Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Republican on Republican violence ... you hate to see it. This is THE Travis Tritt, who apparently has gone full-on MAGA.  How a country singer has "confidential sources"  is beyond me, but whatever. 

It's weird, the minor celebrities that MAGA draws.  Scott Baio, Kirk Cameron, Kevin Sorbo, etc.

I have a cousin who loves Kevin Sorbo, and thinks it's awesome that he's MAGA.  Anytime she posts about him, I post this and mention "this is peak Kevin Sorbo, because he wasn't acting!"

 

Posted
4 hours ago, Beau Vine said:

Reposting this so everyone sees it clearly and those of you still trying to talk to your Trumper friends and family can realize that you're wasting your fucking time:

F3-urojXIAAtsLY?format=jpg&name=900x900


The dumbest people alive 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Biff Tannen said:

That's a parody account right?  Or do they actually believe the magats would applaud the rescuing of mexicans?

I’m not certain. All possibilities are believable. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Biff Tannen said:

That's a parody account right?  Or do they actually believe the magats would applaud the rescuing of mexicans?

I don't know. He has a history of "saving" brown people hit by hurricanes 

 

picture.jpg

Posted
18 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Doesn't really matter, but that's a hell of a margin of error.

Noticed that as well. It kind of matters though. For a MOE that big, there probably weren't that many respondents. And Magats are like Aggies when it comes to internet polls. How many folks here, upon seeing that survey, would even consider answering it? The premise is so fucking stupid (trustworthiness of Republican candidates) I'd just roll my eyes and move on. 

Posted
18 hours ago, Bookman said:

Is the attorney/client privilege for legal advice to Trump waived if Mark Meadows was in the room, and the advice sought was in the furtherance of the conspiracy?

Generally speaking, yes to both. Privilege is lost if another non-client party is in the room. If Meadows was considered a co-client, privilege is lost between the clients if they ultimately become adverse to each other (i.e., the attorney would be prohibited from talking about it, but either client could use it against the other). Also, talking about your intent to commit a crime is not privileged. In every state I'm aware of, there's a "crime-fraud exception" that negates privilege. Depending on the crime being discussed, the attorney may actually have a duty to report it to authorities. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, SquishMitten said:

Noticed that as well. It kind of matters though. For a MOE that big, there probably weren't that many respondents. And Magats are like Aggies when it comes to internet polls. How many folks here, upon seeing that survey, would even consider answering it? The premise is so fucking stupid (trustworthiness of Republican candidates) I'd just roll my eyes and move on. 

And how many answered it farcically?  You have to hope that some of them answered Trump to fuck with them.

Posted
1 hour ago, Macanudo said:

And how many answered it farcically?  You have to hope that some of them answered Trump to fuck with them.

In a somewhat similar vein, it drives me nuts when the media trots out the "81% of people have little to no trust that the 2024 election will be decided fairly" or somesuch.  Yet they forget to mention, oh, 40% of those were Rs who think the Dems have rigged all elections because dear leader told them so with ZERO evidence and the other 41% are Dems that have seen the Rs planning in real life how they are going to try and fuck with elections.  Those are two radically different reasons to say you don't have trust in fair elections.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
1 hour ago, The Dog said:

Side note - in a new CBS poll 71% of Republicans want Trump at the debate. 

The problem is he cannot because he will incriminate himself. 

Lol, he's going to burn the entire party to the ground.  Can't wait.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, The Dog said:

Side note - in a new CBS poll 71% of Republicans want Trump at the debate. 

The problem is he cannot because he will incriminate himself. 

I'm a little curious what the legal objection to that stunt is.  I suppose any time he uses an indictment for a political purpose, that could be construed as an attempt to contaminate the jury pool.  And, if he gets gagged or contempted for that, it's probably not going to be just one thing, but the accumulation of things.

Posted

BUT WHAT ABOUT FREE SPEECH! 

Yeah, we have an amendment just down the page from that one that sorta addresses this all...

