Jump to content

Charlie Kirk assassinated at an event in Utah (by a 22 YO groyper)


Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

You can watch the video, broken down by one of his friends. He gets shot in the chest, the bullet hits his armor, ricochets, fragments and enters his throat and then exits from the left side of his neck. Have you never shot an animal or person with a rifle or bow? The entry wound bleeds little. The exit pours blood.  Are you pretending to be ignorant? Or are you pretending to be knowledgeable? I has confuse because this is an imbeciles opinion. 

Don't take this the wrong way, but you should get a vasectomy.  Today.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 5
Posted

Has anyone observed that the state of Utah, especially the parts outside of SLC, are about as close to New Gilead as you will find in the US?

And that this kid was raised by white, church-attending, gun-loving, straight, cis, two-parent household?

That he wasn't in college long enough to be indoctrinated, but instead went to a no-homo trade school?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

You can watch the video, broken down by one of his friends. He gets shot in the chest, the bullet hits his armor, ricochets, fragments and enters his throat and then exits from the left side of his neck. Have you never shot an animal or person with a rifle or bow? The entry wound bleeds little. The exit pours blood.  Are you pretending to be ignorant? Or are you pretending to be knowledgeable? I has confuse because this is an imbeciles opinion. 

Animated GIF

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
11 hours ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

You can watch the video, broken down by one of his friends. He gets shot in the chest, the bullet hits his armor, ricochets, fragments and enters his throat and then exits from the left side of his neck. Have you never shot an animal or person with a rifle or bow? The entry wound bleeds little. The exit pours blood.  Are you pretending to be ignorant? Or are you pretending to be knowledgeable? I has confuse because this is an imbeciles opinion. 

Dude. That was that guys theory. A very unlikely theory. He didn't come anywhere close to proving that theory. He can't. All he has is cell phone video that he breaks down frame by frame. I found it a very interesting theory, and I had no idea they were making body armor like that. However, without any physical evidence you can't take that as a fact.

Posted

Kirk was about to turn on Trump on Israel and Epstein and position himself for 2028, so Trump had Kirk killed. 
 

If the left had any sense, that is the conspiracy they’d be feeding.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Snake Diggity said:

Kirk was about to turn on Trump on Israel and Epstein and position himself for 2028, so Trump had Kirk killed. 
 

If the left had any sense, that is the conspiracy they’d be feeding.

So, let me get this straight, we need to start pushing Candace Owens' conspiracy theories to get ahead? 

Posted
1 hour ago, Sawbonz said:

This must have sounded witty in your tiny brain 

 

1 hour ago, wildcat09 said:

Why are you arguing with a guy whose idea of a fun new troll persona is dumber Ana?

Underwhelming

Posted
30 minutes ago, Snake Diggity said:

Dude, look around.  It’s over.

Yeah maybe but I think embracing conspiracy theories being spread by an antisemitic grifter is probably not a good line to cross.

Posted
17 minutes ago, CowboyFred said:

So the dude writes in meme speak on the bullets and discord but in messages to a lover he turns into Ulysses S. Grant? 🤔

I’m not ready to go full conspiracy theory but goddamn that does read fake as fuck. If they plea him out to avoid the death penalty and no trial occurs to test the evidence they’re putting out there, and if the narrative is all from the FBI and Utah officials, it’s going to be suspicious af. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Anastasis said:

BlueAnon out here wilding. 

Meanwhile, the following political commentators/people with actual influence and power are all talking about an Israel conspiracy in regards to Kirk's murder: 

Candace Owens

Steve Bannon

Tucker Carlson

Matt Gaetz 

Megyn Kelly 

Posted

If the texts are forged after the fact, there's no way that doesn't get caught pretty quickly. These people are lazy and stupid and have no idea how to go about doing something like that without leaving glaring traces. 

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

Has anyone observed that the state of Utah, especially the parts outside of SLC, are about as close to New Gilead as you will find in the US?

And that this kid was raised by white, church-attending, gun-loving, straight, cis, two-parent household?

That he wasn't in college long enough to be indoctrinated, but instead went to a no-homo trade school?

Kash Patel / Stephen Miller / Pam Bondi in response to your stating facts:

you-to-me.gif

Edited by Gap03
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Meanwhile, the following political commentators/people with actual influence and power are all talking about an Israel conspiracy in regards to Kirk's murder: 

Some of the blueanon posts here could be very closely paraphrasing Candace Owens. 

