Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, YChang said:

Explain it to me... why is this what gets some people to see the light on Trump & GOP? Had a few friends text me today saying this issue is what’s gonna have them vote Dem next time. Like what the fuck? THIS is what shook you?

No offense but this is silly

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

No offense but this is silly

Why would I take offense to this?

Edited by YChang
Posted
4 minutes ago, YChang said:

Explain it to me... why is this what gets some people to see the light on Trump & GOP? Had a few friends text me today saying this issue is what’s gonna have them vote Dem next time. Like what the fuck? THIS is what shook you?

From the outside you can’t understand it, from the inside you can’t explain it.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, YChang said:

Explain it to me... why is this what gets some people to see the light on Trump & GOP? Had a few friends text me today saying this issue is what’s gonna have them vote Dem next time. Like what the fuck? THIS is what shook you?

Your friends are liars. They'd vote for a convicted pedophile Trump over a radical left Marxist socialist communist. They'd just scrunch their nose a bit to feel okay about it. For the good of the country, after all.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, GreenspointTexas said:

3 minutes were cut out. Totally normal

Maybe in a few years, they're release a Criterion Collection edition with the missing footage?

Posted

If Mike Johnson is calling for release and Boebert is calling for a special investigator why tf did they vote not to release the files

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

If Mike Johnson is calling for release and Boebert is calling for a special investigator why tf did they vote not to release the files

IMG_2442.jpeg.9d058fdf746acbb9b8e73a0836916464.jpeg

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Posted
If Mike Johnson is calling for release and Boebert is calling for a special investigator why tf did they vote not to release the files

Same reason Josh Hawley is doing this. These are not serious people.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

If Mike Johnson is calling for release and Boebert is calling for a special investigator why tf did they vote not to release the files

spacer.png

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

If you’re on the list and alive then you should be in jail

The voices in my head read this to the tune/meter of "If you're happy and you know it clap your hands" (you have to drop the "then")

Posted
The voices in my head read this to the tune/meter of "If you're happy and you know it clap your hands" (you have to drop the "then")

If you’re on the list and living, straight to jail
Posted

It’s obvious that Trump is listed somewhere in the file. Perhaps not even as participating but is listed enough that he doesn’t want it. He’s ordered Bondi to not release them and this is why he’s praising her. Bondi could potentially release it with some names redacted but I assume some AG lawyers (or former) would rebel if the names were redacted or pages kept out.

This reasoning is why Trump also cannot get rid of Bondi so easily. Trump also needs some big misdirection to get Epstein files out of the news.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)

"It was made up by Comey."

"Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release."

 

That sounds like he's dog whistling to her, repeating in a vague public way what he told her behind closed doors to go out there and say.  It almost sounds like a threat.

 

Edited by TexArcher
Posted
1 hour ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

It’s obvious that Trump is listed somewhere in the file. Perhaps not even as participating but is listed enough that he doesn’t want it. He’s ordered Bondi to not release them and this is why he’s praising her. Bondi could potentially release it with some names redacted but I assume some AG lawyers (or former) would rebel if the names were redacted or pages kept out.

This reasoning is why Trump also cannot get rid of Bondi so easily. Trump also needs some big misdirection to get Epstein files out of the news.

At war with Russia would do the trick. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Underdog said:

At war with Russia would do the trick. 

Exactly. Hence the reports that he’s asking Ukraine what it would take for them to bomb Moscow. I don’t think Trump wants a US-Russia war but if you balance that with his whatever involvement with Epstein, then yes a hot war would be preferable for him.

Posted
5 minutes ago, VABuckeye said:

I don't like the word but if ever there was a CUNT, it is Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Overwhelming consensus on this site is that we all get a pass for calling Marjorie Taylor Greene a cunt.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
12 hours ago, aggie08 said:

Your friends are liars. They'd vote for a convicted pedophile Trump over a radical left Marxist socialist communist. They'd just scrunch their nose a bit to feel okay about it. For the good of the country, after all.

