Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Serious question: does Trump Always Chicken Out as much as Craig James Killed 5 Hookers at SMU?

 

 

Or is it just that Trump Always Chickens Out?

 

 

Trump

Always

Chickens

Out

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TACO

 

 

 

Edited by TexArcher
Trump Always Chickens Out (like a little baby bitch)
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Bullneck said:

image.png.e5a6f9316a851167f45361906e4ce148.png

I’ve been saying this since the first go round. I wanted to go to a dotard rally with the “what in gods holy name are you blathering about?” from Lebowski on a big poster. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Guys I really don’t want to associate that sack of shit with tacos. Can’t we make a thing for like AGGY or something?

I would gladly give up tacos for the rest of my life if it meant Trump and MAGA went away forever.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, royiv said:

I would gladly give up tacos for the rest of my life if it meant Trump and MAGA went away forever.

Two things…

Take it easy with that.

You need to get better tacos

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, royiv said:

I would gladly give up tacos for the rest of my life if it meant Trump and MAGA went away forever.

Season 9 No GIF by The Office

 

I can always move to Mexico to escape MAGA and have tacos still. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

 

11 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

Two things…

Take it easy with that.

You need to get better tacos

 

2 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

Season 9 No GIF by The Office

 

I can always move to Mexico to escape MAGA and have tacos still. 

Pussies. Plenty of delicious foods out there. If you’re not willing to make a sacrifice for your country, you suck.

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, royiv said:

 

 

Pussies. Plenty of delicious foods out there. If you’re not willing to make a sacrifice for your country, you suck.

Why should we sacrifice tacos for a country that doesn’t even appreciate them? 
And yea you def need to eat some better tacos.

Posted

Harvard should declare sovereignty and start issuing its own visas. Its endowment would put it pretty high on the list for sovereign wealth funds. When DOJ Barbie writes demands they should respond with 80 pages of copy and pasted sovereign citizen stuff from the internet. I would thoroughly enjoy that haha!

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
13 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:

Why should we sacrifice tacos for a country that doesn’t even appreciate them? 
And yea you def need to eat some better tacos.

I had your wife’s taco last night and it was rancid, so yeah, I guess you’re right.

  • Haha 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, 'stache said:

Harvard should declare sovereignty and start issuing its own visas. Its endowment would put it pretty high on the list for sovereign wealth funds.

Scott Galloway probably stole this joke, but he calls Harvard a hedge fund that happens to own a university.  

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Pope Leo has a video presentation and a public mass planned for June 14. In Chicago, at Rate Field. The pope won’t be there in person. He’s gonna Skype it.

Quote

Pope Leo will offer a “special video message to the young people of the world,” at the event, which is scheduled for June 14 at 333 W. 35th St., home of the White Sox, the Archdiocese of Chicago announced. 

The “once-in-a-lifetime celebration” will include music, film, in-person testimonials and prayer, the archdiocese said. A Catholic Mass will be celebrated after the program.

Quote

 

Gates will open for the event at 12:30 p.m., with the celebration taking place at 2:30 p.m. and the Mass beginning at 4 p.m., the archdiocese said. More information on the event will come later. 

 

https://chicago.suntimes.com/pope-leo-xiv/2025/05/28/pope-leo-xiv-video-message-mass-rate-field
 

“.Once in a lifetime event” scheduled more or less concurrently with the Mushroom Parade? It is getting easier to like the new pope.

Edited by Willfully Horn
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Drool 1
Posted

Dotard is going to tell us how much Biden is taco tomorrow. The most taco 
 

It will make zero sense and I’m looking forward to laughing a lot 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Willfully Horn said:

Pope Leo has a video presentation and a public mass planned for June 14. In Chicago, at Rate Field. The pope won’t be there in person. He’s gonna Skype it.

https://chicago.suntimes.com/pope-leo-xiv/2025/05/28/pope-leo-xiv-video-message-mass-rate-field
 

“.Once in a lifetime event” scheduled more or less concurrently with the Mushroom Parade? It is getting easier to like the new pope.

image.gif.eb0808f20c96a2f332a318ac3dd5fb51.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, royiv said:

I had your wife’s taco last night and it was rancid, so yeah, I guess you’re right.

It was quite ze feast, ya- you see I had Sunny side up, and I had Sunny side down, unt I had Sunny side all ze way around

Posted

 

12 minutes ago, Mo Horn said:

The craziness gets crazier. I guess you could say it's entertaining if it wasn't about running the country. 

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/katie-miller-posts-doge-is-like-buddhism-as-she-follows-elon-musk-amid-strange-throuple-rumor/articleshow/121498545.cms

 

I am personally willing to pay for her birth control. Movie monsters have had more fortunate parentage.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Any surly law dogs want to weigh in on this?

