Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

So?  You still prosecute to the fullest extent possible whether it makes any difference or not.

His contention was that it might have made a difference.  It would not.  Hell, I'm not even sure convictions affirmed by the Supreme Court would have made any difference.

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Not really, outside academic settings. 

Why lie about something so patently false? What is your deal? In my experience, everyone that justifiable can put Dr. ahead of their title, does.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, aggie08 said:

Why lie about something so patently false? What is your deal? In my experience, everyone that justifiable can put Dr. ahead of their title, does.

I can't even believe that I am entertaining the notion of getting involved in a conversation with an aggie of how people with academic doctorates refer to themselves in real life situations compared to physician's use of the term doctor. 

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
Just now, Anastasis said:

I can't even believe that I am entertaining the notion of getting involved in a conversation with an aggie of how people with academic doctorates refer to themselves in real life situations compared to physician's use of the term doctor. 

Clever and witty as always.

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, aggie08 said:

Clever and witty as always.

You you should either know that you are wrong, or at least know that you are kicking around in the shallow end of the pool. 

  • Fuck You 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, safe sex said:

Why quote Ana and inflict him on everyone? What is your deal?

Sorry Zach Galifianakis GIF

It's a mistake I rarely, rarely make. Mea culpa.

Posted (edited)

Every one with two eyes, no phd or md required, knew that biden was mentally declined for a long time. Everyone in the inner circle certainly knew it. Everyone that has dealt with dementia and the aging process with family personally knows this. Again, no phd in ed psych or whatever required. They covered it up. It's pretty obvious. I would wager a large amount that they had indications of the prostate cancer over a year ago as well. No reason to believe that they did not cover that up as well. 

Sorry that you guys have to hear this shit from me. 

Edited by Anastasis
  • Fuck You 2
Posted
3 hours ago, VABuckeye said:

Not sure but we sure could protect from people who are at an age where their mental faculties can go and go fast. 

The possibility of a president’s mental acuity degrading quickly are present regardless of age. Early onset Alzheimer’s can manifest in folks in their twenties or thirties. That is rare, sure, but it can happen.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

The possibility of a president’s mental acuity degrading quickly are present regardless of age. Early onset Alzheimer’s can manifest in folks in their twenties or thirties. That is rare, sure, but it can happen.

lol wtf

Posted

Perfect opportunity to announce all this stuff in 2023 and either have hi step down immediately, or after demands to do so, and elevate Harris to POTUS.  Why would this have been seen as a bad play?  Especially if you make republicans demand it, then it’s not just a stunt to get a female potus.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

lol wtf

Quote

Early-onset Alzheimer's typically appears in the 40s, 50s and early 60s. However, it is not unheard of for an individual to be diagnosed in their 20s or 30s, especially in families who carry one of the three genetic mutations predicting early-onset Alzheimer's disease

https://www.google.com/search?q=early+onset+alzheimers+age&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari

 

I’ve seen this referred to as young onset Alzheimer’s.

Edited by Willfully Horn
Posted
1 minute ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Perfect opportunity to announce all this stuff in 2023 and either have hi step down immediately, or after demands to do so, and elevate Harris to POTUS.  Why would this have been seen as a bad play?  Especially if you make republicans demand it, then it’s not just a stunt to get a female potus.

It was diagnosed in May of 2025. Unless you are some foreseeing savant, shut the fuck up.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Irwin F Fletcher said:

It was diagnosed in May of 2025. Unless you are some foreseeing savant, shut the fuck up.

Well I’m saying bullshit. Yes it’s possible for cancer to metastasize before being discovered/diagnosed in the general public, but the president of the United States doesn’t get to not have health checks for long periods of time.  So if I’m being asked to believe that this cancer formed and metastasized over the course of a few months, I’m skeptical. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Well I’m saying bullshit. Yes it’s possible for cancer to metastasize before being discovered/diagnosed in the general public, but the president of the United States doesn’t get to not have health checks for long periods of time.  So if I’m being asked to believe that this cancer formed and metastasized over the course of a few months, I’m skeptical. 

Person, woman, man, camera, TV

Posted
2 hours ago, Hank_Hill said:

Uhhhhhh he knows she has a doctorate in education right?

I read that as that was the joke-- as in he was trolling her for using her Dr. title despite not being a medical doctor. In his mind that was funny. No, in his mind that was hilarious, hence the pin.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Vegas64 said:

I read that as that was the joke-- as in he was trolling her for using her Dr. title despite not being a medical doctor. In his mind that was funny. No, in his mind that was hilarious, hence the pin.

Hell yea he really got her. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

Hell yea he really got her. 

It takes a pathological person to try and zing someone who's loved one/spouse just received essentially a death sentence. I cannot even theoritically understand that mindset. I cannot imagine hating someone so much. I don't know.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Vegas64 said:

It takes a pathological person to try and zing someone who's loved one/spouse just received essentially a death sentence. I cannot even theoritically understand that mindset. I cannot imagine hating someone so much. I don't know.

Evil. It’s called being evil.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

Oh I’m aware. It just isn’t comparable to the rates of elderly cognitive disorders in any way. 

Undoubtedly. Which ought have been clear through the words, “This is rare, but it can happen.”

Posted
1 hour ago, Vegas64 said:

It takes a pathological person to try and zing someone who's loved one/spouse just received essentially a death sentence. I cannot even theoritically understand that mindset. I cannot imagine hating someone so much. I don't know.

image.gif.e4c595468c180709e932c5a6410424ca.gif

  • Hook 'Em 2


×
×
  • Create New...