Jump to content

Charlie Kirk assassinated at an event in Utah (by a 22 YO groyper)


Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, Chopper said:

Informative thread that rips apart a study claiming increased violence from the left and decreased from the right, which has already been cited in various news reports. John Horgan is a prof at GA State who studies the psychology of terrorism.

Screenshot2025-09-26at8_34_00AM.thumb.png.35197eaeb76f847073fd88c57c2c806d.png

full thread https://bsky.app/profile/johnhorgan.bsky.social/post/3lzqclq3s622q

I appreciate this posters brevity:

image.thumb.png.3c0ebe48d6eab4b7902e2ce380c18d0c.png

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Pancho said:

Wait, she’s already doing podcasts on his show?

I get that everyone grieves differently but damn that was fast.

Kirk was dead a week, and his widow was hawking a dating app while also saying she was available.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
On 9/25/2025 at 11:18 AM, wood said:

Yep. He's not wrong. I said it on day 1 when Trump started making these demands, that the businesses, universities etc would be smarter to tell him to fuck off, federal funding or not. Say 'we'll see you in court'. Yes, they might take a hit in terms of Federal funding, but they'd recover and learn to live without it. Most importantly, they'd be back in control of their own destinies.

The bully will never be satisfied & will never go away until you put up a fight. Once you do fight back, they'll quit like the gaping pussies that they are.


I think the problem is these business and academic leaders don’t spend enough time sunning their taints

  • Haha 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

I'm not going to read the whole thread to see if this has been posted, but folks on the Lew Rockwell site think the man in the tan shirt and dark sunglasses who is directly right of Charlie's head in this video is the shooter. He immediately jumps over the fence to help Charlie.

https://rense.com/general98/video-2.mp4

There are all kinds of crazy theories right now. I saw multiple people talking about how the mic on his shirt was a Mossad special like the exploding pagers except it shot a projectile rather than exploding.

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

Yes, these theories make a lot of sense given that there is video of a man on a nearby roof and they found a rifle in the woods.

The conspiracies are just an acknowledgement that, even with a pronoun boyfriend and that text exchange, the right didn't get the leftwing radical killer that they desperately wanted.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

I'm not going to read the whole thread to see if this has been posted, but folks on the Lew Rockwell site think the man in the tan shirt and dark sunglasses who is directly right of Charlie's head in this video is the shooter. He immediately jumps over the fence to help Charlie.

https://rense.com/general98/video-2.mp4

That would be pretty wild if there were multiple shooters out trying to kill him at the same event. If the bullet really was lodged in his spine, it HAD to have been a lower power round that a 30-06 out of a rifle

Posted
1 hour ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

I'm not going to read the whole thread to see if this has been posted, but folks on the Lew Rockwell site think the man in the tan shirt and dark sunglasses who is directly right of Charlie's head in this video is the shooter. He immediately jumps over the fence to help Charlie.

https://rense.com/general98/video-2.mp4

Why are you reading Lew Rockwell’s site?

  • Haha 1
Posted

Everything has to be a conspiracy theory now. We could have video of him on the roof, the weapon, and a confession from the guy and people would still.... oh wait we do have those things. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Everything has to be a conspiracy theory now. We could have video of him on the roof, the weapon, and a confession from the guy and people would still.... oh wait we do have those things. 

Well it only took the FBI a few swings to eventually land on their perp, imo the cloud of conspiracy comes from their manifold fuckups from the jump. When there's uncertainty and an unclear explanation that's amended multiple times that's kind of to be expected

Posted
5 minutes ago, Captainant said:

imo the cloud of conspiracy comes from their manifold fuckups from the jump.

It would be there no matter what. It's just how things are now.

Posted

Lots of unknowns but you can’t really rule anything out now that history, science and medicine are gone.  We are left to speculate on all options.   
 

So, was Charlie fucking Jon Benet? Her live body or corpse?  Is Erika a reincarnation of Jon Benet and proof that Buddhism is the one true religion?  Did Jon Benet fake her death, become transgender and take the name Charlie Kirk only to get married to Erika under false pretenses?   Then who was it that Jon Brent’s brother really killed and masturbated upon in the family mansion basement  (allegedly)?   All unanswerable questions must now be treated as equally plausible.  
 

Enquiring minds want to know.  

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Red Five said:

Everything has to be a conspiracy theory now. We could have video of him on the roof, the weapon, and a confession from the guy and people would still.... oh wait we do have those things. 

Obviously the supposedly 25 different people in the crowd, plus the camera behind him, plus his own security team all being out to kill him is silly.  What isn't silly is basic physics.  Skip to 11 minutes if you just want to see the good stuff.  The odds that this douche got killed by the gun/bullet they said he did with the damage we saw and they themselves are claiming happened?  One in a zillion.  And if you believe everything that comes out of Trump's FBI that is being run by two podcaster apparatchiks, you're more delulu than the it was an Israeli plot and his security team killed him with his own mic! crowd.  

  

Edited by SpiralOut
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Captainant said:

That would be pretty wild if there were multiple shooters out trying to kill him at the same event. If the bullet really was lodged in his spine, it HAD to have been a lower power round that a 30-06 out of a rifle

Picturing it like that scene where all the international assassins in disguise are bumbling around trying to kill Detective Clouseau.

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, SpiralOut said:

Obviously the supposedly 25 different people in the crowd, plus the camera behind him, plus his own security team all being out to kill him is silly.  What isn't silly is basic physics.  Skip to 11 minutes if you just want to see the good stuff.  The odds that this douche got killed by the gun/bullet they said he did with the damage we saw and they themselves are claiming happened?  One in a zillion.  And if you believe everything that comes out of Trump's FBI that is being run by two podcaster apparatchiks, you're more delulu than the it was an Israeli plot and his security team killed him with his own mic! crowd.  

  

Yeah that’s a totally apples to apples comparison of what happened.

Edited by Covri
Posted
2 hours ago, Covri said:

Yeah that’s a totally apples to apples comparison of what happened.

I have yet to see anyone, anywhere claim that shot is in line with what they expect a .30 cal round to do to a human neck.  Except for the MAGA goons who claim it's totally normal because Charlie Kirk had God blessed neck bones.  That's what we're going with.  

 

Posted
6 hours ago, Red Five said:

Everything has to be a conspiracy theory now. We could have video of him on the roof, the weapon, and a confession from the guy and people would still.... oh wait we do have those things. 

whatever, man...Candace Owens already broke the real story!



×
×
  • Create New...