Jump to content

Academic Laundering/Fraud (I should start my own Journal...)


52-80

Recommended Posts

Erick C Jones Sr, recently minted Dean of Engineering at Uni Nevada-Reno.  Formerly associate dean at UT Arlington and senior science advisor in the State Department. Aggie BS (1993). UH PhD (2003)

Erick C Jones Jr, current lab director and engineering assistant professor at UT Arlington.  UT Austin PhD (2021).

Junior's publication history is necessarily thin.

image.thumb.png.d6b43e598cd1e427afc243c8a5f094c5.png

Many of them seem to be co-authored with Senior (EC Jones, E Jones, ECJ Jones), and in something called the International Supply Chain Tech Journal.

This Journal claims to be peer-reviewed.

image.thumb.png.0dc19c75baddbdeee0bafa5c15a7e363.png

Except on the Editorial Board of the journal is ... "Dr Erick Jones Jr" (and other UT Arlington people).

The journal is published by PWD Groups Inc, which is a firm based in Arlington TX owned by... Erick Jones.

Here are all of the articles in the February 2024 edition

image.thumb.png.7aaf0103b68907f60bbec29f8a8b4ec6.png

 

How about January 2024? 

(You might recognize Mamun Habib as visiting scientist at UTA and Editor in Chief of ISCTJ lol)

image.thumb.png.ff55c55b7b971fb25a67a8f463c87012.png

it goes on and on

 

And just so you understand the scientific rigour of this peer-reviewed journal, here is the ENTIRETY of an article authored by Erick senior in the Dec 2022 print.

image.thumb.png.dfd2b87c8c12af03ec44202037d53dba.png

 

I should found my own journal and inflate my h-index through the roof.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, slorch said:

Hard to believe that ever happened with the lack of cash flow in the academic world.

Senior draws 400k a year from nevada and however much from the state department (not sure if position still active)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

Senior draws 400k a year from nevada and however much from the state department (not sure if position still active)

Oh, I most certainly was being sarcastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, slorch said:

Oh, I most certainly was being sarcastic.

I know. And I know this sort of publication stuffing is very common (happens in industry too), im just flabbergasted at how blatant and shameless this particular example is. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 52-80 said:

Erick C Jones Sr, recently minted Dean of Engineering at Uni Nevada-Reno.  Formerly associate dean at UT Arlington and senior science advisor in the State Department. Aggie BS (1993). UH PhD (2003)

Erick C Jones Jr, current lab director and engineering assistant professor at UT Arlington.  UT Austin PhD (2021).

Thank you for calling it like it is (thread title) and not Playing. The. Game. which is what Erick senior and junior would likely say. In most academic endeavors, the annual review assesses three areas: teaching, service, and research. The last is the one by which the most $$, the most prestige, the administrative appointments, the gravitas, and the respect is placed. It is a system that once was admired world-wide that has been corrupted over and over again. Sad.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know; but I would wonder how much additional staffing (in your graph it is staff in public elementary and secondary i.e. K-12) is due to the increased awareness and regulations regarding student services--such as special needs, behavioral and ESL support and so on?  At the higher ed level (not in the graph), some of those needs would follow students along with TItle IX and ADA compliance, NCAA administrative compliance, career counseling staff, mental health services, first gen support, and testing services just off the top of my head. Most of those services were nonexistent when I was in school save for Title IX, NCAA, and rudimentary career and mental health staff.

I was reading not too long ago about how many students bring emotional support animals with them to school. Not service animals (separate category) but each student has to fill out an application etc. Which means someone has to review that, etc etc.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am somewhat jaded in my viewpoints in this area because I am an Associate Editor of a reputable journal. Also, I do most of my research either in Business or Industrial Engineering journals.  

 

When it comes to journals, there are no rules about journals only rules about if the journal counts as "quality" for the tenure process.

Is it backed by a major publisher (Elsevier, Emerald, Wiley. etc)? no...

Is it backed by a major society (CCSMP, OR Society, etc)? no...

Since its title supply chain, is it listed in the ABDC list?  no...

Is it Cablles listed at all? no....

In this case it would not be considered a viable journal for most business schools in Texas for tenure.

 

So now is it considered a predatory journal or is it just a bullshit journal housed by the university? Looking through it and checking on the various journal ranking groups, it isn't cosidered predatory (ie pay for play) so it is obvious just a small inhouse journal that is used to help push recognition for the college or program.