Holy shit, if I am going to relapse hard if I have to listen to another person start a conversation with, "As a student of the Constitution..." 

You know the 1st, 2nd, and 5th amendments.  And not even that well.  Plus, oh yeah...before they wrote out the Bill of Rights...they actually wrote out the actual fucking Constitution.  Seven Articles.  Same number of indictments for Commander Dipshit (when the last 3 fall later this year).  The whole thing would have been longer but they didn't fathom half the shit Trump would do.  

I musta missed the Federalist Paper that dealt with, "What if a sitting or recently removed President shares U.S. military plans with adversaries for personal gain or fame?"  There's no specific law for half his shit because nobody, even Nixon, ever thought somebody in charge of the Republic would pull this kinda shit.  Yeah, sorry Article II didn't do a deep dive into perfect phone calls.  I think they were busy with a fucking war or something.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
On 8/20/2023 at 9:48 AM, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

Republican on Republican violence ... you hate to see it. This is THE Travis Tritt, who apparently has gone full-on MAGA.  How a country singer has "confidential sources"  is beyond me, but whatever. 

Travis Tritt Kemp.jpg

If I were Dominion, I'd have a petition ready to file against any public figure who spouts this shit that has been disproven over and over again to the extent Fox News paid damn near a billion dollars to get out from what they did. I would call it an "FAFO Petition."

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
On 8/20/2023 at 12:01 PM, RDCanecutter said:

I wonder how they think that would work out for them? Probably with lots of other people obediently doing the dangerous parts. Well, maybe they'd command a Home Guard unit that would round up some Sociology Professors trying to infiltrate the Cracker Barrel mess hall by driving up in a VW van with poorly-disguised flower stickers.

109F5855-6198-4DF1-8A03-621B4D1B7E7D.jpeg.b612329f3bc7fc1392dbed4498722cc1.jpeg

“You just tell that woman to give us all the Funyuns, Pringles, pretzels and non-Bud-Lite beers in her pantry, and we’ll be gone…”

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

And there will be zero consequences for it.  

I'm not sure how this will all play out, but what I can tell you is that in Georgia if you revoke the terms of your bail you get hauled in pretty quickly.  There is a pretty good reason that once someone is arraigned here you don't here them say much beyond referring to their attorney or no comment.  There also aren't a series of steps for this sort of stuff, once you violate it the judge will just revoke it, they arrest you, you wait in jail, and then you have to wait for another pretrial hearing/bail.  You don't want to go down said path.  I had a friend that did something wrong (not overly serious), got arrested, arraigned, etc.  The county made a paperwork mistake, the judge subsequently revoked his bail, and he got to spend 8 days in Fulton County for it to get cleared up/see the judge.  

Now big mouth having to keep it shut for months on end seems fairly unrealistic to me.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 3
Posted
1 hour ago, BamaATL said:

I'm not sure how this will all play out, but what I can tell you is that in Georgia if you revoke the terms of your bail you get hauled in pretty quickly.  There is a pretty good reason that once someone is arraigned here you don't here them say much beyond referring to their attorney or no comment.  There also aren't a series of steps for this sort of stuff, once you violate it the judge will just revoke it, they arrest you, you wait in jail, and then you have to wait for another pretrial hearing/bail.  You don't want to go down said path.  I had a friend that did something wrong (not overly serious), got arrested, arraigned, etc.  The county made a paperwork mistake, the judge subsequently revoked his bail, and he got to spend 8 days in Fulton County for it to get cleared up/see the judge.  

Now big mouth having to keep it shut for months on end seems fairly unrealistic to me.  

I hope you're right.  If he's held accountable for his actions, it will be the first time so far.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, The Dog said:

Side note - in a new CBS poll 71% of Republicans want Trump at the debate. 

The problem is he cannot because he will incriminate himself. 

Has anyone ever pled the 5th during a Presidential primary election?

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Constant said:

Has anyone ever pled the 5th during a Presidential primary election?

