Jump to content

Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

This is how you humble brag!

It's hard to tell the story of an asshole that you just happened to bump into all the time.   Also in S. Florida Supercars and Eastern european hookers aren't exactly rare.

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Constant said:

IMG_4516.thumb.jpeg.3778d29fee07b6cc96f9262ac204af00.jpeg

Someone woke up a little upset. 

image.gif.2aa74dc976e652a305ae9732726ef10a.gif

Actually, wait a minute. If Biden extorted millions from foreign countries, ... which countries? You mean Russia, Don?

And isn't that a GOOD thing for America?

Edited by Rimbo
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, locodos said:

It's hard to tell the story of an asshole that you just happened to bump into all the time.   Also in S. Florida Supercars and Eastern european hookers aren't exactly rare.

That's how you rollback a humblebrag.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 4
Posted
6 hours ago, Pig Bellmont said:

Wait - *now* Trump thinks it’s wrong or a crime to use federal office to extort millions from foreign governments?

I mean, yeah.

He thinks you're supposed to use it to extort millions from Americans, usually under the guise of "fundraising."

Posted
2 hours ago, shakahorn said:

It would actually be kinda clever if Trump purposely called him "Bidden."  You know, like for sale, available to the highest bidder.  Of course he's a dumbass so at best it's a typo and at worst, he really thinks that's how it's spelled.

The covfefe guy is intentionally making clever typos. lolk

Posted

There's no better evidence that everything in Trump's orbit turns to shit than Vladimir Putin. Dude was bossing Russia for 20 years stealing all the money for himself but after getting involved with Trump has made the biggest blunder of the 21st century so far, is getting his ass kicked by Ukraine, and just had one of his top guys mutiny on him. 

The power of Trump to ruin everything he aligns with is extraordinary. 

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 3
Posted
2 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:

Maybe not "stupid" but certainly not "smart".  Consider the fact that UPenn has never conferred an honorary degree on Trump, nor have they asked him to speak at any commencement ceremonies.  Consider that in his day, the school accepted 40% of applicants, far more than the current 7%.  Consider that one of his professors (William Kelley) has repeatedly stated that Trump was "the dumbest goddamned student I ever had".  Consider that his degree is in real estate, a field he has struggled in mightily over the years, despite his claims to the contrary.  Consider that the commencement program when he graduated listed honors for all students (cum laude, magna cum laude, summa cum laude) and he did not attain any of those standards.  Consider that he was never on the UPenn Dean's List.  Consider the fact that Trump directed his attorney Michael Cohen to threaten his high school, UPenn, and the College Board to never release his grades or test scores.

Sorry, he's of average intelligence at the very best.

Consider that he (even with connections) had to transfer from Fordham to gain admission to Penn. 

Posted
4 hours ago, WhatTheBuck said:

What’s even more mind boggling is that despite how brazenly in-your-face stupid he is, millions of Americans can’t see it. He shows himself to be a clueless dumbfuck time after time after time and they still manage to believe he’s as smart as he tells them he is. 

Yeah, the explanations that follow this are not persuasive.

He is the classic idiot-savant.  He is good at precisely one thing: self-promotion.  That's it.  Full-stop.  He is an absolute fucking moron. My fucking dog could beat him in a chess match, and my dog has been dead for 2 years.  He's the stupidest man to ever hold major office in this country, and there's not a close second.

28 minutes ago, Francisco 2.0 said:

"Fees dispute."  As in, his potential attorney said "I will incur some fees to defend you, and I expect you to pay them."  Nauta said "I don't think I will."  Voila -- a dispute!

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 7
Posted
25 minutes ago, Rimbo said:

trump is turbofucked

nauta is... what's more than turbofucked? rocketboosterfucked?

I think it's either hyperfucked, warpfucked, or we would have also accepted lightfucked, as in lightspeed.  But then Eric shoved a lightbulb literally up his ass.  I'd call him an idiot, but the bulb did actually kinda soft glow for like 10 seconds, really impressive.  Only part of his body generating anything of use.  

  • Haha 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

Yeah, the explanations that follow this are not persuasive.

He is the classic idiot-savant.  He is good at precisely one thing: self-promotion.  That's it.  Full-stop.  He is an absolute fucking moron. My fucking dog could beat him in a chess match, and my dog has been dead for 2 years.  He's the stupidest man to ever hold major office in this country, and there's not a close second.

