Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Could this remedy not have been submitted along with the objection, instead of waiting for another hearing?  And maybe addressed by Trump co outside of court?

 

12 minutes ago, The Dog said:

it was Trump's attorneys who made the suggested remedy. I think it was on them to make it work. Also I think that the original bond was designed so that Trump could find a way to get out of paying it but it didn't work.

Donald Trump GIF by Election 2016

trumpco is doing all this to throw sand in the gears and delaydelaydelay. Of course trumpco could have handled this outside of court, but then it would have been neat and tidy and expedient and completely counterproductive to their desired outcomes. 

Posted

image.png.eac7dff60fa3949d2da3194cfc5a29b7.png

Again, I'm a layperson, but I do know how to put together a rational argument. I think the assertion that Trump is influencing the statement is a sound one. If these are good lawyers, I'd be shocked if they created this statement in a vacuum.

Trump's basic defense against any accusation is to call the accuser a "never-Trumper." He's a never-Bidener, should we discount everything he says? I see strong Trump influence on that tack. I don't see myself using that as an argument. The "very popular tv show" also sounds like a Trump phrase as he is obsessed with ratings and lying about them.

Stormy made a life off these communications? She used "pure opportunism" to get Trump to fork over 6 figures? Huh? She's made money since on this story, so she must be evil. I still don't think that holds much sway in a trial. Who wouldn't cash in?

* I love this last sentence. She knew nothing about the actual crimes alleged here. Well, Blanche, she can confirm she got paid off and anything she may have witnessed indicating why.

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Smax said:

I'm so tired of hearing his voice, bitching whining lying about being the victim here

I'M SO TIRED OF HEARING HIS VOICE, BITCHING WHINING LYING ABOUT BEING THE VICTIM HERE.

TRUTH!!!!!!!

Posted
24 minutes ago, Smax said:

I'm so tired of hearing his voice, bitching whining lying about being the victim here

Lies upon lies upon lies ad nauseum

Posted
17 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

image.png.eac7dff60fa3949d2da3194cfc5a29b7.png

Again, I'm a layperson, but I do know how to put together a rational argument. I think the assertion that Trump is influencing the statement is a sound one. If these are good lawyers, I'd be shocked if they created this statement in a vacuum.

Trump's basic defense against any accusation is to call the accuser a "never-Trumper." He's a never-Bidener, should we discount everything he says? I see strong Trump influence on that tack. I don't see myself using that as an argument. The "very popular tv show" also sounds like a Trump phrase as he is obsessed with ratings and lying about them.

Stormy made a life off these communications? She used "pure opportunism" to get Trump to fork over 6 figures? Huh? She's made money since on this story, so she must be evil. I still don't think that holds much sway in a trial. Who wouldn't cash in?

* I love this last sentence. She knew nothing about the actual crimes alleged here. Well, Blanche, she can confirm she got paid off and anything she may have witnessed indicating why.

 

It reads to me like a typical opening statement when you have a weak case, you have to at least try to give the jury reasons to not believe the witnesses against the defendant. Saying that she is "biased" against Trump is consistent with ordinary jury instructions that the jury is to be the sole judge of credibility of a witness and can take any "biases" into consideration. He just needs one to buy into it for a mistrial but it does not read like an opening statement of a party that has a strong basis for acquittal. If Trump had written it, the term "whore" and "slut" would be all over it, regardless of legal rules or decorum.  

  • Like 1
Posted

"And, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my client has never even met the plaintiff.  Well, maybe once or twice, I don't know, people say there are pictures.  Look, he meets a lot of people, ok? He's very popular and when you're popular everyone wants to meet you and get a picture and the flashes go off and it's like flash, pop, pop pop pop.  Like popcorn, right? All the popping and then you eat it and it's like you aren't eating anything at all, but it tastes so good.  So good.  But not the bailiff.  The bailiff, look, the bailiff, ahhhhhhh.   And the plaintiff.  Some very good people are saying that she isn't the plaintiff, but she is, and she isn't, she isn't even the defendant's type, and he never met her before.  Thank you."

