Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Normally I would take my suitcoat off before taking a shit That hard but there probably wasn’t a hook.  
 

normally I would also wonder why someone was photographing me taking such an aggressive shit.  Maybe that explains the disgruntled look and embarrassment explains why he left town so fast.  

Edited by YGIFS
  • Haha 2
Posted

There’s something about the mugshot that makes me sad. A team of weak, insecure advisors probably workshopped the photo then worked with a weak, demented old man to practice looking tough for his weak, profoundly lost followers.

The vanity, shallowness, and utter lack of substance in the entire pathetic movement encapsulated in one photo.

 

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Posted
I've been practicing criminal law for over a decade and never once I have I seen someone weighed during booking. I have no idea why the entire world including the myriad internet experts just assumed they weigh during bookings. Did the county indicate they were going to?
That's the devils tricks. We all know he sucks ass, but we all tune in even though we know it's counter productive. it's kinda like he's the antichrist but we all just nod along
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:


Did…did he take dozens of mega shits all over the street?

Same. Are those washed up squids or like… corpses?

Might need some ether or mescaline to aid in interpretation. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Stilicho said:

Same. Are those washed up squids or like… corpses?

Might need some ether or mescaline to aid in interpretation. 

Looks kinda like when the man-o-war wash up on the Galveston shore

Posted
2 hours ago, Beau Vine said:

 

He should familiarize himself with the modified version of the “cracker slapper” popularized in the aftermath of the Riverboat Rebellion in Montgomery. The folding mechanism on them fits perfectly across the brows of ignorant, dumb biscuit bakers on the take.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, SilasCoade said:

I bet she's a lot of fun in the bedroom

There’s a whole thread on that.  In short she’s the type you fuck and run when you’re done!

Posted
1 hour ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

Meanwhile, outside the jail, a pair of women lusting after Trump's attention decided to have a catfight:

 

 

 

 

Large Marge lol

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

I guess we just don't know the art of the deal. Seriously though, this is more curious to me than his weight.

If the trial occurs after the election, the PAC doesn't have the use of the $200k for the campaign. It'll be sitting on Rice St. earning 0%. 

If he uses Four Seasons Bail Bonds, the PAC will still have $180k available to spend prior to November 2024.

  • Drool 1
Posted

Perhaps a neurotic privacy move so that he's not directly providing the state of Georgia with any of his shady personal banking information? 

 

  • Drool 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Beau Vine said:

 

 

this is just the griftiest of grifts, and I wish I would have gotten in on it from the ground up. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 2
Posted
8 hours ago, hpslugga said:

IMG_4333.thumb.png.8e6eb2332b7920518847f963237685ab.png

 

This is like Google trying to get me to prove I'm not a robot by selecting all the pictures of psychopaths.

  • Haha 3
  • Drool 2
Posted

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/24/co-defendant-georgia-trump-indictment-00112932

 

Quote

Shawn Still, a Georgia Republican charged alongside former President Donald Trump in a racketeering conspiracy to subvert the 2020 election, says he signed false papers claiming to be a legitimate presidential elector at Trump’s direction.

“Mr. Still, as a presidential elector, was also acting at the direction of the incumbent president of the United States,” his attorney Thomas Bever argued Thursday in a court filing seeking to transfer the case against him to federal court. “The president’s attorneys instructed Mr. Still and the other contingent electors that they had to meet and cast their ballots on Dec. 14, 2020.”

 

 

Quote

In the weeks after his defeat at the polls to Joe Biden, Trump and his campaign urged state and national GOP officials to assemble slates of would-be presidential electors in seven states where Trump had filed legal challenges to the results. Campaign attorneys and a cadre of outside lawyers — including several charged alongside Trump in the indictment — argued that those activists should meet and cast electoral votes on Trump’s behalf on the same day the legitimate presidential electors met to vote for Biden.

 

Quote

Though the Trump campaign’s attorneys told many of them that the effort was necessary to preserve Trump’s chances to prevail in ongoing legal challenges, Trump eventually used the existence of these illegitimate slates to provoke a controversy on Jan. 6, 2021, pressuring then-Vice President Mike Pence to recognize and count the unofficial electoral votes instead of Biden’s. Prosecutors in those states and Washington, D.C., have scrutinized the false electors in numerous criminal probes. In Michigan, all 16 false electors were recently charged with felonies for their role in the effort.

