Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

I don't know anything about this blurb and everything else I skimmed on Google is a day or two old and only covers the arrest. The only thing I see that references it is a tweet from the State Department that says it had nothing to do with his release. 

 

 

chrome_screenshot_Aug 18, 2025 1_17_55 PM CDT.png

 

3 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

No quid pro quo!

Gaurdians

Of

Pedophiles

It's that plain and simple.  It's not conspiracy, or hyperbole...they are actively and repeatedly doing it.  The safest thing in the world to be right now is 1) a pedophile 2) who is a member of a political group the GOP wants to protect.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Posted
57 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

Sure seems like this is yesterday's news already.

Their plan is working- delay, deny, deflect until the American attention span switches to the next dancing butterfly.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
On 8/18/2025 at 1:29 PM, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:

I don't know anything about this blurb and everything else I skimmed on Google is a day or two old and only covers the arrest. The only thing I see that references it is a tweet from the State Department that says it had nothing to do with his release. 

 

 

chrome_screenshot_Aug 18, 2025 1_17_55 PM CDT.png

"The Israeli Embassy in Washington and the Israeli Prime Minister's Office did not immediately return messages.

Israeli media quoted the Prime Minister's Office as denying that Alexandrovich was arrested, saying only that a "state employee" was "questioned by American authorities during his stay" and he had "returned to Israel as scheduled."
 
Posted

Another federal judge rejects DOJs request to release the grand jury transcripts and even more correctly the judge said that there is nothing preventing the DOJ from releasing their investigation files which are much more substantial. Link.

Of course we now know there is a certain president mentioned in the overall files and that can’t be redacted now.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Drool 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Red Five said:

I heard someone earlier call this “a potential coverup”. This is not a potential coverup, it’s a fucking coverup. Of child rape.

Yep. The absolute best case scenario for Trump in all this is that he's preventing child rapists from facing any accountability for their crimes. Even if he's not in the files (he is), that's still terrible and would completely end the presidency of anyone who wasn't leading a large cult.

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
20 hours ago, Red Five said:

I heard someone earlier call this “a potential coverup”. This is not a potential coverup, it’s a fucking coverup. Of child rape.

Dems could probably make some hay at this point pressuring the Times, WaPo, CNN, etc. to explain why they're helping Trump cover it up.  

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted

Just the president's personal attorney having a nice chat with the world's most famous living child sex predator and rapist and notorious liar, after moving her to one of the cushiest prisons in America. 

  • Rage+1 2
Posted (edited)
On 8/20/2025 at 3:51 PM, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Another federal judge rejects DOJs request to release the grand jury transcripts and even more correctly the judge said that there is nothing preventing the DOJ from releasing their investigation files which are much more substantial. Link.

Of course we now know there is a certain president mentioned in the overall files and that can’t be redacted now.

Haha, awesome Judge Berman.  Take some performative bullshit designed to place blame on judges -- again -- and throw it back in the fat fuckin turd's face, along with Blondi and fucking guy Patel.

Edited by TwiceHorn
Posted
27 minutes ago, GreenspointTexas said:

I like how we are all sitting back and just taking this

The obvious truth is that Americans can be described as a Venn Diagram of idiots, assholes, and pussies and it's becoming closer and closer to being a single circle every day.

  • Like 1
Posted

OK I have a stupid question for this thread because I'm not extremely knowledgeable on the details of all the Epstein stuff. I see constant posts on Reddit, etc about releasing the files. But my question is in what fucking universe does anything think that this administration would release anything that paints Trump or his buddies in a negative light? If/when the "files" ever come out, it will literally just be a piece of paper that says "every Democrat rapes children". What does that accomplish?

Posted
1 hour ago, HenryJames said:

 

WSJ article: https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/justice-department-releases-ghislaine-maxwell-interview-transcript-98cd6d7f

Money quote:

Quote

When asked about President Trump, who had socialized with Epstein in the past, she said she “never witnessed the President in any inappropriate setting in any way.”

“The President was never inappropriate with anybody. In the times that I was with him, he was a gentleman in all respects,” Maxwell told Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.

200.gif

Posted

Jesus Christ. Certainly this is all transparent enough even for the dumbest Dotardarians to see through. And typing that out I realize yeah they won't. 

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 2
Posted

Maxwell added "not only was he perfectly behaved, he was dashingly handsome, virile, and exudes a magnetic charm that women find irresistible. He's the perfect male package."

I mean, if she's gonna carry his water to gain favors then go the whole way, bitch.

Posted
Quote

"In the times that I was with him, he was a gentleman in all respects,” Maxwell told Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.

Was she with him when he was having sex with minors?

  • Like 1
Posted

It means nothing. She's a notorious liar to begin with, in addition to all of the obvious reasons she has to lie about this. Nothing she says matters. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, GhostOfTomJoad said:

Maxwell added "not only was he perfectly behaved, he was dashingly handsome, virile, and exudes a magnetic charm that women find irresistible. He's the perfect male package."

I mean, if she's gonna carry his water to gain favors then go the whole way, bitch.

And he totally doesn't have a small penis.

  • Gil Bang changed the title to Ghislaine "Sgt. Schultz" Maxwell: "I know NOTH-ING"
Posted

Of course fucking MSNBC, "Our top story! Breaking news! Maxwell says Trump did no wrong! Here, listen to recordings of a convicted child sex trafficker!" 

Posted (edited)
Quote

“The President was never inappropriate with anybody. In the times that I was with him, he was a gentleman in all respects

"Uh, just as a follow up here... Did Mr. Trump ever coordinate with you regarding potential 'dates' or 'companions'? If so, what can you tell us about those transactions? Also, it's been said that you introduced the President to the First Lady- what do you recall about that process? What do you remember about your work with the former Ms. Melanija Knavs?"

If her business was indeed to be a madame/pimp for high priced and powerful clientele, including connections to underaged women, then much of that terrible and transactional behavior would not be inappropriate. In other words, she could be saying "Mr. Trump was a good client to work with, and always paid me in a timely fashion- as true gentlemen always do".

Edited by NWBuck


×
×
  • Create New...