Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, C-Man said:

Legitimately shocked, if true. I don't have any particular love or hate for Bill Clinton but I fully expected him to be all up in those files. If he's not, it'll be hilarious, because he was the highest level democrat who we expected to be in there. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
  • Replies 587
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I’m no expert, but I would think being really, really, super famously…. like more so than anyone ever… into “young teens” would qualify you for pedo status. But that’s just me.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

I'm sure the next step will add that at least they were girls, because it's the gays and drag queens who are the real pedo predators. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
I'm sure the next step will add that at least they were girls, because it's the gays and drag queens who are the real pedo predators. 

Um yeah we sure about that? I mean, it would explain a lot.
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

image.png.388f2e50e184629a289eb3fc7e877aa0.png

Guys.....find yourself a gal who looks at you the way a fat white racist Karen cunt bitch looks at Trump.

19 minutes ago, C-Man said:

c82983a2999704c2238bb6533b191322.jpg

Saw a sentence or two from this yesterday but …

giphy.gif

Told y'all the "well, actually" excuses were forthcoming.

13 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I'm sure the next step will add that at least they were girls, because it's the gays and drag queens who are the real pedo predators. 

Stache gets it.   Again, within a few days, we're going to be beyond mere excuses and rationalization -- we will have reached the point of "actually, this is a good thing."  There will be some discussion about how we want our leaders to be virile, "alpha males," and any virile alpha male type naturally lusts for the fresh ripe body of a teen girl -- who, we remind you, would have been prime marrying age and the foundation for creating tribal alliances through most of human history -- so Trump's penchant for hot teen girls is a good thing.  It proves that he's the kind of manly leader we need to save us from woke socialists.

Edited by Brisketexan
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I just browsed an article that said even if the House votes to release the files the Senate has to approve also? They ain't getting the votes there. And even if they do, is it typical legislation that dotard can veto? Yeah, we're never seeing those files, even if they still exist. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Red Five said:

So at what point in a normal administration would Trump resign from office (assuming what’s in there is the kind of stuff we think is probably in there)? After the vote? After the release of the files? Or already.

2018. When was his "perfect phone call" with Zelensky?

1 hour ago, Huckleberry said:

They have created an entire ecosystem where victimhood is the main currency. This crybaby starts this part off by preemptively crying about how he is picked on every time he points out something wrong the Democrats did or Trump did or anyone did. HE IS CRYING ABOUT BEING CALLED OUT WHEN HE CALLS PEOPLE OUT. 

Christ almighty these fucking infants. 

Holy shit, Trump is Derka?!?!

  • Haha 1
Posted
I just browsed an article that said even if the House votes to release the files the Senate has to approve also? They ain't getting the votes there. And even if they do, is it typical legislation that dotard can veto? Yeah, we're never seeing those files, even if they still exist. 

Fucking seriously? “Ok we finally got the 218 signatures! Now, all we need is for Donald Trump, JD Vance, Mike Johnson, and Pam Bondi to all sign off to release the files and we’re there!”
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I just browsed an article that said even if the House votes to release the files the Senate has to approve also? They ain't getting the votes there. And even if they do, is it typical legislation that dotard can veto? Yeah, we're never seeing those files, even if they still exist. 

Someone walked through it. House sends it to the senate, the senate has to pass it, Trump can veto, then Congress overrides.

But make Trump veto releasing the Epstein files, lol. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I just browsed an article that said even if the House votes to release the files the Senate has to approve also? They ain't getting the votes there. And even if they do, is it typical legislation that dotard can veto? Yeah, we're never seeing those files, even if they still exist. 

Democrats campaigning on "They are hiding the truth about Epstein and Trump from you" among all of the other things they will get to campaign on next year sounds like a decent consolation prize. 

Cynic in me says the real good stuff has long been destroyed but got a little bit of hope everything will eventually come out...

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I just browsed an article that said even if the House votes to release the files the Senate has to approve also? They ain't getting the votes there. And even if they do, is it typical legislation that dotard can veto? Yeah, we're never seeing those files, even if they still exist. 

I asked the same thing yesterday. I think that's correct but the House/Senate could override said veto with a 2/3 vote in each house ... 

kk.gif 

... so not gonna happen.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

Someone walked through it. House sends it to the senate, the senate has to pass it, Trump can veto, then Congress overrides.

But make Trump veto releasing the Epstein files, lol. 

Exactly. Make Trump veto it. But first, make those senators who are walking into midterm elections next year, try and vote no.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I just browsed an article that said even if the House votes to release the files the Senate has to approve also? They ain't getting the votes there. And even if they do, is it typical legislation that dotard can veto? Yeah, we're never seeing those files, even if they still exist. 

Johnson has scheduled a vote for next week on this. Smartest move he's made to get it out of his chamber. 

Here's what I think - if the House majority is 2/3rds or greater then the pressure on the Senate to take this up will be enormous. If the rumor of nearly 100 GOP House members voting for this are true then they will easily exceed that. 

Remember that it's not like these GOP members suddenly have a conscience. They are being pressured by the QANON crazies who are holding them to their promises of releasing the files. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I'm sure the next step will add that at least they were girls, because it's the gays and drag queens who are the real pedo predators. 

 

not like he was banging 5 year olds !!!!

 

  • Rage+1 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, The Dog said:

Johnson has scheduled a vote for next week on this. Smartest move he's made to get it out of his chamber. 

