Jump to content

The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Dahobbs said:

But what are you testing? Other income? Assets? If just income, you'd actually be harming those that would be more likely to need the funds since they were still working. It wouldn't make sense to me to exclude the person still actively working and yet allow the person with millions in retirement assets to still receive SS. 

Yup.  Only saying not all reaching retirement should get the while check.  Insurance, not pension, IOW.  Not everyone needs it.  The cat fight on this (terms) would be spectacular 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Yup.  Only saying not all reaching retirement should get the while check.  Insurance, not pension, IOW.  Not everyone needs it.  The cat fight on this (terms) would be spectacular 

Lifting the cap on contributions is easy pickings.  And I say that as someone who would sure as hell take a hit on it -- I max out pretty early in the year.  Just keep taxing me, and use the extra to make up for the shortfall elsewhere.  People of current means/income can do more to lift things up.

I'm okay with paying more in taxes if it actually means that fewer of my fellow Americans have to spend the last years of their lives eating cat food and living among roaches.

I mean, do that later.  For NOW, I want maximum suffering, I want the whole system to fail so that maybe the fucking idiots who vote for Trump and this shit will realize "gee, maybe we DO need a functioning government and society."  But, once we are back on some sort of "so, society and the common good maybe matter a little bit" train instead of the "fuck everyone, rich people get everything and more of it, everyone else can get fucked, TRIUMPH OF THE WILL!" train, I'm all-in on that plan.

  • Hook 'Em 8
Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

It would explain the hair.

Actually, my mom (and my wife) have curly hair. 

IMG_4274.jpeg.fef700333447e1ea44124c56f573aae5.jpeg

Edited by Gatorubet
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 6
Posted
1 hour ago, Rex Kramer said:

Okay, Ana is catching a lot heat but this is funny. And accurate. I however am irritated by it. 

Well, let's take a look

I think there's a consensus that we overspend on defense.  One of the multiple reasons we don't cut our defense spending is the number of people employed and the economic activity it generates.  Defense exports were nearly 30% of our defense budget in 2023.

So, Trump's foreign policy is going to severely curtail foreign purchases of our defense products, reducing activity in that sector.

Yet our governmental defense spending will remain untouched and likely grow.  

Sounds like a win-win to me.🙄

 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
10 hours ago, cactusflinthead said:

So much winning 

 

In the spirit maker’s quarterly earnings call on March 5, CEO Lawson Whiting said blocking consumers from buying American-made products in Canada or other countries is a crushing blow for U.S. companies.

“That’s worse than a tariff because it’s literally taking your sales away completely, removing our products on the shelves,” Whiting told investors. “That’s a very disproportionate response to a 25% tariff."

https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/jack-daniels-brown-forman-canada-tariffs-taken-off-shelves-stores-ontario-alcohol-bourbon-trump/741970/

 

 

Screenshot_20250313-235334.png

It's crazy. I mean, could anyone have seen this coming?

 

Screenshot_20250314-104827-266.thumb.png.9b7b1bd18903f39212f5ea4bc5c0d53d.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

It's crazy. I mean, could anyone have seen this coming?

“That’s worse than a tariff because it’s literally taking your sales away completely, removing our products on the shelves,” Whiting told investors. “That’s a very disproportionate response to a 25% tariff."

 

IMG_4275.gif.5dd4dd567c45b766c5072a8a42577077.gif

Not so much disproportionate to saying we are taking your country as our 51st state. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
21 hours ago, sidis said:

i suspect it is more about dimon being just another public personality with no accountability for anything he says or does and shamelessly heel turning when it starts to impact him. recall that this was him in january of this year:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/22/economy/jamie-dimon-tariffs-get-over-it/index.html

 

Exactly.  Furthermore getting attention from the media doesn't mean one is particularly intelligent or insightful, but rather than one draws traffic.  See Boebert, MTG, Gym Jordan, Trump, Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, Herschel Walker. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

I said I’m irritated by it. But his comment was funny.  But good sermon. 

It's a bit too factual to be a sermon.  No one gives a shit about the well-being of defense contractors, or their profitability, except to the extent they employ people.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

It's a bit too factual to be a sermon.  No one gives a shit about the well-being of defense contractors, or their profitability, except to the extent they employ people.

I care very deeply about the well being of the defense industrial base and also think that the idea of “spending too much on defense” is something we can decide for ourselves is extremely naive in the multipolar world that DJT’s team is trying to explicitly create. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/13/2025 at 12:25 AM, Anastasis said:

That bill has zero chance of passage, even in texas. You know this. 

It’s not zero percent, maybe less than fifty percent but it’s no where close to zero. It shouldn’t be filed to begin with. And elected officials who do file them should be escorted out of the building. You know this. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, troph said:

It’s not zero percent, maybe less than fifty percent but it’s no where close to zero. It shouldn’t be filed to begin with. And elected officials who do file them should be escorted out of the building. You know this. 

I agree it shouldn't be filed. What should be filed is a bill that restricts the government from collecting data on biological sex and gender. 