"Fees dispute."  As in, his potential attorney said "I will incur some fees to defend you, and I expect you to pay them."  Nauta said "I don't think I will."  Voila -- a dispute!

News Interview GIF by For(bes) The Culture

Posted
25 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

"Fees dispute."  As in, his potential attorney said "I will incur some fees to defend you, and I expect you to pay them."  Nauta said "I don't think I will. I have the backing of His Excellency, Donald Trump."  Voila -- a dispute!

Alternative possibility.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Imagine hitching your wagon to Trump and expecting that he's going to look out for your best interests when you help him with his criming.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, RomaVicta said:

Alternative possibility.

I expect you are closer to it.  The guy figured the Trump outfit is paying the fees, and that is going to put me in an ethical jackpot at some point.  That jackpot could be mitigated to some extent by the presence of other counsel, but they could easily quit/withdraw/get fired and leave this guy holding the bag in an ethical jackpot.

This is yet another way Trump is in a different world.  Especially of late, he is used to hiring lawyers for his underlings and minions that can do damage control (e.g. Cassidy Hutchinson).  That is a lot easier to pull off, in terms of a) finding lawyers willing to do it and b) not being blatantly exposed, in a civil or investigatory context than in that of a criminal trial.

As we have seen from the Georgia elector proceedings, criminal courts/judges are extra solicitous about ethical shenanigans among defense counsel because it could deprive a defendant of rights/a fair trial and cause a mistrial or reversal on appeal.

Edited by TwiceHorn
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:

"Fees dispute."  As in, his potential attorney said "I will incur some fees to defend you, and I expect you to pay them."  Nauta said "I don't think I will."  Voila -- a dispute!

* Wallah

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Posted
8 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

Holy shit, I was going to quote a few bits from Waltine's wiki page, but it's worth a read as a whole (seriously, it's like a 2-minute read but there is nugget after nugget in there).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Nauta#

Is the navy gonna come after him next?


he’s in love with trump. Probably changes his diaper and sponge bathes him

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

So what this defense presupposes is if you declare "off the record" to the ghostwriter of a former colleague, who is not even in the room...you are fully exempted from legal proceedings against you for any and all crimes because they can't use it in said former colleagues memoir?  

Yet another fascinating turn in our legal system.  From now on, I highly recommend y'all roll with an amateur writer everywhere you go (with a running tape recorder).  Second you lay some shit down-beatings, theft, keybump, roofies, etc.  Just say, "Off the record."  BOOM!  (Michael) Scott-Free!

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

 

This is what I expected his defense to be. 

No video evidence means no evidence. 

The recording becomes nothing but public discourse. 

  • Rage+1 1
Posted

Wait so now he's claiming he didn't have any documents? What happened to "They're mine, I can keep them if I want because I'm me" or whatever. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Red Five said:

Wait so now he's claiming he didn't have any documents? What happened to "They're mine, I can keep them if I want because I'm me" or whatever. 

He’s claiming that in the audio recording there weren’t any real documents he was flashing around. 

Posted
1 minute ago, SydneyCarton said:

He’s claiming that in the audio recording there weren’t any real documents he was flashing around. 

 

And it might work.

Except it's possible that Smith, out of his 84 witnesses, has a few that were there and witnessed the event.  That's what Trump doesn't know (or care about, actually).

 

 

Posted
Just now, Francisco 2.0 said:

 

And it might work.

Except it's possible that Smith, out of his 84 witnesses, has a few that were there and witnessed the event.  That's what Trump doesn't know (or care about, actually).

 

 

He’s contradicted himself multiple times in the last few weeks alone. But a witness would have to say “yes I saw without a doubt those were plans to invade Iraq.” 


But it doesn’t matter. Even if thats his defense, it still paints a horribad picture of his moving around documents for years and obstructing, as well has his acknowledgement that he knew he couldn’t declassify things. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Fastbreak said:

“Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury. My client has committed so many crimes that it it impossible to convict him in just this one. The defense rests.”

simpsons-germs.gif

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • Drool 1
Posted

How does he make this defense in Court without taking the stand? 
 

The prosecution is going to have the witnesses, the recording and the documents which were actually recovered.

He can make this argument with no consequences in the court of public opinion; however, it will subject him to cross examination in this case. That opens him up to a ton of questions his counsel won’t want him to answer.

  • Hook 'Em 1


×
×
  • Create New...