Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, SydneyCarton said:

This shit amazes me. It's damn near the fucking opposite to what I've been attractied to my entire life. Fucking losers.

Load and Outspoken, and refusal to be a fucking servant walflower are literally top of the list of shit that turns me on...what a bunch of fragile pussies who can't handle being challenged. 

Fucking this.

To summarize it more succinctly, these pathetic chuds only want to have sex with women who lie there like a robot and have no expectations, vs. a woman who wants to go 4 rounds and takes the lead and tells you what she wants, with appropriately profane/dirty descriptors.

These guys are absolutely pathetic.  They are the opposite of manly.  Anyone who is threatened by a woman with agency is a fucking pathetic-ass simpering coward.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 8/27/2024 at 10:45 PM, tx 3 putt said:

 

It's amusing how just aggro Navarro is.  But this might explain why we don't have some vague-ass crime like "election interference."

Posted
26 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:


The next question should be: "You said this country needs a dictator. So, if Kamala wins, you'd be okay with her being a dictator?"

Or Joe Biden should just cancel the election.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

He is a walking pile of shit, but he didn't dodge the question.  He said he was open to the idea but would have to evaluate the fiscal impact.  Of course we all know what his conclusion will be after that "evaluation" but, given the hypothetical nature of the question, I wouldn't expect a democrat to answer it any differently.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, TexasHooch said:

He is a walking pile of shit, but he didn't dodge the question.  He said he was open to the idea but would have to evaluate the fiscal impact.  Of course we all know what his conclusion will be after that "evaluation" but, given the hypothetical nature of the question, I wouldn't expect a democrat to answer it any differently.

 

He also said that shumer’s bill would require that we give ivf to “men that think they’re women” as if that makes any sense. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

He also said that shumer’s bill would require that we give ivf to “men that think they’re women” as if that makes any sense. 

Exactly. Cotton "won" the argument by pivoting to some abject bullshit that the host just accepted. Same as it ever was.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, TexasHooch said:

He is a walking pile of shit, but he didn't dodge the question.  He said he was open to the idea but would have to evaluate the fiscal impact.  Of course we all know what his conclusion will be after that "evaluation" but, given the hypothetical nature of the question, I wouldn't expect a democrat to answer it any differently.

 

My expectation would be that a Democrat should say “I reject the premise of the question.

Please stop and ask yourself Kristen: what would Tim Russert do? We’ve had 10 years of this nonsense. Stop treating Donald Trump like a normal politician who has serious policy positions. His supporters don’t, it even costs you credibility with them.”

Edited by Bozo_Casanova
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Chad Fuck said:


Yeah except that in one case the country had actually attacked and killed thousands of American servicemen. But we get the point.

We all have an el Guapo to face

  • Haha 4
Posted
3 hours ago, LonghornSean said:

Fucking ghouls

 

-Disproportionately developed chest and shoulders

- skinny wrists and forearms 

-”always skip leg day” lower body.

-size 6 leather combat shoes

-rolled up sleeves

- duck-like walk

 

That is 99% a white tech bro.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

So obviously Delta's dress code against offensive messages has zero to do with the 1st amendment, but that's not why I post this.

Dude has a shirt of Trump shooting 2 middle fingers . Dumb (Trump says fuck you, haha), but I get it at least.  It's the text of the shirt which says hawk-tua, spit on that thang that has me legitimately confused. Seriously, what does that girl's catchphrase have to do with Trump? Does he want to spit on Trump's crank during oral sex? 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, TexasHooch said:

So obviously Delta's dress code against offensive messages has zero to do with the 1st amendment, but that's not why I post this.

Dude has a shirt of Trump shooting 2 middle fingers . Dumb (Trump says fuck you, haha), but I get it at least.  It's the text of the shirt which says hawk-tua, spit on that thang that has me legitimately confused. Seriously, what does that girl's catchphrase have to do with Trump? Does he want to spit on Trump's crank during oral sex? 

 

Another example of MAGA's ignorance here on Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom./Marlin Perkins

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, TexasHooch said:

So obviously Delta's dress code against offensive messages has zero to do with the 1st amendment, but that's not why I post this.

Dude has a shirt of Trump shooting 2 middle fingers . Dumb (Trump says fuck you, haha), but I get it at least.  It's the text of the shirt which says hawk-tua, spit on that thang that has me legitimately confused. Seriously, what does that girl's catchphrase have to do with Trump? Does he want to spit on Trump's crank during oral sex? 

He thinks Trump is a cocksucker too?

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

I'm just tickled Matt Walsh conducts "weekly milk surveillance". He makes a real point to go down that milk aisle when he's doing his grocery shopping to enforce that no raw milk is being made available for purchase. 

  • Haha 3


×
×
  • Create New...