What is funnier to me in their call for papers is this:

Quote

Dr. Erick Jones Jr., University of texas at Austin, United States of America

If you cant get UT right in the boilerplate...

 

Edited by Laxtonto
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

I don't know; but I would wonder how much additional staffing (in your graph it is staff in public elementary and secondary i.e. K-12) is due to the increased awareness and regulations regarding student services--such as special needs, behavioral and ESL support and so on?  At the higher ed level (not in the graph), some of those needs would follow students along with TItle IX and ADA compliance, NCAA administrative compliance, career counseling staff, mental health services, first gen support, and testing services just off the top of my head. Most of those services were nonexistent when I was in school save for Title IX, NCAA, and rudimentary career and mental health staff.

I was reading not too long ago about how many students bring emotional support animals with them to school. Not service animals (separate category) but each student has to fill out an application etc. Which means someone has to review that, etc etc.

That’s what happens when the federal government gets involved with local education, plus lawyers coming to parent/teacher conferences.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, huge said:

Is this another reason that college tuition has increased at 10x inflation?  

State and Federal funding has dropped from 40% to less than 10% for most schools and yet the state and fed has mandated a massive bloat in required staff to be viable for the students to receive financial aid.

So for your students to have the privilege to get gouged on student loans, they had to double the administrative staff and yet still cut everyone funding... There are virtually no offsets and so instead all of the costs go right to the cost of tuition.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, huge said:

Is this another reason that college tuition has increased at 10x inflation?  

I had read an argument that tuition growth has been overexaggerated due to the "sticker price" of colleges being artificially inflated to game admissions and rankings.  Institutions jack up their sticker price and escalate the grants to give the impression of generosity and entice enrollment due to the discount. 

The BLS, which is one of the primary sources of official economic data, says this about their survey method:

https://www.bls.gov/cpi/factsheets/college-tuition.htm

College tuition is eligible to be priced, including adjustments for various types of student financial aid such as scholarships and grants. The CPI first began tracking the price of tuition adjusted by financial aid in 2003. Probability sampling techniques are used to determine if scholarships or grants should be included when pricing tuition for a specific college. All college tuition quotes price student tuition and fixed fees; selected quotes are additionally be adjusted by financial aid. Since financial aid data for the current academic year is not always readily available at the time of pricing, the CPI currently accepts financial aid data that is no older than 1 academic year.

 

But when you look at their data series, the measured price actually accelerated in 2003 instead of dampened... so who the fuck knows

image.png.970a408d6167271b6226c64fd02c7291.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

I don't know; but I would wonder how much additional staffing (in your graph it is staff in public elementary and secondary i.e. K-12) is due to the increased awareness and regulations regarding student services--such as special needs, behavioral and ESL support and so on?  At the higher ed level (not in the graph), some of those needs would follow students along with TItle IX and ADA compliance, NCAA administrative compliance, career counseling staff, mental health services, first gen support, and testing services just off the top of my head. Most of those services were nonexistent when I was in school save for Title IX, NCAA, and rudimentary career and mental health staff.

I was reading not too long ago about how many students bring emotional support animals with them to school. Not service animals (separate category) but each student has to fill out an application etc. Which means someone has to review that, etc etc.

Another huge factor is the permeation of IT in most aspects of education. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly enough, I have concluded that my numerous posts on this site, because they reflect my years of accumulated wisdom and brilliance, constitute academic research papers.  And because you degenerates are my peers (God, how embarrassing), those papers are "peer reviewed."  Conclusion: I am one of them most published academic geniuses in history, and I should be the dean of something.  The College of Muledick and This Threat is Worthless Without Pics, or something like that.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it does appear that Erick Jones, pere et fils, are the rara avis in the form of graduate-degree-holding African-Americans in STEM.

The younger Jones, while perhaps not published in the most prestigious journals, seems to push his "content" to a lot of platforms, including some fairly serious and prestigious places.

Rightly or wrongly, but I suspect more rightly than wrongly, a lot of black academics probably feel like they're on the outside looking in.  Because this isn't outright fraud, more power to em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Rightly or wrongly, but I suspect more rightly than wrongly, a lot of black academics probably feel like they're on the outside looking in.  Because this isn't outright fraud, more power to em.

