Jump to content

2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thought y'all might enjoy a good novella. 

17 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

This and the LA Times is nothing more than owners preemptively protecting themselves if DJT wins.  It is a sign that our Constitution and social contract are at grave risk. 

It's a pleasure to find a forum where I can toss a hook 'em after one of your posts. Great observation, my friend.

 

17 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

When the people and entities supposedly protected from government action by the First Amendment restrain their speech because they fear the planned regime will NOT be restrained by the protections provided by the First Amendment, then the First Amendment is dead.

To be clear, the side shouting "free speech!" as loudly as they can, all the time -- in the COMPLETELY wrong context -- has actually succeeded in killing protected free speech.

They are enemies of the Republic, freedom, and the Constitution.

The hate engine has spent more than forty years convincing them that they are the protectors of America. Liberals are their juden. We're carried beyond reason. Somehow the obvious doesn't matter anymore.

If a reckoning comes for the MAGA traitors, they will be Michael Douglas on the pier in Falling Down.

spacer.png

Their irony deafness doesn't recognize the obvious in the below. This is why you can't argue with them:

image.png.2bd4120d28fa4eed4995d1a759e9a25c.png

It now occurs to me that if nothing is obvious, you can't be ironic. Not bad for a Saturday morning.

16 hours ago, South Austin said:

Yep.  And more specifically, Kamala Harris needs to schedule a stop in North Carolina as soon as she can, and tell the attendees and viewing audience that Andy Mother-Fucking Harris has proposed stripping North Carolinians of their right to vote and determine the allocation of the state's electoral votes regardless of the will of the people.  

She would need to speak off the cuff on this subject and it's implications alone. Leave the boilerplate at home. This national leader, Fuckwad Harris (no relation), is calling for election results prior to election day. He is cancelling everybody's vote and right to vote whether you vote Republican or Democrat. 

Does anyone want to give a man who doesn't care anything about our Constituition the power to award public office before anyone has even voted? 

That was Vice President Kamala Harris, we have Congressman Fuckwad Harris here to explain his point of view. Congressman?

Kamala Harris is a radical socialist who wants murderers and rapers to come to this country to murder and rape us. And eat our pets as they're doing in Springfield. We want to protect the sanctity of election results by preventing Democrat cheating. We will not let them steal another election!

Do you believe Donald Trump won in 2020?

We don't want to look back. We are looking forward to the day that we can make America great again at bayonet point.

 

16 hours ago, mdmost said:

Corporate media with a vested interest in things staying a certain way. It's why I hope CNN and others start going under. They've stoked this era of politics at every turn. They reacted to Fox News by becoming something almost worse. 

CNN has ceased being a news gathering organization as they rely on print media for their stories. They've drifted so far from the concept of reporting that their banner at the bottom of the screen always reads: Breaking News. Most of the time, it's just a description of who is appearing on one of their panels. Real journalism news organizations were picky about getting things right.

CNN does try to stay in the middle with their panel discussions which has some value. Sadly, they don't exercise editorial discretion to keep out the bullshit. They're too timid to call something what it is. Lies in the case of Trump or famine in the case of the poor citizens of Gaza.

If they go, I wonder where a lot of people will hear what the newspapers they never read are reporting. CNN  is at least a clearing house for a little bit of that. I'd prefer that CNN improve, but that's a pipe dream.

8 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

I’m actually impressed he knows the word “melancholia”

7 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

He watched the movie to see Kristen Dunst's tits.

TwiceHorn beat me to the main point. The other main point is Dunst is blonde and...well just take a look at photos from 2011.

image.png.e636019b95488d337cf36ef5af053fe5.png image.png.d14d2030bd9f4983f03c80a55b94fd29.png

 

image.png.57f9ad41a8a26a9f58ee1efd3b629be7.png

Take me, daddy.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Couple things:

1) The Harris rally was epic. It seems like it broke through the noise for her in a way that nothing else really has this month. 

2) Trump is flailing and his team is flailing. He could win, obviously, but they are running on fumes and relying on whatever fuckery they have cooked up to come down with the ball. It is evident to me that they thought Harris would revert the signal by now. She hasn’t, and the mid-oct Trump bounce has peaked.
 

