Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Red Five said:

"But why would Trump be blocking the release of the files? Who is he protecting?" -absolute fucking imbeciles. Roughly 79 million of them.

2 hours ago, tx ind said:

I'm starting to think that the timing of this around the holidays when people aren't working will bring it more attention.

I’m staying with some relatives who voted for Trump and had the red ball caps in the past but they’ve toned down all of the MAGa shit to the point where we saw nothing.  I was expecting Fox News.  They instead keep it on Scripps News whenever I don’t have it on one of those European Christmas market tour things on YouTube.  

Anyways a story came up this morning over breakfast about Trump riding on Epstein’s plane and the couple watched it and didn’t offer commentary, but they watched it.  

No idea if this is temporary or just while we are here but seems like they genuinely made the switch.  They have the channel memorized and we haven’t seen or heard shit about Trump out of them them, unlike last Christmas. 

I’m hoping this is happening more than we see among the more moderates.  

Edited by atomheartbevo
  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, South Austin said:

Why did those in power fight so hard against the release of files that were all about fake news?

Because you see....

sknx9q.gif.12bb45682f8a26960484f92af42517fc.gif

Posted
7 minutes ago, South Austin said:

Why did those in power fight so hard against the release of files that were all about fake news?

Because Trump is losing his mind and the GOP and conservative media have to parrot everything he says even when he contradicts himself or goes back on anything he said in the campaign. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Remember when Trump, the FBI Director, and the Attorney General all got Boebert in the Situation Room, in a desperate attempt to not be legally obligated to release the files? Hurr durr wonder why.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted

I don't hang out with cocaine dealers, if i don't really like cocaine.

I don't go to casinos, if i don't like gambling.

I don't go to swimming pools, if i can't swim.

i don't skydive, if i have a deathly fear of heights.

I don't pal around with sex traffickers... well.... you get it.

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
8 minutes ago, yoladu said:

I don't hang out with cocaine dealers, if i don't really like cocaine.

I don't go to casinos, if i don't like gambling.

I don't go to swimming pools, if i can't swim.

i don't skydive, if i have a deathly fear of heights.

I don't pal around with sex traffickers... well.... you get it.

 

 

I don't ever want the word "nubile" to appear within 3 country miles of my name.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted

Interesting. Lots of political accounts have posted about the Epstein letter since last night, but this story hadn't really gone viral. 

But a pop culture account tweeted about it this morning, and the engagement absolutely explodes. Finally. 

 

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Red Five said:

How long until there is so much evidence out there that Trump was part of a child sex trafficking ring, that the defense turns to "Well that was a long time ago and stop bringing up old shit, it was a different time," etc. etc.? 

Trump in the 90s?

Image of Nothing, just a mischievous, rambunctious kid.

Edited by SimonBolivar
  • Haha 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, HenryJames said:

 

AI didn't catch that "president" = Trump and/or was unable to read the cursive writing...whomp whomp. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU MAKE US RELEASE EVERYTHING WITHOUT CAREFULLY GOING OVER IT FIRST!

  • Like 1
Posted

Me: "I'll turn on MSNOW and see if they're covering it...."

First thing I hear: "Will all of this fuel new questions into Trump's supposed playboy lifestyle...?"

I swear to fucking god.

  • Rage+1 4
Posted
10 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

 

We elected the wrong miscreant. Hunter sounds like his dad back in his dad's prime. Sharp. Articulate. Pointed. Makes me wonder how much was lost when his brother died.

4 hours ago, HenryJames said:

 

Glad I waited to post. I was thinking this was a fake to draw all the attention of the narrowly focused, stupid press. Make the letter the one issue, then prove it's false. The GOP criminal organization and their constituency of moron can discredit the other thousands of pages. The CNN panels will discuss how this might affect the next election instead of sticking with the broader story. We've seen it before. Hope that's not the case here.

 

1 hour ago, Red Five said:

How long until there is so much evidence out there that Trump was part of a child sex trafficking ring, that the defense turns to "Well that was a long time ago and stop bringing up old shit, it was a different time," etc. etc.? 

