Jump to content

2020 Presidential Election -- Biden v Trump: Sleepy Joe vs Dopey Don [Results begin on page 409]


Patrick Bateman

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

I sure wish we had straight-ticket voting.  Because, although I have never voted straight ticket in my life, I would take great pleasure in "pulling the donkey lever" this year.

I looked at the sample ballot.  There are two judicial races where I somewhat favor the R candidate.  One is a personal acquaintance and the other is a known quantity as a decent judge and seems more competent than his rival.  Both, however. were appointed by Abbott and so did more than just fail to make the switch.  I think I am comfortable punishing them for that.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bateshorn said:

I say this dead honestly:  the only socially liberal, fiscally conservative moderate GOP official left nationally is the Senior senator from Alaska and she’s isn’t up for election until 2022.  
 

The problem with your split ticket activity, while sound in theory, is it doesn’t work in practice.  There is no room in the modern GOP for dissent.  A vote for somebody who seems non Trumpy and moderate is effectively same voting for a Trump person. Mike McCaul is a very pleasant person.  I’ve met with him several times.  I genuinely like him. FOr all intents and purposes tho, he’s the same as Louie Gohmert.  
 

I appreciate your thoughtful approach, and I pass along my thoughts as somebody who has worked for both Democrats and Republicans as a congressional staffer.  We are not in normal times.  Our democracy is frighteningly vulnerable to autocracy because it’s a lot more norm based than rule based.  If the GOP is not repudiated at the ballot box at all levels now, I’m deeply worried that even if Trump loses, a more effective version of him is going to re appear and it’s your local county official who is going to help that  person seize power at the local level. 

Thanks. Some good stuff to think about here, as well as others that chimed in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bateshorn said:

The Times should suspend Haberman for a week for retweeting that trash without verification or comment. 

I think she realized she stepped in it and is now in damage control mode. Spent a good chunk of last 2 hours re-tweeting other journos pointing out how fishy and slapshod this latest attempt at ratfuckery by Rudy is. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bateshorn said:

socially liberal, fiscally conservative

This has always been a bullshit facade and it took me a while to realize it. The consequences of conservative economic policy are the same as social conservative policy.  Economic mobility and egalitarian access to prosperity are crushed.  These are the bootstraps folks that still think they live in 1950s America but are pro-choice and support gay marriage.  Today, if you say you’re fiscally conservative but socially liberal, you are a conservative. Period.   

Edited by Hugo Stiglitz
  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chad Fuck said:

Voted yesterday in East Dallas. I showed up at 9:06am and it took me an hour twenty to get through the line. At first they only had one of 6 ID machines working, so the people who lined up at 6:30am had to wait two hours. By the time I got to the front of the line all six were working and the line was moving at a pretty good clip. Felt fucking awesome to vote D from Pres to dog catcher.

Also saw the first one of these in the hood yesterday while out walking the dogs:
370d25d355dfc47b9c14cc724b0637a6.jpg

I’m pretty sure that is my grandparents old house.

Edited by conVINCEd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Lobo said:

I am still waiting to meet the person who starts off their political rant with, "Listen, as a social conservative, fiscal liberal...I feel that..."  

I would argue that’s the modern GOP:  spend like a sailor on fleet week (at least tax spend and subsidize corporations), lecture on morals like Increase Mather 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just cause it doesn’t exist at a National/political level doesn’t mean you can’t support it at a personal level and ask the same of your representatives. 
 

Im isolationist curious as a voter, so it’s something I like exploring even if I don’t find national politicians that embrace my vision of it (internationalist for humanitarian purposes/anti interventionist on military issues)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Thatguy said:

But mostly it's about letting the world know that The United States of America WILL NOT HAVE A FUCKING CLOWN AS A FACE OF THE FRANCHISE.

Right. And I didn't vote for him in 2016. 

As for the rest, I'm just not as politically left as a lot of you and don't see these things as zero sum. There's a lot of shit on the left that I'm not fond of, either. I respect the views that y'all have here - it's just a little too much for me. Hence why I'm never on this forum. 

But, after reading some of the thoughts here I'm probably closer to straight dem than putting in a split ballot. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, G650 said:

Even if I'm voting for all Democrats for as far as I can see?

