Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Hermanator said:

 

Or if it's a praying type of family then offer to do the Christmas dinner prayer and thank the good lord for shining his light on president trump raping children and now all of his christian followers can atone for their sins and fight to have him removed from office.

ricky-bobby.gif

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted

lest we forget..

the cover on the binder when the original "Epstein files" were released back in February 2025

Congressman - The Epstein files are not a hoax. The Speaker adjourned  Congress early to avoid the topic, but we will not forget. When the House  returns from August recess, I can

The Most Transparent Administration in History

The 45th and 47th President of the Unites States

Donald J. Trump

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, yoladu said:

lest we forget..

the cover on the binder when the original "Epstein files" were released back in February 2025

Congressman - The Epstein files are not a hoax. The Speaker adjourned  Congress early to avoid the topic, but we will not forget. When the House  returns from August recess, I can

The Most Transparent Administration in History

The 45th and 47th President of the Unites States

Donald J. Trump

Then they actually read what was in the files.

"Um.... never mind! Everyone fucking shut up about it right now! Epstein? Who's that?" 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

you mean the document you released? you are looking into it now? clown show.

and why does the DOJ have their own twitter account? So they can comment on  ongoing investigations,  i guess.

Edited by yoladu
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 5
Posted
7 minutes ago, yoladu said:

you mean the document you released? you are looking into it now? clown show.

and why does the DOJ have their own twitter account? So they can comment on  ongoing investigations,  i guess.

Wait, are they going to tell us that Donald Trump does not like young nubile girls?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

someone help me here - in summary

- you can make MS Word docs from the PDFs and get some of the redacted removed? Bozo's post above

- you can search "trump_" and not "trump" and see his name? Saw that somewhere but it doesn't make sense to me 

- they released some of the files anyway that had little/no redaction

- the letter thing that is blowing up.

Is that all right ^

Posted
15 minutes ago, Red Five said:

DOJ now saying the letter from Epstein is fake.

And in a "See?? Everything we release could be fake..." way.

 

doj midterm election results - it's all fake !

Posted
12 minutes ago, staboner said:

someone help me here - in summary

- you can make MS Word docs from the PDFs and get some of the redacted removed? Bozo's post above

- you can search "trump_" and not "trump" and see his name? Saw that somewhere but it doesn't make sense to me 

- they released some of the files anyway that had little/no redaction

- the letter thing that is blowing up.

Is that all right ^

When you draw shapes over text with Acrobat, it's drawing the shape/box essentially on a new layer over the text. So the text remains, but you can't see it with the blacked out rectangle. But if you highlight all the text, you can still get all of it, including the bits under the shapes/blackouts. The correct way, if using Photoshop/Acrobat, would be to rasterize/flatten it all to a single layer, but that would involve actually using your brain. Of course, this is a ridiculously dumb oversight, so the MAGAsphere has shifted to saying DOJ did this all on purpose.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Evil Bill Obrien said:

Aint nobody gonna believe this Goebbels mother fucker running the Dept of Justice Social media accounts:
 


Uh Huh Whatever GIF by Bounce

And Trump was never on Epstein’s plane either 

Edited by tx ind
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, speed817 said:

At this point, we're just waiting for a snuff video featuring Trump to be leaked and they will call it AI....

 

 

  • Haha 4
Posted

Do y'all remember when Patel testified under oath that Epstein didn't traffic girls to anyone but himself? What the hell was that and why did he do that?

Epstein is the most famous sex trafficker in history. That's like saying "I have seen no evidence that Tom Brady ever once threw a football". 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
Do y'all remember when Patel testified under oath that Epstein didn't traffic girls to anyone but himself? What the hell was that and why did he do that?
Epstein is the most famous sex trafficker in history. That's like saying "I have seen no evidence that Tom Brady ever once threw a football". 

