Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If the story is that Trump was friends with Epstein and wrote him a birthday message that referenced women and sex, is this really a big story? The first part is already known and the second part would be assumed. I hate Trump but I don’t believe that alone puts Trump in a new category.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

If the story is that Trump was friends with Epstein and wrote him a birthday message that referenced women and sex, is this really a big story? The first part is already known and the second part would be assumed. I hate Trump but I don’t believe that alone puts Trump in a new category.

Dude it references “wonderful secrets” to the most notorious child rapist 

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

Dude it references “wonderful secrets” to the most notorious child rapist 

Sure. Ambiguous language is definitely what's going to finally stick to him. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Even if it's fleeting, I'm going to enjoy that this piece of shit is fuming/reeling right now. Fuck you, Trump. 

/ducks for cover in Los Angeles

Posted
18 minutes ago, aggie08 said:

Sure. Ambiguous language is definitely what's going to finally stick to him. 

Yeah. He's threatening to sue, so I'm assuming there is more in there than that. I mean fuck, they were best friends (per Epstein). For years. Sharing "secrets" could be anything (if you're wanting to find an alternate reason... of course we know what it means in reality on Earth 1). 

Posted

This poem thing doesn’t sound like something Trump could or would write, there aren’t even random capitalized words or anything about the Democrats!   Did he plagiarize it from somewhere

  • Haha 1
Posted

I’m assuming the WSJ is now in the process of slow walking Donny into a series of traps, and I hope some keeps randomly playing little snippets of Jump into the Fire around the White House 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Royalfan5 said:

I’m assuming the WSJ is now in the process of slow walking Donny into a series of traps, and I hope some keeps randomly playing little snippets of Jump into the Fire around the White House 

This.  I'd like to see the discovery on this one.

Also, +rep for the Nilsson Schmilsson (or Goodfellas) reference.

Edited by Bullneck
Posted

The birthday letter is absolutely ridiculous.  But the WSJ is not publishing that without strong evidence/belief that it's real, right?  WTF, we live in a bizarro hell right now. 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted

We are soon going to see a big beautiful picture of a naked woman drawn in sharpie with that stupid signature of his covering her snatch. Some people are saying it may be the best sharpie drawing of a naked woman by any president in history 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Posted

Louisiana’s US Senator Kennedy just called for Trump to release everything have to do with Epstein. 

Make no mistake, politicians will protect Trump to keep getting elected as long as sticking with Trump won’t get them unelected

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:

We are soon going to see a big beautiful picture of a naked woman drawn in sharpie with that stupid signature of his covering her snatch. Some people are saying it may be the best sharpie drawing of a naked woman by any president in history 

 

IMG_0998.gif

  • Haha 2
  • Drool 1
Posted

“This is not me. This is a fake thing. It’s a fake Wall Street Journal story,” he said. “I never wrote a picture in my life. I don’t draw pictures of women,” he said. “It’s not my language. It’s not my words.”
 

Wrote a picture 

who talks like that 

image.thumb.png.4d0cc25231a0e419562240830794c77c.png

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Red Five said:


He just started laying the groundwork though. Like saying months before elections that they will be rigged (if he loses).

Agree.  Just saying this one is much messier.  Usually the masses want to believe his bullshit.  This is very different.  They want names and it’s very hard for him to keep himself out.  It will be obvious even to the rubes if he just blacks out all his own parts - or why isn’t it already out?

Edited by ChiTownDoc
Posted
13 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

Louisiana’s US Senator Kennedy just called for Trump to release everything have to do with Epstein. 

Make no mistake, politicians will protect Trump to keep getting elected as long as sticking with Trump won’t get them unelected

oh shit, the guy with the fakest accent in DC is on board.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

The birthday letter is absolutely ridiculous.  But the WSJ is not publishing that without strong evidence/belief that it's real, right?  WTF, we live in a bizarro hell right now. 

 

They must have the cards to back it up because, with Trump suing every media outlet that goes against him on even slightly flimsy grounds, there's no way the WSJ would publish that without solid evidence. He won a settlement against 60 Minutes and ABC for far less.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
4 hours ago, aggie08 said:

Counterpoint: Jan 6th and boxes of highly classified documents stuffed in a resort bathroom weren't policy minutiae either.

They were liberal anger, though.  And Biden did it!

Posted
6 hours ago, Gourmand said:

The motherfucking rapist is literally ON TAPE saying "and  when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."

And millions of (white) women voted for this demon. 

All of whom have "Christian" in their X bio.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

There’s no client list because Epstein wasn’t keeping notes on a criminal fucking conspiracy. 

He was if he was running a mossad/cia blackmail scheme. 
 

I guess my question is, why would so many people get entrapped by an underage sex trap, and how did they know it would be successful?  How common is this?

Posted
10 minutes ago, wild_turkey said:

They must have the cards to back it up because, with Trump suing every media outlet that goes against him on even slightly flimsy grounds, there's no way the WSJ would publish that without solid evidence. He won a settlement against 60 Minutes and ABC for far less.

Well, he didn’t really win anything. He accepted bribes.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

 

Oh come on...clearly he just had a 5 year old draw that!!!  Oh wait, that's just the way he draws...and acts.

Edited by OU Sucks


×
×
  • Create New...