A few days ago, I saw a tweet by one of the big MAGA influencers that said that while raping kids is wrong, as Christians they should forgive Trump and keep voting MAGA for the good of the country.

If hi res video of him raping and murdering a 3 year old was released, it'd probably increase his support a measurable amount. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, VABuckeye said:

I don't like the word but if ever there was a CUNT, it is Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Americans need to follow the British lead and add "cunt" to the list of perfectly acceptable profanity.

Gen X, America's most foul-mouthed generation, should lead the way.

Posted
2 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

It’s obvious that Trump is listed somewhere in the file. Perhaps not even as participating but is listed enough that he doesn’t want it. He’s ordered Bondi to not release them and this is why he’s praising her. Bondi could potentially release it with some names redacted but I assume some AG lawyers (or former) would rebel if the names were redacted or pages kept out.

This reasoning is why Trump also cannot get rid of Bondi so easily. Trump also needs some big misdirection to get Epstein files out of the news.

Bondi has a real problem on her hands. I just read wikipedia, and she's crooked: abuses her power and shrugs off ethics. But, what are her moral foundations? I'll pre-empt the obvious rejoinder that she has none. We don't know that.

Is she a sociopath who doesn't care about having her name forever tied to a trafficking operation that provided teenagers to old men? I think that dread is what makes the GOPs do their disingenuous reversal on their votes. They're disingenuous through and through, but I doubt any of them are sincere in their votes to cover-up for the president. Their faces may get blend with the crowd. 

None of them are as isolated in this as Bondi.

When this comes up, her name will always be in the first paragraph. The intolerant moral persecution of non-Ward Cleave sexual certainty is despicable, but, say what you will, at least it's an ethos, Dude.

I'm guessing that she does not want to be bad guy in this. She's spitting the bit when it comes to trafficking teenage girls to amoral wealthy shitwads.

I think Trump's fallback position about "credible" information is a compromise offer. Either don't publish under claim of credibility or publish and paint the whole thing as incredible (I hate what we've done with this word). Not a bad strategy for a public that's so far been willing to collect Trump Big Beautiful Fig Leaves.

Accusing Obama and Biden is quite a leap. It's lazy on Trump's part. He's likely going off script to do so. I think the script was Steele Dossier, Russia Hoax, Perfect Phone Call all generated by the deep state. He's peddled that before with putridly favorable results.

A lot of this comes down to the soul of Pam Bondi. Pence came to a moment where he stood his ground, and no person exceeded his sychopancy. 

Well, Pam?

Posted
29 minutes ago, VABuckeye said:

I don't like the word but if ever there was a CUNT, it is Marjorie Taylor Greene.

I don't like it either. We've had the discussion. The word rises like lightning in the mind when considering some people. Most people use it aptly without regard to sex, but it still has that degrading aspect. There is no such word for men. 

I only use the word when with people who know exactly what I mean. I rarely use it, however.

The deacons will pass the collection plate. I'll be in back with the altar boys.

Posted
5 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

I don't like it either. We've had the discussion. The word rises like lightning in the mind when considering some people. Most people use it aptly without regard to sex, but it still has that degrading aspect. There is no such word for men. 

I only use the word when with people who know exactly what I mean. I rarely use it, however.

The deacons will pass the collection plate. I'll be in back with the altar boys.

When used properly, it's the same word.

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

took a min but i figured out who this dude was lmao

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Morrow_(Texas_politician)

 

https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/incendiary-state-board-of-education-candidate-rob-morrow-advances-to-runoff

Quote

Matt Mackowiak, the current Travis County Republican chairman, tweeted his dismay about Morrow making the primary.

"[W]e will crush him on May 26 or I will light myself on fire," Mackowiak tweeted.

 

 

Also, agreed! 

Anyone who helped cover it up after as well!

image.png.fa8cceea7b710e9ee73aa7d83f354851.png

unnamed.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

When used properly, it's the same word.