On the other hand, Patel is thick as a brick. Like he legit may not have seen them because his crazy eyeballs were looking at his honey trap girlfriend or a gold commercial during that meeting.
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I don't believe that one actually happened. I believe that someone went to the police with that story in 2020, but it's quite a bit worse than all the other stories and the timing of the criminal complaint is suspicious.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, staboner said:

someone help me here - in summary

- you can make MS Word docs from the PDFs and get some of the redacted removed? Bozo's post above

- you can search "trump_" and not "trump" and see his name? Saw that somewhere but it doesn't make sense to me 

- they released some of the files anyway that had little/no redaction

- the letter thing that is blowing up.

Is that all right ^

Didn't somebody post on here last night that the Krassensteins (one of them posted this hack) were grifters and this was bogus information?

Posted

Epstein's brother said Jeffrey was murdered because he was about to "name names." Goes on to allege Trump authorized the murder.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article313920022.html?giftCode=3def220d65503f5c1b17bda4d48db15b8a5b6064bce226fb887e9eb1875e6a47

Quote

Jeffrey Epstein’s brother, Mark Epstein, told the FBI in 2023 that Epstein was murdered in his jail cell because he was about to “name names.”

Mark Epstein, 71, who has long believed that his brother was killed, also alleged in the tip that President Donald Trump “authorized” the late sex traffickers murder.

Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article313920022.html#storylink=cpy

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, OU Sucks said:

When you draw shapes over text with Acrobat, it's drawing the shape/box essentially on a new layer over the text. So the text remains, but you can't see it with the blacked out rectangle. But if you highlight all the text, you can still get all of it, including the bits under the shapes/blackouts. The correct way, if using Photoshop/Acrobat, would be to rasterize/flatten it all to a single layer, but that would involve actually using your brain. Of course, this is a ridiculously dumb oversight, so the MAGAsphere has shifted to saying DOJ did this all on purpose.

Didn't they do the same thing in the dotard's first term?

Posted
2 hours ago, staboner said:

someone help me here - in summary

- you can make MS Word docs from the PDFs and get some of the redacted removed? Bozo's post above

- you can search "trump_" and not "trump" and see his name? Saw that somewhere but it doesn't make sense to me 

- they released some of the files anyway that had little/no redaction

- the letter thing that is blowing up.

Is that all right ^

What the dumbshits did was highlight shit then clicked the black fill in. Works the same as highlighting it yellow. 

Posted
3 hours ago, South Austin said:

I mean, I see how the dots are connected on a high level.  But something's missing for me.  The implication is that prison officials read this letter, relayed the news to someone who told someone who ordered a hit on Epstein in his prison cell.  If a prison leak got word of this letter to someone with the power to end Epstein's life (i.e., Trump or someone in his inner circle), why didn't that power also include the ability to get rid of the fucking letter? 

Is this how it went:

Prison mole:  "We intercepted a letter from Epstein discussing President Trump and his 'love of young nubile girls.'"

[Unnamed]:  "Okay, let's kill him and make it look like a suicide."

Prison mole:  "Got it.  What do you want us to do with the letter?"

[Unnamed]:  "Go ahead and mail it. God forbid there's an investigation of interference with the United States mail.  If it gets out, nobody will ever believe it, and we'll say it's fake news."

MV5BMTg0OTAyNTExN15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTAxMTQyMQ@@._V1_.jpg.48dcfa0f1b9d81558e98aa9b35037c98.jpg

 

(i remember seeing this poster in the tiny post office in the basement of a building on the west mall back in 1998)

Posted
56 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

Didn't they do the same thing in the dotard's first term?

It's a common lawdog rookie mistake when producing documents.

Also don't send a redline version of a word doc to opposing counsel unless you intend to (the redlines really never go away unless you strip metadata).

Once you've seen the mistake made, it sticks with you.

Unless you're a bunch of fucktards hired by Trump.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
Just a few more things that are a bad look for the parties implicated.  But hardly a coverup.

I understand the details of him getting off easy in 2008 have not been released.
 

Yeah. Not going to look good for W at all, since it was his admin that did that deal, but I’m sure you knew that and aren’t just showing your ass like Mark Mullin.

Edit: Mullin tried to claim 2009. My bad.
Posted

Texags mods have locked their Epstein thread, lol. 160 pages of wild speculation and who knows what else - locked the day there is actual information to discuss. 