 

Spoiler

Still’s argument is part of an effort to pluck his case out of the state courts and instead have his legal fate decided by a federal judge in the Northern District of Georgia. He contends that because Trump effectively instructed him to cast the ballot — based in part on legal advice from campaign and party lawyers — he was acting with the imprimatur of the federal government. That entitles him to immunity from state prosecution under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, he says.

Still, who took office as a state senator in January, aligned his argument closely with co-defendant David Shafer, a former chair of the Georgia GOP who also served as a false elector on Trump’s behalf in December 2020. Like Still, Shafer is seeking to transfer his charges to federal court, arguing that the advice of Trump campaign attorneys was consistent with historical precedents and federal procedures.

“Mr. Shafer and the other Republican Electors in the 2020 election acted at the direction of the incumbent President and other federal officials,” Shafer’s attorney wrote in a petition seeking to move the Fulton County case to federal court.

A third false elector, Cathleen Latham, is also charged in the indictment.

The arguments by Still and Shafer underscore the tensions and cracks likely to emerge among the 19 defendants. Both men laid their decisions primarily at the feet of Trump and his attorneys for devising and blessing the false-elector gambit. Evidence amassed by the Jan. 6 select committee — as well as special counsel Jack Smith — revealed that Trump called RNC chair Ronna McDaniel a week before the Dec. 14 vote and put her on the phone with attorney John Eastman, a key driver of the false elector effort, to emphasize the importance of assembling the “alternative” slates.

The bids by Shafer and Still have been less prominent than similar efforts by Mark Meadows, Trump’s former chief of staff, and Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Department official, both of whom made failed emergency efforts to prevent the Fulton County district attorney from arresting them.

U.S. District Court Judge Steve Jones has set an Aug. 28 evidentiary hearing to consider Meadows’ effort and a Sept. 18 hearing to consider Clark’s.

 

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 3
Posted
16 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/24/co-defendant-georgia-trump-indictment-00112932

 

 

 

 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

Still’s argument is part of an effort to pluck his case out of the state courts and instead have his legal fate decided by a federal judge in the Northern District of Georgia. He contends that because Trump effectively instructed him to cast the ballot — based in part on legal advice from campaign and party lawyers — he was acting with the imprimatur of the federal government. That entitles him to immunity from state prosecution under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, he says.

Still, who took office as a state senator in January, aligned his argument closely with co-defendant David Shafer, a former chair of the Georgia GOP who also served as a false elector on Trump’s behalf in December 2020. Like Still, Shafer is seeking to transfer his charges to federal court, arguing that the advice of Trump campaign attorneys was consistent with historical precedents and federal procedures.

“Mr. Shafer and the other Republican Electors in the 2020 election acted at the direction of the incumbent President and other federal officials,” Shafer’s attorney wrote in a petition seeking to move the Fulton County case to federal court.

A third false elector, Cathleen Latham, is also charged in the indictment.

The arguments by Still and Shafer underscore the tensions and cracks likely to emerge among the 19 defendants. Both men laid their decisions primarily at the feet of Trump and his attorneys for devising and blessing the false-elector gambit. Evidence amassed by the Jan. 6 select committee — as well as special counsel Jack Smith — revealed that Trump called RNC chair Ronna McDaniel a week before the Dec. 14 vote and put her on the phone with attorney John Eastman, a key driver of the false elector effort, to emphasize the importance of assembling the “alternative” slates.

The bids by Shafer and Still have been less prominent than similar efforts by Mark Meadows, Trump’s former chief of staff, and Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Department official, both of whom made failed emergency efforts to prevent the Fulton County district attorney from arresting them.

U.S. District Court Judge Steve Jones has set an Aug. 28 evidentiary hearing to consider Meadows’ effort and a Sept. 18 hearing to consider Clark’s.

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, Genco said:

If the trial occurs after the election, the PAC doesn't have the use of the $200k for the campaign. It'll be sitting on Rice St. earning 0%. 

If he uses Four Seasons Bail Bonds, the PAC will still have $180k available to spend prior to November 2024.

$200K is a rounding error in a presidential election war chest.  He's already grifted all the money from the PAC and there are no funds to write a check against.

Edited by CooterBrown
  • Drool 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, CooterBrown said:

$200K is a rounding error in a presidential election war chest.  He's already grifted all the money from the PAC and there are no funds to write a check against.

 

1 minute ago, Red Five said:

$200k for a billionaire would be like me dropping a $20. Why even bother messing with a bonds.... person?

Occam's Razor says the PAC is now broke.

  • Hook 'Em 2


×
×
  • Create New...