  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
  • Drool 2
Posted
38 minutes ago, Captainant said:

 

Donald Trump GIF by Election 2016

trumpco is doing all this to throw sand in the gears and delaydelaydelay. Of course trumpco could have handled this outside of court, but then it would have been neat and tidy and expedient and completely counterproductive to their desired outcomes. 

How many times do we have to tell you that the bond issue is not delaying anything. We understand your fever dream that this is a problem, but even after being told it’s not a problem you insist on saying the bond delays the appeal.  Just stop!

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

She has publicly described what his junk looks like, if he's going to deny sexual relations with her, it seems pretty obvious to me how to prove whether she's telling the truth, but please, please, please, no.

  • Haha 7
Posted
1 hour ago, pyrohornIII said:

This drives a lot of the Hispanic vote in Texas.  The idea of Trump's machismo.

Women of Trump calendar?  

I wonder if they intend to use the "definition of sex" defense Clinton used?

 

5 minutes ago, 'stache said:

She has publicly described what his junk looks like, if he's going to deny sexual relations with her, it seems pretty obvious to me how to prove whether she's telling the truth, but please, please, please, no.

 

It wasn't sex b/c he's too small for actual penetration?

Posted
10 minutes ago, 'stache said:

She has publicly described what his junk looks like, if he's going to deny sexual relations with her, it seems pretty obvious to me how to prove whether she's telling the truth, but please, please, please, no.

pubbeas chudus?

Posted
1 hour ago, pyrohornIII said:

This drives a lot of the Hispanic vote in Texas.  The idea of Trump's machismo.

Women of Trump calendar?  

I wonder if they intend to use the "definition of sex" defense Clinton used?

Someone should check her papers.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Would someone pay off an extorter who was completely lying about an incident? It's possible to create a scenario where this would occur but it's far more likely to believe the opposite. 

I'm not close to the facts of this case, but isn't the entire case going to depend on Cohen's testimony and what Trump knew and arranged? Whether Trump had sex with Daniels just seems like salacious details but almost immaterial. I assume the defense isn't going to disagree that Daniels was paid off by Cohen, who may or may not have acted on Trump's explicit directions. 

If I'm the prosecutor, I would hate to have Cohen as one of my main witnesses. Sleazy, convicted lawyer who likes to go on TV slamming Trump but previously loved Trump when Trump was paying him. In almost every situation, Cohen has zero credibility.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

So, this involved three people. One is on trial, and the other two are going to confirm all the shit they did? One of which already went to prison for it? Do I have that right?

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
14 hours ago, tx ind said:

Every time there's a story of him running out of cash it's not surprising, the best part is what happens next.  You move to the anticipation of what the next grift will be, we've gotten sneakers, bibles, 5% cuts from down ballot folks, what's next?

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/22/business/trump-media-stock-truth-social/index.html

Getting another ~$1.3B+ today. That seems like a well run venture over there. I'd recommend he figure out how to dump that shit today. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Red Five said:

So, this involved three people. One is on trial, and the other two are going to confirm all the shit they did? One of which already went to prison for it? Do I have that right?

image.gif.32eae0690f971f2c344fb8a338b15817.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 3
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Would someone pay off an extorter who was completely lying about an incident? It's possible to create a scenario where this would occur but it's far more likely to believe the opposite. 

You need to read the brilliant defense opening more closely. Stormy used opportunism. She's an opportunist.

Edited by RomaVicta
Posted
6 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

FYI for those with interest:

 

There’s some good news for people who want to follow the Trump trial in detail, but can’t make it to the courthouse. The New York state court system has just agreed to publish a transcript of each day’s proceeding by the end of the following day on its website. You can find the daily transcripts here.

