Jump to content

The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread


Recommended Posts

Posted

I assume a lot of these posts are Russian Twitter bots. The question I have is why is Russia turning on him now? Just to sow chaos basically? Not getting what they want as fast as they want in Ukraine?

Posted
25 minutes ago, tokamak said:

I assume a lot of these posts are Russian Twitter bots. The question I have is why is Russia turning on him now? Just to sow chaos basically? Not getting what they want as fast as they want in Ukraine?

Division and chaos have always been their overarching goal with these ops.

Posted (edited)

dumb question...CA, CO, etc. have weed even though it's illegal at the fed level, why couldn't states like TX and WI do the same with the hemp products? like... just keep making/selling, dare the feds to 'come and take it' like the full legal weed states do?

Edited by mchookem
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
dumb question...CA, CO, etc. have weed even though it's illegal at the fed level, why couldn't states like TX and WI do the same with the hemp products? like... just keep making/selling, dare the feds to 'come and take it' like the full legal weed states do?

This was the same question I had.
Posted
6 hours ago, mchookem said:

dumb question...CA, CO, etc. have weed even though it's illegal at the fed level, why couldn't states like TX and WI do the same with the hemp products? like... just keep making/selling, dare the feds to 'come and take it' like the full legal weed states do?

Because our Lt. Governor is a boot licking sycophantic MAGtard.

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted

If Biden did that? Ā 
If Obama did that?

If Crazy Earl of Crazy Earl’s Used Car Mart did that, there would be commentary, consequences, feedback. Ā 
Ā 

But the President of the United States of America did that. Ā Today. Ā  Ho hum. Ā In the new times (dibs on the phrase, I’m working in the details), US ā€œjournalismā€ will be punished or demoted for such laziness. Ā That is the election pitch I want to hear. Ā 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/10/2025 at 7:28 AM, Bozo_Casanova said:

Reagan didn’t act like that, but Trump is very continuous with Reagan.Ā 
Im not sure if you were one of the Reagan Republicans who believed in all that nonsense and are still trying to rationalize your support, but there’s a straight line between the two.
Reagan was just far more palatable and his administration was held much more in check by congress, which in those days was elected in mostly competitive districts by communities of interest.*
Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

or ā€œcommunities of interest,ā€ as @Ag with kidsĀ likes to call real places and people with things in common, as opposed to preordained partisan outcomes.Ā 

Sigh...You keep on bringing this up...

Ā 

But, how are you going to define your "community of interest"?

Your household?

Your street?

Your neighborhood?

Your suburb area?

Your town/city?

Your metro area?

Your county?

Your regional area in the state?

Your state?

Your regional area in the country?

Your country?

Your continent?

Ā 

ALL of those could be "communities of interest"

If you want to define it at one of the the lowest levels (which is what it appears you want to do), then we can't do that with 435 US Representatives (or for TX, 150 Reps and 31 Senators).Ā  Because there are just too many "communities of interest" at those levels.

Ā 

BTW, people don't cooperate politically with "communities of interest".Ā  Most areas have people who care closely about lots of local issues, but disagree massively about wider issues.Ā  How do you propose reconciling those differences?Ā  BTW, by "most areas", I meant you could attach that definition to any one of those areas I listed above...even including the household...



Ɨ
Ɨ
  • Create New...