Jump to content

2024 Presidential Election Thread - Let's keep the party going.


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

Does moaning count as "conversation"?  

Asking for a friend.

Hell yes it does.  Which is why one should be thoughtful in one's condiment purchases.

 

  • Haha 4
  • Drool 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

This.  Drive a fucking armored attack vehicle that only has forward gears, no reverse.  And let that cannon rip till the barrel gets fucking red-hot.

Here’s where Slim Pickens praising Gov Lepetomain’s purty talking would be appropriate 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Aqua Buddha said:

On all the polls, remember that since Dobbs, there has been a silent 5-8 point advantage to the Democratic candidates meaning if the polling is tied, it's really Dem +5.

I don't trust the polls even a little bit.  Not in a bad way, not in a good way, just....not at all.  So, the way I see it, we can't see the score during the game.  We have no reliable way of knowing whether we're winning or losing.  So....let's just ram the fucking ball down their throat and/or crush their goddamned QB on every fucking play.  Run the plays that result in a win.  We'll count the points after the whistle blows, but if you fucking gain 1000 yards and sack the opposing QB 30 times, you'll win the fucking game.

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Js1 said:

The good thing is there is no rush to throw someone out there while she’s still re-introducing herself to most voters. Let everyone speculate and do the vetting and announce it prior to and closer to the convention  

Yeah, there’s time. They’re going to be doing polling to test the prospective candidates in all the crucial states. I don’t know who will ultimately get the nod but I trust they’re doing their due diligence and I’ll be happy with whomever they choose. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, TexEx15 said:

 

These motherfuckers all understand the assignment.  Move forward as one unit.  Execute the mission without faltering, and without mercy.

main-qimg-ae0d33ef13217c952775102a63e09f

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
49 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Perhaps my favorite part about Harris winning would be Trump realizing he won't get pardoned.

You know my favorite part?  It's that somewhere here in Austin on Sunday early afternoon, a certain attorney general who knows he is about to be under federal indictment saw a news alert.  And almost immediately he recognized that his likelihood of spending a significant amount of time in a federal prison increased by at least a factor of ten.

That had to make for quite a downer at brunch.

21 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

Given Vance’s strong conservative Christian views on sexual and reproductive morality, I’m guessing it was a pull-out couch. 

 

Drums Eye Roll GIF

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

These motherfuckers all understand the assignment.  Move forward as one unit.  Execute the mission without faltering, and without mercy.

main-qimg-ae0d33ef13217c952775102a63e09f

And throw this in there for good measure.

spacer.png

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
19 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

On all the polls, remember that since Dobbs, there has been a silent 5-8 point advantage to the Democratic candidates meaning if the polling is tied, it's really Dem +5.

Splain please.

Posted
3 hours ago, Js1 said:

Beshear and Walz are your best to lock up the Midwest. Cooper and Kelly are best for the sunbelt states (AZ, GA, NC), where Harris probably has the most upside.

Shapiro is risky too because he’s only been a governor for 2 years. Pritzker is a fat billionaire.

The actual best choice for Harris is Sherrod Brown but you can’t give up that red statre senate seat 

Harris should pick multiple VPs. Why not? It will be just like a bank.

  • Drool 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Splain please.

I don't know if I'd say that like that, but the polls have underestimated Dems big time since Dobbs.  The 2022 midterms, the 2023 specials, etc.  They keep telling us one thing but the results are different and then the pundits have to explain away how it means nothing. 

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
2 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Splain please.

In most of the races since Dobbs, the Democratic candidate has significantly over performed their polling.  It makes me think the polling is just bad anymore because who is actually answering a phone call from a stranger?  Also, people could just be lying.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Andrew Jackson and Kamala Harris have a lot in common.

First, they would be the only two presidents where neither of their parents were born on the mainland of America.

Second, like George Washington, Andrew Jackson did not have biological children of his own. 

This may make MAGA’s heads explode.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, C-Man said:

Trump is going to try and "Willie Horton" Kamala.

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/trump-planning-to-willie-horton-kamala

Let’s talk about Trump’s effort at criminal justice reform. Why doesn’t he ever talk about the First Step Act anymore?

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/01/trump-republicans-first-step-act-00029104

Trump’s criminal justice reform bill becomes persona non grata among GOPers

When Donald Trump signed a long-sought criminal justice reform measure into law in 2018, he had visions of using the legislation to make major inroads with Black and moderate swing voters.