The father owns a company…that publishes a journal…that claims to be legitimate (they themselves described it as so)…wherein some 70% of the content is authored is authored by him and/or his son…and 90% if you include the editorial board (who are UTa colleagues). 
 

And you dont think thats fraudulent? Or at the least hugely unethical for people who hold academic positions in public universities?

 

You can read every article yourself. Heres one authored by the editor in chief. 
https://isctj.com/index.php/isctj/article/view/285

Heres another from the editor and the Joneses

https://isctj.com/index.php/isctj/article/view/285
 

Another great one below, must be from a friend

IMG_4943.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mrs Whiggins said:

I don't know; but I would wonder how much additional staffing (in your graph it is staff in public elementary and secondary i.e. K-12) is due to the increased awareness and regulations regarding student services--such as special needs, behavioral and ESL support and so on?  At the higher ed level (not in the graph), some of those needs would follow students along with TItle IX and ADA compliance, NCAA administrative compliance, career counseling staff, mental health services, first gen support, and testing services just off the top of my head. Most of those services were nonexistent when I was in school save for Title IX, NCAA, and rudimentary career and mental health staff.

I was reading not too long ago about how many students bring emotional support animals with them to school. Not service animals (separate category) but each student has to fill out an application etc. Which means someone has to review that, etc etc.

It’s not nothing, but probably a very small share of the 134% increase in non-teaching staff. My older sister was a human services professor (not exactly a segment of professors known to rage against bloat), and she complained about the unnecessary (non-teaching) staffing at colleges. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B.S. journals are nothing new.  It is inevitable outcome when professors are required to publish x number of article/year.   If you are in a niche research, your more prestigious journals may only offer 1 option a year to publish in it, otherwise you have to select an alternative, maybe one that is more industry focused, or one that is a few tiers down in prestige.   Not having read the material or the journal in question (or the article posted) it is possible that someone is trying to create a new journal and is looking to fill it with their own work as they try to get it off the ground.  It would make sense if that research area was more focused as well.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

 

IMG_4943.jpeg

Lol this woman is an assistant professor at UTa, and this is about all she has her name to. 
 

who cares? valid question. its not criminal and dont make shit to 99.9% of the world. If you are affiliated with the university, this is hugely embarrassing conduct

IMG_4944.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Samson's Wig said:

Layer on your facts all you want, but we all know it's just that older generations worked harder to pay their own way through school, and kids these days are soft.  It has nothing to do with state university tuition being subsidized at 90% or more for boomers and less than 10% now.   Those good folks would have never accepted a government handout. We know this to be true.

Inflation adjusted public funding of higher education is up almost 200% since 1977.  The number of students in higher education has increased about 70% since that time.  So the per capita inflation adjusted spend is significantly higher than it was 45 years ago when Boomers were in college.

spacer.png

 

The state never came close to funding 90% of higher education.

spacer.png

 

If you look at this, the tuition piece has been pretty close to constant for the last 30 years (when most of us were in college).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

The father owns a company…that publishes a journal…that claims to be legitimate (they themselves described it as so)…wherein some 70% of the content is authored is authored by him and/or his son…and 90% if you include the editorial board (who are UTa colleagues). 
 

And you dont think thats fraudulent? Or at the least hugely unethical for people who hold academic positions in public universities?

 

You can read every article yourself. Heres one authored by the editor in chief. 
https://isctj.com/index.php/isctj/article/view/285

Heres another from the editor and the Joneses

https://isctj.com/index.php/isctj/article/view/285
 

Another great one below, must be from a friend

IMG_4943.jpeg

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Universities live in their own bubble without any true outside accountability. These organization would never survive in a regular business setting (i.e. restaurants, salons, etc.) so you get a massive academic circle jerk with snake oil sales people grifting parents and the government for way too much funding for too little value. When I read about college bloat and loose money I think about the doctors that fleece easy to scam entities like Medicare but get caught and do jail time when they should have gone into academics. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

Lol this woman is an assistant professor at UTa, and this is about all she has her name to. 
 

who cares? valid question. its not criminal and dont make shit to 99.9% of the world. If you are affiliated with the university, this is hugely embarrassing conduct

IMG_4944.jpeg

What does piss me off is that my publication history destroys that but UTA would never hire me. Applied to UTA many times and not even a courtesy conference interview from UTA...

Politics in academia are weird...

 

Maybe I need to set up a thread on the nerds board about coming up with a set of Surly led articles, just for the fuck of it..

