Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Pancho said:

I thought it was 10 million? 
 

image.thumb.png.fec08f4e16389eb1dfc2202f5c09505d.png

 

"According to the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) population estimates , in 2022 almost 63.6 million Hispanics/Latinos (of any race) lived in the United States, representing 19.1% of the total U.S. population."

She's just getting ahead of the script.  They won't all be illegal until 2026 or 2027.

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

fat orange fucking cunt

 

 

WASHINGTON — This week, the Trump Administration released its Army Corps work plans that show President Trump is politicizing critical infrastructure investments.

House Appropriations Committee analysis shows that the Trump administration shifted more than $250 million away from critical infrastructure construction projects in Democratic-led states, particularly Washington and California, to Republican-led states. This includes the complete elimination of Army Corps construction funding for states like California. This move risks delaying critical safety projects across the country. 

House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT-03) and House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Ranking Member Marcy Kaptur (D-OH-09) condemned this corrupt move. 

“President Trump is blatantly playing politics with critical Army Corps construction investments and punishing the American people for the way their states have voted,” said Representatives DeLauro and Kaptur. “Rushing water from collapsed dams and floods caused by failed infrastructure do not know state borders, nor do they have political leanings. The damage, lives lost, and economic outcomes impact all Americans, which is why the federal government makes these investments in the first place. The Trump administration should follow Congress’s intent to guide its investments. Instead, President Trump has unilaterally chosen to punish the people living in certain states—a historic and clear abuse of taxpayer dollars. This is the exact scenario we feared when House Republicans introduced their slush fund 2025 funding bill, which failed to reflect both Republican and Democratic priorities. It does not matter who is in the White House, people across the country are harmed when all the power Congress holds to represent the people in their states and districts is handed to the President.”

The Republican fiscal year 2025 full-year continuing resolution cut Corps of Engineers’ Civil Works Construction by $1.4 billion or 44 percent, and it also gave all discretion to the Trump administration to prioritize projects among over 1,000 throughout the country that should be directed by Congress. Army Corps of Engineers projects keep commerce safely flowing on our waterways, manage flood risk, and restore ecosystems. 

In her March 11, 2025, remarks on the House Floor in opposition to the power-grab continuing resolution, Ranking Member DeLauro raised the prospect of exactly this scenario:

“The Army Corps of Engineers construction projects would be cut by $1.4 billion, 44 percent, and President Trump, not Congress, would determine who gets funding, what city, state, locality, and how much money that is there.”

The Army Corps’ work plan can be found here.

###

 

  • Rage+1 6
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Pew Research estimates the number of illegal aliens in the US to be 11 million, so yes, Laura is just counting all Latinos.

But we are all illegal. Every one of us. 

Posted
Pew Research estimates the number of illegal aliens in the US to be 11 million, so yes, Laura is just counting all Latinos.

Because…and this is very, very important, and very, very true…it’s not about legal status. And never was. It’s about purging an entire ethnicity as “not real Americans.” The veil is gone, the justification has been dispensed with. It is about ridding this country of ALL dirty browns. It always has been, they’re just being honest now.
A Hispanic person voting for a Republican is empowering your own executioner. It’s suicidal.
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

Why would he punish states like Washington and California, since he has said that if the votes were counted fairly and accurately he would have won bigly there also?  Punish his voters for the alleged fraud of others?

Posted

I did not have Kash and Dan Bonginobio throwing water on the maga fire conspiracy that Epstein was killed by the Clinton’s on my 2025 bingo card. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

the fact that either of those clowns has seen a shred of classified information is beyond infuriating. it's like the class idiots getting an advance copy of the test and the only ones who score 100 on it. fucking imbeciles

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Pancho said:

I did not have Kash and Dan Bonginobio throwing water on the maga fire conspiracy that Epstein was killed by the Clinton’s on my 2025 bingo card. 

Well, because it was Trump had him killed.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/17/2025 at 9:02 PM, TexArcher said:

 

"According to the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) population estimates , in 2022 almost 63.6 million Hispanics/Latinos (of any race) lived in the United States, representing 19.1% of the total U.S. population."

She's just getting ahead of the script.  They won't all be illegal until 2026 or 2027.

 

all those dirty browns are illegal !!!!!

