Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Dotard speaking nonsense now. "I was fined $355 million dollars for building a perfect company."

"If I'm not successful in my appeal, then the state of New York will be gone."

 

Edited by Red Five
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Trump may not care much about these judgements because he’s close enough to dying that he probably has enough assets to not really impact his spending ability. If you’re Don Jr or Eric, your future money is quickly drying up.

of course Trump has to worry about his freedom with the upcoming trials.

Posted
1 hour ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

As I am understand it, the provision that bars him from obtaining a loan from a NY licensed institution is big because it prevents him from posting a bond and appealing. 

As am I

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 5
Posted
27 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

Yeah, but you actually know a thing or two about what you're talking about. You and I, we have a difference of opinion that's based on weighing facts differently. But at least facts and knowledge are involved, here.

Oh, I admitted it several posts before that, too. And all throughout.

But if you want me to change my view, you actually have to be able to show me something I'm not already taking into account, or show me why I'm weighing the data wrongly, or otherwise be speaking at a level where I can say, "Gee, I hadn't considered that" or "gee, maybe I'm weighing this too heavily/not enough." Ya gotta be able to back your opinion up with something real.

I'm not going to reconsider my views over simian fecal tossing. I'm going to give that the disrespect it deserves.

I literally said in the post you quoted that no one would ask you to change your view, you non reading fuck. 

Posted
1 minute ago, SydneyCarton said:

I literally said in the post you quoted that no one would ask you to change your view, you non reading fuck. 

He reads a lot about politics and history.  He doesn't read your posts.

  • Haha 4
Posted

Alright, let us begin.  

There's to be a Freedom Convoy to his first to be seized property.  How do we know?  Well, it'll be publicly announced in papers of record and government websites.  The date and location have to be, by law, be announced in advance.  We rile up MAGA's to ride there ahead of time.  Shouldn't be hard.  Shit, I'll send 'em gas cards.  You tell them to come heavy and form a human barricade in front of whichever property it is that may be seized BY THE ILLEGAL AND POLITICAL WITCH-HUNT JUDGE FROM THE DEEP STATE.  And then feed 'em some meth at Waffle House and watch the bullets fly.  I finally got it.  I've been whining to you folks for a couple years but this is it.  This is how we get them to start murdering one another.  They didn't know that "Civil War" mean them firing upon each other.  Oh my god, this is gonna be better than LSD-flavored viagra.  Keep an eye out for public notices on forfeiture.  Tell the MAGA's in your life to go heavy or go home.  

And for the record, I gave Brisket a $1 one time so this is me telling you all that I had nothing to do with this.  There will be casualties.  But it's a sacrifice I'm willing to let other people make.  

We're almost there folks.  Sorry it took me so long to sort it out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Dotard speaking nonsense now. "I was fined $355 million dollars for building a perfect company."

"If I'm not successful in my appeal, then the state of New York will be gone."

 

Narrator: If he is reelected and doesn’t win his appeal, he is ordering a nuclear strike against New York. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Narrator: If he is reelected and doesn’t win his appeal, he is ordering a nuclear strike against New York. 

I mean.....here's the thing.  We're posting absurdist, insane, hyperbolic takes on this board.  That's what we do.

Except....under a Donald Trump presidency II, they aren't entirely insane or hyperbolic.  The chances of Term Two Trump ordering an actual military strike against a US state that pisses him off are not just non-zero, they are a positive integer.  This is fucking insanity.

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Underdog said:

Negged.  Bird Lady is much, much too good for Trump to play. 

Can he play Marv so he can get pelted in the face with bricks?

Edited by Biff Tannen
mixed up ma burglers
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Homercles said:

Ok so tell me how this is horrible news for democrats 

I’ll wait for NYT pitch bot to chime in 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 1
Posted

Question for those that know PAC law.  My understanding is that it's basically illegal to take PAC or Super PAC money and convert it to personal funds.  There is grey area on this, but not likely $550 million worth of grey area.  With a Conservator/Monitor, I have to imagine any capital infusion would be intensely scrutinized.  

Do I have this correct?  

Posted
Just now, BamaATL said:

Question for those that know PAC law.  My understanding is that it's basically illegal to take PAC or Super PAC money and convert it to personal funds.  There is grey area on this, but not likely $550 million worth of grey area.  With a Conservator/Monitor, I have to imagine any capital infusion would be intensely scrutinized.  

Do I have this correct?  

as brisket would say, "Oh my sweet summer child."  

Do you even 'Processing Fee', bro? 

Watch what happens next.  I say this as somebody who has spent years in fin-tech and banking.  This is going to create a whole new sub-vertical of digital banking.  This is going to be absolutely incredibly to watch.  Good news---gonna hurt him------------a lot.  Bad news---we don't currently have any laws against it because, as usual, our prize lack of imagination.  Nobody thought to do this.  But Steve Bannon has already established the de novo charter for it through a shell corp.  Say what you want about these fuckers, they are pretty fucking creative at finding the choke points in our Republic.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

as brisket would say, "Oh my sweet summer child."  

Do you even 'Processing Fee', bro? 

Watch what happens next.  I say this as somebody who has spent years in fin-tech and banking.  This is going to create a whole new sub-vertical of digital banking.  This is going to be absolutely incredibly to watch.  Good news---gonna hurt him------------a lot.  Bad news---we don't currently have any laws against it because, as usual, our prize lack of imagination.  Nobody thought to do this.  But Steve Bannon has already established the de novo charter for it through a shell corp.  Say what you want about these fuckers, they are pretty fucking creative at finding the choke points in our Republic.  

Bannon's about to go on trial for that though, and he isn't under near the scrutiny this will be.  

Posted (edited)

$355 million fine for fraud + $100 million interest + $83 million for defaming Carroll =

538 MILLION DOLLARS

1ccd510729afb09c9d4117ff0042e765

Edited by bolverk
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted

I have not been following the details of this case at all, other than the general understanding of it.  Regarding Trump‘s shot on appeal, assuming he gets a bond, does anyone know if the amount of money the judge awarded help or hurt?   

I guess what I’m asking is if anyone has an idea if the award is great enough that this raises an appeal issue that would not have been there if the judge had awarded half of that? Or was it addressed within the 95 pages describing Trump‘s dishonest ass-Hattery and so mitigated any impression of unfairness

Posted
35 minutes ago, BamaATL said:

Question for those that know PAC law.  My understanding is that it's basically illegal to take PAC or Super PAC money and convert it to personal funds.  There is grey area on this, but not likely $550 million worth of grey area.  With a Conservator/Monitor, I have to imagine any capital infusion would be intensely scrutinized.  

Do I have this correct?  

 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

I wanna send like a penny to the gofundme along with the message, "lol, gfy" but the minimum donation is $5.

And sure, $5 is only 0.0000014% of the total judgment but it's 10000% of what I'm willing to pay

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
Just now, Biff Tannen said:

Who the fuck are these grifters?

i mean, you just answered your own question

https://grantcardone.com/

Quote

Grant Cardone, bestselling author, world's #1 sales trainer, renowned speaker, international social media influencer and real estate mogul. 10X your life!

Yep. Another grifter. Hope he doesn't have business in New York

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Doesn't Jared have $2 billion in Saudi money lying around somewhere? Could he kick in to help?

He would probably be disassembled if he did.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, bolverk said:

Doesn't Jared have $2 billion in Saudi money lying around somewhere? Could he kick in to help?

Sorry, Donald.  I really want to help, but that money is all tied up in projects.  Otherwise I'd be there for you.  Totes.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2


×
×
  • Create New...