(Hint: it's not worth reading, just depressing really.)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
5 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

“He raped me.”

“Donald J Trump had raped her along with Jeffrey Epstein.”

“She was found with her head ‘blown off’… there was no way it was a suicide.”

Now we’re starting to see why Trump was hiding the Epstein files, and it probably gets much worse.

image.thumb.png.62c1d93979bd1fbaece7fbc5190d52fb.png

 

Mad Arthur GIF by MOODMAN

trump raped epstein?!?! holy shit!

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BillyBadAss said:

Texags mods have locked their Epstein thread, lol. 160 pages of wild speculation and who knows what else - locked the day there is actual information to discuss. 

(Hint: it's not worth reading, just depressing really.)

 

texag question - How does anyone not want EVERYONE involved to have the maximum punishment?

response - entire govt would collapse 

 

me - 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Posted
12 minutes ago, BillyBadAss said:

Texags mods have locked their Epstein thread, lol. 160 pages of wild speculation and who knows what else - locked the day there is actual information to discuss. 

(Hint: it's not worth reading, just depressing really.)

 

aggies, the gift that keeps giving. every aggie stereo type is spot on  ....

Have you kids been able to cobble together when, where and to whom all these Trump rapes happen?

What I wish this Christmas season is that for everyone naming Trump as a pedo with zero evidence is for that person to have the same allegation made against them, publicly, and that their lives be completely ruined by it.

Posted

Zero evidence huh? From the same people who draw batshit crazy conclusions about everything under the sun with nothing but wild internet theories. Pure insanity.

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Okie State said:

Zero evidence huh? From the same people who draw batshit crazy conclusions about everything under the sun with nothing but wild internet theories. Pure insanity.

 

the racist aggie stereo type falls in here ....

switch 'Obama'' for 'trump' in the epstein files and they'd be marching on washington as we speak. it would all be 100% true 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

switch 'Obama'' for 'trump' in the epstein files and they'd be marching on washington as we speak. it would all be 100% true 

He could be mentioned zero times in the files. How about just "he was best friends with Jeffrey Epstein for years".

They deemed him unfit for the presidency because they didn't like some things his pastor said. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Red Five said:

They deemed him unfit for the presidency because they didn't like some things his pastor said. 

Whaaaaaat?

All this time I thought.. no, I knew... there had to be a reason. I thought it was because he wouldn't buy the fries.

Posted
10 hours ago, Chuckie Finster said:

No proof that the claims are untrue other than “if they were true, wouldn’t the Dems have used them against Trump?!?!”

Counterpoint: dems are incompetent morons

 

17 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

Are you asking if Epstein wrote a suicide note from jail to another incarcerated pedophile implicating Trump as a pedophile?

This simulation has officially jumped the shark

Posted (edited)

Just a reminder that most of the people claiming this is all a nothing-burger are the same ones who were convinced that Wayfair furniture catalogs were secret child trafficking menus a few years ago.

Edited by Chuckie Finster
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 hours ago, OU Sucks said:

When you draw shapes over text with Acrobat, it's drawing the shape/box essentially on a new layer over the text. So the text remains, but you can't see it with the blacked out rectangle. But if you highlight all the text, you can still get all of it, including the bits under the shapes/blackouts. The correct way, if using Photoshop/Acrobat, would be to rasterize/flatten it all to a single layer, but that would involve actually using your brain. Of course, this is a ridiculously dumb oversight, so the MAGAsphere has shifted to saying DOJ did this all on purpose.

2 hours ago, MissingInAction said:

What the dumbshits did was highlight shit then clicked the black fill in. Works the same as highlighting it yellow. 


What if I told you that there are FBI agents/DOJ officials who dislike Trump and this bullshit and deliberately made sure, at least as much as they could, that we could find Trump in the files, and get at that redacted text as much as possible, while pretending to redact that information to please their bosses?

Or we can believe that dozens or hundreds of agents who work with PDF files every fucking day just absolutely whiffed something this simple in a case this high-profile?



×
×
  • Create New...