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

Inflation adjusted public funding of higher education is up almost 200% since 1977.  The number of students in higher education has increased about 70% since that time.  So the per capita inflation adjusted spend is significantly higher than it was 45 years ago when Boomers were in college.

spacer.png

 

The state never came close to funding 90% of higher education.

spacer.png

 

If you look at this, the tuition piece has been pretty close to constant for the last 30 years (when most of us were in college).

Please don't bring facts to an Internet argument, sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm disappointed in this place.  40 posts in and nobody has done the 'Office Space' meme, "Uh sorry sir, I do not know anything about any academic laundering!" 

There's a lot of bloat to be sure.  But wait until you guys see how much a private university-The University of Austin-has gotten via a recommendation from the THECB to the state.  And they haven't conferred a single degree yet and they're about to get 8 figures of cash with zero strings attached.  

All of it is a long confidence game.  But the good news, at least a handful of the students actually learn some shit and have fun doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Newdoc said:

Universities live in their own bubble without any true outside accountability. These organization would never survive in a regular business setting (i.e. restaurants, salons, etc.) so you get a massive academic circle jerk with snake oil sales people grifting parents and the government for way too much funding for too little value. When I read about college bloat and loose money I think about the doctors that fleece easy to scam entities like Medicare but get caught and do jail time when they should have gone into academics. 

I know what will fix it.

Make it "free".

massiveeyeroll.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Frank Drebin said:

Inflation adjusted public funding of higher education is up almost 200% since 1977.  The number of students in higher education has increased about 70% since that time.  So the per capita inflation adjusted spend is significantly higher than it was 45 years ago when Boomers were in college.

spacer.png

 

The state never came close to funding 90% of higher education.

spacer.png

 

If you look at this, the tuition piece has been pretty close to constant for the last 30 years (when most of us were in college).

That tuition number seems to get used like our property tax rate number.  Doesn't tell the whole story (or change).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, huge said:

Is this another reason that college tuition has increased at 10x inflation?  

 

3 hours ago, Laxtonto said:

State and Federal funding has dropped from 40% to less than 10% for most schools and yet the state and fed has mandated a massive bloat in required staff to be viable for the students to receive financial aid.

So for your students to have the privilege to get gouged on student loans, they had to double the administrative staff and yet still cut everyone funding... There are virtually no offsets and so instead all of the costs go right to the cost of tuition.

 

The increase in tuition is directly related to a.) less funding from the state and b.) keeping up with infrastructure so you college campus is attractive to students.

There’s also a c.) increase in programs that are new (in general) and updating programs to fit the student of today and the future. But it’s mostly because of a.) above.

Does admin staff account to the tuition increase? Ehh, not directly when compared to a, b, and c above; however, the increase in administrative staff is because of the amount of work required by states, BoRs, and accrediting boards to keep the college open or certain programs going. That shit is what most of my time being a dean is about. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Newdoc said:

Universities live in their own bubble without any true outside accountability. These organization would never survive in a regular business setting (i.e. restaurants, salons, etc.)

What is the fascination with making things that are not supposed to be profit-driven businesses (universities, the government) function like businesses?

 

  • Hook 'Em 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Newdoc said:

Universities live in their own bubble without any true outside accountability. These organization would never survive in a regular business setting (i.e. restaurants, salons, etc.) so you get a massive academic circle jerk with snake oil sales people grifting parents and the government for way too much funding for too little value. When I read about college bloat and loose money I think about the doctors that fleece easy to scam entities like Medicare but get caught and do jail time when they should have gone into academics. 

 

In what way do colleges and universities not have accountability? They (mostly) aren’t for-profit institutions, and they/we are held accountability by various governing bodies. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Js1 said:

What is the fascination with making things that are not supposed to be profit-driven businesses (universities, the government) function like businesses?

 

Because the profit-driven mechanism of businesses requires being competitive and accountable. 
 

Hope that helps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Pancho said:

 

In what way do colleges and universities not have accountability? They (mostly) aren’t for-profit institutions, and they/we are held accountability by various governing bodies. 

1:25 to 1:38 sums it up succinctly

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

Because the profit-driven mechanism of businesses requires being competitive and accountable. 
 

Hope that helps. 

Yeah, we've never seen profit driven entities not be held accountable for their actions. Oh, wait...

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...