The First Step Act was not just hailed as a rare bipartisan achievement for the 45th president but as the beginning of a major shift in GOP politics, one that would move the party past the 1980s tough-on-crime mindset to a focus on rehabilitation, racial fairness and second chances.

Three-and-a-half years later, few Republicans — Trump included — seem not at all interested in talking about it.

With spikes in crime registering as a top concern for voters, Republicans have increasingly reverted back to that 1980s mindset. Talk of additional legislation has taken a back seat to calls for enhanced policing and accusations that Democratic-led cities are veering toward lawlessness.

Trump himself rarely, if ever, mentions criminal justice reform when he issues statements or gives political speeches, having grown convinced the First Step Act never produced the spike in support from Black voters that he expected.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Trump himself rarely, if ever, mentions criminal justice reform when he issues statements or gives political speeches, having grown convinced the First Step Act never produced the spike in support from Black voters that he expected.

That sums him up in a nutshell.  His attempt didn't curry him favor with the group he wanted, so now he pretends it never happened. 

Hence why he moved onto pardoning rappers and fraudsters, like Amber Rose.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, The Dog said:

 

Yup he said it.  It was likely a Freudian slip, and you can hear him catch himself mid word and try to slur it a bit, but that it what he said.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Agree with this premise and it's not worth the risk with Shapiro. 

I hope Kamala's team is very patient with selecting and announcing the VP pick. Trump is gonna dump Vance. They have a legitimate built-in excuse, as they selected couch fucker against a Biden-Harris ticket. They need to "go in another direction" with Kamala at the top of the ticket. The longer Kamala waits, the longer Trump has to deal with all the negative Vance press and Kamala rising in the polls. Force them to make the new VP move first. 

 

4 hours ago, South Austin said:

If you're just looking at the electoral map, this seems like a ding against him.  I think it's doubtful Beshear gets Harris Kentucky, which leads to the question of whether his regional appeal is enough to win any of the rust belt states.  

By comparison on this point, Cooper arguably gives Harris at least the possibility of picking up a purplish North Carolina (though I'm not sure I give that better than a 50% chance).

The main knock against Shapiro, as highlighted in the New Republic article, is his position on the Israel/Palestine war (although the article seems to imply that any Jewish VP pick is risky).  I understand the need for Harris to make a safe pick, but is this really the single issue that can decide the presidential election?  Are those voters supporting Palestine so entrenched that they think a Trump/Vance administration is going to do them any more favors than Harris/Shapiro?  

I'm not saying this as someone who thinks that Shapiro is the No. 1 pick.  But I question the New Republic's writer who believes a Shapiro VP pick could be fatal to Harris's chances of winning.

Short version:  What the fuck do I know?

 

2 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:

Me too, but I’m coming around on Tim Waltz 

Me too.  I like Shapiro, but I want him to stay GOV in PA.

48 minutes ago, Pancho said:


Maybe we can find out since he’s apparently from Texas 

 

LO fucking L

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Js1 said:

That sums him up in a nutshell.  His attempt didn't curry him favor with the group he wanted, so now he pretends it never happened. 

Hence why he moved onto pardoning rappers and fraudsters, like Amber Rose.

Yep. It’s also revealing about how he thinks. Want to increase your popularity with black voters? Try criminal justice reform. Or pardon black criminals. Or suggest that they can identify with you when you’re prosecuted for your crimes. Because, you know, black people are criminals.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
1 minute ago, WhatTheBuck said:

Yep. It’s also revealing about how he thinks. Want to increase your popularity with black voters? Try criminal justice reform. Or pardon black criminals. Or suggest that they can identify with you when you’re prosecuted for your crimes. Because, you know, black people are criminals.

You forgot sneakers 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Dutchrudder said:

If Mark Kelly gets you Arizona, then he has to be the pick. I know he's well liked in that state and a lock for reelection in a few years, but the electoral math gets much easier if Arizona is in the blue column.  I also love his background as a Navy Pilot who was flying missions in Desert Storm, and as a NASA pilot who flew several shuttle missions and spent a good amount of time aboard the ISS. The contrast of someone who actually fought for their country and appreciates science with the fat fuck orange mongoloid who constantly shits all over both of those subjects will let the Dems have a field day with this campaign. 

Oh and when Mark's wife was shot at a campaign event, nearly died and had severe brain injuries, he retired from NASA to go help her recover and do physical therapy instead of fucking porn stars and leaving her. The stark contrast and family values he can bring to the ticket would be a huge asset, and potentially set him up to be next in line after Harris. 