Edited by Anastasis
Posted
11 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Meanwhile, the following political commentators/people with actual influence and power are all talking about an Israel conspiracy in regards to Kirk's murder: 

Candace Owens

Steve Bannon

Tucker Carlson

Matt Gaetz 

Megyn Kelly 

The tweets from August describing EXACTLY what happened are pretty nuts though.

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Meanwhile, the following political commentators/people with actual influence and power are all talking about an Israel conspiracy in regards to Kirk's murder: 

Candace Owens

Steve Bannon

Tucker Carlson

Matt Gaetz 

Megyn Kelly 

The Dems shouldn't be commenting on the theories, but damn sure should be engaging a bot army to amplify the fuck out of this, just like the right would be doing.  The right LOVES a conspiracy theory, so it's just a matter of making certain that all of them see it (especially if it would cause some of them to start questioning their blind allegiance to both Trump and Israel).   

Edited by Gap03
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Some of the blueanon posts here could be very closely paraphrasing Candace Owens. 

Hundreds of Texas sports fans here are reading anonymous posts, and millions of people around the world are listening to Candace Owens. 

I'm just saying lets have the proper perspective when it comes to conspiratorial conversation around Kirk's death. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

You shouldn't. If you have ever blood trailed an animal, you know that the exit wound produces all of the blood and the entrance in most cases produces none. It's not rocket science. I see your posts in "shit Ive cooked lately" and think you're an artist. However, you know shit here. If you have only rifle hunted than shut the fuck up.

Do you understand what happens when a major artery is cut? It spurts out blood regardless if it was an entry or exit wound.

Edited by kevwun
Posted
17 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Meanwhile, the following political commentators/people with actual influence and power are all talking about an Israel conspiracy in regards to Kirk's murder: 

Candace Owens

Steve Bannon

Tucker Carlson

Matt Gaetz 

Megyn Kelly 

Good, let them eat their own.

Posted
1 hour ago, Brian Fantana said:

So, let me get this straight, we need to start pushing Candace Owens' conspiracy theories to get ahead? 

 

6 minutes ago, Gap03 said:

The Dems shouldn't be commenting on the theories, but damn sure should be engaging a bot army to amplify the fuck out of this, just like the right would be doing.  The right LOVES a conspiracy theory, so it's just a matter of making certain that all of them see it.   

It is only a matter of time before MAGA turns on itself.  The question is how much damage they will do before it happens.  The left/Dems need to help it along.  They should have been doing this long ago.  Playing by the old rules is forfeiting the game.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
16 minutes ago, Anastasis said:

Some of the blueanon posts here could be very closely paraphrasing Candace Owens. 

When you have an administration and movement that shoots out an unprecedented amount of absolute bullshit 24/7, you'll pardon us when we don't immediately take something that looks fishy AF at face value.

Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

Camp near the Rappahannock River
March 12th, 1863

My Dearest Sarah,

I take pen in hand this evening by the dim light of our campfire, hoping these few lines may find you and the children in good health. My thoughts are ever with you, and though the hardships of soldiering weigh heavily upon me, it is the memory of your kind smile and gentle voice that sustains me through the long marches and restless nights.

Dear Marie,

It is hot as fuck out here. It is hard to fight these sand monkeys with your balls stuck to your legs. It is very very hot and I am very very sweatie. It is very very hot because I am in the dessert. What else did I want to axe you? Oh yeah, don't fuck nobody til I get back.

Edited by HornPhD
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, C-Man said:

When you have an administration and movement that shoots out an unprecedented amount of absolute bullshit 24/7, you'll pardon us when we don't immediately take something that looks fishy AF at face value.

Kash basically openly stated he wanted to fabricate a manifesto. I just don’t think that’s what these texts are.

Posted
When you have an administration and movement that shoots out an unprecedented amount of absolute bullshit 24/7, you'll pardon us when we don't immediately take something that looks fishy AF at face value.

Like yesterday when the FBI director testified before Congress that Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t a sex trafficker? And he said that out loud. With cameras and shit around. Under oath.
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, C-Man said:

When you have an administration and movement that shoots out an unprecedented amount of absolute bullshit 24/7, you'll pardon us when we don't immediately take something that looks fishy AF at face value.

I get it. Just don't get put off when y'all aren't thinking shit through all the way and someone points out that you sound like lunatics. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

Kash basically openly stated he wanted to fabricate a manifesto. I just don’t think that’s what these texts are.

