Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
49 minutes ago, Captainant said:

Lee Atwater said it best nearly 40 years ago

You start out in 1954 by saying, “N****r, n****r, n****r.” By 1968 you can’t say “n****r”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “N****r, n****r.”

Were back to basically just saying the N-word 🤣😂

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
4 hours ago, Dnaguy said:

But seriously….. isn’t Peter North more known for his prodigious volume of ejaculate vs actually the size of his member? 
As a surly-ite with the requisite giant dong that I only use to bang 11’s, I’d be charitable and asses that he isn’t deficient in that area.

Its just that, his marketability / calling card was more of what he left behind vs. what he brought to the table so to speak.

why-not-both-why-not.gif

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 10/28/2025 at 6:36 PM, HenryJames said:

 

Running club?

Sounds suspiciously like a gang or leftist organization specifically organized with the intent of building up the conditioning of the members so they can better elude ICE officers.

Better arrest everyone and detain them all until we get to the bottom of this. They all look like they could be illegals so no need for a warrant or due process.

/MAGA homeland security and justice department

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Captainant said:

Lee Atwater said it best nearly 40 years ago

You start out in 1954 by saying, “N****r, n****r, n****r.” By 1968 you can’t say “n****r”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “N****r, n****r.”

There is for sure a lot of racism in this debate. 
 

I do think that you have two very different things at play. Fundamentally, I do not think that the extension or withholding of rights to other citizens based on race or immutable characteristics is an issue that should be up to a vote. 
 

I do think that a nation’s immigration policy— who, how, how many, what means, what benefits— is rightfully a topic for democratic debate and processes. And on those lines, a few propositions almost anyone can agree on:

1. Our current immigration regime has not been democratically tackled for close to 50 years even as the fundamentals— who, how many, what means— of immigration to the country have changed tremendously. 
 

2. America has the highest proportion of foreign born residents since the turn of the century. Rapid demographic change driven by migration causes anxieties, debates, and reactions across time and space in every society that is confronted with them.  Americans are not uniquely good or bad in this respect. 
 

3. American voters consistently show contradictory and complicated views on immigration (illegal or otherwise) and that has created an incentive for elected officials to duck open debate and passage of legislation to avoid confronting tough choices and inevitably taking sides in a debate that will leave lots of people unhappy. 
 

4. Legislation that responds to current facts has been substituted with technocratic implementation by the executive in ways that undermine democratic credibility: namely, the same codified laws are implemented to dramatically different ends  and effect depending on the executive. That corrodes public confidence in the idea that the legal underpinnings are sound. 


I don’t see the underlying issue as unique to immigration. Elected reps have punted big questions time and time again in favor of letting the executive decide by administrative practice and interpretation. All this is kind of coming to a head all at once and Congress has been mostly content to continue to duck responsibility when they fear the resolution will upset voters. 

Edited by 956 Worldwide
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

.....and in the current climate, we can't even have the fucking discussion.

Do I agree that my house has an issue with too many spiders being in places where I don't want them?  Sure.  But I can't even have a fucking conversation with people whose sole proposals are "burn Brisket's house to the ground" or "hit the house with 10,000 gallons of poison, killing everyone and everything in it including Brisket and his family."

No.  There's not even a starting point in a conversation where people are intent on ending either my home or my family, and who are willing to completely disregard the law of the land (arson and murder are kinda illegal) to do it.

Layer on the fact that we DID try to address the spider problem a year ago, through legal means, and those same people killed that plan dead so Donald The House and Family Destroyer could be elected.

Fuck all the way off.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
13 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

.....and in the current climate, we can't even have the fucking discussion.

Do I agree that my house has an issue with too many spiders being in places where I don't want them?  Sure.  But I can't even have a fucking conversation with people whose sole proposals are "burn Brisket's house to the ground" or "hit the house with 10,000 gallons of poison, killing everyone and everything in it including Brisket and his family."

No.  There's not even a starting point in a conversation where people are intent on ending either my home or my family, and who are willing to completely disregard the law of the land (arson and murder are kinda illegal) to do it.

Layer on the fact that we DID try to address the spider problem a year ago, through legal means, and those same people killed that plan dead so Donald The House and Family Destroyer could be elected.

Fuck all the way off.

You are kind of insensitive towards racists and fascists, did you know that?  They have feelings too.  

Posted
5 hours ago, Dnaguy said:

Running club?

Sounds suspiciously like a gang or leftist organization specifically organized with the intent of building up the conditioning of the members so they can better elude ICE officers.

Better arrest everyone and detain them all until we get to the bottom of this. They all look like they could be illegals so no need for a warrant or due process.

/MAGA homeland security and justice department

A.N.T.I.F.A.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted (edited)
On 10/29/2025 at 9:21 PM, Enemy07 said:

The taxpayer bailout of the 2008 mortgage recession cost 700 billion. Does that match what us Texans pay for illegals? Still drunk by the way.

Assuming this was posted in good faith 

 

TARP was a series of loans and while I agree they should not have been made, and reports show close to 100% of the funds went to bonuses owed to bankers etc, as of 2023 all but about 31 B had been repaid  


in 2023 alone, “illegals” paid an estimated 66B in payroll and income taxes alone. State income, property tax through ownership or rents, and sales and excise taxes added another 20 B or so

 

Think we are going to miss 90B annually going forward or nah?

Edited by Sawbonz
  • Hook 'Em 1


×
×
  • Create New...