 

https://ww2.nycourts.gov/press/index.shtml

 

Thank you sir

Posted
1 hour ago, Gatorubet said:

How many times do we have to tell you that the bond issue is not delaying anything. We understand your fever dream that this is a problem, but even after being told it’s not a problem you insist on saying the bond delays the appeal.  Just stop!

Dude, half the people in this thread have already hallucinated a plea deal where Trump stays his term at home in Florida, even though the only source for this is their own whisky-addled brains. Just to keep in mind what you're arguing with.

Posted
2 hours ago, Smax said:

I'm so tired of hearing his voice, bitching whining lying about being the victim here

I know it's not gonna happen, but man, that bitching/whining/moaning would be music to my ears if he was doing it from behind bars. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Rimbo said:

...even though the only source for this is their own whisky-addled brains...

:raises hand:

Um, I'd just like to state for the record, my brain is actually weed-addled.

  • Haha 3
  • Drool 1
Posted
2 hours ago, 'stache said:

She has publicly described what his junk looks like, if he's going to deny sexual relations with her, it seems pretty obvious to me how to prove whether she's telling the truth, but please, please, please, no.

 

 

  • Haha 4
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

And an antiseptic

My blood should be pretty hostile.  Spent Sat/Sun doing landscape work in the AM and then chilling in the pool with Vodka/Topo Chico & Pineapple...  that stuff is dangerous.  Last night I thought I was just a little sun burnt and slept like shit.   Felt worse and worse all day, had the test sitting around, so figured what the hell...  Positive right off the bat.

Ricola & Tylenol are all I'm using.   

 

I wonder if there are cheap flights to NY?   Just kidding I'm hunkering down at home

Edited by locodos
spel r hard
  • Drool 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, locodos said:

My blood should be pretty hostile.  Spent Sat/Sun doing landscape work in the AM and then chilling in the pool with Vodka/Topo Chico & Pineapple...  that stuff is dangerous.  Last night I thought I was just a little sun burnt and slept like shit.   Felt worse and worse all day, had the test sitting around, so figured what the hell...  Positive right off the bat.

Ricola & Tylenol are all I'm using.   

 

I wonder if there are cheap flights to NY?   Just kidding I'm hunkering down at home

You need to remove the nano bots. Try bleeding yourself and running the blood through one of the really good Brita filters. Like the blue ones. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

You need to remove the nano bots. 

Try bleeding yourself and running the blood through one of the really good Brita filters. Like the blue ones. 

Nah man 5G for Life!

PS it was always right there all along!

5g-data-network-norway.jpg

At home plasmapheresis, now at new low low prices!

Edited by locodos
Posted
37 minutes ago, GenXer said:

You say that like it’s a bad thing

 

34 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Alcohol is a preservative. 

 

30 minutes ago, locodos said:

Not me, I'm back on the Rona!

 

 

27 minutes ago, Goredho said:

:raises hand:

Um, I'd just like to state for the record, my brain is actually weed-addled.

 

25 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

And an antiseptic

 

18 minutes ago, locodos said:

My blood should be pretty hostile.  Spent Sat/Sun doing landscape work in the AM and then chilling in the pool with Vodka/Topo Chico & Pineapple...  that stuff is dangerous.  Last night I thought I was just a little sun burnt and slept like shit.   Felt worse and worse all day, had the test sitting around, so figured what the hell...  Positive right off the bat.

Ricola & Tylenol are all I'm using.   

 

I wonder if there are cheap flights to NY?   Just kidding I'm hunkering down at home

 

8 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

You need to remove the nano bots. Try bleeding yourself and running the blood through one of the really good Brita filters. Like the blue ones. 

Yes. We're a few cylinders short of a V-8, is all. Not playing with full decks. A hamster short of an embarrassing rectal surgery. Not quite meeting recommended specifications. A few teeth short on our gears. The books of our lives lack punctuation and have spelling errors. Our memory banks are insolvent. We are the third Godfather movie, mentally speaking. Our IQ tests came back negative.



×
×
  • Create New...