The ABA is one of a very few national law dog organizations for "general purpose" law.  Most others are either "practice-related" (e.g. American Intellectual Property Lawyers Association, American Trial Lawyer's Association) or more or less advocacy groups.

Therefore, it made sense that it would weigh in on nominees.

I think their ratings were pretty fair and they'll still be able to do them on the basis of publicly available information.  That a judge nominee doesn't make herself available to the ABA on a voluntary basis should be a black mark against them (it won't).

Most information about judicial nominees, including the questionnaire they fill out for the Senate Judiciary Committee, is publicly available, as is almost their entire judicial record, if any.  So, this is, as usual, pretty performative.

They very well may be able to sue over this as it is clearly viewpoint discrimination.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
29 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

Screenshot2025-05-30082109.thumb.png.68c92843cbda68922c335fd90d802faa.png

Best I can tell, the new conservative position on literally everything is "whatever that lifelong NY liberal and convicted felon wants". If he started talking about how awesome abortion is, like 90% of the party would immediately switch their positions. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Haha 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

The ABA is one of a very few national law dog organizations for "general purpose" law.  Most others are either "practice-related" (e.g. American Intellectual Property Lawyers Association, American Trial Lawyer's Association) or more or less advocacy groups.

Therefore, it made sense that it would weigh in on nominees.

I think their ratings were pretty fair and they'll still be able to do them on the basis of publicly available information.  That a judge nominee doesn't make herself available to the ABA on a voluntary basis should be a black mark against them (it won't).

Most information about judicial nominees, including the questionnaire they fill out for the Senate Judiciary Committee, is publicly available, as is almost their entire judicial record, if any.  So, this is, as usual, pretty performative.

They very well may be able to sue over this as it is clearly viewpoint discrimination.

So the usual response of “this is all pretty normal, nothing to be concerned about here” from the lawyers who keep saying our judicial branch is a-ok!

Posted
17 hours ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-05-29/federal-job-seekers-will-be-quizzed-on-trump-s-executive-orders?embedded-checkout=true

 

 

 

 

  Hide contents

Two other questions ask how applicants would improve government efficiency and about their personal work ethic.

Responses must be 200 words or fewer and the memo seeks to prevent any cheating. “Applicants will be required to certify that they are using their own words, and did not use a consultant or AI,” the memo says, referring to artificial intelligence. 

The 30-page memo, from White House Domestic Policy Council Director Vince Haley and OPM acting director Charles Ezell, implements President Donald Trump’s executive order ending diversity, equity and inclusion in federal hiring.

The order also required that the government prioritize hiring people “committed to improving the efficiency of the Federal government, passionate about the ideals of our American republic, and committed to upholding the rule of law and the United States Constitution.”

But Trump is also reshaping the US government’s workforce in other ways, overhauling the civil service system by giving him power to directly hire and fire as many as 50,000 jobs previously reserved for career federal employees.

 

“What we’ve seen is an overwhelming effort to cow the workforce and frankly ensure that there’s a loyalty to the president of the day more than anything else,” said Max Stier, president of the Partnership for Public Service, a nonpartisan group focused on improving the federal workforce. 

Asking the new questions is “deeply problematic,” he said.

“Bluntly, it’s an almost partisan and ideological overlay without understanding the responsibilities they’re hiring for.” For example, there’s no reason why a dental hygienist at the Department of Veterans Affairs should have an understanding of Trump’s executive orders, Stier said.

Beyond the content of the questions, Stier said adding four essay questions to an already burdensome federal hiring process can only make it more difficult for the government to hire the best workers, calling it “a recipe for dysfunction.”

But OPM says the questions aren’t much different from those any employer would ask to make sure that a prospective employee fits with company culture.

“It is a best practice in hiring to ask all applicants the same questions,” said OPM spokeswoman McLaurine Pinover. “The answers can then be evaluated by the hiring manager and agency leadership to evaluate whether the candidate would be a good fit for the role.”

The federal personnel agency said the plan’s overall goal is to reduce the length of the hiring process to less than 80 days and create “a federal workforce that reflects the highest standards of merit and service.” 

The memo also implements new skill-based assessments, consisting of at least two tests of technical skills for many jobs, and eliminates unnecessary college degree requirements for many positions.

 

N/A

Posted

Ah, "many trillions of dollars" due to Trump's tariffs. 

The US GDP is $27.7T.  You'd think a substantial fraction of that in 4 months (actually less) would be noticeable.  I must be looking at the wrong numbers.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted

"desperately needed tariffs". 

I like how he just skips to holy fucking shit mode immediately, every time. Judges rule against him = They hate Donald Trump and want to destroy America. No other possible explanation. 



×
×
  • Create New...