Trump floated that a few times early in his term. "Why are you brining this up? It's old. Nobody cares."

image.png.c79da773961d0ef2150558889087aef1.png

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

MAGA seemed so concerned about sex trafficking of girls until Trump was caught up in it. They created gossip to support their beliefs in what the Left politicians were doing but now they conveniently ignore that Trump is all over the evidence. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

MAGA seemed so concerned about sex trafficking of girls until Trump was caught up in it. They created gossip to support their beliefs in what the Left politicians were doing but now they conveniently ignore that Trump is all over the evidence. 

big-lebowski-bowling.gif

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

This is the one thing Donnie hasn't been able to shake.  It helps that it's both disgusting and easy to understand.  It also fully holds the attention of his conspiracy loving base.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, kevwun said:

This is the one thing Donnie hasn't been able to shake.  It helps that it's both disgusting and easy to understand.  It also fully holds the attention of his conspiracy loving base.

because he's obviously fucking guilty and has used the entire might of the US government to cover it up.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/19/2025 at 2:39 PM, Hermanator said:

At this point any attempts to hide or redact stuff will automatically be seen as trump hiding his pedophile shit. It'll automatically be assumed by the majority of people. 

 

It was easy to see coming that these clowns would break the law and try to cover it up, and they would do such a shitty job that it would only make trump look guilty. Along with Bondi, Kash, Bongos, and anyone else involved with this cover-up. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 minute ago, TexArcher said:

Have an aneurysm over it, you fat piece of shit.

The more time they have to spend on this the less time they have to fuck up everything else (at least that’s what tell myself).

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

Honestly whoever needed evidence was deluding themselves. Imagine if you had a close friend who could hook you up with unlimited, consequence-free sex sessions with underage girls. 99.999% of people would end that friendship and they would even call the police if they felt safe doing so.

But is Donald J. Trump the kind of person who would turn down sex with underage girls? Most honest people know and have always known that the answer is: "absolutely not, he would be a repeat customer."

We already knew he WALKED INTO A GLASS DOOR BECAUSE HE WAS TOO DISTRACTED BY THE SIGHT OF UNDERAGE GIRLS SWIMMING IN A POOL.

We already knew he SUMMONED REPUBLICAN CONGRESSWOMEN INTO THE SITUATION ROOM TRYING TO PREVENT THE FILES FROM BEING RELEASED. THE FUCKING SITUATION ROOM.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
Posted

Out of curiosity I put Fox News in the background at 12pm. Here are the lead stories: 

- Positive Trump Economy Update 

- Long segment on Tim Walz/Minnesota Fraud Claims 

-  quick mention of Black Congresswoman who was arrested outside of NJ ICE facility returning to building to speak out 

-  Long segment on Nick Reiner's mental health and insanity plea  - 

- EPSTEIN DOCS RELEASE -  fake Epstein passport, link to Royal family, that Trump flew on Epstein's plane 8 times, DOJ stating claims are unfounded and false, no mention of Nassar letter - whole thing maybe lasted 2 minutes 

- Seinfeld and Festivus! 

 

 

 

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

Right when it's Christmas eve dinner time, every one sits down at the table, about to take the first bite... Just blurt out "so... how about all the stone cold hard evidence trump rapes children? Crazy, huh?"

Or if it's a praying type of family then offer to do the Christmas dinner prayer and thank the good lord for shining his light on president trump raping children and now all of his christian followers can atone for their sins and fight to have him removed from office.

denzel washington GIF

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Hank Kingsley said:

that Trump flew on Epstein's plane 8 times

The fact that Fox News mentioned this means they believe it to be true,

Every little bit chips away at the narrative Trump is pushing. Every little bit.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Honestly whoever needed evidence was deluding themselves. Imagine if you had a close friend who could hook you up with unlimited, consequence-free sex sessions with underage girls. 99.999% of people would end that friendship and they would even call the police if they felt safe doing so.

But is Donald J. Trump the kind of person who would turn down sex with underage girls? Most honest people know and have always known that the answer is: "absolutely not, he would be a repeat customer."

We already knew he WALKED INTO A GLASS DOOR BECAUSE HE WAS TOO DISTRACTED BY THE SIGHT OF UNDERAGE GIRLS SWIMMING IN A POOL.

We already knew he SUMMONED REPUBLICAN CONGRESSWOMEN INTO THE SITUATION ROOM TRYING TO PREVENT THE FILES FROM BEING RELEASED. THE FUCKING SITUATION ROOM.

His Howard Stern interview from a decade or so ago should be required viewing for everyone. Where he was asked "What's the youngest you would have sex with?", instead of replying "What a disgusting question" or something, he thinks for a second and says "Well I wouldn't have sex with a 12 year-old". The obvious implication is that he has had sex with middle school aged children, but would probably draw the line at 12.

This interview was before he entered politics, and to my knowledge has never been used against him in any campaign. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Drool 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, chainsaw said:

Honestly whoever needed evidence was deluding themselves. Imagine if you had a close friend who could hook you up with unlimited, consequence-free sex sessions with underage girls. 99.999% of people would end that friendship and they would even call the police if they felt safe doing so.