Here's what I think - if the House majority is 2/3rds or greater then the pressure on the Senate to take this up will be enormous. If the rumor of nearly 100 GOP House members voting for this are true then they will easily exceed that. 

Remember that it's not like these GOP members suddenly have a conscience. They are being pressured by the QANON crazies who are holding them to their promises of releasing the files. 

I guess I haven't been following this close enough because I've assumed nothing would happen. Why would 100 GOP representatives vote against the discharge petition but for the file release? Why would any GOP senator vote against dear leader? They don't have the cunt cabal that crossed over in the House for the discharge petition. If dotard vetoes no way in hell any of them cross him with an override. That would be the end of their careers. No maga voter is going to hold any of this against them, they might grumble a bit on twitter, but they'll always vote against the opponent, because trans etc.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Oh how many of you are ready for the Thanksgiving conversations that begin "you know, your grandmother Pearl was 13 when she married your grandfather Enos who was 15 and had already been working at the dairy for 3 years. She was 14 when your uncle Frank was born. That's just how things were then"?

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Haha 2
  • Rage+1 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

not like he was banging 5 year olds !!!!

 

Same Megyn Kelly who is super into needing to protect 15 year olds from trans athletes and people in restrooms but not actual pedophiles. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, mdmost said:

Same Megyn Kelly who is super into needing to protect 15 year olds from trans athletes and people in restrooms but not actual pedophiles. 

And from drag queens reading story books. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, C-Man said:

c82983a2999704c2238bb6533b191322.jpg

Saw a sentence or two from this yesterday but …

giphy.gif

If some liberal podcaster or whatever said that, right wing twitter would be in instant meltdown about sex traffickers.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

Obvious trial balloon.  She didn't make that up out of thin air.

 

we now know that there's evidence that trump banged a 15yo

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, 'stache said:

I'm sure the next step will add that at least they were girls, because it's the gays and drag queens who are the real pedo predators. 

That was always the case.  The right wing focus on pedophilia and sex trafficking was always the replacement for calling their opponents faggots.  As gay marriage became more accepted by society as a whole, pedophilia accusations is what they started attacking liberals with, despite there being zero evidence liberals are more likely to be pedophiles.  They had to maintain this fantasy they were morally superior to the perverted liberals.  And then they push into it into any kind of discussion of gay rights.  

 

51 minutes ago, 'stache said:

I just browsed an article that said even if the House votes to release the files the Senate has to approve also? They ain't getting the votes there. And even if they do, is it typical legislation that dotard can veto? Yeah, we're never seeing those files, even if they still exist. 

I'm curious if the House can release whatever information they possess.  I get they would need a law to compel the Executive Branch to release everything, but I wouldn't think the Executive Branch could restrain the House from releasing what they have.  It wouldn't be a law, just a decision on how the House operates. 

Edited by Tuco
Posted
4 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

we now know that there's evidence that trump banged a 15yo

Exactly.  15, 18, to-ma-to, to-mah-to

Posted
1 hour ago, 'stache said:

I'm sure the next step will add that at least they were girls, because it's the gays and drag queens who are the real pedo predators. 

He was friends with Peter Thiel, so...

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Tuco said:

That was always the case.  The right wing focus on pedophilia and sex trafficking was always the replacement for calling their opponents faggots.  As gay marriage became more accepted by society as a whole, pedophilia accusations is what they started attacking liberals with, despite there being zero evidence liberals are more likely to be pedophiles.  They had to maintain this fantasy they were morally superior to the perverted liberals.  And then they push into it into any kind of discussion of gay rights.  

 

I'm curious if the House can release whatever information they possess.  I get they would need a law to compel the Executive Branch to release everything, but I wouldn't think the Executive Branch could restrain the House from releasing what they have.  It wouldn't be a law, just a decision on how the House operates. 

They just did.

Posted

The 15 vs 8 year old thing may come into play if the trial is in Florida, since they just passed a law allowing the death penalty for pdf files who abuse children under 12. How awesome would it be if he's sentenced to death under a law passed by 'Meatball Ron'?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

About six months ago I said something about how a decent percentage of maga would suddenly become very comfortable with child rape if the files were to ever be released. I got a bunch of “Dude. Not cool” replies.

We all on the same page now?

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted

The years of Republicans screaming about pedophile rings and sex dungeons is gonna morph into them wanting to lower the age of consent to 13. 

The greatest trick these people ever pulled is convincing others they actually have morals. Nothing matters to them but power. 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted
38 minutes ago, 'stache said:

Why would 100 GOP representatives vote against the discharge petition but for the file release?

Nobody voted "against" the discharge petition. Only four were needed to get it across the finish line. Once they hit the 218 threshold it stops. It's a petition - not a vote.

38 minutes ago, 'stache said:

Why would any GOP senator vote against dear leader?

Because they are under enormous pressure from their constituents to vote to release the files, because they ALL campaigned on it.

FWIW, I don't think this gets 2/3rds in the Senate if it even comes to a vote. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Red Five said:

About six months ago I said something about how a decent percentage of maga would suddenly become very comfortable with child rape if the files were to ever be released. I got a bunch of “Dude. Not cool” replies.

We all on the same page now?

The real uncomfortable question is how many MAGA posters on Surly are child abusers?

  • Like 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

not like he was banging 5 year olds !!!!

 

Jurassic Park Ian Malcom GIF

 

I was wondering which of these subhuman republicans was going to be the first to publicly excuse raping young girls because trump does it. 

  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1


×
×
  • Create New...