Many democrats embrace modern conservative economic policy or at least tolerate it.  They’re fine with funding the war machine at absurd levels while catering to the corporate oligarchs by allowing them to loot the population without investing anything back into the infrastructure that built their wealth. The Republicans are just more overt about it b/c they can politically afford to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

This has always been a bullshit facade and it took me a while to realize it. The consequences of conservative economic policy are the same as social conservative policy.  Economic mobility and egalitarian access to prosperity are crushed.  These are the bootstraps folks that still think they live in 1950s America but are pro-choice and support gay marriage.  Today, if you say you’re fiscally conservative but socially liberal, you are a conservative. Period.   

Excellent point. "Socially liberal, fiscally conservative" is just conservative with less bullshit to memorize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ztejas said:

Right. And I didn't vote for him in 2016. 

As for the rest, I'm just not as politically left as a lot of you and don't see these things as zero sum. There's a lot of shit on the left that I'm not fond of, either. I respect the views that y'all have here - it's just a little too much for me. Hence why I'm never on this forum. 

But, after reading some of the thoughts here I'm probably closer to straight dem than putting in a split ballot. 

   That's the thing man. A lot of us aren't as politically left as you think. Quite a few of us arrived here pretty recently, and it has a lot to do with the guy currently soiling the WH. I have some Aggie neighbors that are voting straight Dem, and they have never voted Dem in their lives. Ever. That's how fed up they have gotten. They are both grads. Make good money, and have two gun safes in their home. When those kinds of people are turning it's getting ugly.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If a candidate brands themselves as a Fiscal Conservative Social Liberal, I'd love to hear their pitch on ice cream after every meal to toddlers, new skateboards to young boys, dollhouses for young girls, blowjobs every Tuesday and Friday for married men, and spa dates on weekends for married women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

This has always been a bullshit facade and it took me a while to realize it. The consequences of conservative economic policy are the same as social conservative policy.  Economic mobility and egalitarian access to prosperity are crushed.  These are the bootstraps folks that still think they live in 1950s America but are pro-choice and support gay marriage.  Today, if you say you’re fiscally conservative but socially liberal, you are a conservative. Period.   

Honestly it's probably less "fiscal" and more about individual freedom and what the government can and can't tell you to do. I still think individual success translates to societal welfare. I still think the biggest thing you can do to enact change is change your own life and get ahead of the chains so to speak. 

But then again, I'm not offended if someone calls me a "conservative". That's different than being labeled a republican or Trumper.

(Or just what @SydneyCarton said. That works too)

Edited by ztejas
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

The emails recovered from the a hard drive aren't actually emails.  They're images of emails.  Because that's what normal people always do -- take screencaps of all their incriminating emails.

 

 

Man, that's TOTALLY what I do.  And then I put them in a folder marked "SECRET IMPORTANT STUFF - DO NOT LOOK AT THIS!"

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The man the Founders dreaded entered the high office they created—and proceeded to abuse that office in just the ways they feared. Now that man is seeking a second term, which would be even more abusive and dangerous. Trump’s election strategy is to weaponize the Electoral College to re-secure the presidency of the United States over the opposition of the majority of the people who live and vote there. If he can activate the fears of enough white people in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan, he could succeed—defeating the much larger number of Americans who want him gone. Every plausible scenario of Electoral College success implies a popular-vote defeat even more lopsided than the 2.9 million votes he lost by in 2016.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/11/last-exit-trump-autocracy/616466/

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

That's the thing man. A lot of us aren't as politically left as you think.

I'm probably anchored in a biased way based on the posters that can't keep it in the CR. I do beleive you when you say that, I just don't read what gets posted over here enough to know it. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

They’re fine with funding the war machine at absurd levels while catering to the corporate oligarchs by allowing them to loot the population without investing anything back into the infrastructure that built their wealth.

Well, I don't , but I'm still generally fiscally conservative. I like to not have run away spending, military or otherwise. And highly prefer money going to infrastructure. And support single payer health care and guaranteed basic income.

 

And I'm socially super liberal. Without hyperbole, I'd let people tie up farm animals in the town square and hot chicks have donkey shows for the populace to see.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

I mean, I understand what you're saying, but this is difficult for me to agree with wholesale. So in short, I'm fiscally conservative and socially liberal, so feel free to get fucked. And before we start, if you tell me I'm not actually fiscally conservative, you can also feel free to get fucked in advance with bushel of sea urchins. 