If the texts are scripted, who are the most likely individuals that scripted them, and for what purpose?

If people want to talk crazy and least think it through all the way. 

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, Thatguy said:

It matters because it paints a specific picture. It also matters because I don't know a single young person who texts like that, even to their employers. He sounds 50. 

I go through a 16 and 17 year olds phone from time to time and I 100% agree. Suspiciously (or, er, suss) there is a lack of ngl, lowkeys, and weird abbreviations that don't even seem to be about saving time typing out the full word like, js, fr, lk, etc.

Edited by Vegas64
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

Why would someone risk an indictment (attached to the indictment charge or whatever it’s called) and a trial over a forged confession via text message? 

it doesn’t matter if he was a groyper or a bi young man in love with a trans woman. 

he should be convicted quickly, serve his whole life in prison without the chance of parole, and we should realize these truths:

1. Violence is never ok. That’s physical violence or verbal violence.

2. Hate will destroy you.

3. Charlie Kirk should still be alive.

4. Hundreds and hundreds of trans women - especially trans women of color - should still be alive.

5. None of this matters, the narrative will be won by those who have an agenda to oppress trans people. 

We’re cooked, or at least trans people are. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

The pushback from some right-wing media regarding Kirk's murder motive AND Bondi's comments about punishing hate speech is the only thing providing a glimmer of hope for me right now. The right is fully in power in this country, Dems are worthless and have zero influence. The fact that (as of now) they are not coalescing around just blaming the left is good. Maybe shit is getting a little to real for them after Kirk was killed. There's some infighting, hopefully it sticks and grows stronger. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

Has anyone observed that the state of Utah, especially the parts outside of SLC, are about as close to New Gilead as you will find in the US?

And that this kid was raised by white, church-attending, gun-loving, straight, cis, two-parent household?

That he wasn't in college long enough to be indoctrinated, but instead went to a no-homo trade school?

I said this Friday after seeing the picture of the kid in his bedroom before we knew anything about anything and I'm going to look into being an FBI detective now:

Quote

 

We don't really know, but an inference or deduction you could have as a first working profile hypothesis:

Guy looks like a dork, pics of his gaming computer, probably deeply/chronically online. Radicalized one way or another online and into the weird part of twitter and sites that are front runners on the weird memes. Kid is decently smart (academic award for a bottom half school) but only manages one semester? Screams of undiagnosed/diagnosed mental illness. Kid doesn't look or act like his (likely) MAGA dad, usually those kids raised in that conservative environment either conform to it or rebel against it pretty hard. 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

The pushback from some right-wing media regarding Kirk's murder motive AND Bondi's comments about punishing hate speech is the only thing providing a glimmer of hope for me right now. The right is fully in power in this country, Dems are worthless and have zero influence. The fact that (as of now) they are not coalescing around just blaming the left is good. Maybe shit is getting a little to real for them after Kirk was killed. There's some infighting, hopefully it sticks and grows stronger. 

 

Shit has gotten real for a lot of R politicians. Hence Congress wanting to amend or add funding for security. It's weird that only one side wants protection though. Like I said earlier, the made up boogeyman in their heads is now real. Some politicians, Nancy Mace for example, are in a catch 22. She has to be even more right winged and lunatic or she definitely knows what could happen to her. No one is putting that genie back.

  • Like 1
Posted

Like yesterday when the FBI director testified before Congress that Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t a sex trafficker? And he said that out loud. With cameras and shit around. Under oath.

Ding, ding. When they feel confident enough to throw out things like that, makes you wonder where the line would actually be — or if a line even exists in the first place.
Posted
You shouldn't. If you have ever blood trailed an animal, you know that the exit wound produces all of the blood and the entrance in most cases produces none. It's not rocket science. I see your posts in "shit Ive cooked lately" and think you're an artist. However, you know shit here. If you have only rifle hunted than shut the fuck up.

I know you are desperately trying to flex here, but no one gives a shit. You are trying to act like a macho man with your shooting a man or animal comment, and dismissing rifle hunters is even odder. Kirk was shot with a fucking rifle, so if anything, bows are more irrelevant to the discussion, which indicates you are kind of a moron to go along with the douchey persona you are perpetrating. Yet, you also fail to discuss shot placement, because that is also important as it relates to the amount of blood loss in the victim/critter. Further evidence that you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about.


×
×
  • Create New...