Posted
14 hours ago, Ted Lange said:

Not sure if this one has been posted 

image.thumb.png.91522ae702d74d2922af035d574c2c3b.png

A few things:

1. Wasn’t Hanania very recently a MAGA villain? Has he pulled a face turn in recent weeks?

2. This professor was (maybe still is) a fucking dipshit. See #3. However, it’s good to see people waking up (even if it’s too late to avoid a lot of pain).

3. So many otherwise rational adults overreacted to what should have been completely unsurprising boundary-testing by college students. I’ve tried to explain to so many people that performative wokeness is an ultimately harmless (albeit sometimes annoying) fad. But these unimaginative dipshits, swaddled in the false security of normalcy bias, insisted that a bunch of oversensitive college kids were a far bigger threat to their freedoms than an openly fascist would-be dictator and his cadre of anti-intellectual Christian nationalists. They’re in the FO stage now. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rex Kramer said:

Anyway, on #2 above, you would be amazed at what we waste. It made make any American sick to their stomachs. 

I have no doubts.

Query: do you think that issue (waste/cronyism) will get better, or worse under this regime?

Posted
1 minute ago, Rex Kramer said:

I’m close with a few attorneys and yall are all the same. You talk at people without ascertaining whether or not the audience understands the topic, which sometimes they do better than the attorney. 

IMG_4279.webp.060d91321fe5b747afd3658738bb84a2.webp

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Nivek said:

Define waste.   

Well, per the current definition, it's "any taxpayer dollar that doesn't go to paying/subsidizing an enterprise owned by Elon Musk."  That's it.  That's the whole definition.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Rex Kramer said:

Hey fucko, you’re the one that entertains VAPA. Don’t mean mouse meme me bruh 

?? That is just acknowledging the big brain assertion.  And that’s Mister Fucko!

Posted
20 hours ago, Tuco said:

Just as a reminder, these dipshits were around during Trump's first presidency, which included Trump redrawing lines on a hurricane map, Trump saying windmills cause cancer, Trump saying that global warming was a Chinese conspiracy, Trump saying that we should rake forests, and, of course, the daily barrage on common sense while a global pandemic was killing thousands of Americans per day.  They don't get to pretend that this is a surprise.  They don't get to pretend they didn't have the data.  They just didn't think they'd be personally affected. 

Fucking ENRAGES me. And don't forget he's been an extremely obvious, barely-trying-to-hide-it Russian asset for 10 years now. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 4
Posted
5 hours ago, Rex Kramer said:

Might get better but not appreciably. He’s not approaching with a surgeon’s knife. As my caddy in Mexico told me once, “[he’s] putting with a sledge hammer.”

Dem Mexican caddies know stuff.  

  • Haha 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Bullneck said:

Dem Mexican caddies know stuff.  

I would have told that caddie to go back to ... Mexico. Okay, I probably wouldn't tell him that, but I'd tell him something. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

I didn't know the donkey show industry was still thriving. Is that all local or are some countries outsourcing their donkey show labor? 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

I just now learned that PornHub is a Canadian website.

Talk about your unlubed consequences!


 

GmFTmdBWsAAolt3.jpg

Already "banned" in Texas

  • Rage+1 1
Posted
5 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

BREAKING:

Canada set to CANCEL order for U.S F-35 fighter jets 

“We are being compelled to look at options.” 

- Bill Blair, Canadian Defence Minister
 

Yea I mean buying military equipment from someone threatening to invade you seems like a bad idea

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chooky said:

I didn't know the donkey show industry was still thriving. Is that all local or are some countries outsourcing their donkey show labor? 

It’s hard holding on to homegrown talent when USA comes calling. Kinky Kelly has been in the States for dang near 20 years, you just don’t rebuild and reload from him and the Sexy Stud.

  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
3 hours ago, MissingInAction said:

I've been in that jail. Should be called "punto de extorsion".

Username checks out. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, immamac said:

Well they own most of them, so yeah most of the free porn on the internet. 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aylo


From the link.  JP Morgan? Cornell University? AHAHAHAHA!

Manwin went on an acquisition spree of other popular pornographic entities.In June 2010, Manwin opened non-adult video sharing website Videobash.com (now defunct).  In September 2010, Manwin acquired EuroRevenue, which owned various niche pornography sites. In November 2010, Manwin introduced celebrity news website Celebs.com (now defunct). In December 2010, Manwin entered into a partnership with Wicked Pictures to manage Wicked Pictures' paysites. The 2010 Manwin purchases accounted for US$130 million in debt. In 2011, the company raised US$362 million in financing from 125 secret investors, including Fortress Investment Group, JPMorgan Chase, and Cornell University.

  • Haha 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, MissingInAction said:

In order to conduct a full analysis I'll need the names of these so called "niche porn sites".

I didn’t even know there was such a thing as midget donkeys…

  • Drool 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Oh no not the only free porn site on the internet!

Glad I wasn’t the only one who thought this. The internet is like 90% pron. If you can’t find a way besides that site, you are an internet ignoramus. 



×
×
  • Create New...