3) Harris should absolutely do Rogan, and I still hope she does. There is literally no downside and in an election like this she loses when dances to their tune (CNN/60 Mins) and wins when she’s making her own weather (Fox, CHD, Houston Rally).

On point 2, weekend Fox & Friends (my mom had it on) was basically discussing how she could still lose the race, not how Trump is winning it.

Not the most confident assessment of the race by the F&F B-team 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

Harris should set up a series of rallies in Philly or Pittsburgh at 2-3 venues.  Places that seat 15,000+.  Plan it so that she moves from one place to another and has three distinct "parties" like she did last night but all in one day and in a 4-5 hour window.   Imagine the way that would look if 40k or 50k or 100k showed out for that.   I think the enthusiasm is there for it   The logistics are a bit hard to pull off but do it.    

Think about if she'd been at Minute Maid for a speech at 4:00, moved to Shell at 5:30 and then Minute Maid to close it out.  Have the Big Screens on so everyone at each location can watch party with the other locations.  Give three distinct speeched covering 3 specific items (say, the economy, foreign policy and a GOTV one.)

That would rock.  But with 9+ days left, it might not matter.   

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

MAGA !!!!!!!!

 

Sounds like he's trying to channel his inner Springsteen.

Google says the stadium has 22,000 seats.  They all look filled, as well as half the field.  They are doing The Wave in the video:

image.thumb.png.1e899333ed7cef5335a0e049e2e5d55e.png

Edited by Bullneck
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Drool 1
Posted

Were there any voting locations close to the rally yesterday?

It would have been awesome if there was a line switch system where one person could go vote while waiting in line and then switch with whoever you came with.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Macanudo said:

Harris should set up a series of rallies in Philly or Pittsburgh at 2-3 venues.  Places that seat 15,000+.  Plan it so that she moves from one place to another and has three distinct "parties" like she did last night but all in one day and in a 4-5 hour window.   Imagine the way that would look if 40k or 50k or 100k showed out for that.   I think the enthusiasm is there for it   The logistics are a bit hard to pull off but do it.    

Think about if she'd been at Minute Maid for a speech at 4:00, moved to Shell at 5:30 and then Minute Maid to close it out.  Have the Big Screens on so everyone at each location can watch party with the other locations.  Give three distinct speeched covering 3 specific items (say, the economy, foreign policy and a GOTV one.)

That would rock.  But with 9+ days left, it might not matter.   

She should hold a rally at Four Seasons Total Landscaping. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Radical Larry said:

She should hold a rally at Four Seasons Total Landscaping. 

That's the spike the football moment, what you do is post up there once 270 is crossed and give a speech.  

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Drool 1
Posted
Sounds like he's trying to channel his inner Springsteen.
Google says the stadium has 22,000 seats.  They all look filled, as well as half the field.  They are doing The Wave in the video:
image.thumb.png.1e899333ed7cef5335a0e049e2e5d55e.png

I know we are so far beyond stuff like this, but it reminded me that Trump thought a reasonable exaggeration for the crowd outside his McDonalds stunt was TWENTY-NINE THOUSAND, aka the same size as the Kamala rally last night.

I can’t believe we are this close to putting a man that stupid back in office.
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

 

its a mistake to not go on Rogan.


Boy, stop. R

Harris going on Rogan isn’t officially dead, Jesus Christ. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

I've been wondering about this for a while -- if Mike Johnson would just say "I think there's election fraud, so how 'bout I just pick the next president" or words to that effect.

This headline says he can't but by now I've seen enough election lawyering to know there's a "well, if you look at it a different way" or "we gotta let Clarence Thomas vote on this one" coming.  

image.thumb.png.bbb2f69050cadc76ec2d884b876b7f69.png

 

  • Rage+1 2
Posted
1 minute ago, 956 Worldwide said:

The goal is not to win court cases or even the election.  The goal is to inject enough disinformation, confusion, and lawfare into the system so that the House, state legislatures, and local officials can just appoint DJT president. 

