Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've voted in two R primaries.  Both times to vote for David Dewhurst, once for Senate to try to block Cruz, and the other for Lt. Gov. to try to block Dannie Goeb.  All it got me was years of texts, robo calls, and junk mail.  Not going there again.

I’ve done similar maybe this time will be close enough to block Paxton
Posted
35 minutes ago, Updawg said:


I’ve done similar maybe this time will be close enough to block Paxton

I will bet you cash money right now that Paxton beats Cornyn in the primary by at least 8 points.  It will not be close.

You have no idea how utterly horribad Texas GQP primary voters are.  "I am Donald Trump's cumsock, and I was used to suffocate a baby" (R) would be the dream primary candidate.  And Ken Paxton is that kinda candidate.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

Driving through so, so many dying shithole little towns in Texas recently, I noticed how many houses and other buildings are just literally in ruins, clearly haven't been occupied in decades, but the decrepit, crumbled remains just sit there sinking into the ground. Apparently no one in these places gives enough of a shit to just get the rotting, rat-attracting boards hauled off. No pride, no dignity. Except the false kind. And the people there wouldn't vote D even if the R's promised to ram those rotting boards straight up their ass. Far better than succumbing to the moral decay of those evil libs. That's my state of the state address 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

I will bet you cash money right now that Paxton beats Cornyn in the primary by at least 8 points.  It will not be close.

You have no idea how utterly horribad Texas GQP primary voters are.  "I am Donald Trump's cumsock, and I was used to suffocate a baby" (R) would be the dream primary candidate.  And Ken Paxton is that kinda candidate.

And 38% of the population will be convinced Cornyn is in favor of Trans playing sports. 
The people who will decide this election are the stupidest morons among us. 
Talk about two bad alternatives, but one is clearly worse. 

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

lol, awesome. we're gonna be disease-ridden, toothless assholes again, just like real Texans! they really rehashing this shit, again!?

Edited by Longhorn_Fan68
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

lol, awesome. we're gonna be disease-ridden, toothless assholes again, just like real Texans! they really rehashing this shit, again!?

Bring back the Commanches and we can have some real fun.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • 2 months later...
Posted
Posted


I’d like to think Cornyn is going to go scorched earth on this stupid fuck leading up to the primary, but he’s a big pussy so I expect he won’t

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 3
Posted
15 hours ago, Sawbonz said:

I’d like to think Cornyn is going to go scorched earth on this stupid fuck leading up to the primary, but he’s a big pussy so I expect he won’t

He bakes his brisket. He ain’t doing shit.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
  • Rage+1 2
Posted
He'll probably drop out when Trump endorses Paxton

This is exactly what happens. I mean, he may not drop out, but he might as well. Grifting criminal con men stick together; Paxton is a lock for the Trump endorsement, which means he’s a lock to be our next Senator.

Remember, folks…it only gets worse, and there is no bottom.
Odds are very high that Paxton opens a criminal inquiry into why Biden murdered 20+ campers along the Guadalupe within the next week. You think that’s alarmist hyperbole. It’s not.
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, bluto said:

He’s on the Epstein list!!!

Fuck yeah, Ken Paxton is!  I am calling on Pam Bondi, release the Epstein list on your desk to prove Ken Paxton is not on it!  Thank you for your attention to this matter!

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Posted

Do you think her lawyer was okay with her sending out that tweet, or do you think she even consulted with him before doing that?  

I'm not a family lawyer, but with a law practice that is as personal and emotional as that, I imagine a lot of lawyers routinely tell their divorce clients upon engagement to refrain from any social media communications about the proceeding, even if the other spouse was a cheating, stealing, abusive shitbag.  I'll let @hornian and others weigh in.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, South Austin said:

Do you think her lawyer was okay with her sending out that tweet, or do you think she even consulted with him before doing that?  

I'm not a family lawyer, but with a law practice that is as personal and emotional as that, I imagine a lot of lawyers routinely tell their divorce clients upon engagement to refrain from any social media communications about the proceeding, even if the other spouse was a cheating, stealing, abusive shitbag.  I'll let @hornian and others weigh in.

 

So glad social media wasn't a thing when I filed, because my ex would have been all over that spouting off shit day and night.

 

Also, this:

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
  • Drool 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

Not surprised but wonder what event kicked off the divorce today.

 

"recent discoveries"

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/texas/article/ken-paxton-angela-paxton-20764827.php

Quote

State Sen. Angela Paxton on Thursday filed for divorce from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, court records show.

The McKinney Republican cited “recent discoveries” and “biblical grounds” in a statement on the social media site X.

“I believe marriage is a sacred covenant and I have earnestly pursued reconciliation,” she wrote. “But in light of recent discoveries, I do not believe that it honors God or is loving to myself, my children, or Ken to remain in the marriage.”

 

 

 

Posted

Yeah…love the “recent discoveries” angle. Him fucking an aide was a centerpiece of his impeachment and related lawsuit, from YEARS ago. It’s all about political expediency.
But, you know, the party of Christian family values.
There is no less Christian, less pro-family group on earth than the GQP, yet here we are.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:

@rexkramer had his account scrubbed when his old lady decided to ditch him.

Gonna need the backstory here. Is that why he's been more insufferable lately? What will the HP community think!?!!?

Posted (edited)

And here you go:

https://www.kut.org/politics/2025-07-10/state-sen-angela-paxton-files-for-divorce-from-texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton

 

Quote

Angela Paxton, a Republican who represents the McKinney area, filed a petition for divorce in Collin County on Thursday, according to court records. In her divorce petition, she accuses her husband of adultery and noted the couple ceased living together in June 2024.

 

 

Also, from the same article. This brings the chuckles.   

 

Quote

Cornyn, the senior senator from Texas, has long been critical of Paxton's alleged malfeasance as an elected official. The attorney general's marital problems could benefit Cornyn during the upcoming campaign.

 

Edited by Francisco 2.0
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)

This is the same party that elected Donald Trump after the "grab them by the pussy" tape, elected him again after covering up hush payments to a porn star, and will elect him again (after the Roberts Court rules he can run for a third term) when they now pretty much know he's all over the Epstein files for having sex with trafficked minors.

The divorce and whatever scandalous details of Ken's affairs come out of it don't matter.  If the voters still see Paxton as more MAGA than Cornyn, Cornyn will get his ass whupped.  

Edited by South Austin
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 3
Posted
2 hours ago, South Austin said:

Do you think her lawyer was okay with her sending out that tweet, or do you think she even consulted with him before doing that?  

I'm not a family lawyer, but with a law practice that is as personal and emotional as that, I imagine a lot of lawyers routinely tell their divorce clients upon engagement to refrain from any social media communications about the proceeding, even if the other spouse was a cheating, stealing, abusive shitbag.  I'll let @hornian and others weigh in.

I mean, I tell my clients not to post anything that they wouldn't want to be read into evidence in Court. 

I think she's probably OK with that being in evidence. I would be too, based on the content I've seen. Although I groaned as a family law practitioner when I read the term "biblical grounds" because all that means is that she is signaling that she is pleadings for a fault-based ground (adultery) instead of no-fault grounds to curry favor with her base.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, MissingInAction said:

That wall eyed cunt will be the next POTUS.

As an unfaithful, lying, thieving, fraudulent huckster who has made a mockery of the legal system in Texas resulting in taxpayers being forced to pay for his abuse of power...he's guar-an-fucking-teed to be the #1 vote getter at the next CPAC poll for '28 GOP candidates.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1


×
×
  • Create New...