But is Donald J. Trump the kind of person who would turn down sex with underage girls? Most honest people know and have always known that the answer is: "absolutely not, he would be a repeat customer."

We already knew he WALKED INTO A GLASS DOOR BECAUSE HE WAS TOO DISTRACTED BY THE SIGHT OF UNDERAGE GIRLS SWIMMING IN A POOL.

We already knew he SUMMONED REPUBLICAN CONGRESSWOMEN INTO THE SITUATION ROOM TRYING TO PREVENT THE FILES FROM BEING RELEASED. THE FUCKING SITUATION ROOM.

This seems high. I mean, just look how many Republican men we know are pedophiles. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 2
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
4 hours ago, GreenspointTexas said:

Goddamn how can anyone NOT see hes guilty?

They didn't care that he solicited and accepted illegal in kind campaign contributions from the Russian government. 

They didn't care that he recruited an armed mob to attack the Capitol while he sat backed and watched it happen.

He clearly doesn't expect them to care that he raped teenagers. 

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, elfenix said:

They didn't care that he solicited and accepted illegal in kind campaign contributions from the Russian government. 

They didn't care that he recruited an armed mob to attack the Capitol while he sat backed and watched it happen.

He clearly doesn't expect them to care that he raped teenagers. 

I think the attempted coverup is pretty clear evidence that he thinks they will care that he raped teenagers.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
This seems high. I mean, just look how many Republican men we know are pedophiles. 

All of them.
At this point, the only rational presumption about a man who supports the GQP is that he is a pedophile himself.
  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

“He raped me.”

“Donald J Trump had raped her along with Jeffrey Epstein.”

“She was found with her head ‘blown off’… there was no way it was a suicide.”

Now we’re starting to see why Trump was hiding the Epstein files, and it probably gets much worse.

image.thumb.png.62c1d93979bd1fbaece7fbc5190d52fb.png

 

Mad Arthur GIF by MOODMAN

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, The Hot Dog Buffet said:

So far I haven't seen anything in these files that I wasn't already completely sure had taken place.

Yup.

And his horde will have no problem making excuses for this, as they did when Trump was accused of rape double digit times by adult women.

It's all hearsay.  Allegations.  People looking to cash a check.  Pizzagate was real, but this is bullshit.  Obviously.

Cognitive dissonance is undefeated on a level that pussy can only aspire to.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

I’m staying with some relatives who voted for Trump and had the red ball caps in the past but they’ve toned down all of the MAGa shit to the point where we saw nothing.  I was expecting Fox News.  They instead keep it on Scripps News whenever I don’t have it on one of those European Christmas market tour things on YouTube.  

Anyways a story came up this morning over breakfast about Trump riding on Epstein’s plane and the couple watched it and didn’t offer commentary, but they watched it.  

No idea if this is temporary or just while we are here but seems like they genuinely made the switch.  They have the channel memorized and we haven’t seen or heard shit about Trump out of them them, unlike last Christmas. 

I’m hoping this is happening more than we see among the more moderates.  

*searches European Christmas markets on YouTube*

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, tx 3 putt said:

bwhahahahahahahahaha

image.thumb.png.7d69210dae5462762146487d85b295d3.png

 

 

5 hours ago, CooterBrown said:

99.9999% chance that the redaction fuck up was on purpose by the FBI agent(s) assigned to redact those files. They knew exactly what they were doing and probably surprised it took a week for someone to figure out to read the hidden text.

100% this.  A handful of FBI agents were having drinks talking about Trump being a disgusting perv, and they came up with this "fuck up" as a solution.  

Edited by Gil Bang
Posted
10 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:

 

I mean, I see how the dots are connected on a high level.  But something's missing for me.  The implication is that prison officials read this letter, relayed the news to someone who told someone who ordered a hit on Epstein in his prison cell.  If a prison leak got word of this letter to someone with the power to end Epstein's life (i.e., Trump or someone in his inner circle), why didn't that power also include the ability to get rid of the fucking letter? 

Is this how it went:

Prison mole:  "We intercepted a letter from Epstein discussing President Trump and his 'love of young nubile girls.'"

[Unnamed]:  "Okay, let's kill him and make it look like a suicide."

Prison mole:  "Got it.  What do you want us to do with the letter?"

[Unnamed]:  "Go ahead and mail it. God forbid there's an investigation of interference with the United States mail.  If it gets out, nobody will ever believe it, and we'll say it's fake news."



×
×
  • Create New...