Jump to content

Plastic bag ban struck down


jimmyjazz

Recommended Posts

What is the state law on waste disposal that the ban conflicts with?  It doesn't trigger me, but I would probably vote for my town banning plastic bags if it were an option.  We are a family of 5 and the amount of bags we accumulate in a month is ridiculous.  We go back in forth between the reusable bags vs. plastic depending on the size of the order.

Edited by Gene Parmesan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've gotten used to the ban in Austin, so much so that it irks me when I go to the grocery story when visiting my inlaws in East Texas, and I always end up waking out with about fifty plastic bags because they can never seem to fit more than two items, no matter how small, in one bag. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gene Parmesan said:

What is the state law on waste disposal that the ban conflicts with?  It doesn't trigger me, but I would probably vote for my town banning plastic bags if it were an option.  We are a family of 5 and the amount of bags we accumulate in a month is ridiculous.  We go back in forth between the reusable bags vs. plastic depending on the size of the order.

According to the court, the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act.  “[a] local government . . . may not adopt an ordinance . . . to . . . prohibit or restrict, for solid waste management purposes, the sale or use of a container or package in a manner not authorized by state law”

10 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

So much for local control. 

meh, lefties like state or federal law superseding local laws when they disagree with the local law, just like right wingers do here.  It's putting outcomes ahead of process.  

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Steamboat1874 said:

Local control only matters when it agrees with the cartel holding our state government hostage.

From my understanding the Federal vs State control are valid arguments since the Constitution addresses this question, and some believe the Feds have gone past the original intent or subsequent amendments.

However the Constitution doesn't continue the logic that local jurisdictions somehow take precedence over state, or federal.  In fact I thought it's not addressed at all therefore putting local authority completely at the mercy of the other 2.   The state can tell the locals how, what and why to act.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bschoolprof said:

According to the court, the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act.  “[a] local government . . . may not adopt an ordinance . . . to . . . prohibit or restrict, for solid waste management purposes, the sale or use of a container or package in a manner not authorized by state law” 

I should probably read the opinion, but I'm not going to today.  What is the state law that makes the bag ban not authorized?  Did the lege try to preempt local control by enacting a law that prevents municipalities from banning plastic bags?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was inevitable.  state law.

i find it ironic that the conservatives who bitch about state rights vs federal laws are against city specific bag bans.  i guess it's ok to push back on the federal guvment but when cities push back on states, that's a no no.

 

re austin, i think the habit is formed.  i'll continue to bring my own bags.  sure is nice not having plastic bags littering the streets.  will be interesting to see the shitheads who start using plastic bags.  my guess is the poors and fat old white people.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, bschoolprof said:

meh, lefties like state or federal law superseding local laws when they disagree with the local law, just like right wingers do here.  It's putting outcomes ahead of process.  

You're missing the irony. "Lefties" are always in favor of a stronger central government. It's the "righties" that claim to be in favor of local control.

  • Like 2
  • Fuck You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

So much for local control. 

The State grants the city charters.

The Federal government did not grant charters for the states, in fact the other way around via the Constitution.

But yeah, I think the Texas SC ruling sucks. Laredo & Austin had finally gotten something right that benefited both communities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to have a drawer to store those disposable bags.  Kept them to use as small trash liners, etc.  After only a few months, the damn drawer became stuffed to the gills.  And that was for a single-person household.

Those bags are not banned, but they're simply not furnished here.  It's supposed to encourage people to bring reusable bags....and guess what....I end up buying new bags on every single grocery trip and immediately trashing them at home, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

You're missing the irony. "Lefties" are always in favor of a stronger central government. It's the "righties" that claim to be in favor of local control.

Righties are in favor of the Constitution, but not those who abuse it by overreaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 52-80 said:

I used to have a drawer to store those disposable bags.  Kept them to use as small trash liners, etc.  After only a few months, the damn drawer became stuffed to the gills.  And that was for a single-person household.

Those bags are not banned, but they're simply not furnished here.  It's supposed to encourage people to bring reusable bags....and guess what....I end up buying new bags on every single grocery trip and immediately trashing them at home, anyway.

We have about a dozen reusable bags. And wash them now & then for sanitary purposes.

I like them because we can carry a lot more heavy crap in them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a reasonable legislation that forced personal habits to change, much like the push towards mandatory seat belt usage that began in the mid-1980's.  It takes a while but eventually it's second nature to bring bags to the grocery store.  It's hardly some sort of violation of one's personal freedoms -- bags are available at a cost, or you can wheel your unbagged groceries out to your car.  The only choice that is being removed is that of the store.  I can live with that.  Greater good and so on.

Edited by jimmyjazz
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Armybrat said:

The State grants the city charters.

The Federal government did not grant charters for the states, in fact the other way around via the Constitution.

But yeah, I think the Texas SC ruling sucks. Laredo & Austin had finally gotten something right that benefited both communities.

I know how the legal relationship works and agree on both points. Also Ft Stockton and other cities.