Well, no worries, our expedient legal process should help us sort thru all this by 2047.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
I've been wondering about this for a while -- if Mike Johnson would just say "I think there's election fraud, so how 'bout I just pick the next president" or words to that effect.
This headline says he can't but by now I've seen enough election lawyering to know there's a "well, if you look at it a different way" or "we gotta let Clarence Thomas vote on this one" coming.  
image.thumb.png.bbb2f69050cadc76ec2d884b876b7f69.png
 

There would be numerous posters on this very board claiming that this is a fine, logical, legal idea and our Trump Derangement Syndrome/hatred for America prevents us from seeing that.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

According to republican ads, the biggest issues in this country are trans people and murderous/rapist immigrants. Also, why do I never hear from Democrats that inflation is better? In their ads or otherwise, at least it seems that way to me.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Pancho said:


Boy, stop. R

Harris going on Rogan isn’t officially dead, Jesus Christ. 

Yeah, I hope she ends up going on Rogan. Sooner the better.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

What is everyone's opinion that Kamala Harris should go on Joe Rogan's podcast? 

Just because a lot of people listen to it. Larger audience than most of those rallies she is doing. 

And Joe is not exactly known for ferociously grilling his guests.

Edited by Valmy77
Posted
45 minutes ago, Pancho said:


Boy, stop. R

Harris going on Rogan isn’t officially dead, Jesus Christ. 

Not sure why my posts are triggering you. You might just have to accept disagreeing with me.

people are voting. Any indecision OR a decision not to go on Rogan, is effectively not going on the show. I’m also 100% aware people can delay or change their decision but there are consequences when millions are voting. 

Posted
14 hours ago, Red Five said:

There is something about going on Joe Rogan that feels beneath the office, unlike any of the other podcasts/interviews she's done. Probably because Rogan is a meathead fucking idiot. 

He is, but he's wildly popular.  I also feel like the vapid Call Her Daddy podcast was equally beneath the office, but you have to penetrative our modern media silos somehow.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Not sure why my posts are triggering you. You might just have to accept disagreeing with me.

people are voting. Any indecision OR a decision not to go on Rogan, is effectively not going on the show. I’m also 100% aware people can delay or change their decision but there are consequences when millions are voting. 

 

Just now, Born to Run said:

He is, but he's wildly popular.  I also feel like the vapid Call Her Daddy podcast was equally beneath the office, but you have to penetrative our modern media silos somehow.

She did Howard Stern. Gtfo here with the beneath the office. It's the 1st or 2nd largest English spoken podcast on the planet. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, mdmost said:

That quote is from 2022. 

lulz it is on Drudge rn though.

image.png.c8841acffc9a9ebb10f17e77bb4db2f2.png

Edited by Chopper
save you a click
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Not sure why my posts are triggering you. You might just have to accept disagreeing with me.

people are voting. Any indecision OR a decision not to go on Rogan, is effectively not going on the show. I’m also 100% aware people can delay or change their decision but there are consequences when millions are voting. 

Your posts aren’t triggers—they just aren’t well reasoned. 

There’s been no announcement about her going on Rogan yet you’re angry that she hasn’t done it. There’s been no evidence that it’s the Harris team that is waffling about going on Rogan and you keep suggesting that it is. 

 

That’s all.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
8 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

people are voting. Any indecision OR a decision not to go on Rogan, is effectively not going on the show. I’m also 100% aware people can delay or change their decision but there are consequences when millions are voting. 

I forget who said it but women are crawling over glass to vote if they need to. Fuck the fascist. He'll be in prison soon. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Drool 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Pancho said:

Your posts aren’t triggers—they just aren’t well reasoned. 

There’s been no announcement about her going on Rogan yet you’re angry that she hasn’t done it. There’s been no evidence that it’s the Harris team that is waffling about going on Rogan and you keep suggesting that it is. 

 

That’s all.

There's not only no evidence, there's evidence pointing the exact opposite fucking way! 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Gil Bang said:

And I banked at BBVA when it became PNC and went to shit. 

This ain't no lie.  I was Compass -> BBVA -> PNC.  I was surprised at how little changed in the Compass to BBVA transition, but this PNC is some fucking bullshit.  I hate those cunts.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

Frustrated Headache GIF by Kelly Clarkson
 

I can’t believe we are still on the Rohan thing, but I wouldn’t be surprised if part of the issue is scheduling, especially if she’s gonna do an in studio. Taking half a day to go to Austin this late in the campaign is not a good use of valuable campaign time. Look at how w bad it fubar-d Trump’s schedule yesterday. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1


×
×
  • Create New...