And he's a graduate from a Service Academy, U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. Heave Ho!

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

J.D. knows about addiction.  It's a big part of his best-selling book set mainly in opioid country in Eastern Ohio, Western PA, WV, etc.  

It starts with a billowy Love Seat, then you're onto pleather sofas, and the next thing you know---you're at a 12-seat modular sectional orgy.  

...it all started simply and innocently enough with the old familiar basement couch, but before long I found myself parking out of the way on my grocery trips, just so I could walk by the Scandinavia store.  Then is was a trip to Costco everyday-damn their liberal return policy. Soon after I was a full blown addict trying to plan family vacations around Rooms To Go Superstore locations and no payments for 6 months promotions.  But then I hit rock bottom....

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Loch Ness Monster said:

Lots of protestors outside the Netanyahu speech to Congress.

Gonna go ahead and say, let Shapiro stay in PA. Don't piss off Muslims.

giphy.gif?cid=6c09b952p5xyl330svza63qkoc

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Loch Ness Monster said:

Lots of protestors outside the Netanyahu speech to Congress.

Gonna go ahead and say, let Shapiro stay in PA. Don't piss off Muslims.

Git any guesses on the # of eligible Muslim voters in the USA?

Now compare that to the # of eligible Jewish voters.

Posted

Is it true the JD Vance fucked 5 couches as a hillbilly?  Cause if so I can not vote for JD Vance who fucked 5 couches.  JD Vance needs apologize for fucking 5 couches if in fact JD Vance fucked 5 couches!  Shame shame on JD Vance for fucking 5 couches, if indeed JD Vance fucked 5 couches ! 
 

#JDF5C

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Haha 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, ROFL BOX said:

Git any guesses on the # of eligible Muslim voters in the USA?

Now compare that to the # of eligible Jewish voters.

I don't think that's his point.  The point is to stay as fucking vanilla (literally) as possible with the VP pick.

Edited by SizzleChest
  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Loch Ness Monster said:

Lots of protestors outside the Netanyahu speech to Congress.

Gonna go ahead and say, let Shapiro stay in PA. Don't piss off Muslims.

I think it’s a grave mistake to project the roughly 5k people in DC on a Wednesday at 2PM with an important demographic to reach or convince.

The whole issue is a loser either way and Kamala needs to tap dance as much as she can and try to shove it to the bottom of the conversation.  There’s no way it wins you the election but it might lose it; and the chances of losing it are stronger if you appeal too much to people on the streets. 
 

Kelly is an astronaut.  Just pick him and have him wear his mission patch to debate JD. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, ROFL BOX said:

Git any guesses on the # of eligible Muslim voters in the USA?

Now compare that to the # of eligible Jewish voters.

How many Jewish votes does Harris lose by picking a gentile? How many Muslim votes does she lose by picking a Jew? Which number is bigger?

Posted
29 minutes ago, Js1 said:

I don't know if I'd say that like that, but the polls have underestimated Dems big time since Dobbs.  The 2022 midterms, the 2023 specials, etc.  They keep telling us one thing but the results are different and then the pundits have to explain away how it means nothing. 

 

28 minutes ago, Aqua Buddha said:

In most of the races since Dobbs, the Democratic candidate has significantly over performed their polling.  It makes me think the polling is just bad anymore because who is actually answering a phone call from a stranger?  Also, people could just be lying.

While this is mostly accurate keep in mind that Trump wasn't on the ballot and hard core MAGA only shows up when he's on it. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, Gourmand said:

He is really great. Kinda OT but my former state rep James Talarico (redistricted out of my burb by the fascist Texas GOP) has a lot of the same qualities as a politician as Mayor Pete. I'd really like to see him have a higher profile in national politics because he's that good. 

 

Are we neighbors? I've been Talarico's biggest cheerleader on this board for a while, and yea...it sucks to go from him to Caroline Harris. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
1 hour ago, shakahorn said:

This is the part I never get.  Not just hispanics, all minorities. You think you're safe?  No, you're next.  I never laughed so much as when an Asian woman (no pics assholes) told me "I can't be next, I'm a naturalized US citizen."

Hope she enjoys camp!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

Andrew Jackson and Kamala Harris have a lot in common.

First, they would be the only two presidents where neither of their parents were born on the mainland of America.

Second, like George Washington, Andrew Jackson did not have biological children of his own. 

This may make MAGA’s heads explode.

spacer.png

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1


×
×
  • Create New...