That being said, I would like to see statutes that impinge on the prerogative of homerule* cities substantially curtailed at the state level. 
Government is typically better, more responsive and more appropriate at the local level.  I suspect you and I agree on this.   It will never happen, but a fella can wish.

 

 

 

 

 

 

* cities of over 5000 that have adopted a charter that is an alternative to the local government code.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I think it's a reasonable legislation that forced personal habits to change, much like the push towards mandatory seat belt usage that began in the mid-1980's.  It takes a while but eventually it's second nature to bring bags to the grocery store.  It's hardly some sort of violation of one's personal freedoms -- bags are available at a cost, or you can wheel your unbagged groceries out to your car.  The only choice that is being removed is that of the store.  I can live with that.  Greater good and so on.

But then how am I supposed to get

my dog walk poop bags and tiny bathroom garbage can liners?

in lieu of a ban, how about this. When I was in Czech Republic ten years ago, the grocers has plastic bags but you had to buy them. Everyone but me brought some sort of bag with them, sometimes the plastic, to avoid paying. Would that work here?  Charging $0.50 per plastic bag, with proceeds going to recycling or other cleanup efforts, might encourage people to get accustomed to bringing their own bags. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pato del Muerto said:

But then how am I supposed to get

my dog walk poop bags and tiny bathroom garbage can liners?

in lieu of a ban, how about this. When I was in Czech Republic ten years ago, the grocers has plastic bags but you had to buy them. Everyone but me brought some sort of bag with them, sometimes the plastic, to avoid paying. Would that work here?  Charging $0.50 per plastic bag, with proceeds going to recycling or other cleanup efforts, might encourage people to get accustomed to bringing their own bags. 

That's essentially the current policy in Austin.  Well, with one variation -- stores can bag groceries in paper bags as they did in the past.  Plastic bags are limited to (a) raw meat and produce and (b) reusable bags which can be brought in or purchased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Armybrat said:

Righties are in favor of the Constitution, but not those who abuse it by overreaching.

Not anymore. Now they're in favor of whatever the strongman says is the proper thing. They also used to be for free markets and now they cheer on protectionist bullshit

Edited by SimonBolivar
  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm skimming the ruling and although I am not an attorney and I am reading this while giving a presentation and leading discussion on a conference call I am deeply familiar with both the language of city ordances and the state law in this area.

Unless I'm missing something, the SC seems to believe that any container or package that winds up as solid waste is therefor a container or package used for a solid waste management purpose or the city ordinance has a solid waste management purpose in curtailing the container, and since a plastic bag is plainly a container, the state law preempts the city ordinance, despite the fact that the city has an interest in protecting other areas where bags wind up, such as the street and waterways.

That seems incredibly bizarre to me. Lawyers, read that and tell me I'm missing something.
 

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bschoolprof said:

According to the court, the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act.  “[a] local government . . . may not adopt an ordinance . . . to . . . prohibit or restrict, for solid waste management purposes, the sale or use of a container or package in a manner not authorized by state law”

meh, lefties like state or federal law superseding local laws when they disagree with the local law, just like right wingers do here.  It's putting outcomes ahead of process.  

Agreed.  The legislature can fix this, either by permitting local government to make their own regs, or by banning bans entirely.  Then you have an issue of "local control."

 

http://www.txcourts.gov/media/1441865/160748.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could a city flip this concept around, and charge fees to a store if they want to use plastic bags?   Then in theory, the extra revenue helps the city manage the trash problem, like plastic bags littering the city.  And it encourages stores to eliminate or reduce their plastic bags.     

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MissingInAction said:

Great news for dog owners because free poop bags.

grocery bags have such terrible quality control i'd never want to use one to pick up shit.  plenty have holes in the bottom.  i'll gladly pay the ~1.5 cents for a bag that i have no chance of touching fresh dog shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MissingInAction said:

Lolwut? You must be new around here or a cloak room reject. 

I have owned dogs for many years and lamented the plastic bag ban because I used them to pick up their shit.

I'm definitely a reject of something.  It was my attempt at humor that people don't pick up their dog's poop. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

remember when you used to see plastic bags littered everywhere? you probably don't, but get ready to see it again. when i travel outside of austin and see all the plastic bags everywhere, i am thankful for the bag ban.

and let's all laugh again at texas republicans for local control. except when they are against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, RDCanecutter said:

Would this have stopped the Rio Grande from smelling like piss?

Maybe we need a lifeguard to tell the people when to get out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

in lieu of a ban, how about this. When I was in Czech Republic ten years ago, the grocers has plastic bags but you had to buy them. Everyone but me brought some sort of bag with them, sometimes the plastic, to avoid paying. Would that work here?  Charging $0.50 per plastic bag, with proceeds going to recycling or other cleanup efforts, might encourage people to get accustomed to bringing their own bags. 

HEB charges .25 a bag if you don't have your own.  They have been doing it since the bag ban started.  Don;t know if the proceeds go anywhere, but they sell them...when they are open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...