 

People made similar arguments about the N word back in the 80s.

"I mean bad people not black people." That may be the intention, but using the word throws a lot of unintended shrapnel. 

I conceded that the word comes to my mind and there are places for it, but only if everyone present understands and approves. Sorta like the N-word.

I will say the N-word with people certain that I only use it to parody racist yokels. If someone uses the N-word at a gathering of people I don't know well, I will make clear that I abhor the word. 

In some ways, it comes down more to politeness than political correctness. 

My four volume analysis will soon be published. Look for it at an Amazon near you.

Edited by RomaVicta
Posted
47 minutes ago, VABuckeye said:

I don't like the word but if ever there was a CUNT, it is Marjorie Taylor Greene.

I don't throw it around lightly but certain people deserve it. She does.

Bondi will finally release something, the 'definitive' files but they will be manipulated to pain liberals in a bad light and Trump will be nowhere on it.

Also, Wired is reporting that nearly three minutes are missing from the edited Epstein jail cell video.

https://www.wired.com/story/the-fbis-jeffrey-epstein-prison-video-had-nearly-3-minutes-cut-out/

Quote

Newly uncovered metadata reveals that nearly three minutes of footage were cut from what the US Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation described as “full raw” surveillance video from the only functioning camera near Jeffrey Epstein’s prison cell the night before he was found dead. The video was released last week as part of the Trump administration’s commitment to fully investigate Epstein’s 2019 death but instead has raised new questions about how the footage was edited and assembled.

WIRED previously reported that the video had been stitched together in Adobe Premiere Pro from two video files, contradicting the Justice Department’s claim that it was “raw” footage. Now, further analysis shows that one of the source clips was approximately 2 minutes and 53 seconds longer than the segment included in the final video, indicating that footage appears to have been trimmed before release. It’s unclear what, if anything, the minutes cut from the first clip showed.

The nearly three-minute discrepancy may be related to the widely reported one-minute gap—between 11:58:58 pm and 12:00:00 am—that attorney general Pam Bondi has attributed to a nightly system reset. The metadata confirms that the first video file, which showed footage from August 9, 2019, continued for several minutes beyond what appears in the final version of the video and was trimmed to the 11:58:58 pm mark, right before the jump to midnight. The cut to the first clip doesn’t necessarily mean that there is additional time unaccounted for—the second clip picks up at midnight, which suggests the two would overlap—nor does it prove that the missing minute was cut from the video.

The footage was released at a moment of political tension. Trump allies had spent months speculating about the disclosure of explosive new evidence about Epstein’s death. But last week, the DOJ and FBI issued a memo stating that no “incriminating ‘client list’” exists and reaffirmed the government’s long-standing conclusion that Epstein—whom the US government accused of committing conspiracy to sex traffic minors and sex trafficking minors—died by suicide. That announcement triggered immediate backlash from pro-Trump influencers and media figures, who essentially accused the administration of a cover-up.

In response to detailed questions about how the video was assembled, WIRED sent a request for comment to the Department of Justice at 7:40 am on Tuesday morning. Just two minutes later, Natalie Baldassarre, a public affairs officer for the DOJ, replied tersely: “Refer you to the FBI.” The FBI declined WIRED’s request for comment.

On Friday, WIRED published an analysis of metadata embedded in the video, confirmed by independent video forensics experts, which indicates that the file was assembled from at least two source clips, saved multiple times, exported, and then uploaded to the DOJ’s website, where it was presented as “raw” footage.

WIRED’s initial analysis found that those saves took place over a 23-minute span; however, further analysis of additional metadata shows the file was actually edited and saved several times over a period of more than three and a half hours on May 23, 2025. Specifically, the file was created at 4:48 pm and last modified at 8:16 pm ET that day. The metadata also references “MJCOLE~1,” which is likely a shortened version of a longer username. While it likely begins with “MJCOLE,” the full name cannot be determined from the metadata alone.

