed in a mass shooting incident.

The FBI does not define Mass Shooting in any form. They do define Mass Murder but that includes all forms of weapon, not just guns.

In that, the criteria are simple…if four or more people are shot or killed in a single incident, not including the shooter, that incident is categorized as a mass shooting based purely on that numerical threshold.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
1 minute ago, Irwin F Fletcher said:

Well, I've got a good source that said  "Charlie don't surf".

 

Take it for what it's worth.

lol literally took this picture today in KiheiIMG_6144.thumb.jpeg.1bc7b396ba0435dfa068f72020b79a6f.jpeg

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

So do I have this right? 

1. An old white man was immediately arrested after the shooting. He was let go after determining he wasn't the shooter. 

2. Utah police later arrested another man. The fucking FBI Director states that suspect has been caught. 

3. It was determined the second man was also not the shooter. The fucking FBI Director retracts and says shooter is still at large. 

4. Crickets since then??

 

I think they know who it was but it doesn’t fit the narrative they want pushed. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Anastasis said:

Life is a matter of a half inch one way or the other for most of us.  

Your mother never complained so long as I left a 20 on the nightstand

  • Like 1
  • Haha 8
Posted
9 minutes ago, billfromlaketravis said:

I think this ends outdoor political rallies for the foreseeable future. Metal detector and wands are the world we live in. 

oh no. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, elfenix said:

Your mother never complained so long as I left a 20 on the nightstand

Reported for fake newsery. She told me your range was 1/4" one way or the other with a point estimate of 3. 

Posted
1 hour ago, hobbes2702 said:

“Christians are under attack”. A sitting senator on CNN just now 

Yeah, no. 

1 hour ago, Anastasis said:

It was Okie MWM. The OK base will eat that up. 

 

Charlie Kirk strongly identified as a Christian. He was not killed for it. He was killed because he engaged people in the public square, put his shit out there and gave others equal opportunity to put their shit out there. Our political climate doesn't like that sort of thing. 

You are as big of an idiot at MWM.

1 hour ago, TexArcher said:

He strongly identified as a Christian Nationalist, which is and has always been code for White Racist.

And he didn't "give others equal opportunity to put their shit out there."  Every video of his "debates" is 3 minutes with him talking for 2 minutes and 45 seconds and the other guy getting one quick sentence at a time in before he's cut off with more talking points. 

And he also contributed to the Covid misinformation campaign and several others.  He was a complete fraud of an intellectual that only a stupid person would fall for.

He was a college dropout who figured out how to enrich himself by stirring the pot with inflammatory rhetoric.  He was Ann Coulter for Gen Z, nothing more.

 

This.

1 hour ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:

If by “Christians” you mean grifting/moneychanging racist hatemongers who profit off spreading hate, violence and intolerance in our youth, then yes you hit the nail on the head!  

Yep. 

1 hour ago, Surly Bevo said:

Well, a large portion of Hispanics are catholic, and then a lot of black people are of some protestant faith, soooo

Dumb And Dumber GIF

Sorry, American evangelicals only count white male protestants.

1 hour ago, Ted Lange said:

image.thumb.png.c49798e97e011d518a69f158a05bbf17.png

Fuck the Yankees.

1 hour ago, hobbes2702 said:

The dumbest post possibly ever.

And that is saying something.

58 minutes ago, royiv said:

Fuck the Yankees.

Yep!

31 minutes ago, Sbbruin said:

There’s a thread on TexAgs titled “hero”

Well There It Is Jurassic Park GIF

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
Just now, Anastasis said:

Reported for fake newsery. She told me your range was 1/4" one way or the other with a point estimate of 3. 

I wasn't going to brag, but you said it not me

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Kirk was literally ok with Sandy Hook and Uvalde as the price to pay for our 2nd amendment rights. His words not mine. Now his family joins those families as victims of policies he championed. 

There are literally no gun control advocates that are going to take away a hunting rifle, which was the most likely gun used today.  This is clown argument shit. 

Edited by Anastasis
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Fuck You 1
Posted
Just now, NorthLoop said:

ATLAS/3I about to turn around

It should with the number of morons on this site. No wonder the aliens do anal probes on these covid loving TP hoarding assholes

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
Just now, Pimphand said:

It should with the number of morons on this site. No wonder the aliens do anal probes on these covid loving TP hoarding assholes

I feel like you're not listening to me...

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Pimphand said:

It should with the number of morons on this site. No wonder the aliens do anal probes on these covid loving TP hoarding assholes

Are you having a stroke?

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Pimphand said:

It should with the number of morons on this site. No wonder the aliens do anal probes on these covid loving TP hoarding assholes

Because our asses are so clean from the TP? Right?

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

There are literally no gun control advocates that are going to take away a hunting rifle, which was the most likely gun used today.  This is clown argument shit. 

No dying by the violence that he found acceptable is definitely not ironic at all.

 

ironic alanis morissette GIF

Edited by elfenix
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
So do I have this right? 
1. An old white man was immediately arrested after the shooting. He was let go after determining he wasn't the shooter. 
2. Utah police later arrested another man. The fucking FBI Director states that suspect has been caught. 
3. It was determined the second man was also not the shooter. The fucking FBI Director retracts and says shooter is still at large. 
4. Crickets since then??
 

49b2206094b01d8fafb234808fafaff6.jpg
  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
Posted
2 hours ago, CowboyFred said:

And weird how many claim “I didn’t always agree with him but…”

I don't even get that. More like Kirk was a true American hero. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, DalTxHornFan said:

R's just won the midterms today.

I remember the posts from the very left posters here after Butler along the same lines. Basically conceding the election. I thought that was foolish. Turns out...

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Kirk was literally ok with Sandy Hook and Uvalde as the price to pay for our 2nd amendment rights. His words not mine. Now his family joins those families as victims of policies he championed. 

Nobody on either side justified the murder of children. The right didn’t say FAFO to the kids or their families. It is a political and philosophical debate of whether somewhat neutering the 2nd amendment would stop (mass) murder or if completing banning guns would end murder AND if so is it worth undoing the original purpose of the 2nd amendment. Today was a political assassination and the response from some is that he FAFO by speaking his political beliefs, and many people are ok with or even celebrate that. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Fuck You 2


×
×
  • Create New...