No, but there's gotta be a Key & Peele/Chapelle meme in here somewhere.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Lol, didn't realize this.  Good luck.

Quote

his bond order for the Fulton County case also says that he is not allowed to make “direct or indirect threat of any nature against the community or to any property in the community,” including, but not limited to, “posts on social media or reposts of posts made by another individual on social media.” The idea that Trump will be able to sit on his hands while his GOP challengers discuss his criminal exposure feels like…a bit of a stretch!

 

Edited by Biff Tannen
no idea why that's crossed out and can't fix it
Posted

The stable genius that once remembered 5 words for a half hour, who was the head of our Rule of Law Republic, had to be reminded by a court of law not to threaten jurors or community members involved with his case since that's his go-to reflex.  Somebody had to tell President Trump not to have U.S. citizens doing their civic duty murdered by his minions, lest he be out $200k.  That happened today.  in America.  You fucking children.  

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

Yeah, there's a few different ways that syntax could go.  And I know his people are used to his rants on social media.  But I mean, in what world would you ever, ever under any kind of legal investigation from parking ticket to a coup to genocide would you possibly consider the use of the word "murder" in a written statement that the judge and jury could see?  

I mean look, ladies and gentlemen of the supposed jury...I may have double parked.  But that is nothing compared to the violent murder spree the other side's lawyer is about to discuss with you.  

I get what Commander Dipshit is trying to say but that is just a really weird way to bring up something that should never be uttered, ever.  Especially if some of your crimes led to people...you know...dying.  From...you know...violence

  • Like 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, The Dog said:

At least his lawyers were able to talk him into removing the wink-wink emoji after the "Murder" references - finally a small victory ...

Posted

Remember when half the country flipped their collective lid because Obama wore a tan suit?

This dipshit crafts hysterical screeds and spews them out on social media like a middle school girl who just got rejected by the backup quarterback after she let him touch her "down there".

DISCLAIMER:  I never played quarterback

  • Haha 4
Posted
5 hours ago, The Dog said:

 

They also introduced that new legislation that lets them punish or remove a prosecutor for purely political reasons and they’re going to make use of it as we all knew they would.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/trumps-georgia-allies-search-for-ways-to-punish-fani-willis/LYUKIOKBJJBMBAXFD3JCWO2ZTQ/

Quote

State senator eyes new panel as way to punish Fani Willis over Trump indictments

Commission, starting in October, will have power to sanction and even remove prosecutors
 

Several Republican lawmakers are seeking ways to sanction Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis after she brought criminal charges against former President Donald Trump and 18 allies.

Trump backers are going after Willis using a new state law approved by Gov. Brian Kemp that creates a state commission with power to sanction or oust prosecutors found to be neglecting their duties or responsible for an array of other violations.

State Sen. Clint Dixon said Monday that he would file a complaint against Willis in October when the Prosecuting Attorneys Qualifications Commission begins its proceedings, saying the indictments were sparked by Willis’ “unabashed goal to become some sort of leftist celebrity.”

“Once the Prosecutorial Oversight Committee is appointed in October, we can have them investigate and take action against Fani Willis and her efforts that weaponize the justice system against political opponents,” the Buford Republican said in a social media post.

“This is our best measure,” Dixon added, “and I will be ready to call for that investigation.”

 

Posted
52 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

I continue to be amazed that he feels a phone call can be described as "perfect".  It's been a running theme since his call to Z in Ukraine.

I wonder if his vocabulary is just that bad, or if he instinctively understands the importance of repeating propaganda verbatim and often. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:

They also introduced that new legislation that lets them punish or remove a prosecutor for purely political reasons and they’re going to make use of it as we all knew they would.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/trumps-georgia-allies-search-for-ways-to-punish-fani-willis/LYUKIOKBJJBMBAXFD3JCWO2ZTQ/

 

Member when they swore up and down that this law was for (liberal) prosecutors that weren’t enforcing laws?

  • Rage+1 1


×
×
  • Create New...