Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, wildcat09 said:

Yeah, it's stupid to try to make it about healthcare. We need some idiots to learn from touching the stove that touching the stove is bad and they shouldn't do it again. Last Trump admin Dems worked to alleviate the effects of his policies on millions of voters and got no credit for it.  He just slapped his name on the checks they had worked to pass. There are lots of people who need to experience the results of what they voted for. 

It'd make more sense, and would have better public appeal, to simply say that Dems are in the minority and have no control over the outcome, but that they will not co-sign a lawless dictatorship that steals from taxpayers for his own purposes and benefit.  But they're so fucking policy brained they can't help themselves.

They just need to hammer home if this budget bill passes your healthcare premiums will almost double next year and say that over and over and over and over

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

Steering this back to real world impact, Russ Vought has determined that furloughed feds aren’t entitled to back pay, although Congress and nearly everyone else believed they passed a law in 2019 which says exactly that.  
 

I FULLY expect the Supreme Court to rule that the move is likely illegal, but unfortunately the people who miss paychecks don’t have standing to sue for them.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/07/white-house-furloughed-workers-00596231

  • Rage+1 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:

Right.  As I understand it, the issue the Dems are rallying around in this shutdown is the extension of ACA tax credits.  This isn't about employer-provided insurance, it's about those who get their insurance via the ACA marketplace, which in 2025 is about 24 million people.

Take those 24 million mostly healthy and young individuals out of the overall insurance pool and the whole system pays for the increase. That’s why I said just tell people their insurance premiums will be 75% higher if this passes and when it passes, if they kill the filibuster shout from the rooftops on every fucking program, this is Trump’s fault.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Drool 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

Steering this back to real world impact, Russ Vought has determined that furloughed feds aren’t entitled to back pay, although Congress and nearly everyone else believed they passed a law in 2019 which says exactly that.  
 

I FULLY expect the Supreme Court to rule that the move is likely illegal, but unfortunately the people who miss paychecks don’t have standing to sue for them.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/07/white-house-furloughed-workers-00596231

will that's an interesting nonsensical move. good. 

Posted
49 minutes ago, Dutchrudder said:

Not approving of this message, but I think it's not worthy that our POTUS is posting ITYSL memes about it.

 

FB_IMG_1759874364004.jpg

Well yeah, but this is misrepresenting the facts. Shocker. 

Posted
4 hours ago, 956 Worldwide said:

I FULLY expect the Supreme Court to rule that the move is likely illegal, but unfortunately the people who miss paychecks don’t have standing to sue .

No the employees have standing, they just filed the case in the wrong court.  The correct court is which ever court Trump just disbanded, which is obviously illegal but because it no longer exists, no one has standing to sue to reinstate it.  So sad, but they tried!

Posted

Republicans and trump are already eating the negative publicity about the shutdown, so the democrats should just be filling social media with the truth keeping the heat on trump. 

Autocratic rulers are in danger when the population hates their guts. Since trump doesn't have complete control of the military yet, as evidenced by the response to drunk Pete and comatose Don shitting all over them in person, trump needs to be worrying about how long it'll take for a few top ranking generals to realize they can take him, his cabinet, and several republican politicians out and take control of the government. 

Once the rules are no longer followed and it's governmental anarchy there is nothing stopping competent people in a position of power from attempting to kill and overthrow the incompetent dictator and take power for themselves. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Drool 1
Posted

Dan Pfieffer is killing me.  He's comparing this shut down to pre-dotard era shut downs and treating the voting populace now the same as those from the pre-dotard era.  WE ARE IN A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PLACE WITH MAGATS.  This is not the same.  They DO NOT CARE about the details behind the shut down.  These Dem operatives have to get out from behind their policy wonk walls.  They are so disconnected from the average voter.  Dumb it down.  Make it simpler.  Blame the Rs and Trump.  Doesn't matter why.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
This.  The fact that the Dems think Joe Public that gets their health insurance from obamacare has any idea what that means shows how out of touch they are.

The Dems should concede. The Rs won, so if it inflicts pain on their constituents so be it. Your premiums went up 17k annually? Too bad, so sad. Vote better next time.
Posted
Just now, DaysOff said:


The Dems should concede. The Rs won, so if it inflicts pain on their constituents so be it. Your premiums went up 17k annually? Too bad, so sad. Vote better next time.

that is a bit of an irony on this shutdown. any success the dems have on this is ultimately doing the republicans a huge favor of protecting them from the consequences of their own terrible policy. the shrewder political move would be to just stand back and let the meltdown transpire and when all the rural white trash realize it was them that the new law completely turbofucks, it would strain even the most obscene obfuscation to try and blame a law that trump wanted and the republican majorities passed in bipartisan fashion to lay it at the feet of democrats. let them live with the consequences of their votes. but trying to keep people from becoming bankrupt/dying because they need to see a doctor is getting in the way of that whole thing.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

Do they not have 50 R votes, so are hiding behind the 60 vote rule that they (incredulously) can attempt to place blame on dems?  

My guess

Posted
26 minutes ago, sidis said:

that is a bit of an irony on this shutdown. any success the dems have on this is ultimately doing the republicans a huge favor of protecting them from the consequences of their own terrible policy. the shrewder political move would be to just stand back and let the meltdown transpire and when all the rural white trash realize it was them that the new law completely turbofucks, it would strain even the most obscene obfuscation to try and blame a law that trump wanted and the republican majorities passed in bipartisan fashion to lay it at the feet of democrats. let them live with the consequences of their votes. but trying to keep people from becoming bankrupt/dying because they need to see a doctor is getting in the way of that whole thing.

They did that in March, how's that working out for the Dems?  



×
×
  • Create New...