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Brisketexan said:


Because…and this is very, very important, and very, very true…it’s not about legal status. And never was. It’s about purging an entire ethnicity as “not real Americans.” The veil is gone, the justification has been dispensed with. It is about ridding this country of ALL dirty browns. It always has been, they’re just being honest now.
A Hispanic person voting for a Republican is empowering your own executioner. It’s suicidal.

giphy.webp

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

Ok THIS one has to be a fake right?

Right?!

 

Honestly, I don't remember where I found the guitar solo pic, but here's him playing the piano. 

  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

Oh, and the way his hair magically gets longer when he plays guitar.  And also the way he flips his guitar over to play lefthanded.  I need to work on that one.

Posted
6 hours ago, Irwin F Fletcher said:

Yes, it's fake. There is no way Donald has this much energy, nor strength to hold a guitar. 

Yup. It was the luxurious hair rather than the typical cotton candy combover that might have been a clue as well 

Posted (edited)

It's not the fact that at Springsteen, Swift, Oprah, etc supported Harris.  

It pisses him off that the only celebs he can get are C and D listers, or those who's heyday was in the Carter/Reagan years.

Also, 1:34 am and this is what is on the mind of the President.

 

 

 

Edited by Francisco 2.0
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, mdmost said:

He's really mad he can't attack Biden for a while now so he moves on to his next target. 

Oh he’ll still attack Biden.

”TODAY THE STOCK MARLET FELL 1,000 POINTS BECAUSE OF THE HORRIBLE CANCEROUS ECONOMIC POLICIES OF JOE BIDEN!!!”

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

So, all through undergrad, I called my profs "doctor," and so did everyone else.  I tend to call expert witnesses "doctor" also, which is the only non-personal contact I have with PhDs.

It took some adjustment not to call law school profs doctor.

The whole "Dr. Jill Biden" thing is a scam that works on people who've never met a PhD.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

So, all through undergrad, I called my profs "doctor," and so did everyone else.  I tend to call expert witnesses "doctor" also, which is the only non-personal contact I have with PhDs.

It took some adjustment not to call law school profs doctor.

The whole "Dr. Jill Biden" thing is a scam that works on people who've never met a PhD.

I called my undergrad non-PhD professors "professor."  I think I only had a few college professors who had a PhD.  So it wasn't really an adjustment to call my law school professors "professor" when none of them had a PhD.

But yeah, referring to her as Dr. Jill, when he knows she has a PhD in education and not an MD, in a conspiratorial comment about Joe's medical diagnosis, is another shitty aspect of Coke Head's tweet.

Posted
4 minutes ago, South Austin said:

I called my undergrad non-PhD professors "professor."  I think I only had a few college professors who had a PhD.  So it wasn't really an adjustment to call my law school professors "professor" when none of them had a PhD.

But yeah, referring to her as Dr. Jill, when he knows she has a PhD in education and not an MD, in a conspiratorial comment about Joe's medical diagnosis, is another shitty aspect of Coke Head's tweet.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSuFai0SsQj_kbtibH0JRa

  • Haha 5
Posted
2 hours ago, South Austin said:

I think I only had a few college professors who had a PhD.

Where was that?  I only had one who DIDN'T have a PhD, and he was like 90 years old.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Where was that?  I only had one who DIDN'T have a PhD, and he was like 90 years old.

University of Texas.  I was in the College of Liberal Arts if that makes a difference.  But after I read your post, I looked up two of my favorite professors (who remarkably are still there almost 30 years after I graduated), and they in fact have PhD's.  I'm not sure if they had their doctorates at the time I was in school, but I'm all but certain the students addressed them as "Professor." 

Posted
13 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

all those dirty browns are illegal !!!!!

A bill just got out of committee in the Louisiana legislature that will prohibit any dirty brown undocumented Person from getting an award in a personal injury suit in Louisiana state court system if they are injured.

White Christian Republicans should not have to pay for the deaths and broken bones of dirty brown immigrants who we kill or injure.  

Mud people have no rights. Stephen Miller out front should’ve told you..

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Yeah, my dad (PhD professor) taught me that "professor" is universal enough, but to never use "doctor" for a non-PhD.

Yep.  My the technical term of my graduate degree is a "Doctor of Jurisprudence," but I've never heard of a lawyer going by or referring to themselves as "Doctor."  And while I don't have any personal familiarity with the PhD track, my understand has always been that it's a hell of a lot hard to get a PhD than a JD.



×
×
  • Create New...