I would consider myself to be fiscally conservative in principle, as well as having lots of libertarian tendencies. I'm socially liberal, for sure. I'm also for increased Taxes on corporations, and on the higher end of the tax brackets. I'm all for blowing up the tax code and starting over entirely, if we're talking about it. Do you know what fiscal conservatism means to me? GETTING CONTROL OF OUR MOTHERFUCKING DEBT.  Period. Then maybe plowing more money back into other areas, like education, social programs, etc. But you know what, I'm fiscally conservative. STOP WASTING MONEY AND FIX OUR FUCKING DEBT.

I understand why you want to try and boil shit down to simplistic, basic terms. But all you're doing it increasing partisanship. I'd argue that if you want people to step outside existing boundaries, stop fucking forcing them into boxes so you can color within whatever lines you deem fitting. We're better off as an electorate the MORE diverse we are, and the LESS ease with which people get labeled and grouped. The exercise you went through in your post is the flip side of the same partisan bullshit and simplistic that the GOP has been seizing upon for years. Make it harder to identify with one group of people, and those people are more likely to make decisions based upon merit or thoughtful consideration as opposed to "their team." And personally, telling me that despite considering fiscally conservative and socially liberal that I am, in fact, just a regular old conservative despite the fact I just actively went out and happily, orgasmically voted against my own immediate financial interests for a straight blue ticket and a better America...yeah, go fuck yourself. 

 

I agree with most of this. From my perspective, more efficient government is being fiscally conservative. I would like to see decreased federal spending across the board including the military. Additionally, I agree with having higher taxes for corporations and wealthy individuals as we have allowed the tax system to essentially become welfare for the wealthy. Basically, our government utilizes its resources extremely poorly and I hope for it to do better.

I'm going out to vote at lunch today and will be voting straight ticket blue for the first time in my life. I've come to the conclusion that the Democratic Party is more fiscally conservative than the party of Trump as they actually want to try and pay for a few things.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, G650 said:

Well, I don't , but I'm still generally fiscally conservative. I like to not have run away spending, military or otherwise. And highly prefer money going to infrastructure. And support single payer health care and guaranteed basic income.

 

And I'm socially super liberal. Without hyperbole, I'd let people tie up farm animals in the town square and hot chicks have donkey shows for the populace to see.

That's pretty socially liberal bordering on illegal.....lol

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neonmoon said:

Who was the last fiscally conservative President? Seriously?

I think the recent tradition of Republicans blowing up the debt means that what we used to call "fiscal conservatism" should be renamed to plain old "fiscal responsibility." Because these days, the conservative party seems a lot more interested in protecting the wealth of its oligarchy than spending responsibly.

"Fiscally conservative" 20 years ago might have meant "fiscally responsible," and I can get behind that. But it doesn't mean that anymore. It now means, "the rich get richer, poor get poorer, fuck the national debt, because the rich will have enough to protect themselves when the chickens come home to roost."

  • Hook 'Em 7
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Lobo said:

I am still waiting to meet the person who starts off their political rant with, "Listen, as a social conservative, fiscal liberal...I feel that..."  

I’m not going to say I’m a fiscal liberal, but I’m certainly open to any spending that helps others have a. Opportunity and is squandering my tax dollars. Hell, I voluntarily give away an inch of money and my life’s ambition is to set up a foundation to help marginalized people have careers and financial stability through investments in education and mentor ship. 
All of which to say is that this fits me way more than anyone I know, and you aren’t wrong- it’s a really small group of people that think this way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bateshorn said:

I mean, America is a fundamentally right of center nation.  It’s just that the traditional right of center party has become a hard right party. 

I think America has shifted to the left and the Republicans are still stuck in the '80s-90s mentality more than anything else. It's masking how far the Democratic party base has moved. 

We're going to see some realignment after the election. Neither the current Biden coalition or Trumpism are sustainable, so something has to break.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Dog said:

I think America has shifted to the left and the Republicans are still stuck in the '80s-90s mentality more than anything else. It's masking how far the Democratic party base has moved. 

We're going to see some realignment after the election. Neither the current Biden coalition or Trumpism are sustainable, so something has to break.

I disagree with this. I don't think the democratic base has moved nearly as far as the republican base in the opposite direction. I do agree that this coalition can't last, because there's a lot of people who just aren't where the far progressive democrats want to go that are stuck in the middle with no viable option. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...