Both analyses found that the two clips, labeled “2025-05-22 16-35-21.mp4” and “2025-05-22 21-12-48.mp4,” were stitched together. The first clip is 4 hours, 19 minutes, and 16 seconds long, but only the first 4 hours, 16 minutes, and 23.368 seconds appears in the published version, meaning nearly 2 minutes and 53 seconds were cut from the end. According to the metadata, the cut occurs just at 11:58:58 pm. The cut is milliseconds before the one-minute recording gap that Bondi said was caused by a quirk of the surveillance system. The second clip, “2025-05-22 21-12-48.mp4,” picks up immediately afterward, continuing the footage from 12:00:00 am until 6:40:00 am.

The analysis was first provided to WIRED by a researcher who requested anonymity for privacy reasons. WIRED reviewed its findings with two independent video forensics experts, each with over 15 years of experience in Premiere and video production, who confirmed that the edit occurred just before the missing minute mark and that approximately three minutes of footage were cut from the original clip.

The FBI released both “raw” and enhanced versions of the video. Both versions include internal comment markers, annotations typically used in editing software to flag moments of interest. The enhanced version, which the FBI referred to as Video 2, contains 15 such markers that apparently correspond to visible movement near “46 door” at New York’s Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). This door is near the cell block where Epstein was being held while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. These markers appear to have been left by analysts during their review, but they do not include the original comment text.

According to a 2023 report by the DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG), only two cameras in the vicinity of the Special Housing Unit (SHU), the area of the MCC where Epstein was held, were filming and recording at the time of his death. According to the report, the camera that recorded the footage the DOJ released July 7 captured video of a large portion of the SHU common area and parts of the stairways leading to various “tiers,” one of which housed Epstein’s cell.

The OIG report notes that the MCC’s surveillance system was outdated at the time of Epstein’s death, “had not been properly maintained,” and that the DVR hard drives that stored the video files “frequently malfunctioned and needed to be replaced.”

Both the 2023 OIG report and the DOJ-FBI memo published last week state that anyone entering or attempting to access the tier containing Epstein’s cell from the SHU common area on August 9 or 10, 2019, would have been visible on that camera. However, Epstein’s cell door itself was not within the camera’s field of view. The stairway leading to the tier where he was held was also partially obstructed and difficult to see clearly on the video. (A second camera, which covered the “ninth-floor fire exit and two of the floor’s four elevators,” was also filming at the time, according to the OIG report.)

Amid backlash from supporters and critics alike, President Donald Trump defended Bondi on Saturday, saying she was doing a “fantastic job.”

“What’s going on with my ‘boys’ and, in some cases, ‘gals?’ They’re all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB!” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “We’re on one Team, MAGA, and I don’t like what’s happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and ‘selfish people’ are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein.”

 

Posted

IMO, current Republican women deserve that label… Gump, Mace, Boebert, Sowfanik, etc… I’ll never apologize for using it when directed towards them. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

 

Ok yeah, now I believe he had Epstein killed. 

The Epstein-o-philes seem to not realize that Trump was president while Epstein died in federal prison.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

The marching orders have been sent out. Let's see if the lemmings fall in line as usual. If the base no longer cares about it then it's another masterful pivot and he really can do nothing wrong in their eyes. 

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

So Epstein hanged himself in jail over a hoax. His girlfriend is in prison over a hoax 

Just like when guys have a misunderstanding with the mafia and stab themselves in the back 14 times.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

The Epstein-o-philes seem to not realize that Trump was president while Epstein died in federal prison.

This week, Bill O'Reilly was going off on News Nation on how the Biden Administration failed to fully prosecute and punish Epstein. The show host had to inform O'Reilly that Epstein committed suicide 18 months before Biden took office. O'Reilly eventually agreed he was wrong on the dates. However in turn he did not move his furor to the 1st Trump administration. 



×
×
  • Create New...